- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
522 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
by a variety of enzymes into many different prostaglandins and leukotrienes. COX 1 is a constitutively expressed enzyme while COX 2 is induced by inflammation. Using a rodent model for ROP, one group demonstrated that COX 2 was heavily expressed in both retinal ganglion cells and in newly formed blood vessels (Wilkinson-Berka et al. 2003). Treatment with the COX 2 selective inhibitor, rofecoxib, resulted in a 37% decrease in blood vessels in this study.
Using several models of ocular angiogenesis, another group examined the effects of inhibiting either COX 1 or COX 2 (Castro et al. 2004). CNV was induced in Brown Norway rats using an argon laser while Hartley guinea pigs were treated with VEGF to produce intradermal extravasation of Evans Blue Dye (EBD)-albumin. They found that no NSAID was capable of blocking either laser CNV or VEGFinduced neovascularization. However, in corneal vascularization models inhibition of COX 2 (but not COX 1) had a significant effect. These data underscore the complexity of how different tissues within the eye respond to a similar therapeutic agent. A more recent survey of a variety of clinically relevant NSAIDs extended these observations by comparing the relative efficacy of blocking VEGF-mediated angiogenesis as compared to FGF-mediated angiogenesis using a corneal neovascularization model (Pakneshan et al. 2008). The authors found a great variability in the efficacy of different NSAIDs to inhibit VEGF-mediated angiogenesis from 3 (rofecoxib) to 66% (indomethacin). In comparison, inhibition of FGF-mediated angiogenesis was somewhat greater on average. Again, indomethacin provided the greatest degree of antiangiogenic efficacy. In this regard it is interesting to note that indomethacin has the ability to inhibit polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration, which is unrelated to its COX inhibitory activity (Goodwin 1984).
21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
It is estimated that as of this writing, 23 million people within the United States are diagnosed with diabetes and the number is increasing each year. Complications associated with diabetes are responsible for the majority of cases of blindness among working age populations in developed countries (Congdon et al. 2003), making the treatment of this disease of importance as a prophylactic measure to ensure retinal health. As the number of diabetes cases increases, so will ocular pathologies associated with this disease.
21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
There exist two forms of diabetes termed type I and type 2, which represent very different diseases. Type 1 diabetes, which was once called juvenile onset diabetes, is an autoimmune disease in which cytotoxic T cells attack and destroy the insulin secreting beta cells of the pancreas. This accounts for approximately 10% of diabetes cases. Type 2 diabetes is a metabolic disease which has many contributing factors.
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
523 |
Obesity coupled with lack of exercise tops the list of risk factors; a disconcerting fact given the degree of obesity in the world today (Han et al. 2010.). Type 2 diabetes is preceded by a long period in which the ability of insulin to function is compromised; a process which is called impaired glucose tolerance or insulin resistance. Decreased insulin function is compensated for by increased insulin production. The increased work load has its consequences, however, and over time, the beta cells die. Eventually, the pancreas can no longer produce enough insulin and the patient passes from a state of insulin resistance to diabetes.
The cause of eye disease, along with most other complications associated with diabetes, is high blood glucose. Glucose levels are only modestly increased during the prediabetic period; however, this is believed to be sufficient to begin to damage ocular tissues (Nguyen et al. 2007). One of the many functions of insulin is to promote the expression of the glucose transporter, GLUT4, on the surface of skeletal muscle cells as well as other tissues. Blood glucose can then passively move into the cell where it is quickly converted to glucose-6-phosphate, which cannot pass back through the channel, thus allowing glucose to steadily move out of the blood into its storage depot. The retina primarily expresses GLUT1 and GLUT3, which are not regulated by insulin. For this reason, the retina is considered “insulin independent.” All of these glucose transporters are upregulated during hypoxia allowing increased glucose to enter the cell. Elevated glucose levels have several pathological consequences, some of which are elaborated below.
Glycation: Glucose itself is reactive and can form glycation products with proteins. Initially the glycation, involving the formation of a Schiff base, is reversible. Over time, these modifications become permanent and are referred to as advanced glycation end-products (AGE). AGE have wide spread effects on both mechanical aspects of tissue properties as well as on signal transduction events necessary for tissue homeostasis. Within Bruch’s membrane, for example, AGEs bind to collagen. The receptor for AGE (RAGE) is engaged and promotes an inflammatory response (Yamagishi et al. 2005). Vitronection, discussed earlier in the context of angiogenesis, has also been shown to function as a target of glycation contributing to retinopathy (Hammes et al. 1996). Additionally, glycation has been shown to affect Ca++ channels on pericytes (Hughes et al. 2004). These support cells associated with retinal capillaries, upon glycation, become less sensitive to endothelin-1-mediated contraction signals.
Polyol accumulation: The second mechanism involves the conversion of glucose to sorbitol via aldose reductase (sometimes referred to as the polyol pathway). Since glucose movement into retinal tissues is insulin independent, high blood glucose leads to high retinal glucose. Glucose is preferentially utilized as a substrate by hexokinase. However, if glucose levels within the cell increase beyond the point where hexokinase can function, then the excess glucose is utilized by aldose reductase. Sorbitol, produced by aldose reductase, plays a role as an osmotic regulator along with myo-inositol and taurine. When sorbitol levels increase (due to increased cellular glucose), myo-inositol and taurine levels decrease. Alterations in signal transduction, due to decreases in myo-inositol and taurine, have been implicated in several diabetic complications including retinal dysfunction (Lorenzi 2007).
524 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
Conversion of glucose to sorbitol requires the conversion of NADPH to NADP. As the regeneration of glutathione (the primary means of protection against redox damage) also requires NADPH, the conversion of glucose to sorbitol decreases the ability of retinal tissue to respond to oxidative stress. Perhaps the best evidence of a role for aldose reductase in diabetic retinopathy comes from the study of aldose reductase deficient mice (Cheung et al. 2005). The authors, having created aldose reductase null mice (Ho et al. 2000), backcrossed the knockout allele into the C57BL/KsJ db/m strain to create aldose reductase deficient mice which spontaneously developed diabetes. Control littermates developed classic signs of diabetic retinopathy including a breakdown of the blood–brain barrier, loss of pericytes, and neovascularization. These pathological changes were significantly less severe in the aldose reductase null mice. Inhibition of aldose reductase is a viable therapeutic strategy; however, inhibitors such as sorbinil have been found to have limited efficacy due to delivery issues as well as toxicities that limit its usefulness (Tsai and Burnakis 1993). New delivery technologies may propel a resurgence of this target, however. One group has investigated the use of PLGA encapsulation to deliver the aldose reductase inhibitor, N-4-(benzoylaminophenylsulfonyl glycine) (BAPSG), in a sustained release implant to diabetic rats (Aukunuru et al. 2002). The formulation provided some improvement over oral dosing, lending hope to this strategy.
Diabetic retinopathy: Diabetic retinopathy can be divided into five pathophysiological events that occur at the level of the retinal capillary (Chew 2000). These include (1) the formation of microaneurysms, (2) an increase in vascular permeability, (3) the formation of vascular occlusions, (4) neovascularization and scarring, and (5) contraction of the scar and the vitreous. Visual impairment is most directly caused either by increased vascular permeability or by vascular occlusions. These in turn lead to macular edema and the formation of scar tissue (fibrovascular proliferation). The contraction of the scarred tissue can lead to distortions in vision or retinal detachment.
In the early stages of diabetic retinopathy, the basement membrane in discrete areas of the retina begins to thicken, helping to precipitate the ischemic stress that will ultimately produce neovascularization. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is believed to play a role in this process. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) binds to its cell surface receptor (uPAR) to initiate the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin (Fig. 21.4). Plasmin, in turn, cleaves and activates MMPs which act to balance synthesis and degradation rates for the ECM. PAI-1 levels are greatly increased in tissues of patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (Grant et al. 1996). Transgenic mice overexpressing PAI-1 showed thickened basement membranes around retinal capillaries (Grant et al. 2000). Interestingly, evidence suggests that neovascularization is promoted at a particular level of PAI-1 and that too much or too little disrupts this process. In a murine oxygen-induced retinopathy model using wild type and PAI-1 knockout mice it was found that lack of PAI-1 resulted in approximately a 50% decrease in neovascularization (Basu et al. 2009). Conversely, in a separate study PAI-1 was administered by intravitreal injection in a rat model of ROP and found to decrease neovascularization (Penn and Rajaratnam 2003). Consistent with this concept, researchers found that mice lacking PAI-1 showed
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
525 |
decreased levels of neovascularization (Lambert et al. 2003a). By treating these mice with 100 mg recombinant PAI-1 they restored neovascularization. However, when they treated wild type mice with the same dose of PAI-1 after input into the laser CNV model, neovascularization was inhibited. PAI-1 both inhibits plasmin formation and physically interacts with vitronectin. To determine which of these separate processes may be involved in neovascularization, this group made use of the PAI-1(Q123K) mutant, which is deficient in vitronectin binding but is still capable of inhibiting plasmin formation. Interestingly, this mutant was as capable as wild type PAI-1 in the restoration of disease, suggesting that it is the inhibition of plasmin formation that serves as a useful target.
PEDF, discussed previously, also appears to play a role in diabetic retinopathy. It is downregulated in neovascular ocular diseases and (as mentioned earlier) adenovirus expressed PEDF was shown to have some efficacy in the treatment of advanced AMD (Campochiaro et al. 2006). PEDF has also been found to decrease advanced glycosylation end-product (AGE) mediated angiogenesis in a cultured porcine retinal EC model (Sheikpranbabu et al. 2009). Intravitreal injections of PEDF were found to block the progression of early stages of diabetic retinopathy in the streptozotocin rat model (Yoshida et al. 2009).
VEGF, a potent inducer of neovascularization, is also an important mediator of vascular leakage. It causes this by increasing intracellular Ca++ levels and promoting the activation of PKC [reviewed in Dvorak et al. (1995)]. VEGF was actually first identified as a vascular permeability factor. It acts primarily on microvessels such as post capillary venules and has a potency that is 50,000 times greater than histamine. Permeability is increased through the opening of vesicular-vacuolar fenestrae, which span the length of the vascular endothelial cytoplasm. Numerous experiments have been performed examining the effects of modulating VEGF activity on DR.
Endogenous antiangiogenic proteins include the NC1 fragments of collagen: arrestin, canstatin, and tumstatin as described earlier. In addition, a fragment of plasminogen, termed angiostatin, has been shown to play a protective role in DR (Wahl et al. 2004). Angiostatin contains a number of triple disulfide bond-linked loops referred to as kringle domains which have powerful antiangiogenic properties (O’Reilly et al. 1994). Indeed, expression of the kringle 5 (K5) domain of plasminogen was able to ameliorate diabetes-induced retinal vascular leakage (Park et al. 2009).
Diabetic macular edema: Increased vascular permeability is an early (nonproliferative) stage of diabetic retinopathy and often occurs near the macula. The definition of diabetic macular edema (DME) is a thickening of the retina due to edema within one disc diameter of the macula (Chew 2000). Edema is often accompanied by a hard exudate, comprised of lipoprotein deposits. While edema may come and go with no consequence to visual acuity, these exudates have been associated with retinal damage and permanent vision loss.
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Data from animal models suggest that the blockage of capillaries might be due to the formation of micro-thrombi consisting of aggregates of leukocytes. Leukocyte interactions with blood vessels are altered in diabetic retinopathy through changes in the expression of integrins and their ligands.
