- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
538 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
Research focused on identified new targets
Use of neurotrophic factors as a treatment for retinal degenerative diseases is in its early phase. A few products are making their way through clinical trials; however, many of the possible targets have yet to make it to the clinic. Several neurotrophic factors have been examined in the context of RGC protection. The FGF family has been shown to play an important role both in the development of the brain, in general (Abe and Saito 2001) and in the retina, in particular (Hicks 1998). FGF receptors are expressed in the developing retina and appear to be essential for appropriate development to occur. Initial attempts to use FGF-2 as a therapeutic agent via intravitreal injection failed (Cui et al. 1999). Sapieha et al. (2003, 2006), however, reasoned that as FGF-2 is quite labile the failure may be due more to the mode of delivery than to the efficacy of the molecule. Indeed, they found that by injecting the vitreous chamber with an FGF-2 expressing adeno-associated virus (AAV) they were able to promote significant axonal growth via an Erk related signaling cascade. Unfortunately, this growth was limited to 1 mm from the lesion site. FGF2 among other factors is upregulated by the expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). LIF expression was found to be upregulated in a subset of Müller glial cells after axonal injury (Joly et al. 2008). Exogenous application of recombinant LIF via intravitreal injection was found to activate a complex genetic pathway associated with retinal protection including the upregulation of Edn2, STAT3, FGF2, and GFAP. Müller cells have the interesting ability to dedifferentiate into progenitor cells of which a few will then differentiate into neurons. FGFR activation along with the activation of the ERK pathway has recently been shown to promote this transformation of Müller cells into progenitor cells (Fischer et al. 2009).
21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
Uveitis involving posterior ocular structures is most often caused by infection. In this context, we are not considering an otherwise healthy patient, but rather, a patient who is immunosuppressed and is now vulnerable to an opportunistic infective agent. Immunosuppression can occur for a variety of reasons. Perhaps the most common reason at present is HIV infection and the development of AIDS. Other reasons may include chemotherapy, immunosuppression for organ transplant, pregnancy, and malnutrition. A discussion of the mechanisms by which the immune system protects us from infection is beyond the scope of this chapter and ultimately is not pertinent to the mechanisms by which anti-infective agents function. Posterior uveitis involves inflammation of structures such as choroid, retina, vitreous, optic nerve head, and retinal vessels (Sudharshan et al. 2010).
We may divide the universe of pathogens which commonly infect ocular structures to viruses, parasites, and bacteria. Viruses which we will consider here include CMV, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster. Parasites to be considered include
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
539 |
toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma gondii) and toxocariasis (helminthic round worm) (Klotz et al. 2000). Finally, we will consider bacillus tuberculosis (TB), syphilis, and bartonella (Sudharshan et al. 2010).
21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
Viral targets
CMV: CMV retinitis is the most common AIDS-related opportunistic infection in the eye and manifests as one of two distinct clinical patterns (Vrabec 2004). The indolent form of CMV retinitis is characterized as granular lesions in the peripheral retina. In turn, severe CMV retinitis is characterized by hemorrhage in the posterior retina. Treatment of CMV retinitis can be achieved by antiretroviral agents of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and anti-CMV agents (Vrabec 2004) (Table 21.5).
Anti-CMV agents include ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir, and fomivirsen (Table 21.6). Ganciclovir is a guanosine nucleoside analog derivative. It acts by competitively inhibiting DNA polymerase of CMV, and thereby prevents DNA replication. Valganciclovir is a prodrug of ganciclovir with an improved bioavailability. Foscarnet is an organic analog of inorganic pyrophosphate. It is both an inhibitor of pyrophosphate binding site of DNA polymerase of CMV and reverse transcriptase of HIV. Cidofovir acts by competitively inhibiting CMV DNA polymerase and consequently inhibits DNA replication. Fomivirsen is an antisense oligonucleotide which acts by binding to mRNA of major immediate-early transcriptional unit of CMV and results in degradation of this viral transcript. Therefore, Fomiversen slows down viral replication.
Herpes simplex and varicella zoster viruses: Necrotizing herpetic retinopathy (NHR) is most commonly caused by herpes simplex and varicella zoster viruses. NHR is clinically presented in two forms, ARN and progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN) (Vrabec 2004). NHR is characterized by vitritis, peripheral retinitis, and retinal arteritis. Treatment can be achieved by long-term systemic antivirals such as acyclovir or valacyclovir (Sudharshan et al. 2010).
Parasitic targets
Ocular toxoplasmosis: Ocular toxoplasmosis is caused by Toxoplasma gondii. Most individuals infected with T. gondii will not develop ocular disease. However, two specific populations are particularly at high risk: immunocompromised patients such as HIV-acquired patients, and neonates who have been exposed transplacentally by mother’s infection (Feldman 1982). Toxoplasmosis causes necrotizing chorioretinitis most commonly in the posterior pole. The ideal treatment for this pathogen has not yet been indentified (Sudharshan et al. 2010). Current treatment strategies target the trophozites of T. gondii. However, the best strategy is to target cysts of T. gondii (Sudharshan et al. 2010). Pyrimethamine in combination with sulfadiazine has a synergistic effect and is perhaps the most effective treatment. Currently, classic treatment consists of drugs such as sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine, folic acid, and a corticosteroid. Other treatments that have had success include clindamycin, trimethoprim plus sulphamethoxazol, spiramycin, zaithromycin, and atovaquone
Table 21.5 Drugs in clinical trials for treating uveitis
|
|
Chemical/pharmacological |
|
Small/large molecule and |
|
|
Drug |
classification |
Brand/company |
current clinical phase |
Mechanism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daclizumab/ |
Antibody |
National Eye Institute |
Large (II) |
Immunosuppression |
|
Denileukin |
|
|
|
|
AEB071 |
Immunosuppressive agent |
Novartis |
Small (II) |
PKC inhibitor |
|
Dexamethasone |
Anti-inflammatory |
OzurdexTM/Allergan |
Small (III) |
Altered expression of glucocorticoid |
|
|
(intravitreal |
|
|
|
responsive genes |
|
implant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Efalizumab |
Antibody |
National Eye Institute |
Large (I) |
Immunosuppression |
|
AIN 457 |
Antibody |
Novartis |
Large (III) |
Selectively neutralizes interleukins IL-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
and IL-17A |
|
Rapamycin |
Inhibitor of mTOR |
MacuSight |
Small (I) |
Inhibits mTOR, which is serine/threonine |
|
|
|
|
|
kinase involved in cell proliferation |
|
Daclizumab and |
Antibody/small molecule |
National Eye Institute |
Large/Small (I) |
Immunosuppression |
|
Rapamycin |
|
|
|
|
|
Rituximab |
Antibody |
Roche |
Large (II) |
Immunosuppression |
Difluprednate |
Anti-inflammatory |
Sirion Therapeutics |
Small (III) |
Corticosteroid |
|
Leflunomide |
Antimetabolite |
National Eye Institute |
Small (II) |
Inhibits pyrimidine synthesis |
|
Enbrel |
Fusion protein |
National Eye Institute |
Large (II) |
Blocks TNF |
|
Interferon gamma 1-b |
Type II interferon |
Actimmune®/National |
Large (I) |
Decreases the swelling in the back of the |
|
|
|
|
Eye Institute |
|
eye |
|
AEB071 |
PKC inhibitor |
Novartis |
Small (II) |
Inhibits T cell activation via a calcineurin- |
|
|
|
|
|
independent pathway |
|
LX211 |
Calcineurin inhibitor |
LuxBiosciences |
Small (III) |
Inhibits immunocompetent T cells |
|
|
|
|
|
resulting in the inhibition of produc- |
|
|
|
|
|
tion and release of lymphokines |
|
Adalimumab |
Antibody |
Oregon Health Science |
Large (II) |
Immunosuppression |
|
|
|
University |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540
.al et Scheinman .I.R
Table 21.6 Drugs for treating vascular diseases of the back of the eye
|
Chemical/pharmacological |
|
Small/large molecule and |
|
Drug |
classification |
Brand/company |
current clinical phase |
Mechanism |
Bevacizumab |
Antibody |
Instituto University de |
Large (II-Macular edema |
|
|
Oftalmobiologia |
secondary to retinal vein |
|
|
Applicado |
occlusion) |
Ciliary neurotro- |
Encapsulated genetically |
NT-501TM/Neurotech |
Small (II-Retinitis Pigmetosa) |
pic factor |
modified human cells, |
Pharmaceuticals |
|
(CNTF) |
which secrete ciliary |
|
|
|
neurotrophic factor |
|
|
|
(CNTF) |
|
|
Blockage of all forms of VEGF-A
CNTF is capable of rescuing dying photoreceptors and protecting them from degeneration
Ranibizumab |
Antibody |
Medical University of |
Large (IV-retinal vein |
|
|
Vienna |
occlusion) |
Ranibizumab |
Antibody |
Greater Houston Retina |
Large (I-ischemic central vein |
|
|
Research |
occlusion) |
Ranibizumab |
Antibody |
LucentisTM/Genentech |
Large (III-macular edema |
|
|
|
secondary to branched |
|
|
|
retinal vein occlusion) |
Dexamethasone |
Corticosteroid |
Allergan |
Small (III-macular edema |
|
|
|
from retinal vein |
|
|
|
occlusion) |
Dexamethasone |
Corticosteroid |
Sangwa Kagaku Kenkyusho |
Small (II-macular edema) |
|
|
Co Ltd |
|
Triamcinolone |
Corticosteroid |
Shaheed Beheshti Medical |
Small (II-branched retinal vein |
acetonide |
|
University |
occlusion/III-retinal vein |
(intravitreal |
|
|
occlusion) |
injection) |
|
|
|
Ranizumab |
Antibody |
LucentisTM/Genentech |
Large (II-uveitic cystoid |
|
|
|
macular edema) |
Acetazolamide |
Diuretic |
National Eye Institute |
Small (II-cystoid macular |
|
|
|
edema) |
Blockage of all forms of VEGF-A
Blockage of all forms of VEGF-A
Blockage of all forms of VEGF-A
Downregulation of permeability enhancing proteins and upregulation of junction proteins
Downregulation of permeability enhancing proteins and upregulation of junction proteins
Downregulation of permeability enhancing proteins and upregulation of junction proteins
Blockage of all forms of VEGF-A
Mechanism is not clear, but several mechanism are proposed
541 Eye the of Back the of Disorders for Agents Therapeutic and Targets Druggable 21
