- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
504 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
21.2.2 Neovascularization
The high metabolic rate of retinal tissues creates a continual need for nutrients such that even a small perturbation will promote the production of proangiogenic factors. For reasons that are still unclear, these new blood vessels grow in ways that disturb retinal structure. Furthermore, these new vessels are leaky and the resultant extracellular fluid greatly interferes with photoreceptor function. Pathological angiogenesis (neovascularization) is associated with many ocular diseases and thus is of fundamental importance. Ocular examples of diseases with major angiogenic components include diabetic retinopathy, AMD, neovascular glaucoma, retinal vein occlusions, ocular tumors, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) (Andreoli and Miller 2007; Penn et al. 2008).
In the healthy eye, resting vasculature remains in a state of quiescence through a balance between a host of endogenous angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors. Pathological ocular angiogenesis can begin with a hypoxic signal, activating the transcription and expression of growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Penn et al. 2008). Inflammation can also trigger angiogenesis by the induction of VEGF (Ramanathan et al. 2009). Although VEGF can be secreted by many different cell types, the predominant source of ocular VEGF is the Müller glial cell population (Pierce et al. 1995). VEGF-mediated signal transduction plays a role in virtually all aspects of angiogenesis (Cross et al. 2003). In part, this is mediated by a complex web of signal transduction pathways associated with the VEGF receptor (VEGFR2). Autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues upon engagement of VEGF promotes the association of numerous intracellular signaling proteins including phospholipase C gamma (PLCg) and phosphatidyl inositol-3-kinase (PI3K) (summarized in Fig. 21.3). PLCg cleaves components of the plasma membrane to create an activating ligand for protein kinase C (PKC). PKC, in turn activates the small G protein, Raf, and the MAP kinase cascade. Activation of the MAPK cascade promotes cellular proliferation as well as increased motility. Recently, the MAPK-mediated increase in EC motility was mapped to the regulation of Rho kinase (Mavria et al. 2006). PI3K, in turn, activates the kinase; Akt and the GTPase; Rac. PI3K provides survival signals and, via the activation of Rac, promotes an increase in vascular permeability (Eriksson et al. 2003). The combined effects of VEGF on the vascular endothelium results in a coordinated pattern of cellular differentiation and migration: a process termed sprouting.
Sprouting depends on the coordinated patterning of endothelial cells (EC) of which the explorative lead cell is referred to as the tip cell and the following cells as the stalk cells (Ruhrberg et al. 2002; Gerhardt et al. 2003). All of these cells express VEGF receptors. The tip cell is established through the secretion of delta-like 4 (Dll4) which binds to the Notch receptor on neighboring EC. Engagement of Notch on neighboring cells inhibits the expression of VEGF responsive genes that establish the tip cell differentiation program and thus keep neighboring stalk cells from differentiating.
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
505 |
VEGF
VEGF receptor 2
|
PI3K |
PLCγ |
|
|
|
|
IP3 |
DAG |
|
|
|
|
PKC |
|
AKT |
|
Rac |
|
|
|
|
|
MAPK cascade |
|
Survival Signals |
Vascular Permaibility |
Proliferation |
||
Motility |
||||
|
|
|
||
Fig. 21.3 VEGF receptor 2 signal transduction. Engagement of VEGF receptor 2 by VEGF results in the activation of phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K) and phospholipase C gamma (PLCg). PI3K, in turn activates the kinase, AKT and the GTPase, Rac. AKT activity results in the inhibition of apoptotic signaling thus promoting survival. Rac functions to decrease cellular adhesion and thus increase vascular permeability. PLCg promotes the production of diacylglycerol (DAG) from the membrane which activates protein kinase C (PKC). PKC, in turn, activates the map kinase (MAPK) cascade which further bifurcates to promote cell division (proliferation), and cytoskeletal reorganization (increased motility)
Migration requires the localized degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) and selective interactions with integrins present on retinal cells. To this end VEGF induces the upregulation of factors such as urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), which promote EC degradation and the exposure of “cryptic” binding sites on integrins. A diagram of these interactions is shown in Fig. 21.4. UPA binds to its receptor (uPAR), located on the leading edge of the migrating EC (Binder et al. 2007). The binding of uPA to its receptor induces the activation of plasmin which, in turn, cleaves and activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) (Smith and Marshall 2010). MMPs then degrade numerous components of the ECM. The binding of uPA to uPAR also promotes clustering of uPAR and interactions with of uPAR complexes with vitronectin and with integrins promoting changes in integrin conformation. These changes activate a well-defined signal transduction cascade beginning with the activation of the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) as well as the Src kinase (Src) leading to actin assembly and the cytoskeletal modifications associated with migration (Binder et al. 2007; Streuli and Akhtar 2009). VEGF, by promoting vascular permeability, allows the exudation of plasma proteins which create an interim scaffold for migrating EC.
506 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
ECM
Pro-MMP |
MMP |
|
MMP |
GF plasmin
GF GF
uPA
uPAR
pro- |
uPA |
|
uPA |
||
|
||
uPAR uPAR |
||
uPA |
vitronectin |
|
uPAR |
α |
β |
|
|
GF
plasminogen |
Plasminogen |
|
receptor |
|
F-actin |
|
assembly |
Integrin |
|
α β |
3 |
v |
|
Src
FAK
p130Cas
Growth Factor (GF)
receptor
Fig. 21.4 The role of plasminogen in angiogenesis. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) cleaves plasminogen to plasmin. Plasmin contributes to angiogenesis in two ways. First, it activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) which act to breakdown components of the extracellular matrix. This increases the accessibility of growth factor receptors to interact with their ligands (GF). Additionally, plasmin processes a pre-pro form of uPA into its mature form which clusters and then interacts with avb3 integrins through vitronectin. Engagement of this integrin sends a signal via kinases such as the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and the Src kinase to promote cytoskeletal rearrangements via the activation of adaptor proteins such as p130Cas and paxillin (not shown). Cytoskeletal rearrangement is essential for tip and stalk cell movement as the new blood vessel is formed
Although VEGF appears to be a central regulator of angiogenesis, other receptor systems function to modulate VEGF activity. Basic fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) is a highly pleiotropic ligand with many different functions. In the context of vascular biology, FGF-2 has been shown to work through the modulation of VEGF action (Murakami and Simons 2008). FGF-2 signaling both induces the expression of VEGF and enhances VEGFR-2 responsiveness. The angiopoietin receptor (called Tie2) is a vascular specific receptor system that regulates EC survival and vessel maturation (Thomas and Augustin 2009). There are three ligands so far identified: angiopoietin 1, 2, and 3/4. Of these, angiopoietin 1 (Ang1) and Ang2 are the best characterized. Ang1 acts as an agonist of Tie2 whereas Ang2 acts in a more complicated fashion. Under some contexts it can function as an agonist (Kim et al. 2000; Teichert-Kuliszewska et al. 2001) and under other contexts it can function as an antagonist (Maisonpierre et al. 1997). The molecular basis for this complexity has not yet been elucidated. Hypoxia has been shown to upregulate the expression of Tie2, Ang1, and Ang2 in bovine retinas (Oh et al. 1999; Park et al. 2003). A study of human retinal tissues comparing ischemic retinal disease (primarily diabetic retinopathy) to nonischemic disease (idiopathic retinal pucker) found that Tie2 and
21 Druggable Targets and Therapeutic Agents for Disorders of the Back of the Eye |
507 |
Ang2 were upregulated in ischemic disease while Ang1 remained constant (Takagi et al. 2003). Disruption of one copy of Ang 2 (resulting in a decreased gene dosage and decreased Ang 2 protein) decreases angiogenesis in the oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mouse model (Feng et al. 2009). The complexity of angiogenesis has given rise to a plethora of potential targets. Some of these, such as anti-VEGF antibodies are currently in the clinic while others are in development. Other growth factors which might serve as targets include angiopoietin, FGF, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), platelet derived growth factor B (PDGF-B), and placental growth factor (PIGF). Chemokines which might serve as targets include interleukin 8 (IL-8), stromal cell derived factor 1 (SDF1), and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Receptor systems might include CXCR1, FGF-R, PIGFR, PDGFR, and the Tie-receptors. Intracellular signaling molecules might include c-kit, PI3 kinase, PKC, and Src. Finally, extracellular mediators might include integrins, cadherins, MMPs, and peptides or protein fragments derived from the ECM. Given the vastness of this subject only the most important subset of these potential targets will be considered in subsequent sections.
21.2.3 Degeneration
The cells of the retina are neuronal in nature and are susceptible to degeneration through loss of a survival factor, the presence of a toxic factor, mechanical trauma, or finally, the activation of cellular stress. Neurons require a continuous source of survival factors. This requirement is likely a holdover from the developmental need to trim unnecessary connections via an activity dependent survival process (Kuczewski et al. 2009). Here, target tissues release neurotrophic factors which are taken up by active synapses. These factors are transported back along the axon to the cell body where they provide an antiapoptotic signal that balances a proapoptotic signal. Neurons that have not produced active circuits are thus removed and no longer take up valuable nutrients. Some forms of retinal degeneration may involve a constriction in the optic nerve leading to loss of neurotrophic factors. Degeneration may also be caused by perturbations in blood flow leading to the inappropriate release of toxic factors such as glutamate or excessive levels of nitric oxide (NO). Glaucoma, a disease involving anterior ocular structures, induces changes leading to retinal degeneration via both of these mechanisms. Neuron cell death is associated with several ocular diseases. Some of the more common ones include glaucoma and inflammatory optic neuropathies such as that caused by multiple sclerosis, consecutive optic atrophy, and ischemic optic neuropathy. In addition to these diseases, genetic conditions such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) also result in an ocular pathology driven by cell death.
In general, besides mechanical trauma, neurons die either because of the presence of a toxic or proapoptotic compound or else because of the lack of a survival factor. This balance between neuronal death and survival is presumably a consequence of the mechanism by which connections are pruned within the CNS as described earlier.
508 |
R.I. Scheinman et al. |
Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, involves the ordered disassembly of the cell. This process is mediated by a family of cysteine aspartyl-specific proteases termed caspases (Earnshaw et al. 1999). These enzymes exist as zymogens, which are cleaved and thus activated in a cascade via either membrane receptors (the extrinsic pathway) or via mitochondrial factors (the intrinsic pathway) (Tempestini et al. 2003). The final (effector) caspases then target key proteins and DNA. The cell breaks into discrete vesicles which are quickly phagocytosed.
Glaucoma, while a disease of anterior structures, presents an excellent example of the interplay between these different forces leading ultimately to retinal degeneration. Ganglion cell axons which comprise the optic nerve pass out of the eyeball through a constriction called the lamina cribrosa. This sieve of lamellar connective tissue pores serves as a focal point for mechanical stress. Often, glaucoma is associated with IOP. This causes the constriction to tighten and thus cuts off the flow of material along the axons. Most important for this discussion, survival factors such as brain-derived growth factor (BDNF) and NGF are actively transported in the retrograde direction from synapses located in the lateral geniculate area of the cortex to the cell bodies located in the retina. Indeed a buildup of these factors has been observed at the lamina cribrosa in both humans and in animal models of glaucoma (Hollander et al. 1995; Pease et al. 2000; Quigley et al. 2000; Soto et al. 2008). Additionally, mitochondrial damage has also been observed (Ju et al. 2009; Osborne 2010). Increased ocular pressure also affects glial cells. These cells secrete cytokines such as TNFa (Yuan and Neufeld 2000; Tezel 2008), and NO (Neufeld 1999; Liu and Neufeld 2001), which function to activate inflammatory cells.
Control of increased ocular pressure does not always result in improved vision for glaucoma patients, indicating that other factors must be important. Separate from increased ocular pressure, glaucoma is also associated with a dysregulation in vascular perfusion. Vascular dysregulation has been divided into primary and secondary etiologies. Primary dysregulation, an inborn genetic trait, is associated with conditions such as Reynaud phenomena and migraine, and serves as a risk factor for glaucoma. Secondary dysregulation is associated with the onset of conditions that increase the vasoconstrictor protein; endothelin-1 (ET-1), such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus but does not increase glaucoma risk (Grieshaber et al. 2007). Exogenous ET-1 does induce lamina cribrosa ischemia and RGC loss, however, strongly implicating it as a pathogenic factor causing RGC loss (Chauhan 2008). While a causal relationship has yet to be established between vascular dysregulation and RGC degeneration in human glaucoma, animal model data is consistent with this hypothesis (Lau et al. 2006; Krishnamoorthy et al. 2008; Munemasa et al. 2008). Decreased perfusion at the lamina cribrosa can result in increased MMP expression, increased NO production, and increased glutamate secretion; all of which may contribute to RGC apoptosis (Agarwal et al. 2009).
Protein misfolding can also be a cause of retinal neuron degeneration. A number of nascent protein chains are carefully guided to their final confirmation by a series of chaperone proteins (Surguchev and Surguchov 2010). These include large multisubunit enzymes and intrinsically unstructured proteins. Unfolded proteins tend to aggregate through associations among hydrophobic amino acid residues and inappropriate
