- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
82 |
B.E. McCarey |
Table 3.3 The peak fluorescein values as measure with the fluorophotometer following topical application of fluorescein to the treated eye
|
Cornea |
|
Retina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment |
Contralateral |
Treatment |
Contralateral |
|
|
(ng/mL) |
(ng/mL) |
(ng/mL) |
(ng/mL) |
|
Autofluorescence |
14 |
11.1 |
6.0 |
4.8 |
|
Post-75 min |
335 |
11.5 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
|
Post-255 min |
191.9 |
15.5 |
8.2 |
4.0 |
|
topical applications of fluorescein. The experiment supports the difficulty of delivering fluorescein to the posterior segment of the eye with topical corneal applications.
References
Adler CA, Maurice DM, Paterson ME (1971) The effect of viscosity of the vehicle on the penetration of fluorescein into the human eye. Exp Eye Res 11:34–42
Araie M (1986) Carboxyfluorescein. A dye for evaluating the corneal endothelial barrier function in vivo. Exp Eye Res 42:141–150
Araie M, Maurice D (1987) The rate of diffusion of fluorophores through the corneal epithelium and stroma. Exp Eye Res 44:73–87
Berkowitz RA, Klyce SD, Salisbury JD, Kaufman HE (1981) Fluorophotometric determination of the corneal epithelial barrier after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 92:332–335
Boets EP, van Best JA, Boot JP, Oosterhuis JA (1988) Corneal epithelial permeability and daily contact lens wear as determined by fluorophotometry. Curr Eye Res 7:511–514
Bron AJ (1985) Prospects for the dry eye. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 104:801–811
Burstein NL (1980) Preservative cytotoxic threshold for benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine in cat and rabbit corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 19:308–813
Burstein NL (1984) Preservative alteration of corneal permeability in humans and rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:1453–1457
Burstein NL, Klyce SD (1977) Electrophysiologic and morphologic effects of ophthalmic preparations on rabbit cornea epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16:899–911
Cadwallader DE, Ansel HC (1965) Hemolysis of erythrocytes by antibacterial preservatives. II. Quarternary ammonium salts. J Pharm Sci 54:1010–1012
Champeau EJ, Edelhauser HF (1986) Effects of ophthalmic preservatives on the ocular surface: conjunctiva and corneal uptake and distribution of benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine digluconate. In: Holly FJ (ed) The preocular tear film: in health, disease, and contact lens wear. Dry Eye Institute, Lubbock, TX, pp 292–302
Chang SW, Hu FR (1993) Changes in corneal autofluorescence and corneal epithelial barrier function with aging. Cornea 12:493–499
Chang SW, Hsu HC, Hu FR, Chen MS (1995) Corneal autofluorescence and epithelial barrier function in diabetic patients. Ophthalmic Res 27:74–79
Cunha-Vaz J, de Abreu J, Campos A (1975) Early breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier in diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol 59:649–656
de Kruijf EJ, Boot JP, Laterveer L, van Best JA, Ramselaar JA, Oosterhuis JA (1987) A simple method for determination of corneal epithelial permeability in humans. Curr Eye Res 6:1327–1334
Forster S, Mead A, Sears M (1979) An interophthalmic communicating artery as explanation for the consensual irritative response of the rabbit eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:161–165
3 Fluorophotometry for Pharmacokinetic Assessment |
83 |
Gobbels M, Spitznas M (1991) Effects of artificial tears on corneal epithelial permeability in dry eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 229:345–349
Gobbels M, Spitznas M (1992) Corneal epithelial permeability of dry eyes before and after treatment with artificial tears. Ophthalmology 99:873–878
Gobbels M, Spitznas M, Oldendoerp J (1989) Impairment of corneal epithelial barrier function in diabetics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:142–144
Gobbles M, Spitznas M (1989) Influence of artificial tears on corneal epithelium in dry eye syndrome. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227:139–141
Gray JR, Mosier MA, Ishimoto BM (1985) Optimized protocol for Fluorotron Master. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 222:225–229
Grimes PA, Stone RA, Laties AM, Li W (1982) Carboxyfluorescein. A probe of the blood ocular barriers with lower membrane permeability than fluorescein. Arch Ophthalmol 100:635–639
Hughes L, Maurice D (1984) A fresh look at iontophoresis. Arch Ophthalmol 102:1825–1829 Jones RF, Maurice DM (1966) New methods of measuring the rate of aqueous flow on man with
fluorescein. Exp Eye Res 5:208–220
Joshi A, Maurice D, Paugh JR (1996) A new method for determining corneal epithelial barrier to fluorescein in humans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:1008–1016
Kanno Y, Loewenstein WR (1964) Intercellular diffusion. Science 143:959–960
Kuppens EVM, Stolwijk TR, de Keizer RJW, van Best JA (1992) Basal tear turnover and topical timolol in glaucoma patients and healthy controls by fluorophotometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:3442–3448
Kuppens E, Stolwijk T, van Best J, de Keizer R (1994) Topical timolol, corneal epithelial permeability and autofluorescence in glaucoma by fluorophotometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 232:215–220
Lin MC, Graham AD, Fusaro RE, Polse KA (2002) Impact of rigid gas-permeable contact lens extended wear on corneal epithelial barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1019–1024
Maurice D (1963) A new objective fluorophotometer. Exp Eye Res 2:33–38
McCarey BE, al Reaves T (1995) Noninvasive measurement of corneal epithelial permeability. Curr Eye Res 14:505–510
McCarey BE, Reaves TA (1997) Effect of tear lubricating solutions on in vivo corneal epithelial permeability. Curr Eye Res 16:44–50
McCarey BE, Walter JJ (1998) Ocular fluorophotometry of fluorescein uptake following periorbital injections. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:S275
McNamara NA, Fusaro RE, Brand RJ, Polse KA, Srinivas SP (1997) Measurement of corneal epithelial permeability to fluorescein. A repeatability study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:1830–1839
McNamara NA, Polse KA, Bonanno JA (1998) Fluorophotometry in contact lens research: the next step. Optom Vis Sci 75:316–322
Mishima S, Maurice DM (1971) In vivo determination of the endothelial permeability to fluorescein. Acta Soc Ophthalmol 75:236–243
Nelson JD (1995) Simultaneous evaluation of tear turnover and corneal epithelial permeability by fluorophotometry in normal subjects and patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 93:709–753
Occhipiniti JR, Mosier MA, La Motte J, Monji GT (1988) Fluorophotometric measurement of human tear turnover rate. Curr Eye Res 7:995–1000
OcuMetrics I (1995) FM-2 Fluorotron™ Master, Operators Manual, OcuMetrics, Inc., 2224-C Old Middlefield Way, Mountain View, CA 94043-2421, 650:960–3955
Ota Y, Mishima S, Maurice DM (1974) Endothelial permeability of the living cornea to fluorescein. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 13:945–949
Paugh JR, Joshi A (1992) Novel fluorophotometric methods to evaluate tear flow dynamics in man. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33:S950
Paugh JR, Saai A, Abhay J (1998) Preservative effect on epithelial barrier function measured with a novel technique. Adv Exp Med Biol 438:731–735
84 |
B.E. McCarey |
Pfister RR, Burstein NL (1976) The effects of ophthalmic drugs, vehicles, and preservatives on corneal epithelium: a scanning electron microscope study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15:246–259
Ramselaar JA, Boot JP, van Haeringen NJ, van Best JA, Oosterhuis JA (1988) Corneal epithelial permeability after instillation of ophthalmic solutions containing local anesthetics and preservatives. Curr Eye Res 7:947–950
Schalnus R, Ohrloff C (1990) Permeability of the limiting cell layers of the cornea in vivo. Lens Eye Toxic Res 7:371–384
Tognetto D, Cecchini P, Sanguinetti G, Pedio M, Ravalico G (2001) Comparative evaluation of corneal epithelial permeability after the use of diclofenac 0.1% and flurbiprofen 0.03% after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1392–1396
Tsuboti S, Pedersen JE (1987) Acetazolamide effect on the inward permeability of the blood-retina barrier in diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:92–95
van Best J, Tijin A, Tsoi EWSJ, Boets EP, Oosterhuis JA (1985) In vivo assessment of lens transmission for blue-green light by autofluorescence measurement. Ophthalmic Res 17:90–95
van Best JA, Kappelhof JP, Laterveer L, Oosterhuis JA (1987) Blood aqueous barrier permeability verses age by fluorophotometry. Curr Eye Res 6:855–863
van Zutphen H, Demel RA, Norman AW, van Deenen LLM (1971) The action of polyene antibiotics on lipid bilayer membranes in the presence of several cations and anions. Biochim Biophys Acta 241:310–330
Webber W, Jones DP, Wright P (1987) Fluorophotometric measurements of tear turnover rate in normal healthy persons: evidence for a circadian rhythm. Eye 1:615–620
Yokoi K, Yokoi N, Kinoshita S (1998) Impairment of ocular surface epithelium barrier function in patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Ophthalmol 82:797–800
Zeimer RC, Cunha-Vaz JG, Johnson ME (1982) Studies on the technique of vitreous fluorophotometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 22:668–674
Chapter 4
Systemic Route for Retinal Drug Delivery: Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier
Masanori Tachikawa, Vadivel Ganapathy, and Ken-ichi Hosoya
Abstract Systemic delivery of therapeutic drugs to the retina is hindered by the presence of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB) which consists of retinal vascular endothelial cells (inner BRB) and retinal pigment epithelial cells (outer BRB). Recent progress in the BRB research has revealed that the BRB expresses a wide variety of transporters essential for the blood-to-retinal influx transport of nutrients and their analogs. At the same time, the BRB also possesses several transporters responsible for the retina-to-blood efflux transport of xenobiotics and drugs, thus being involved in the removal of potentially harmful compounds from the retina. This information can be exploited to our advantage to establish efficient strategies for optimal delivery of clinically relevant therapeutic drugs into the retina.
Abbreviations |
|
||
ABC |
ATP-binding cassette |
|
|
AZT |
3¢-azido-3¢-deoxythymidine (zidovudine) |
|
|
BAPSG |
N-4-benzoylaminophenylsulfonylglycine |
|
|
BCRP |
Breast cancer resistance protein |
|
|
BRB |
Blood-retinal barrier |
|
|
CRT |
Creatine transporter |
|
|
DHA |
Dehydroascorbic acid |
|
|
ENT |
Equilibrative nucleoside transporter |
|
|
GLUT |
Facilitative glucose transporter |
|
|
HDL |
High-density lipoprotein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-i. Hosoya (*) |
|
||
Department of Pharmaceutics, Graduate School of Medicine |
|
||
and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, |
|
||
Toyama 930-0194, Japan |
|
||
e-mail: hosoyak@pha.u-toyama.ac.jp |
|
||
U.B. Kompella and H.F. Edelhauser (eds.), Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye, |
85 |
||
AAPS Advances in the Pharmaceutical Sciences Series 2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9920-7_4, |
|
||
© American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2011 |
|
||
