- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
7 Transscleral Drug Delivery |
169 |
transscleral drug delivery. In our OGTA studies, peak choroid/retinal following subtenon injection in euthanized rabbits was observed to be approximately 3 times greater compared to injection in vivo. Vitreous concentrations with euthanization were 12 times greater than observed after in vivo injection. These results the significance of the dynamic barriers presented by the conjunctival and choroidal circulations as demonstrated by Robinson et al. (2006).
Taken together, the results of these in vivo studies have investigated and defined the diffusion characteristics of several agents administered by periocular injection. The dynamic barriers to transscleral drug delivery are clearly significant and are best studied in an in vivo model. If a drug is formulated in a sustained delivery vehicle or system, significant vitreous concentrations could be maintained over longer periods, as demonstrated with carboplatin in a fibrin sealant vehicle (Simpson et al. 2002). These studies also demonstrate that periocular drug delivery can achieve effective local delivery, with significant vitreous drug concentrations and minimal systemic levels. Limitations of the anatomic and dynamic barriers to the transscleral approach must be considered. Additionally, potential delivery limitations include drug/solute molecular weight, radius, partition coefficient, and charge. Despite potential limitations, however, periocular drug delivery can provide effective drug delivery to the posterior segment tissues of the eye.
7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
Much experimental evidence currently indicates that transscleral delivery of therapeutic solutes can be achieved. This approach to intraocular drug delivery shows great promise in providing new therapeutic approaches for treating diseases of the posterior segment of the eye. The past results of these experiments have added to the understanding of solute flux across the sclera and provide new data on in vivo transscleral drug permeability and sustained-release delivery of drugs and therapeutic agents for retinal degenerations and disease. The longterm goal of these transscleral delivery studies is to provide a more effective drug delivery to the retina and posterior eye for the treatment of retinal degenerations and posterior segment disease. Delivering drugs across the permeable sclera would be safer and less invasive than intravitreal injection or devices, yet potentially could provide a more effective retinal dose than systemic or topical delivery.
Ultimately, a delivery device (biodegradable and/or refillable) needs to be developed that will provide a sustained release of the drug or protein to the episclera. In this case the sclera will come in equilibrium with the delivery device and provide a slow release of the drug to the suprachoroidal space, where it can then directly diffuse to the choroid, RPE, and neuroretina.
Acknowledgments Supported in part by R24EY017045 and Research to Prevent Blindness Inc.
170 |
D.H. Geroski and H.F. Edelhauser |
References
Ahmed I, Patton TF (1985) Importance of the noncorneal absorption route in topical ophthalmic drug delivery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:584–587
Ahmed I, Gokhale RD, Shah MV, Patton TF (1987) Physico-chemical determinants of drug difusion across the conjunctive, sclera, and cornea. J Pharm Sci 76:583–586
Borcherding MS, Blacik LJ, Sittig RA, Bizzell JW, Breen M, Weinstein HG (1975) Proteoglycans and collagen fibre organization in human corneoscleral tissue. Exp Eye Res 21:59–70
Cruysberg LPJ, Nuyts RM, Geroski DH, Koole LH, Hendrikse F, Edelhauser HF (2002) In vitro human scleral permeability of fluorescein, methotrexate–fluorescein and rhodamine 6 G and the use of: coated coil as a new drug delivery system. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 18:559–569
Cruysberg LPJ, Nuyts RMMA, Gilbert JA, Geroski DH, Hendricks F, Edelhauser HF (2005) In vitro sustained human transscleral drug delivery of fluorescein labeled dexamethasone and methotrexate with fibrin sealant. Curr Eye Res 30:653–660
Edwards A, Prausnitz MR (1998) A fiber matrix model of sclera and corneal stroma for drug delivery to the eye. AIChE J 44:214–225
Ghate D, Brooks W, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF (2007) Pharmacokinetics of intraocular drug delivery by periocular injections using ocular flurophotometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2230–2237
Gilbert JA, Simpson AE, Rudnick DE, Geroski DH, Aaberg TM, Edelhauser HF (2003) Transscleral permeability and intraocular concentration of cisplatin from a collagen matrix. J Control Release 89:409–417
Jiang J, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR (2006) Measurement and Prediction of lateral diffusion within human sclera. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:3011–3016
Kau JC, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF (2005) Trans-scleral permeability of fluorescent antibiotics. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 21:1–10
Kim ES, Dkurairaj C, Kadam RS, Lee SJ, Mo Y, Geroski DH, Kompella UB, Edelhauser HF (2009) Human scleral diffusion of anticancer drugs from solution and nanoparticle formulation. Pharm Res 26(5):1155–1161
Lang JC (1995) Ocular drug delivery conventional ocular formulations. Adv Drug Delivery Rev 16:39–43
Lee SB, Geroski DH, Prausnitz MR, Edelhauser HF (2004) Drug delivery through the scleral: the effects of thickness, hydration and sustained release systems. Exp Eye Res 78:599–607
Lee SJ, Kim ES, Geroski DH, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF (2008a) Pharmacokinetics of Intraocular drug delivery of Oregon Green 488® labeled triamcinolone by subtenon injection using ocular fluorophotometry in rabbit eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:4506–4514
Lee SJ, Kim SJ, Kim ES, Geroski DH, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF (2008b) Transscleral permeability of Oregon Green 488®. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 24:579–586
Maurice DM, Polgar J (1977) Diffusion across the sclera. Exp Eye Res 25:577–582
Miyazaki S, Tkeuchi S, Yokouchi C, Takada M (1984) Pluronic F-127 gels as a vehicle for topical administration of anticancer agents. Chem Pharm Bull 32:4205–4208
Olsen TW, Edelhauser HF, Lim JI, Geroski DH (1995) Human scleral permeability: effects of age, cryotherapy, transscleral diode laser, and surgical thinning. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:1893–1903
Olsen TW, Aaberg SY, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF (1998) Human sclera: thickness and surface area. Am J Ophthalmol 125:237–241
Pardue MT, Gilbert JA, Hejny C, Geroski DH, Edelhauser HF (2004) Preservation of retinal function in rabbit after subconjunctival injection of Carboplatin in fibrin sealant. Retina 24:776–782
Prausnitz MR, Noonan JS (1998) Permeability of cornea, sclera, and conjunctiva: a literature analysis for drug delivery to the eye. J Pharm Sci 87:1479–1488
Prausnitz MR, Edwards A, Noonan JS, Rudnick DE, Edelhauser HF, Geroski DH (1998) Measurement and prediction of transient transport across sclera for drug delivery to the eye. Ind Eng Chem Res 37:2903–2907
7 Transscleral Drug Delivery |
171 |
Robinson MR, Lee SS, Kim H, Kim S, Lutz RJ, Galban C, Bungay PM, Yuan P, Wang NS, Kim J, Csaky KG (2006) A rabbit model for assessing the ocular barriers to the transscleral delivery of triamcinolone acetonide. Exp Eye Res 82:479–487
Rudnick DE, Noonan JS, Geroski DH, Prausnitz MR, Edelhauser HF (1999) The effect of intraocular pressure on sclera permeability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:3054–3058
Sanborn GE, Anand R, Torti RE (1992) Sustained-release of ganciclovir theraph for treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis. Arch Ophthal 110:188–195
Shuler RK Jr, Dioguardi PK, Henjy C et al (2004) Scleral permeability of a small single-stranded oligonucleotide. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 20:159–168
Simpson AE, Gilbert JA, Rudnick DE, Geroski DH, Aaberg TM Jr, Edelhauser HF (2002) Transscleral diffusion of carboplatin: an in vitro and in vivo study. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1069–1074
Tsui YJ, Dalgard C, Van Quill KR, Lee L, Grossniklaus HF, Edelhauser HF, Obrien JM (2008) Subconjunctival topotecan in fibrin sealant in the treatment of transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29:490–496
Van Quill KR, Dioguardi PK, Tong CT, Gilbert JA, Aaberg TM Jr, Grossniklaus HE, Edelhauser HF, O’Brien JM (2005) Subconjunctival carboplatin in fibrin sealant in the treatment of transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology 112:1151–1158
Yu BG, Kwon IC, Kim YH, Han DK, Park KD, Han K, Jeong SY (1996) Development of a local antibiotic delivery system using fibrin glue. J Control Release 39:65–70
Chapter 8
Suprachoroidal and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
Timothy W. Olsen and Brian C. Gilger
Abstract Local drug delivery to the eye minimizes systemic side effects and targets specific ocular tissue. In preclinical studies, transscleral and suprachoroidal delivery appear to achieve therapeutic drug tissue levels that target specific tissues, such as the choroid and macula. These routes allow minimally invasive sustained delivery of drugs to the ocular posterior segment while minimizing systemic drug levels and the associated side effects.
8.1 Introduction
The suprachoroidal route of delivery as well as deep lamellar scleral delivery are both recently described routes for delivery to the posterior pole of the eye (Einmahl et al. 2002; Gilger et al. 2006; Olsen et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2007, 2009). Access to these anatomic areas has just recently been explored. Theoretically, this route of delivery has some key advantages. First, the suprachoroidal space is a potential space inside the eye. It does not interfere with the optical pathways as opposed to intravitreal injections. Second, diffusional pathways and pharmacokinetics are clearly different for suprachoroidal than for intravitreal injections. Diffusional access to the choroidal stroma may have advantages, particularly if one is targeting a disease of the choroid. An example might include selective drug delivery in uveitis or in macular diseases that originate in the choroid or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), respectively. Drugs do not need to cross the internal limiting membrane of the retina in order to gain access to the outer retina, photoreceptors, RPE, and choroid.
T.W. Olsen (*)
Department of Ophthalmology, Emory Eye Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
e-mail: tolsen@emory.edu
U.B. Kompella and H.F. Edelhauser (eds.), Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye, 173 AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series 2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9920-7_8,
© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2011
