- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Gadek and D. Lee |
||
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
N |
|
|
||
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
N O |
N |
O2NO |
|
O |
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timolol |
|
|
|
Nipradilol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CI |
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
N N |
O |
N |
|
|
|
|
structure not |
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
||
N |
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
|
||
|
|
disclosed |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Br |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brimonidine |
|
|
|
SAR 1118 |
|
TG100572 |
R=H |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
TG100801 |
R=PhCO |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
H |
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
N |
|
|
|
|
N |
|
N |
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
H O |
N |
N |
|
|
N |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
ATG-3 (Mecamylamine) |
|
|
Memantine |
AL-8309B |
|
|
|
|
OT 551 |
|||
Fig. 5.2 Structures of drugs delivered to back of eye
inflammatory conditions may enhance drug penetration to the posterior segment via the uvea-scleral route. Thus, topically applied drug which has penetrated into the aqueous humor can transit to the posterior segment via the uvea-scleral route, and potentially access choroid and retina. While it is presently unclear whether all molecules which progress down the uvea-scleral route do so via the suprachoroidal space, it is clear that this path exists. Molecules progressing along the uvea-scleral route are subject to vascular absorption and clearance into the systemic circulation. This clearance route will most likely affect small molecules more than proteins (Stjernschantz et al. 1999; Alm and Nilsson 2009) (Fig. 5.2).
5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
The following discussion presents published data for drugs formulated as ophthalmic drops in clinical development, and for which there is data indicating that drug is reaching the posterior site of action via one or more of the transit routes described above. It is presently not possible to sample drug levels in most human ocular compartments without removal of the eye; however, one can sample aqueous and vitreous fluids from patients undergoing elective pars plana vitrectomy or other surgical procedures, and thus obtain a limited understanding of drug distribution patterns in ocular tissues. Emerging technological developments in confocal and laser microscopy utilizing dual photon excitation may make it possible to noninvasively measure drug pharmacodynamics and PK in anterior and posterior segments of the human eye in the future (Wang et al. 2010). Presently, our understanding of drug distribution
5 Topical Drug Delivery to the Back of the Eye |
119 |
in the eye is mainly limited to studies in preclinical animals. In the examples described below, there is a detailed understanding of preclinical ocular PK and tissue distribution, which has yielded insight into the mechanisms of drug transit to posterior tissues. Though it is often challenging to delineate a transit path for a particular asset as being trans-vitreous trans-corneal, uvea-scleral trans-corneal, or periocular transscleral, the data is often suggestive of one route being a major contributor.
TG100801 is a dual inhibitor of VEGFR and Src kinases put into clinical development for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to AMD (http:\\www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00509548). It possesses a strong preclinical package of data which supports the ability of the drug to reach the back of the eye.
In a series of publications, TargaGen (Doukas et al. 2008; Palanki et al. 2008; Scheppke et al. 2008) has demonstrated that TG100801 is active in animal models of retinal disease when administered as eye drops. TG100801 is an inactive pro-drug of TG100572, which is rapidly hydrolyzed by esterases in ocular tissues. When a single eye drop (10 mL 0.7% w/v) was applied to a mouse eye, both compounds yielded measurable levels of TG100572 in the sclera, choroid, and retina, but the pro-drug delivered tenfold higher levels of drug to the retina (35 h mg/mL of TG100572 from TG100801 vs. 3.2 h mg/mL TG100572) and sustained drug levels in all tissues for longer periods. In addition, similarly high levels of pro-drug were measured in the retina, and suggests that the higher retinal levels of drug may be due to increased penetration of the pro-drug through the retinal pigment epithelium. This trend is supported by the higher lipophilicity of the pro-drug. Plasma levels were undetectable (<1 ng/mL) at all timepoints. Qualitatively similar results were obtained in rats, though the conversion of TG100801 to TG100572 appeared to be slower.
The PK of TG100572 and TG100801 were also evaluated in rabbits, a larger species whose eye size and geometry more closely mimics human eyes. As in rodents, significant concentrations are delivered to the sclera/choroid/retina tissues. Relative to these drug levels, very little drug was measured in aqueous humor and lens, with intermediate levels measured in the vitreous. This suggests that the trans-corneal routes are not the major paths for drug transit. A radiotracer study with 14C-TG100801 confirms the local nature of the delivery to the posterior eye and absence of significant systemic exposure or distribution to the fellow eye (Struble et al. 2007).
In a mouse laser CNV model in which CNV was induced by laser irradiation in both eyes, treatment of one eye with TG100801 reduced the size of the lesion relative to a vehicle-treated eye. The untreated fellow eye showed no effect, and strongly suggests that the treated eye effects were via local, rather than systemic delivery of drug. Whereas the laser CNV model is a measure of the drug’s activity at the choroid, a VEGF-induced retinal leak model is used to assess the ability of drug to access the retina. TG100801 (1.22% w/v, q.d.) completely abolished the retinal leak. The totality of data for TG100801 (efficacy via local delivery, low aqueous humor drug levels) suggests that it reaches the retina via the periocular trans-scleral route.
ATG-3 is a topical eye drop formulation of Mecamylamine (broad spectrum mAChR antagonist) under development by Comentis for wet AMD. In a 16-week Ph I/II trial for diabetic macular edema (Campochiaro et al. 2010), results suggested that 8/21 patients showed convincing improvements in best corrected visual acuity
120 |
T. Gadek and D. Lee |
and/or foveal thickness. Mecamylamine, as a 0.1 or 1% eye drop solution, was shown to be efficacious in a mouse laser-induced CNV model. (Kiuchi et al. 2008) Though the effect of drug on diseased fellow eye was not reported, significant levels of drug were detected in retina/choroid tissues of the treated eye with no detectable levels in plasma. In data published in a patent application (Zhang et al. 2007), topical administration of a 3% solution to the rabbit eye yielded high ratios of retina/choroid to plasma concentrations (plasma levels <50 ng/mL). Compared to an i.v. dose of 15 mg/kg (>30-fold higher total dose compared to eye drop dose), retina/choroid drug levels were higher via eye drop. Collectively, these data suggest that transit to the site of action is via local route(s). Tissue levels of Mecamylamine are measured to be sclera > retina/choroid > vitreous, but aqueous humor levels are also high. The concentration gradient suggests that Mecamylamine most likely transits by the periocular trans-scleral route, but given the high levels in the anterior segment, the uvea-scleral trans-corneal route may also contribute to posterior drug levels.
Memantine is in Ph III clinical development by Allergan as a topical eye drop for neuroprotection in glaucoma (Hughes et al. 2005; Koeberle et al. 2006). Memantine topically dosed to rabbits (0.1% BID for 7 days) resulted in a retinal drug level of 107 ng/mL, similar to that measured with an efficious oral dose of 2 mg/kg. In addition, relatively low levels of drug were measured in the contra-lateral eye, suggesting that drug is reaching posterior tissues via local routes. Memantine binds to melanin at the in vitro level, and drug accumulates to higher levels in pigmented animals. It was reported that autoradiography using 14C-Memantine indicated passage of drug to the retina via the periocular trans-scleral route (data not reported).
Until recently, there was little information around the ability of proteins to transit to the back of the eye via topical eye drops. Molecules as large as dextran (70 kDa) have been demonstrated to penetrate the sclera, the permeability of which has been shown to be inversely correlated with the radius of the molecule (Ambati et al. 2000; Geroski and Edelhauser 2001). Overall, there is little barrier to the diffusion of small and large molecules across the scleral meshwork from extra-scleral periocular fluid. An engineered 28 kDa single chain variable-region fragment (scFv) was shown to yield, via eye drop administration (50 mL; 0.2 mg/mL; application every 20 min for 12 h), ~3 mg/mL of antibody in the aqueous humor of rabbit eyes (Thiel et al. 2002). In contrast, a full-length 146 kDa IgG antibody, was not detected in this compartment. Levels in posterior tissues were not reported. However, in a subsequent report by the same investigator (Williams et al. 2005), it was shown that antibody fragments can be delivered to the back of the eye. Topical dosing of an eye drop formulation of the 28 kDa scFv (50 mL; 0.2 mg/mL; application every 20 min for 12 h) yielded vitreous drug levels of 50–150 ng/mL at 12 h post dosing. Under the same protocol, the full-length IgG was not detected in vitreous, and indicates that higher molecular weight proteins may not penetrate to posterior tissues. In Dutch-Belted rabbits, antibody was not detected in the serum, suggesting a local path for drug transit to back of eye.
More recently, a single chain anti-TNFa scFv antibody fragment (ESBA105) was reported to yield good penetration to posterior ocular compartments when dosed as a topical eye drop (Furrer et al. 2009). Hourly eye drop application to rabbit eyes of a 10 mg/mL solution of scFv over 10 h resulted in >100 ng/mL concentrations
5 Topical Drug Delivery to the Back of the Eye |
121 |
Table 5.3 10 mg/mL ESBA105 application to rabbit eyes (hourly for 10 h)
|
Aqueous humor |
Vitreous humor |
Neuroretina |
RPE-choroid |
Serum |
Cmax (ng/mL) |
12 |
295 |
214 |
263 |
1 |
Tmax (h) |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
T1/2 (h) |
5.6 |
15.9 |
26.9 |
14 |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of antibody in vitreous, neuroretina and RPE-choroid (Table 5.3). Significantly lower levels in serum were measured.
Much lower levels of antibody were measured in the fellow untreated eye. The ocular tissue distribution patterns of treated and fellow eye are similar, and are significantly different from that observed from an i.v. study. Systemic drug levels are 80–1,000 times lower than that measured in individual ocular compartments. These data suggest that delivery to the posterior compartments is via a local route. Levels of antibody in the aqueous humor are low relative to posterior tissues, and suggest a periocular transscleral path is taken towards the back of the eye. In vitro permeation studies using enucleated eyes are also supportive of this (Ottiger et al. 2009).
ESBA105 has subsequently been reported to show activity in a monkey laser CNV model via eye drops (50 mL; 10 mg/mL; 10 drops per day, 36 days) (Lichtlen et al. 2010). In May 2009, recruitment of patients for an anterior uveitis study with ESBA105 was underway (http:\\www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00823173).
There are two later stage clinical eye drop assets also worth highlighting for the completion of this discussion. OT-551, a drug with an antioxidant mechanism of action, recently completed a Ph II trial in geographic atrophy in which there was limited or no benefit to patients (Wong et al. 2010). In addition, Alcon is reported to be in the midst of a Ph III study with AL-8309B (tandospirone; 5-HT 1a receptor antagonist), also for geographic atrophy (http:\\www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00890097). For both examples, there is no preclinical data published which sheds light on how drug reaches the posterior tissues.
5.4 Summary
A number of examples of clinical topical eye drop medications for back of the eye diseases have been reported in recent years. For several of these drugs, the mechanisms of transit from the ocular surface to the back of eye have been assessed in detail by ocular tissue distribution studies and/or efficacy models.
Present understanding of these mechanisms suggests three potential paths for local drug delivery: trans-vitreous, uvea-scleral, and periocular. The first two are characterized by penetration of drug into the anterior chamber, followed by distribution into the vitreous and uvea-scleral tissues, respectively. Access to the anterior chamber is mainly via corneal permeation. Periocular delivery is effected by initial conjunctival penetration, transit of drug around the exterior of the eye globe, followed by diffusion through the sclera and interior tissues. The initial tissue penetration event (cornea or conjunctiva) is relatively inefficient (typically <10%) and will be dependent on the physiochemical properties of the molecule, but the ability to
