- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
9 Advances in Biodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems |
221 |
dexamethasone-PCL implant designed for long-term drug release (Fialho et al. 2008). The implant provides controlled and prolonged delivery of dexamethasone in vitro, releasing 25% of its total drug load in 21 weeks, and loses mass slowly, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. The implants showed good short-term ocular tolerability in rabbits.
A biodegradable, intravitreal 2-mg cyclosporine A drug delivery system formulated with PGLC has been investigated in an experimental model of chronic uveitis in rabbits (Dong et al. 2006a). The efficacy of the implant was compared with that of orally administered cyclosporine A (15 mg/kg daily), no treatment, and treatment with a nonmedicated implant. At all timepoints in the 14-week study, inflammation was significantly lower in rabbits with experimentally induced uveitis that received the cyclosporine-PGLC drug delivery system as compared with those that received vehicle, sham implant, or oral cyclosporine. Rabbits treated with the cyclosporine-PGLC drug delivery system also showed significantly less electroretinographic b-wave depression. Mean intravitreal cyclosporine levels in rabbits implanted with the cyclosporine-PGLC drug delivery system were 102.2–145.5 ng/mL at 1–3 weeks postimplantation, 491.0–575.2 ng/mL at 4–10 weeks, and 257.3 ng/mL at 14 weeks. No toxicity associated with the implant was detected. A biodegradable tacrolimus-PGLC drug delivery system designed for anterior chamber implantation has been investigated for the prolongation of corneal allograft survival in a rabbit model of high-risk keratoplasty (Shi et al. 2005). The implant, which contains a total of 0.5 mg of FK506, produced peak aqueous humor drug concentrations (17.9 ± 2.3 ng/mL) after 28 days, and drug release was sustained for at least 168 days. The implant significantly prolonged graft survival time and produced no adverse reactions.
9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
Several preliminary studies have reported the use of POE as a delivery vehicle for 5-fluorouracil (Einmahl et al. 1999, 2001; Bernatchez et al. 1994). Einmahl and colleagues investigated an injectable, sustained-release POE-based 5-fluorouracil ointment in an experimental glaucoma filtration model in rabbits. The ointment significantly decreased intraocular pressure and led to persistence of the filtering bleb at days 9–28 after trabeculectomy (Einmahl et al. 2001). Corneal toxicity with the POE ointment was significantly lower as compared with conventional 5-fluo- rouracil tamponade. Histopathologic analysis indicated that POE was well tolerated and did not lead to fibrosis. The same research group also developed a POE-based ointment capable of delivering dexamethasone and 5-fluorouracil concomitantly for the potential treatment of intraocular proliferative disorders (Einmahl et al. 1999). A POE-based 5-chlorouracil drug delivery system has also been developed and its performance was evaluated in a glaucoma filtration surgery model in rabbits (Polak et al. 2008).
222 |
S.S. Lee et al. |
9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
Jampel and associates developed biodegradable subscleral PAH-based discs (a copolymer of 25:75 1,3-bis[p-carboxyphenoxy] propane and sebacic acid) for the delivery of various antiproliferative agents and evaluated their effects in vitro and in a primate glaucoma filtration surgery model (Jampel et al. 1990, 1991, 1993; Uppal et al. 1994). PAH discs impregnated with 5-fluorouridine inhibited fibroblast proliferation in vitro, provided sustained drug delivery for at least 16 days in vivo, and prolonged the duration of intraocular pressure reduction following filtration surgery (Jampel et al. 1990). PAH discs were also developed to provide sustained delivery of the antiproliferative agents taxol and etoposide (VP-16) (Jampel et al. 1991). In vitro, the discs delivered taxol for 100 days and at concentrations exceeding taxol’s ID50 threefold for fibroblast proliferation (3 ng/mL). PAH discs with etoposide provided sustained release for 31 days (Jampel et al. 1991). PAH discs impregnated with taxol (50 mg) or etoposide (1 mg) have been investigated as an adjunct to filtration surgery in monkeys (Jampel et al. 1993). PAH disks containing taxol, but not etoposide, had a marked beneficial effect on intraocular pressure and bleb appearance postsurgically. Etoposide-PAH discs (1 mg) placed subconjunctivally in healthy rabbit eyes provided a nearly linear rate (30 mg/day) of drug release over 12 days, except for a burst occurring between days 6 and 7. Steady-state drug levels were 89 ng/mg in the conjunctiva and sclera, 195 ng/mL in the vitreous, and 29 ng/mL in serum; these levels were deemed sufficient to reduce fibroblast proliferation after glaucoma surgery (Uppal et al. 1994).
9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
Felt-Baeyens and colleagues have developed a scleral implant consisting of a com- pression-molded matrix of triamcinolone acetonide and high molecular weight (100,000–150,000) PMM (PMM2.1.2), a novel synthetic polymer, with ethoxylated derivatives of stearic acid (Simulsol) or oligomers of methylidene malonate as plasticizers (Felt-Baeyens et al. 2006). In rabbits implanted with the triamcinolonePMM devices, significant concentrations of triamcinolone acetonide were achieved in the vitreous and sclera over a 5-week period. Assessments of inflammatory cell counts and protein leakage into the aqueous humor indicated that the implants were well tolerated and did not provoke abnormal inflammation.
Hacker and associates have recently developed and evaluated scleral and vitreal implants consisting of a photocrosslinked poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF)/poly (N-vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) matrix for the delivery of the ophthalmic drugs acetazolamide, dichlorphenamide, and timolol maleate (Hacker et al. 2009). Drug release rates of up to 4 mg/day were achieved, and the in vitro release of acetazolamide, dichlorphenamide, and timolol maleate was sustained for approximately 210, 270, and 250 days, respectively. The implants exhibited a small initial burst release
9 Advances in Biodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems |
223 |
(<10%) with a subsequent dual mode of drug release controlled by diffusion and bulk erosion. Drug-free PPF/PVP matrices, when implanted in rabbits for 2 weeks, showed good ocular biocompatibility. Overall, these preliminary results suggest that PPF/PVP matrices may be useful for long-term delivery of a variety of ophthalmic drugs.
The efficacy and safety of a biodegradable, scleral cyclosporine-PVA matrix reservoir implant has been investigated for the treatment of recurrent uveitis in horses (Gilger et al. 2006). Horses with equine recurrent uveitis received episcleral or deep-scleral lamellar cyclosporine-PVA implants and were monitored for up to 3 years. Scleral penetration of cyclosporine in vitro was poor, and when placed episclerally, the cyclosporine-PVA implant failed to control inflammatory uveitic episodes. In contrast, cyclosporine-PVA implants placed in the deep sclera adjacent to the suprachoroidal space significantly decreased uveitic flare-ups and resulted in therapeutic levels of cyclosporine in most ocular tissues.
9.6.8 Drug Delivery Using Polymeric Particles, Gels,
and Contact Lenses
Additional strategies for ocular drug delivery that have been investigated in preclinical studies include biodegradable injectable polymeric particulates (micro/ nano particles, spheres), drug-polymer gels, and drug-eluting polymer-based contact lenses.
Microsomes are spherical liposomal structures, roughly 0.01–10 mm in diameter, which consist of vesicular lipid bilayers separated by water or an aqueous buffer compartment (Conway 2008; Ghate and Edelhauser 2006, 2008). Microsomes can circumvent cell membrane barriers and protect drugs from metabolic or immune attack, thereby maximizing drug efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Microspheres composed of PLGA, PLA, and other biodegradable polymers have been developed for the sustained ocular delivery of therapeutic drugs (Moritera et al. 1991; Giordano et al. 1995; Wada et al. 1992) such as progesterone (Beck et al. 1979), adriamycin (Moritera et al. 1992), and Pegaptanib (Carrasquillo et al. 2003). Microspheres composed of chitosan, a natural biodegradable biopolymer, have been used for the transcorneal delivery of acyclovir in rabbits (Genta et al. 1997) and to enhance the ocular delivery of ofloxacin from erodible inserts made from polyethylene oxide (Di Colo et al. 2002).
Smaller sized particulate drug delivery systems include nanoparticles, nanospheres, and nanocapsules. Nanoparticles are polymeric colloidal particles, ranging in size from 10 to 1,000 nm, consisting of macromolecular materials for drug dissolution, entrapment, encapsulation, adsorption, or attachment. Nanospheres are solid spheres containing drug bound in a matrix or adsorbed on the surface of a colloidal carrier. Nanocapsules are small capsules with a central cavity surrounded by a polymeric membrane (Conway 2008; Ghate and Edelhauser 2006, 2008).
