- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
534 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
of EPO during the proliferative phase also resulted in decreased neovascularization, suggesting that EPO may play multiple roles in this model (Chen et al. 2009).
Omega-3 PUFA, described earlier, also may play a protective role. Altering the ratio of omega-3 to omega-6 PUFA content in the retina (increasing the relative amount of omega-3) resulted in a 50% protective effect against pathological neovascularization in an OIR model (Connor et al. 2007). A similar level of protection was produced by treating with exogenous resolvins or neuroprotectins.
21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
The VEGF blocking drugs, discussed, extensively above are also being used to treat ROP. Numerous clinical trials are in progress such as NCT00622726, NCT00346814, and NCT01205035. Additionally, a trial is currently recruiting, looking at the effects of IGF-1 in the prevention of complications associated with preterm birth including ROP (NCT01096784).
21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
In this section, we consider pathologies which lead primarily to the degenerative loss of retinal cells. The reasons for this loss may be varied. Mutations, such as those identified underlying RP, can disrupt the delicate balance maintained by the photoreceptor cell through pathological aggregation events, disruptions in metabolism, or disruptions in signaling. Alternatively, subtle changes in the shape of the eye, such as those caused by glaucoma, can put pressure on the optic nerve, cutting off the supply of trophic factors necessary for ganglion cell survival.
21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
Retinitis Pigmentosa
RP is an inherited disease of retinal degeneration. As of this writing, 21 autosomal dominant, 32 autosomal recessive, and 4 X-linked genes have been identified (Retnet database, http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/retnet/sum-dis.htm#A-genes information retrieved Oct 2010). The most prevalent causes of RP are mutations in rhodopsin (25% of autosomal dominant cases), mutations in usherin (USH2A) (20% of autosomal recessive cases), and the retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) gene (70% of X-linked cases). In aggregate, the mutations within these three genes account for approximately 30% of all RP diagnoses.
Photoreceptor death in RP follows a two-stage process in which the rods degenerate first followed by the cones. Initially, the patient experiences night blindness followed by a constriction in the visual field. Finally, the patient loses central vision (Hartong et al. 2006). Most patients are declared legally blind due to a severely
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
535 |
constricted visual field by the age of 40. Mutations which cause photoreceptor degeneration often involve either the retinoid acid cycle or the photoreceptor signal transduction cascade. Signal transduction begins with a photon-induced conformational change of 11-cis-retinal to all-trans-retinal. This activates opsins which, in turn, trigger the cGMP phosphodiesterase; transducin, to degrade cGMP. High levels of cGMP are necessary to keep Ca++ channels open which provide the ion flux sometimes referred to as the dark current. Activation of transducin causes the channels to close due to loss of cGMP and the cell promptly hyperpolarizes. This hyperpolarization provides the force to trigger an action potential thus initiating the neural component of the visual signal. Mutations in the proteins involved in processing cGMP are prevalent in RP patients. It is curious to note that some RP mutations are found in genes which only express in rods and yet cones still die. The reason for this is not yet well understood but it may underscore a need of each photoreceptor for healthy neighbors to maintain survival.
Elevated intraocular pressure
Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) may be caused by trauma or by glaucoma and can result in damage to the optic nerve. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) injury may be divided into primary damage followed by secondary damage of originally undamaged cells. Secondary damage is thought to occur via the release of apoptotic inducers from the cells affected by the primary trauma and these signals, in turn, promote the destruction of neighboring RGC.
Numerous therapeutics have been developed to address elevated IOP. The most common classes of compounds used for this purpose are beta adrenergic antagonists, prostaglandin analogs, alpha-adrenergic agonists, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors.
21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
In comparison with other ocular pathologies there are relatively few therapeutics in clinical trials and virtually no therapeutics on the market approved for retinal degenerative diseases. The current therapeutics in clinical trials are described in Table 21.4.
Cell-based therapies. CNTF was discussed earlier in the context of AMD (Sect. 21.3.4.2). Neurotech is also sponsoring a phase II and III trial to test their CNTF expressing cells in the treatment of RP (NCT00447993). While the trial data is not yet available, phase I data indicated that changes in visual acuity, while variable, were largely positive (Emerich and Thanos 2008).
Bone marrow stem cells can be divided into those which are capable of differentiating into a hematopoietic lineage (Lin+) and those that cannot (Lin-). Lincells are of interest as they contain a subpopulation of endothelial precursor cells (EPC) which can differentiate into vascular endothelium and form new blood vessels both in vitro and in vivo (Asahara et al. 1997). These cells were shown to be capable of incorporating into the growing vasculature of the developing retina when injected intravitreally (Otani et al. 2002). Importantly, these authors also tested the effect of these cells on degenerating vasculature. They injected Lincells from normal mice
Table 21.4 Drugs in clinical trials for degenerative retinal diseases
|
Chemical/pharmacological |
|
|
|
Drug |
Classification |
Sponsor/trial(s) |
Small/large molecule |
Mechanism |
|
|
|
|
|
Ciliary neurotrophic |
Human cells genetically |
Neurotech Pharmaceuticals |
Small |
Rescues dying photoreceptors |
factor (CNTF) |
modified to express |
(Phase II) |
|
and protects them from |
|
CNTF (NT-501TM) |
NCT00447954 |
|
degeneration. |
Bone marrow stem cells |
Human stem cells |
University of Sao Palo (Phase I) |
Large |
Bone marrow stem cells secrete |
|
|
NCT01068561 |
|
neurotrophic factors that |
|
|
|
|
protect retinal cells |
Vitamin A |
Vitamin |
NEI (Phase I) |
Small |
Supplements endogenous retinal |
|
|
NCT00000116 |
|
|
Lutein |
Carotenoid |
National center for complementary |
Small |
Protection from oxidative stress |
|
|
and alternative medicine |
|
|
|
|
(Phase II) |
|
|
|
|
NCT00029289 |
|
|
Docosahexaenoic acid |
Omega 3 fatty acid |
The FDA office of orphan |
Small |
Protection of RPE cells from |
|
|
products development |
|
oxidative stress |
|
|
(Phase II) |
|
|
|
|
NCT00100230 |
|
|
Idebenone |
Coenzyme |
Santhera (Phase II) |
Small |
Protection from oxidative stress |
|
|
NCT00747487 |
|
|
Curcumin |
Polyphenol |
Mahidol University |
Small |
Protection from oxidative stress |
|
|
(Phase III) |
|
|
|
|
NCT00528151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536
.al et Scheinman .I.R
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
537 |
into the eyes of rd/rd mice (a model of RP) and found that the retinal vasculature was stabilized for at least a month. Surprisingly, in a subsequent study, they found that not only were retinal blood vessels stabilized, but also photoreceptors were protected through the injection of these cells (Otani et al. 2004).
Bone marrow derived stem cells (MSC) have also been explored as a source of protective factors. In the most recent example of these studies, syngeneic purified MSC were injected IV on postnatal day 30 RCS rats (Wang et al. 2010). The RCS rat is a well-established model of RP. The authors found that IV administration of MCS cells resulted in an increase in the amount of neurotrophic factors present in the retinas of these animals and retinal degeneration was significantly decreased. The University of Sao Palo is sponsoring a phase I trial in which bone marrow stem cells were introduced by intravitreal injection (NCT01068561). While the trial has completed, the results are not yet available as of this writing.
Nutritional supplements. It was observed during a study of the natural course of RP that patients taking either vitamin A, vitamin E, or both showed a slowed degeneration of ERG amplitudes than patients not taking those supplements (Berson et al. 1993). Vitamin A is a source of retinal for the eye and it is interesting to note that mutations in at least five genes involved in vitamin A metabolism have been identified as causing RP (Hartong et al. 2006). The National Eye Institute has sponsored a trial (NCT00000116, just completed) to examine the use of 50,000 U of vitamin A daily. The results are not yet available.
Lutein, found in green leafy vegetables such as spinach has been associated with protecting retinal cells from oxidative damage. A recent clinical trial, sponsored by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCT00029289) reported that lutein had a statistically significant effect on the maintenance of the size of the visual field. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were also improved although less so (Bahrami et al. 2006).
The omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid, is a precursor of neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1). NPD1 acts primarily on RPE to promote survival via protection from oxidative stress. As RPE cells are essential to the survival of photoreceptor cells it is thought that docosahexaenoic acid works indirectly to protect photoreceptor cells (Bazan 2006). The FDA Office of Orphan Products Development has sponsored a phase II clinical trial (NCT00100230) to examine the role of docosahexaenoic acid in patients with X-linked RP. The trial is ongoing.
Curcumin, an extract from Curcuma longa plants, has well-known antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity (Epstein et al. 2010) and has been applied to ocular degenerative disease (Matteucci et al. 2010). A trial examining the efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy is currently in progress (NCT00528151).
Synthetic neuroprotective compounds: Santhera Pharmaceuticals has developed an analog of coenzyme Q10 called idebenone. It functions by inhibiting lipoperoxide formation. Santhera Pharmaceuticals is currently examining the safety and tolerability of idebenone in the treatment of Leber’s Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (NCT00747487). The trial is ongoing.
