- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
4 Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier |
99 |
The xanthophyll carotenoids such as lutein, zeaxanthin, and lycopene play a significant role in the maintenance of normal vision. These carotenoids are taken up into differentiated ARPE-19 cells via SR-BI (During et al. 2008), suggesting that a similar mechanism might operate in vivo in the uptake of these pigments from blood.
4.2.7.3 Cystine
Glutathione (g-Glu-Cys-Gly), a tripeptide consisting of gluatamate, cysteine, and glycine, is a major antioxidant in the retina. Since intracellular cysteine is low compared to the other two amino acids, cysteine is the rate-limiting amino acid for glutathione synthesis. Cysteine is present in plasma predominantly in the oxidized form cystine. The cystine uptake is mediated by cystine-glutamate exchanger which consists of the “transporter proper” xCT (SLC7A11) and the chaperone 4F2hc. xCT is expressed in TR-iBRB cells (Tomi et al. 2002). When the cellular levels of glutathione are depleted by treatment with diethylmaleate, the expression of xCT is up-regulated to facilitate glutathione synthesis (Hosoya et al. 2001a; Tomi et al. 2002). Functional and immunocytochemical studies have shown that RPE cells express xCT (Bridges et al. 2001; Dun et al. 2006; Gnana-Prakasam et al. 2009). The expression of the transporter is up-regulated in RPE cells in response to increased oxidative stress, indicating a protective role of xCT as an antioxidant mechanism through glutathione (Bridges et al. 2001; Gnana-Prakasam et al. 2009). Thus, xCT at the BRB may be an important factor of glutathione homeostasis in the retina.
4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
4.2.8.1 Creatine
Creatine plays a vital role in the storage and transmission of phosphate-bound energy in retina. The Na+- and Cl−-dependent creatine transporter (CRT, SLA6A8) mediates creatine influx into retina at the inner BRB. CRT is localized on both the luminal and abluminal membranes of rat retinal capillary endothelial cells (Nakashima et al. 2004). Creatine supplementation into retina is a potentially promising treatment for gyrate atrophy of the choroid and retina with hyperornithinemia. However, CRT at the inner BRB is almost saturated by plasma creatine (140–600 mM in mice and rats), since the Michaelis constant for creatine uptake in TR-iBRB cells (~15 mM) is much lower than these plasma concentrations (Nakashima et al. 2004). The development of drugs which increase the density of CRT on the luminal membrane and/or CRT transport activity at the inner BRB is needed for creatine therapy of the gyrate atrophy.
100 |
M. Tachikawa et al. |
4.2.8.2 Taurine
Taurine, the most abundant free amino acid in retina, functions as an osmolyte to regulate cellular volume under altered osmotic conditions. High levels of taurine in the retina are maintained by the Na+- and Cl−-dependent taurine transporter (TAUT, SLC6A6) (Heller-Stilb et al. 2001). Indeed, TAUT knockout mice show markedly decreased taurine levels in the eye and loss of vision due to severe retinal degradation (Heller-Stilb et al. 2001). TAUT at the inner BRB mediates taurine transport from blood to the retina (Tomi et al. 2007b). Since the Michaelis constant for taurine uptake by TR-iBRB cells (~20 mM) is several-fold smaller than the plasma taurine concentration (100–300 mM) in rats, the blood-to-retina taurine transport appears to be more than 80% saturated by the endogenous taurine under in vivo conditions (Tomi et al. 2007b). TAUT also transports g-aminobutyric acid (an inhibitory neurotransmitter) with a lower affinity than taurine (Tomi et al. 2008). Several studies have demonstrated the functional expression and regulation of the TAUT in RPE cells (Bridges et al. 2001; El-Sherbeny et al. 2004; Leibach et al. 1993). Isolated apical membrane vesicles from bovine RPE cells demonstrate robust Na+/Cl−- coupled taurine uptake (Miyamoto et al. 1991; Sivakami et al. 1992).
4.3Efflux Transporters at the Blood-Retinal Barrier
The BRB plays an essential role in the protection of the retina from unwanted harmful effects of endobiotics and xenobiotics which are present in systemic circulation and/or produced in the retina. Two distinct mechanisms participate in this process. The endobiotics and xenobiotics including drugs in the systemic circulation might gain entry into retinal capillary endothelial cells and RPE cells either by passive diffusion or by specific influx transporters. These compounds can be effluxed out of these cells back into the circulating blood via a primary active efflux transport system. This efflux transport system consists of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters which exhibit a very broad range of substrate selectivity for such toxic compounds. ABC transporters are likely to exist on the luminal membrane and basolateral membrane of RVEC and RPE cells, respectively, to carry out the efflux process (Fig. 4.1). Within the ABC transporter family, ABCA, ABCB, ABCC, and ABCG transporter subfamilies could provide a protective mechanism for the retina by restricting the entry of potentially harmful compounds into retina. The second mechanism involves transcellular transport of endobiotics and xenobiotics from subretinal space into the circulating blood via concerted actions of influx transporters in the abluminal and apical membranes and efflux transporters in the luminal and basolateral membranes of RVEC and RPE cells, respectively. Organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs, SLCO, SLC21A) and organic anion transporters (OATs, SLC22A) are most likely involved in the influx transport mechanism. ABC transporters play a role in the efflux transport. While it is certainly true that these transporters play a beneficial role in the protection of retina from potentially toxic
4 Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier |
101 |
xenobiotics, the processes pose a major problem for the effective delivery of therapeutically active drugs to retina. Many of the widely used and clinically relevant drugs are substrates for the transporters and therefore such drugs are actively removed from retina across the BRB, thus preventing accumulation of these drugs in retina at therapeutically effective concentrations. This hurdle might be overcome, however, if specific inhibitors of the transporters are coadministered along with the drugs. Therefore, it is important to identify the efflux transport systems at these barriers and elucidate their substrate selectivity in terms of various drugs that are of potential use for the treatment of retinal diseases.
4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
The distribution of b-lactam antibiotics in the vitreous humor/retina after systemic administration is limited, resulting in reduced efficacy in the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis (Barza et al. 1983). 6-MP is frequently used for cancer chemotherapy in patients with childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia involving eye is a rare but challenging problem. This is probably due to the restricted distribution of 6-MP in the eye (Somervaille et al. 2003). One possible factor in the restricted drug distribution in the retina/eye is the retina-to-blood efflux transport of such anionic drugs across the BRB. Indeed, b-lactam antibiotic benzylpenicillin (PCG) and 6-MP are biexponentially eliminated from the vitreous humor after bolus injection into vitreous of the rat eye (Hosoya et al. 2009). The elimination rate constant of PCG and 6-MP during the terminal phase was about twofold greater than that of D-mannitol, a bulk flow marker. This efflux transport was reduced in the retina in the presence of probenecid, p-aminohippuric acid (PAH), and PCG, relatively specific substrates of organic anion transporter (OAT) 3 (SLC22A8) (Kikuchi et al. 2003). OAT3 is localized on the abluminal membrane of retinal capillary endothelial cells (Hosoya et al. 2009). OAT3 knockout mice exhibit decreased distribution and elimination of PCG (VanWert et al. 2007). Thus, OAT3 is involved in the uptake of PCG and 6-MP across the abluminal membrane of RVEC and contributes to the efflux transport of PCG and 6-MP from vitreous humor/retina into blood across the inner BRB.
4.3.2 Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides
(OATPs, SLCO, SLC21A)
Some b-lactam antibiotics are substrates for organic anion transporting polypeptide (Oatp) 1a4 (Slco1a4; Oatp2) (Nakakariya et al. 2008). Since Oatp1a4 is expressed in RVEC (Gao et al. 2002), this transporter could also be involved in the clearance of anionic b-lactam antibiotics at the inner BRB (Katayama et al. 2006). Oatp1c1 (Slco1c1/Oatp14) mRNA is also expressed in isolated rat RVEC (Tomi and
102 |
M. Tachikawa et al. |
Hosoya 2004). Oatp1c1 transports estradiol 17b-glucuronide as is the case with Oatp1a4 whereas Oatp1c1 does not have high affinity for digoxin (Sugiyama et al. 2001), a specific substrate of Oatp1a4. This suggests that Oatp1c1 and Oatp1a4 play distinct roles in the retina-to-blood efflux transport in terms of the specificity of the drugs and xenobiotics. Further studies are needed to clarify the individual contribution of Oatp1c1 and Oatp1a4 to the efflux of specific anionic drugs across the inner BRB. Oatp1a4 is expressed prominently in the apical membrane of RPE cells (Ito et al. 2002). Oatp-E (Slco4a1) is expressed in RPE cells although its exact location is not known (Ito et al. 2003).
4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
Several classes of drugs, including anticancer agents, antibiotics, steroids, and immunosuppressants are recognized as substrates for P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1). P-gp is localized on the luminal membrane of RVEC (Hosoya and Tomi 2005). TR-iBRB cells express P-gp, and the accumulation of rhodamine 123 in TR-iBRB cells is enhanced in the presence of inhibitors of P-gp (Hosoya et al. 2001b). The expression of P-gp has also been demonstrated in a number of human RPE cell lines (e.g., D407, h1RPE), but interestingly not in ARPE-19 cells (Constable et al. 2006; Kennedy and Mangini 2002; Mannermaa et al. 2009). The transporter is localized more predominantly in the RPE basolateral membrane where it can mediate active transfer of its substrates from RPE cells into blood (Kennedy and Mangini 2002). The active efflux transport function of P-gp at the BRB could lower the blood-to- retina permeability of its substrates. For example, cyclosporine A, a substrate of P-gp, was not detected in the intraocular tissues of cyclosporine A-treated rabbits, although the blood level of cyclosporine A was within the therapeutic window (BenEzra and Maftzir 1990). Daunomycin, which is used for the management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, is a substrate for P-gp. Treatment of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy using daunomycin causes overexpression of P-gp, thus resulting in multidrug resistance (Esser et al. 1998). Abcb1a gene knockout mice gave evidence that penetration of central nervous system acting drugs into the brain is restricted by P-gp at the blood–brain barrier (Schinkel et al. 1996). It is therefore intriguing in future studies to investigate the contribution of P-gp to the blood-to-retina transport of drugs, possibly using Abcb1 knockout mice.
4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
Studies on multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4) gene-disrupted mice reveal that MRP4 at the blood–brain barrier and the blood-CSF barrier restricts penetration of drugs into the brain (Kruh et al. 2007). In the retina, MRP4 functions as a BRB efflux transporter of anionic drugs. MRP4 accepts several anionic drugs
