- •Drug Product Development for the Back of the Eye
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 A Strategic Overview of Drug Delivery Systems
- •1.3 Specific Approaches to Drug Delivery for the Posterior Segment
- •1.3.1 The Influence of Physicochemical Properties on Drug Delivery and Pharmacokinetics
- •1.3.2 The Chosen Route of Administration
- •1.3.3 Location of the Target Tissue
- •1.3.4 Potency of the Drug
- •1.3.5 Need for Continuous or Pulsatile Delivery
- •1.3.6 Duration of Drug Delivery Necessary to Induce and Maintain Efficacy
- •1.3.7 Type of Drug Delivery System Selected
- •1.3.8 Pharmacokinetic (PK) Properties of the Drug
- •1.3.9 Local and Systemic Toxicity of the Drug and its Metabolites
- •1.3.10 Previous Ocular Use of Excipients
- •1.3.11 Development and Strategic Team Input
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 Posterior Segment as a Sampling Site
- •2.3 Principle of Microdialysis
- •2.3.1 Extraction Efficiency/Recovery
- •2.4.1 Anesthetized Animal Models
- •2.4.2 Conscious Animal Model
- •2.5 Vitreal Pharmacokinetics in Animals Other than Rabbits
- •2.6 Summary
- •References
- •3.1 Commercial Fluorophotometer
- •3.2 Normal Human Subject and Rabbit Ocular Fluorescence
- •3.3 Fluorophotometry Applications
- •3.3.1 Tear Turnover Rate (%/min)
- •3.3.2 Corneal Epithelial Cell Layer Permeability Methodologies
- •3.3.3 Eye Bath Technique
- •3.3.4 Single Drop Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.3.5 Eye Bath Technique to Measure Epithelial Permeability
- •3.4 Clinical Applications of Fluorophotometry
- •3.5.1 Transscleral Pathways
- •3.5.2 Suprachoroidal Injection
- •3.6 Retrobulbar Fluorescein Injection
- •3.7 Intravenous Fluorescein Injection In Vivo
- •3.8 Ocular Uptake of Fluorescein from Topical Eye Drops
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.1.1 Role of the Blood-Retinal Barrier as a Dynamic Interface
- •4.1.2 Potential Approach of Blood-Retinal Barrier-Targeted Systemic Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •4.2.1 Amino Acid-Mimetic Drugs
- •4.2.2 Monocarboxylic Drugs
- •4.2.3 Nucleoside Analogs
- •4.2.4 Folate Analogs
- •4.2.5 Organic Cationic Drugs
- •4.2.6 Opioid Peptides and Peptidomimetic Drugs
- •4.2.7 Antioxidants
- •4.2.7.1 Vitamin C
- •4.2.7.2 Vitamin E
- •4.2.7.3 Cystine
- •4.2.8 Miscellaneous Protective Compounds
- •4.2.8.1 Creatine
- •4.2.8.2 Taurine
- •4.3.1 Organic Anion Transporter 3 (OAT3, SLC22A8)
- •4.3.3 P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1)
- •4.3.4 Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins (ABCCs)
- •4.3.6 ABCAs
- •4.4 Conclusions and Perspectives
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.2 Drug Distribution
- •5.2.1 Drug Distribution from the Anterior Ocular Surface to the Posterior Segment
- •5.2.2 Studies of Trans-Corneal and Periocular Drug Delivery to the Retina
- •5.2.2.1 The Uvea-Scleral Route
- •5.3 Eye Drops for Posterior Segment Diseases in the Clinic
- •5.4 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.2 Vitreous Anatomy
- •6.2.1 The Inner Limiting Membrane
- •6.3 The Vitreous As a Drug Reservoir
- •6.4 Flow Processes in the Vitreous
- •6.4.1 Flow Patterns
- •6.4.2 Injection and Hydrostatic Effects
- •6.4.3 Diffusion
- •6.4.4 Convective Flow
- •6.5 Clearance Pathways from the Vitreous Compartment
- •6.5.1 Charge and Collagen Interaction
- •6.5.2 Aqueous Clearance
- •6.5.3 Retinal Clearance
- •6.6 Transfer Through the Vitreoretinal Border
- •6.6.1 The Role of the Blood–Retinal Barrier
- •6.6.1.1 Amino Acid Transport
- •6.6.1.2 P-Glycoprotein
- •6.6.1.3 Organic Cationic Transporters
- •6.6.1.4 Organic Anion Transporters
- •6.6.1.5 Other Transporters
- •6.7 The Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.1 Underlying Mechanisms of Vitreous Degeneration
- •6.7.2 Physical Changes Involved in the Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.1 Pre-Clinical Model of Ageing Vitreous
- •6.7.2.2 Effects of Vitreous Liquefaction on Intravitreal Drug Delivery
- •6.7.3 Vitrectomised Eyes
- •6.7.3.1 Intravitreal Drug Distribution and Clearance in Silicone Oil
- •6.7.4 Role of Ocular Movements in Disordered Vitreous
- •6.8 Concluding Remarks
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Drug Delivery to Posterior Segment Ocular Tissues
- •7.3 Scleral Structure and Drug Delivery
- •7.4 Scleral Permeability: Initial Studies
- •7.5 Sustained-Release Delivery In Vitro
- •7.6 In Vivo Studies
- •7.7 Conclusions and Future Directions
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.2 Background
- •8.3 Posterior Segment Delivery
- •8.4 Transscleral and Intrascleral Drug Delivery
- •8.5 Suprachoroidal Drug Delivery
- •8.6 Summary
- •References
- •9.1 Introduction
- •9.2 Nonbiodegradable Ocular Drug Delivery Systems
- •9.2.1 Retisert
- •9.2.2 Ocusert
- •9.2.3 Vitrasert
- •9.2.4 I-vation
- •9.2.5 Iluvien
- •9.2.6 Nonbiodegradable Matrix Implants
- •9.2.6.2 Punctal Plugs
- •9.3 Medical Applications for Biodegradable Polymers
- •9.3.3 Poly(Ortho Esters)
- •9.3.4 Polyanhydrides
- •9.5.1 Ozurdex™
- •9.5.2 Surodex
- •9.5.3 Verisome
- •9.5.4 Lacrisert
- •9.6.1 Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Implants
- •9.6.2 PLGA-Based Implants
- •9.6.5 Poly(Ortho Ester)-Based Implants
- •9.6.6 Polyanhydride-Based Implants
- •9.6.7 Other Biodegradable Polymer-Based Implants
- •9.7 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.2 Manufacturing of Microparticles
- •10.3 Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.1 Morphological Characterization of Microparticles
- •10.3.2 Particle Size Analysis and Distribution
- •10.3.3 Infrared Absorption Spectrophotometry (IR)
- •10.3.4 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
- •10.3.5 X-Ray Diffraction
- •10.3.6 Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)
- •10.3.7 Determination of Drug Loading Efficiency
- •10.3.8 “In Vitro” Release Studies
- •10.3.8.1 Additives in Microspheres
- •10.4 Sterilization of Microparticles
- •10.5 Calculation of the Dose of Microparticles for Injection
- •10.6 Injectability Studies
- •10.7 In Vivo Studies
- •10.7.1 In Vivo Injection of Microparticles
- •10.7.2 Ocular Disposition and Cellular Uptake
- •10.7.3 Tolerance of Microparticles
- •10.7.4 In Vivo Degradation of PLA and PLGA Microparticles
- •10.8 In Vitro and In Vivo Correlation
- •10.9 Microparticles for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Diseases. Animal Models and Human Studies
- •10.9.1 Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy (PVR)
- •10.9.2 Uveitis
- •10.9.3 Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
- •10.9.4 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •10.9.5 Macular edema
- •10.9.6 Acute Retinal Necrosis (ARN)
- •10.9.7 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Retinitis
- •10.9.8 Choroidal Neovascularization
- •10.9.9 Diseases Affecting the Optic Nerve
- •10.9.11 Microparticles in Retinal Repair
- •10.10 Conclusions
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 Nanoparticles
- •11.2.1 Polymer Nanoparticles
- •11.2.2 Liposomes and Lipid Nanoparticles
- •11.2.3 Micelles
- •11.2.4 Protein Nanoparticles
- •11.2.5 Carbohydrate Nanoparticles
- •11.2.6 Dendrimers
- •11.2.7 Combination Nanosystems
- •11.3 Using Nanotechnology to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.3.1 Improving Patient Compliance
- •11.3.2 Increasing Drug Retention and Sustained Release
- •11.3.3 Increasing Permeability and Tissue Partitioning
- •11.3.4 Targeting Nanotherapies
- •11.3.5 Intracellular Trafficking
- •11.4 Alternative Approaches to Improve Ocular Therapeutics
- •11.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.2 Hydrogel Technology
- •12.6 Future Directions
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 General Design Considerations
- •13.2.1 Administration Site
- •13.2.2 Body Design
- •13.2.3 Port Design
- •13.2.4 Vacuum and Pressure
- •13.2.5 Flushing and Fluid Replacement
- •13.2.5.1 Active Pumps
- •13.2.5.2 Passive Systems
- •13.2.5.3 Solid Refill
- •13.2.6 Contamination Potential
- •13.3 Historical Influences
- •13.3.1 Infusion Pumps
- •13.3.2 Glaucoma Drainage Devices
- •13.3.3 Pioneering of Refill Procedure in the Eye
- •13.4 Ophthalmic Refillable Devices
- •13.4.1 Invasiveness and Refilling Frequency
- •13.4.2 Intravitreal Delivery Through the Pars Plana
- •13.4.3 Episcleral Implantation for Trans-Scleral Delivery
- •13.4.4 Subretinal and Suprachoroidal Implantation
- •13.4.5 Lens Capsule Delivery
- •13.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Current Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye
- •14.3 Improved Methods of Drug Delivery to the Eye Using Microneedles
- •14.3.1 Intrastromal Delivery to the Cornea Using Coated Microneedles
- •14.3.3 Suprachoroidal Delivery Using Hollow Microneedles
- •14.4 Microneedle Types and Other Applications
- •14.4.1 Poke and Apply
- •14.4.2 Coat and Poke
- •14.4.3 Poke and Release
- •14.4.4 Poke and Flow
- •14.5 Discussion
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 General Mechanisms of Iontophoretic Drug Delivery
- •15.1.2 The Shunt Pathway
- •15.1.3 The Flip–Flop Gating Mechanism
- •15.1.4 Electro-Osmosis
- •15.2 Ocular Drug Delivery: The Past and the Future
- •15.3 Ophthalmic Applications of Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis
- •15.3.1.1 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Antimitotics
- •15.3.1.2 Transconjunctival Iontophoresis of Anesthetics
- •15.3.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.1 Transcorneal of Fluorescein Iontophoresis for Aqueous Humor Dynamic Studies
- •15.3.2.2 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.3.2.3 Transcorneal Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.3.2.4 Other Drugs for Transcorneal Iontophoresis
- •15.3.2.5 Is Transcorneal Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4 Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.4.1 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antibiotics
- •15.4.2 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Antiviral Drugs
- •15.4.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- •15.4.3.1 Aspirin
- •15.4.3.2 Glucocorticoids
- •15.4.3.3 Transscleral Iontophoresis of Carboplatin
- •15.4.3.4 Is Transscleral Iontophoresis Safe?
- •15.4.3.5 Transscleral Iontophoresis for High Molecular Weight Compounds and Proteins
- •15.4.3.6 Clinical Application of Transscleral Iontophoresis
- •15.5 Applications of Iontophoresis to Ocular Gene Therapy
- •15.6 Future Developments
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Background
- •16.2.1 Intravitreal Injections
- •16.2.2 Impact of Genetics
- •16.3 Better Tools for Delivery and Treatment
- •16.3.1 Barriers to Success
- •16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
- •16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
- •16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
- •16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
- •16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
- •16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
- •16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
- •16.3.2.7 Possible Strategies to Improve Electric Field-Mediated Drug Delivery
- •16.3.3 Experiences with Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.1 Examples of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.3.2 Summary of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Iontophoresis
- •16.3.4 Experiences with Electroporation
- •16.3.4.1 Examples of Electroporation in Living Animals
- •16.3.4.2 Strengths and Weaknesses of Electroporation
- •16.4 Outstanding Issues in Electric Fields for the Delivery of Drugs
- •16.5 Summary
- •References
- •17.1 Introduction
- •17.2 Routes of Protein Administration
- •17.2.1 Topical
- •17.2.2 Intracameral
- •17.2.3 Intravitreal
- •17.2.4 Periocular (Transscleral)
- •17.2.5 Suprachoroidal
- •17.2.6 Subretinal
- •17.2.7 Systemic
- •17.3 Advantages and Challenges of Protein Delivery
- •17.4 Current Development Strategies
- •17.4.1 Pure Protein
- •17.4.2 PEGylation
- •17.4.4 Liposomes
- •17.4.5 Stem Cells
- •17.4.6 Implants
- •17.5 Case Studies
- •17.6 Ophthalmic Protein Formulation Development
- •17.6.1 Protein Biosynthesis
- •17.6.2 Preformulation Studies
- •17.6.3 Selection of Excipients
- •17.6.4 Optimization of Process Variables
- •17.7 Specifications and Regulatory Guidelines
- •17.8 Conclusions
- •References
- •18.1 Need for Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.2 Background
- •18.3 Development of Drug Suspensions Intended for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.1 Drug Suspensions
- •18.3.1.1 Physical Pharmacy Principles that Explain the Stability and Formulation of Suspensions
- •18.3.1.2 Formulation Methodology
- •18.3.1.3 Manufacturing Process
- •18.3.2 Factors To Be Considered in Suspension Development for the Back of the Eye
- •18.3.2.1 Formulation Development and Evaluation
- •18.3.2.2 In Situ Forming Suspensions, Selection of Drug Form for Suspension, and Polymeric Microparticle Suspension
- •18.3.2.3 Clinical Studies on Safety
- •18.4 Conclusions
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 Drug Product Approval Process
- •19.3 Considerations for Back of the Eye Treatments
- •19.4 Adaptive Trial Design
- •19.5 Drug-Device Combinations
- •19.6 Product Summary Basis of Approval Reviews
- •19.6.1 OZURDEX™
- •19.6.2 LUCENTIS™
- •19.7 Summary
- •References
- •20.1 Background
- •20.2 FDA Endpoints
- •20.3 Endpoints for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Table 20.1)
- •20.4 FDA Guidelines for Other Retinal Diseases
- •20.5 Endpoint for Geographic Atrophy
- •20.6 Endpoint for Retinal Vein Occlusion
- •20.7 Future Endpoints
- •References
- •21.1 Introduction
- •21.2 Ocular Physiology and Pathology
- •21.2.1 Ocular Inflammation
- •21.2.2 Neovascularization
- •21.2.3 Degeneration
- •21.3 Current Therapies for Key Back of the Eye Disorders
- •21.3.1 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •21.3.1.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.1.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.1.3 Current Research Focused on Identifying New Targets
- •21.3.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •21.3.2.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.2.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.3 Retinopathy of Prematurity
- •21.3.3.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.3.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use and in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.4 Degenerative Conditions
- •21.3.4.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.4.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.5 Opportunistic Infections
- •21.3.5.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.5.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.3.6 Autoimmune Disease
- •21.3.6.1 Pathophysiology
- •21.3.6.2 Therapeutics Either in Current Use or in Clinical Trials
- •21.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •22.1 Bile Acids as Anti-Apoptotic Neuroprotectants
- •22.3 Potential Need for Local Delivery of Bile Acids as Neuroprotectants
- •22.4 Preliminary Studies of Ocular Delivery of Bile Acids
- •22.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
394 |
J.M. Nickerson and J.H. Boatright |
entrapment that keep a drug from its target, (7) transport processes such as those at the nuclear pore or cell membrane that actively transport drug out of a target subcellular compartment, and (8) failure to activate the drug or agent intracellularly.
16.3.2 Physics-Based Approaches
As we have so few tools in the armamentarium of drug delivery to the eye (Geroski and Edelhauser 2000), it is wise to fully consider all those available and then carefully develop new ones to supplement existing technology.
Physics in medical therapy is often found in radiation oncology: Ionizing radiation (such as X-rays, gamma-rays, and particles) is used to kill cancerous tumors. Laser photocoagulation, cryotherapy, and TTT are the standard of treatment for several ophthalmological diseases, and all are straightforward applications of physics. Cautery, cutting, etc., in surgery are but too common to recognize the underlying physical principles. Given the broad use of physical principles in medicine is seems useful, if not wise, to consider physical approaches to deliver drugs.
16.3.2.1 Physical Methods to Deliver Drugs to a Target Cell in the Posterior Segment
Pressure changes: (1) hydrodynamic pressure is very effective in liver (Liu et al. 1999) but it seems unlikely to be applicable to the eye, as the sclera is tough, preventing stretching of retinal cells, without excess pressure damaging the ONH. An exception may be bleb formation that stretches cells, such as, subretinal blebs, (2) Stretching the plasma membrane by sonoporation is effective in vitro. A laser beam focused to one micron size can open pores transiently if the laser is focused selectively on the cell membrane in vitro (Nikolskaya et al. 2006). Direct microinjection into the target cell or into its nucleus by ballistic or jet injection: This route seems unlikely given the toughness and thickness of the sclera. The application of electric fields in therapy is well known. Defibrillators are commonplace. Tiny current densities are effective in neurostimulation. Examples include the cochlear implant for sensory stimulation and the cardiac pacemaker, widely used and highly successful for low or irregular heart rhythms. Low-voltage iontophoresis has been used since the early 1900's to deliver charged drugs into skin and the eye.
16.3.2.2 History of Electrical Fields in Medicine
There is a long history, back to Roman times, for the use of electric fields in medicine. Quoting from Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cranial_electrotherapy_ stimulation, accessed on July 28, 2010:
“Electrotherapy” has been in use for at least 2000 years, as shown in the (clinical) literature of the early Roman physician, Scribonius Largus. (He wrote) in the Compositiones Medicae
16 Drug and Gene Therapy Mediated by Physical Methods |
395 |
of 46 AD that his patients should stand on a live black torpedo fish for the relief of a variety of medical conditions, including gout and headaches. Claudius Galen (131–201 AD) also recommended using the shocks from the electrical fish for medical therapies.
16.3.2.3 Safety Concerns with Electric Fields
For an electric field-based treatment to be effective, exposures that exceed suggested occupational and public limits might be required. Standards for occupational and public exposure limits to electrical and magnetic fields can be found at http:// www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/elf_ehc/en/index.html.
Exposure of the head to sufficient electric or magnetic fluxes induce phosphenes (Taki et al. 2003). The effect is direct and experimentally repeatable. The exact mechanisms by which phosphenes are generated is not known, whether a physiological property of the retina or central visual pathways. Nonetheless, these phosphenes suggest an effect of electromagnetism on physiological processes and a route that may be exploited for treatment purposes. These potential treatment avenues must be carefully balanced by the serious risks of exposures that cause severe damage by excessive heating.
Safety precautions should be taken in any procedure employing electric fields, electronics, or electrical equipment. The reader’s environment health and safety office is a resource for appropriate information. It is obvious that voltages and currents that are too high will result in massive cell death, and in extreme circumstances tissue will vaporize and burn, leading to electrocution and death. Less appreciated is that vasoconstriction occurs during application of low currents. Only a short duration of vasoconstriction is needed to result the pooling of blood and thrombus formation. However, as with any therapeutic approach, given proper deference, the electric field can be a useful tool in the delivery of drugs to a specific target cell or tissue. Here we review evidence that electrical fields can be used to deliver drugs to specific targets in the cell and subcellular compartments without damage to surrounding tissues in living animals.
16.3.2.4 Definitions of Electric Field Methods
An understanding of electric fields in drug delivery requires definitions of the methods by which particles are acted upon:
(a)Electrophoresis is the technique to move charged particles in an electric field over macroscopic distances in realistic amounts of time. In the laboratory, it is routine to move double-stranded DNAs of 1–10 kilobase lengths in an electric field of a few volts per cm, over distances of 1–15 cm in about an hour in an agarose gel in an aqueous medium. The velocity of electrophoretic movement is directly proportional to the strength of the electric field, the dielectric constant
396 |
J.M. Nickerson and J.H. Boatright |
of the media, the zeta potential (surface charge of the particle), and inversely proportional to the viscosity of the media and the log of the molecular weight of the DNA.
(b)Iontophoresis is a noninvasive method of moving large concentrations of a charged substance by using direct electrical current. A chamber, reservoir, or a patch containing a charged drug is connected to an electrode of the same sign, repelling the drug and moving it into tissue. Typical settings are 1–10 mA/cm2 for 1–10 min. Iontophoresis may increase the effective permeability of a drug by
(a) electrophoresis of the drug through extracellular spaces among cells, (b) the electric field may increase the number and size of microscopic pores through tissues by unclogging them, and (c) concomitant electroendosmosis, as discussed in the next paragraph.
(c)Electroendosmosis is the movement of an uncharged solute with a polar solvent, carrying the drug with the solvent into a tissue. Tissues themselves have charged groups on the surfaces of membranes and in extracellular matrices, which in the case of skin or sclera carry net negative charges at neutral pH. These stationary groups remain ionized as long as the solution is neutral or basic. These fixed negative groups in an electric field are attracted by the anode. As they are immobile in the tissue, they cannot migrate. This results in compen-
sation by the counterflow of H3O+ ions toward the cathode. As the H+ ions are shared across numerous H2O molecules there is a net solvent migration toward the cathode. Transscleral electroendosmosis enhances the flux of positively charged drugs and retards negative ones. For small drugs, the effects of electroendosmosis are relatively small compared to electrophoresis, but the contribution of electroendosmosis to transport increases with molecular size of the drug. For macromolecules and nanoparticles, the effect of electroendosmosis is expected to be dominant.
(d)Electrostimulation is mediated through a direct effect of an electric field on voltage-gated ion channels, opening or closing the channel.
(e)Electroporation, also known as electropermeabilization, is a large increase in permeability of the plasma membrane caused by an externally applied electrical field. The increased permeability of the cell membrane is attributed to formation of small holes or pores when the voltage across the plasma membrane exceeds its dielectric coefficient. Typically, a potential difference of 0.1–1 V across the plasma membrane, which is about 7.5 nm in thickness, is sufficient to transiently open pores with a diameter in the range of 1–10 nm on the surface of the plasma membrane. During or shortly after the application of the field, small pores may fuse with others to form large pores. Numerous commercial instruments that provide accurate pulses and pulse trains of appropriate voltages are readily available. These are used routinely in the research laboratory to transfect bacteria and eukaryotic cells grown in culture. Upwards of 50–90% of eukaryotic cells are transfected and survive under controlled conditions in vitro. The application of electroporation to living animals has been tested successfully, though at reduced and quite variable transfection efficiencies. Morphology, ongoing physiologic processes, and distribution/distortion of electric fields are more difficult to control in vivo, which lead to compromises and a generally less
16 Drug and Gene Therapy Mediated by Physical Methods |
397 |
efficacious outcome in living animals. Even so, remarkable results have been obtained recently.
The goal of electroporation is to open pores transiently, allow diffusion of the drug or agent across the plasma membrane, and provide for the closing or resealing of the pores. The profile of pore closing has three phases: a rapid (microsecond), medium (millisecond), and slow (1–10 s) phase. The latter stage may cause too much equilibration of substances on either side of the membrane, which could be lethal. Obviously, pores that remain open permanently will result in cell death.
Interest in electroporation has been kindled because of the dramatic successes and deadly failures of viral-mediated gene therapies. Immunogenicity of viruses is a major concern in gene therapy; this is mitigated in several ways. Reducing the amount or size of the virus, use of reduced antigenicity viruses, or simply eliminating the virus altogether. Selecting the best virus has led to AAV. Subretinal delivery of genetic material using recombinant AAV has led to promising results in animals and the initiation of clinical trials in LCA2 patients with a defect in RPE65. This route of delivery creates a localized retinal detachment, and there are some concerns about the hazards of the delivery technique and unknown potential risks. This leads to consideration of other potential ways of treating gene defects that cause ophthalmic diseases. Instead of subretinal injection, intravitreal injections have been attempted in animal models of LCA2. Intravitreal injection of naked plasmid DNA is not efficient due to rapid digestion of the plasmid by nucleases, dilution, and nonspecific binding to the vitreous. Also, the plasmid is not delivered to the putative target cells of the retina because of limited diffusion of these very large molecules (MW ~2 million Daltons) within the comparatively large space of the vitreous.
16.3.2.5 Advantages of Electric Fields for DNA Transfection vs. Viral Mediated DNA Delivery
1. Lower immunogenicity of naked DNA compared to high antigenicity of virus proteins.
2. Ease and lower costs of preparation of large quantities of plasmid DNA compared to virus production.
3. Easier preparation of endotoxin-free plasmid with fewer contaminants than are found in viral preparations.
16.3.2.6 Problems of In Vivo Electric Field Applications
1. Size differential matters: Large cells may receive too much current resulting in damage, while small cells receive too little current to allow transfection.
2. Irregular patterns and arrangement of cells can distort the electric field.
3. The voltage at the cell membrane depends on the shape and orientation of the cell, resulting in too many pores in some cells in one orientation and to few pores in differently oriented cells of the same type.
398 |
J.M. Nickerson and J.H. Boatright |
4. Blood, lymph, and aqueous clear out drugs rapidly regardless of delivery method if the drug enters into one of those flow streams. Fluorescence angiography highlights the wash-out process. Also, fluorescein angiography indicates where it is possible to deliver drugs in the eye via circulation. The comparatively short time that fluorescein remains detectable in the eye tells us the short time that ordinary drugs will remain at a target cell in the eye if delivered through the circulation. Coordinated angiography and electroporation pulse delivery could allow a real time choice for maximum drug in the target tissue. Drugs need to be designed to latch on to their target cell in the eye. Comparing the same drug delivery technique in living and postmortem animals underscores the impact of flow and clearance mechanisms on drug delivery. Many approaches appear effective in postmortem animals, but few work as well in the living animal.
5. Damage to cells may take place by any of several routes:
Vasoconstriction by an electric field leads to pooled blood and clot-formation (Palanker et al. 2008). This is distinct from burn damage. There is a clear relationship of current density and pulse duration that defines a threshold above which vasoconstriction occurs. It is important to operate below this threshold to minimize tissue damage, as clots will adversely affect treatment outcomes. If it is necessary to use conditions above the threshold, anticlotting agents may be required.
Electrochemical reactions at the surface interface between metal and liquids or tissues result in the production of toxic substances. Oxygen and hydrogen gas bubbles are generated by electrolysis at the electrodes, which can interrupt current flow and alter reservoir contents. The pH of reservoir solutions changes during current flow because of electrolysis. The pH change can be great, resulting in damage to biologic membranes and tissues, in essence a chemical burn. One way to prevent pH changes in reservoirs is to continuously replace reservoir solutions and another is to buffer them. Also, toxic agents or pH changes can be minimized by increasing the distance from the metal–liquid interface location (at the cathode and anode) to the contact point with the tissue. Membrane technologies have improved drug delivery and safety by blocking movement of the electrochemical products generated at the electrode. Monitoring the pH near the electrodes or at the site of contact with a tissue may be wise during any electric field treatment.
Cells may die by any of several routes as caused by an electric field. It may become necessary to reduce or postpone cell death by pretreatment with antiapoptotic or antinecrotic drugs, such as TUDCA (Boatright et al. 2006).
Extent of heating by electric current–Joule heating: The amount of energy delivered to a tissue can result in thermal damage. Temperature rise during an electrical pulse can be estimated and is a function of current density, pulse duration, resistivity of the tissue and medium, tissue density, and the tissue’s heat capacity.
Damage needs to be monitored during and after electric field application. Edema, inflammation, hypoxia, ischemia, anoxia, glucopenia, reperfusion injury,
