- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
86 |
M. Tachikawa et al. |
HIV |
Human immunodeficiency virus |
LAT |
L (Leucine-referring)-type amino acid transporter |
L-DOPA |
(-)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-L-alanine |
MCT |
H+-coupled monocarboxylate transporter |
6-MP |
6-mercaptopurine |
MRP |
Multidrug resistance-associated protein |
MTF |
N5-methyltetrahydrofolate |
OAT |
Organic anion transporter |
OATP |
Organic anion transporting polypeptide |
OCT |
Organic cation transporter |
PAH |
p-aminohippuric acid |
PCFT |
H+-coupled folate transporter |
PCG |
Benzylpenicillin |
PEPT |
H+-coupled peptide transporter |
P-gp |
P-glycoprotein |
RFC1 |
Reduced folate carrier |
RPE |
Retinal pigment epithelial cells |
RVEC |
Retinal vascular endothelial cells |
SLC |
Solute carrier |
SMCT |
Na+-coupled monocarboxylate transporter |
SOPT |
Na+-coupled oligopeptide transporter |
SR-BI |
Scavenger receptor class B type I |
SVCT |
Na+-dependent vitamin C transporter |
TAUT |
Taurine transporter |
TR-iBRB |
Conditionally immortalized rat retinal capillary endothelial cell line |
xCT |
Cystine/glutamate transporter |
4.1 Introduction
Retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and glaucoma have become an important therapeutic target with urgent medical needs. Although the ophthalmic drug market is dominated by topical eye drop formulations for anterior segment drug therapies (Del Amo and Urtti 2008), development of systemic drug delivery to the retina poses various hurdles in the treatment of retinal diseases. In general, the restricted drug penetration rate from the circulating blood to the retina is a major problem for retinal drug therapies. The retina is protected by the blood-retinal barrier (BRB; Fig. 4.1) from potentially harmful compounds that are present in the systemic circulation and produced in the retina. Although this role of the BRB is certainly beneficial to the retina, it also reduces the efficacy in the retinal drug delivery via systemic administration. However, it has become increasingly clear in recent years that the BRB performs the vectorial transfer of nutrients in the blood-to-retina direction and also eliminates metabolic waste products in the retina- to-blood direction (Hosoya and Tachikawa 2009). Such information would be useful
4 Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier |
87 |
Fig. 4.1 Schematic representation of transport systems at the inner and outer blood-retinal barrier (BRB). The BRB consist of complex tight junctions of retinal capillary endothelial cells (inner BRB) and retinal pigment epithelial cells (outer BRB). The transport systems at the BRB can be classified into three categories; (1) blood-to-retina influx transport processes, (2) efflux pumps, and
(3) retina-to-blood efflux transport processes. In secondary active transport, the abluminal/apical transporters in the blood-to-retina influx transport process and the luminal/basolateral transporters in the retina-to-blood efflux transport process, which are indicated by a question mark, are not well characterized. GLUT facilitative glucose transporter; LAT L-type amino acid transporter; MCT H+- coupled monocarboxylate transporter; SMCT Na+-coupled monocarboxylate transporter; P-gp P-glycoprotein; MRP multidrug resistance-associated protein; BCRP breast cancer resistance protein; Oat organic anion transporter; Oatp organic anion transporting polypeptide
to develop the systemic route for efficient retinal drug delivery. In this chapter, we present a potential approach of the BRB-targeted retinal drug delivery through an overview of transport systems that are expressed at the BRB.
4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
The BRB consists of retinal vascular endothelial cells (RVEC: inner BRB) and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells (outer BRB) (Fig. 4.1). The inner BRB is responsible for nourishment of the inner two-thirds of the retina whereas the outer BRB is responsible for nourishment of the remaining one-third of the retina
88 |
M. Tachikawa et al. |
(Hosoya and Tomi 2005). Essential nutrients for neuronal cells, e.g., ganglion cells, bipolar cells, horizontal cells, amacrine cells, and Müller glial cells are supplied mostly across the inner BRB whereas those for photoreceptor cells are supplied across the outer BRB. RVEC and RPE cells form tight monolayers with complex tight junctions which prevent or decrease nonspecific diffusion across the monolayer. Both cell types are well polarized. The luminal plasma membrane of RVEC is in contact with blood whereas the abluminal membrane faces the retina. Similarly, the basolateral plasma membrane of the RPE cells is in contact with choroidal blood and the apical membrane faces the retina. Thus, the concerted actions of transporters which are localized in different membranes of RVEC and RPE cells enable the vectorial transport of a variety of compounds in the blood-to-retina and the retina-to-blood directions.
4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
A number of parameters need to be considered for systemic drug delivery to the retina: retinal blood flow, influx and efflux transport systems at the BRB, protein binding in the blood, clearance from the blood, and activity of drug metabolizing enzymes in peripheral tissues, blood, and at the BRB. Recent progress in the BRB research has revealed that multiple transporters/receptors are expressed at the BRB. This has opened the door to the development of the BRB-targeted drug delivery to the retina because drug recognition by the BRB transporters/receptors would greatly influence the disposition into the retina. Figure 4.1 illustrates three kinds of transport systems at the BRB. One group represents the blood-to-retina influx transport systems that supply nutrients such as glucose, amino acids, nucleosides, monocarboxylates, and vitamins to retinal cells. Some transporters transport not only their physiologic substrates but also therapeutic drugs that bear structural resemblance to their physiological substrates. Designing amino acidmimetic drugs which are recognized by amino acid transporters at the BRB is a promising approach to achieve retinal drug delivery. Thus, the influx transport systems at the BRB may have potential as a drug delivery route for the treatment of retinal diseases. The second group consists of the efflux pumps that prevent entry of xenobiotics into the RVEC and RPE cells by pumping them out back into the circulating blood. These efflux systems are located in the luminal and basolateral membranes of RVEC and RPE cells, respectively. Especially for hydrophobic drugs that penetrate the barrier mostly by passive diffusion, we need to consider that these efflux processes may contribute to the restricted distribution of drugs to the retina. The third group represents the retina-to-blood efflux transport systems that act to eliminate metabolites and neurotoxic compounds from the retina. To evaluate the ability of various pharmacologic agents to penetrate the BRB, it would be necessary to consider the combined net result of two different
4 Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier |
89 |
processes, namely, the uptake of these agents into the RVEC or RPE cells via influx transporters and their subsequent excretion into the blood via efflux transporters. For example, the retina-to-blood efflux transport of several organic anions has been supposed to involve the concerted actions of organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4, ABCC4) at the inner BRB (Barza et al. 1983; Hosoya et al. 2009). OAT3 and MRP4 share substrates such as b-lactam antibiotics and the anticancer drug 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP). In this case, inhibition of drug efflux transporters may lead to an increased distribution of drug to the retina. Studies carried out by Kompella and his coworkers have demonstrated that preadministration of probenecid, an organic anion transporter inhibitor, increases retinal concentration of N-4-benzoylam inophenylsulfonylglycine (BAPSG), a novel anionic aldose reductase inhibitor (Sunkara et al. 2010). Taken collectively, development of drugs that are well distributed to the retina can be achieved by incorporating structures that are recognized by the blood-to-retina transport systems or are not recognized by the retina-to-blood efflux systems. The success of retinal drug delivery may thus depend on several factors: (1) identity of the transporters that are expressed specifically at the BRB, (2) differential localization of the transporters in the two poles of the plasma membrane of the RVEC and RPE cells, and (3) substrate selectivity of the individual transporters, particularly differences in substrate specificity between the influx transporters and the efflux transporters. These factors can be exploited to our advantage to establish efficient strategies for optimal delivery of clinically relevant therapeutic drugs into the retina (Mannermaa et al. 2006; Hosoya and Tachikawa 2009).
4.2Blood-Retinal Barrier Influx Transporters/Receptors as a Potential Route for Retinal Drug Delivery
The BRB transporters play an essential role in the blood-to-retina transport of essential nutrients such as glucose, amino acids, vitamins, and nucleosides. The role of transporters in this process has been assessed by the greater blood-to-retina permeability rates of these essential nutrients compared with that of mannitol, a marker of passive non-carrier-mediated diffusion (Hosoya and Tachikawa 2009). The molecular identity of the transporters at the BRB has been established using a conditionally immortalized rat retinal capillary endothelial cell line (TR-iBRB cells) as in vitro model of inner BRB (Hosoya et al. 2001b) and primary cultures and cell lines of RPE cells as in vitro model of outer BRB. A considerable amount of work on the transport characteristics of RPE cells has also been carried out using the ARPE-19 cell line. Apical membrane vesicles from RPE cells and isolated RPE/choroid preparations have also been used for the directional transport studies. With the use of these various approaches, a great deal of information is now available on the identity and characteristics of transporters at the BRB as summarized in Table 4.1.
90 |
|
|
|
M. Tachikawa et al. |
Table 4.1 Expression of transporters/receptors at the blood-retinal barrier |
|
|||
|
Expression and localization |
Endogenous and |
|
|
Transport system |
Inner BRB |
Outer BRB |
potential drug substrates |
References |
|
|
|
|
|
SLC2A1 |
rt (LU, AL) |
rt (BL, AP) |
D-Glucose, dehy- |
Hosoya et al. (2004); |
(GLUT1) |
|
|
droascorbic acid |
Minamizono et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2006); Takata |
|
|
|
|
et al. (1992) |
SLC5A8 |
|
rt (BL) |
Lactate, pyruvate, ketone |
Gopal et al. (2007); |
(SMCT1) |
|
|
bodies, benzoate, |
Martin et al. |
|
|
|
salicylate, 5-amin- |
(2007); |
|
|
|
osalicylate, |
Thangaraju et al. |
|
|
|
3-bromopyruvate |
(2009) |
SLC6A6 |
rt (in vitro) |
m, h |
Taurine, g-aminobutyric |
Bridges et al. (2001); |
(TauT) |
|
(in vitro) |
acid |
El-Sherbeny et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2004); Tomi et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2007b, 2008) |
SLC6A8 (CRT) |
rt (LU, AL) |
|
Creatine |
Nakashima et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2004) |
SLC6A14 |
|
h (in vitro) |
Nitric oxide synthase |
Hatanaka et al. (2001, |
(ATB0+) |
|
|
inhibitors, valacyclo- |
2004); Nakanishi |
|
|
|
vir, valganciclovir |
et al. (2001); |
|
|
|
|
Umapathy et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2004) |
SLC7A5 (LAT1) |
rt |
h (in vitro) |
L-Leucine, |
Goldenberg et al. |
|
|
|
L-phenylalanine, |
(1979); Tomi et al. |
|
|
|
L-DOPA, melphalan, |
(2005); Yamamoto |
|
|
|
gabapentin |
et al. (2010) |
SLC7A7 |
|
h (in vitro) |
L-Arginine, L-lysine, |
Nakauchi et al. (2003) |
(y+LAT1) |
|
|
L-ornithine, |
|
|
|
|
L-leucine |
|
SLC7A8 (LAT2) |
|
h (in vitro) |
L-Leucine, |
Yamamoto et al. |
|
|
|
L-phenylalanine, |
(2010) |
|
|
|
L-alanine, |
|
|
|
|
L-glutamine |
|
SLC7A11 (xCT) |
rt (in vitro) |
m, h |
L-Cystine, L-glutamate |
Bridges et al. (2001); |
|
|
(in vitro) |
|
Dun et al. (2006); |
|
|
|
|
Tomi et al. (2002) |
SLC16A1 |
rt (LU, AL) |
rt (AP), h |
Lactate, pyruvate, ketone |
Enerson and Drewes |
(MCT1) |
|
(AP) |
bodies, foscarnet, |
(2003); Gerhart |
|
|
|
salicylate, benzoate |
et al. (1999); Philp |
|
|
|
|
et al. (1998, |
|
|
|
|
2003); Morris and |
|
|
|
|
Felmlee (2008) |
SLC16A8 |
|
m (BL), rt |
Lactate, pyruvate |
Daniele et al. (2008); |
(MCT3) |
|
(BL), h |
|
Philp et al. (1998, |
|
|
(BL) |
|
2003) |
SLC19A1 |
rt |
m (AP), |
Folate, N5-methyl |
Chancy et al. (2000); |
(RFC1) |
|
h (AP, |
tetrahydrofolate |
Hosoya et al. |
|
|
in vitro) |
(MTF), methotrexate |
(2008b) |
(continued)
4 Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier |
91 |
||||
Table 4.1 (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression and localization |
Endogenous and |
|
|
|
Transport system |
Inner BRB |
Outer BRB |
potential drug substrates |
References |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slco1a4 |
rt |
rt (AP) |
Estradiol |
Gao et al. (2002); Ito |
|
(Oatp1a4/ |
|
|
17b-glucuronide, |
et al. (2002) |
|
Oatp2) |
|
|
digoxin |
|
|
Slco1c1 |
rt |
|
Estradiol |
Tomi and Hosoya |
|
(Oatp14) |
|
|
17b-glucuronide |
(2004) |
|
Slco4a1 (Oatp-E) |
|
rt |
Thyroid hormone |
Ito et al. (2003) |
|
SLC22A3 |
|
m, h (in vitro) |
Prazocin, clonidine, |
Koepsell et al. (2007); |
|
(OCT3) |
|
|
cimetidine, verapamil, |
Rajan et al. (2000) |
|
|
|
|
imipramine, |
|
|
|
|
|
desipramine, |
|
|
|
|
|
quinine, nicotine, |
|
|
|
|
|
methylene- |
|
|
|
|
|
dioxymethamphet- |
|
|
|
|
|
amine |
|
|
SLC22A5 |
rt (in vitro) |
|
Acetyl-L-carnitine, |
Ganapathy et al. |
|
(OCTN2) |
|
|
L-carnitine, |
(2000); Ohashi |
|
|
|
|
cephaloridine, |
et al. (1999); |
|
|
|
|
tetraethylammonium, |
Tachikawa et al. |
|
|
|
|
pyrilamine, quinidine, |
(2010) |
|
|
|
|
verapamil, valproate |
|
|
SLC22A8 |
rt (AL) |
|
p-Aminohippuric acid, |
Hosoya et al. (2009) |
|
(OAT3) |
|
|
benzylpenicillin, |
|
|
|
|
|
6-mercaptopurine |
|
|
SLC23A2 |
h (AP, |
Ascorbic acid |
(SVCT2) |
in vitro) |
|
SLC29A2 |
rt (in vitro) |
Purine and pyrimidine |
(ENT2) |
|
nucleosides, |
|
|
3¢-azido-3¢- |
|
|
deoxythymidine |
|
|
(zidovudine, AZT), |
|
|
2¢, 3¢-dideoxycytidine |
|
|
(zalcitabine, ddC), |
|
|
2¢,3¢-dideoxyinosine |
|
|
(ddI), cytarabine, |
|
|
gemcitabine |
SLC46A1 |
m, h (in vitro) |
Folate, MTF, |
(PCFT) |
|
methotrexate |
ABCA3 |
m |
|
Ganapathy et al. (2008)
Baldwin et al. (2004); Nagase et al. (2006); Yao et al. (2001)
Umapathy et al. (2007)
Tachikawa et al. (2008)
ABCA9 |
m |
|
|
Tachikawa et al. |
|
|
|
|
(2008) |
ABCB1 |
rt (LU), |
h (BL) |
Cyclosporine A, |
Hosoya and Tomi |
(P-glyco- |
m, b |
|
daunorubicin, |
(2005); Kennedy |
protein) |
(in vitro), |
|
doxorubicin, |
and Mangini |
|
|
|
irinotecan, paclitaxel, |
(2002); Tomi and |
|
|
|
quinidine, verapamil, |
Hosoya (2010) |
|
|
|
vinblastine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(continued) |
