- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Method
- •1.2.1 Databases
- •1.2.2 Dates
- •1.2.3 Keywords
- •1.2.4 Criteria for Inclusion
- •1.2.5 Criteria for Exclusion
- •1.2.6 Selection of Papers
- •1.3 Results
- •1.3.1 Subspecialty
- •1.3.2 Type of Telemedicine
- •1.3.3 Study Design
- •1.3.4 Final Conclusions of Papers
- •1.4 Discussion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 The Need for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programs
- •2.4 Guidelines for Referring Patients
- •2.7 Program Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.9 Program Personnel and Operations
- •2.9.1 Primary Care Providers
- •2.9.2 Photographers
- •2.9.3 Clinical Consultants
- •2.9.4 Administrators
- •2.9.5 A Note to CEOs, Operations Directors, and Clinic Managers
- •2.10 Policies and Procedures
- •2.10.1 Sample Protocol 1
- •2.10.1.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Services
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.2 Sample Protocol 2
- •2.10.2.1 Pupil Dilation Before Diabetic Retinopathy Photography
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.3 Sample Protocol 3
- •2.10.3.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Photography Review
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.11 Technical Requirements
- •2.11.1 Connectivity
- •2.11.2 Resolution
- •2.11.3 Color
- •2.11.4 Stereopsis
- •2.11.5 Compression
- •2.11.6 Enhancement
- •2.11.7 Pupil Dilation
- •2.11.8 Early California Telemedicine Initiatives Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.11.9 The American Indian Diabetes Teleophthalmology Grant Program
- •2.11.10 Central Valley EyePACS Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Project
- •2.12.1 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •2.12.1.1 ADA Guidelines Terms
- •2.12.1.2 Vitrectomy
- •References
- •3: Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 History of Stereopsis and Stereopsis in Ophthalmology
- •3.3 Technology and Photography
- •3.3.3 Imaging Fields
- •3.3.4 Image Viewing Techniques
- •3.3.5 Image Compression
- •3.4 Stereoscopic Teleophthalmology Systems
- •3.4.1 University of Alberta
- •3.4.4 Joslin Vision Network
- •3.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Main Outcome Measures
- •4.3 Results
- •4.3.1 Retinal Video Recording Versus Retinal Still Photography
- •4.3.2 Video Compression Analysis
- •4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Automated, Remote Image Analysis of Retinal Diseases
- •5.1.2 Telehealth
- •5.2 Design Requirements
- •5.2.1 Telehealth Network Architecture
- •5.2.2 Work Flow
- •5.2.3 Performance Evaluation of the Network
- •5.3 Automated Image Analysis Overview
- •5.3.1 Quality Assessment Module
- •5.3.2 Vascular Tree Segmentation
- •5.3.3 Quality Evaluation
- •5.4 Anatomic Structure Segmentation
- •5.4.1 Optic Nerve Detection
- •5.4.2 Macula
- •5.4.3 Lesion Segmentation
- •5.4.4 Lesion Population Description
- •5.4.5 Image Query
- •5.5 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3 Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Leakage
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Patients and Methods
- •7.2.1 Participants
- •7.2.2 Methods
- •7.2.3 Statistics
- •7.3 Results
- •7.3.1 Reliability of Image Evaluation
- •7.3.2 Prevalence of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Atrophy
- •7.4 Discussion
- •7.5 Perspectives
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Homology Between Retinal and Systemic Microvasculature
- •8.1.3 Need for More Precise CVD Risk Prediction
- •8.2.1 Retinal Microvascular Signs
- •8.2.2 Retinal Vessel Biometry
- •8.2.3 Newer Retinal Imaging for Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.3 Associations of Retinal Imaging and CVD Risk
- •8.3.1.1 Risk of Pre-clinical CVD
- •8.3.1.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.1.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.1 Risk of Hypertension
- •8.3.2.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.2.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.4 Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease
- •8.3.3 Newer Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.4 Retinal Imaging and Its Potential as a Tool for CVD Risk Prediction
- •References
- •9.1 Alzheimer’s Disease
- •9.2 Treatments
- •9.3 Diagnosis
- •9.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Stroke
- •10.1.2 Heart Disease
- •10.1.3 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.2 Purpose
- •10.3 Method
- •10.3.1 Medical Approach
- •10.3.2 Technical Approach
- •10.3.3 Output of Medical Data
- •10.4 Patients
- •10.5 Results
- •10.5.1 Medical History
- •10.5.2 Telemedical Evaluation of Retinal Vessels
- •10.5.2.1 Prevalence of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •10.5.2.2 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.5.2.3 PROCAM-Index
- •10.6 Discussion and Perceptive
- •10.6.1 Estimation of “Stroke Risk” Estimated by the Stage of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 System Requirements
- •11.3 Fundus Camera
- •11.4 Imaging Procedure
- •11.4.1 Reading Center Procedure
- •11.5 Detection of Macular Edema
- •11.6 Implementation
- •11.7 Unreadable Images
- •11.7.1 Impact on Overall Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment Rates
- •11.7.2 Compliance with Recommendations
- •11.7.3 Challenges
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •References
- •12.1 Screening
- •12.2 Background
- •12.3 Historical Perspective in England
- •12.4 Methodology
- •12.4.1 The Aim of the Programme
- •12.5 Systematic DR Screening
- •12.6 Cameras for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.7 Software for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.9 Implementation in England
- •12.11 Quality Assurance
- •12.12 The Development of External Quality Assurance in the English Screening Programme
- •12.13 Information Technology (IT) Developments for the English Screening Programme
- •12.14 Dataset Development
- •12.15 The Development of External Quality Assurance Test Set for the English Screening Programme
- •12.16 Failsafe
- •12.17 The Epidemic of Diabetes
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Burden of Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in India
- •13.3 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models
- •13.4 Need for Telescreening
- •13.5 Guidelines for Telescreening
- •13.6 ATA Categories of DR Telescreening Validation
- •13.7 Yield of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Telescreening Model
- •13.8 How Are Images Transferred
- •13.10 How Many Fields Are Enough for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •13.11 Is Mydriasis Needed While Using Nonmydriatic Camera?
- •13.12 Validation Studies on Telescreening
- •13.12.1 Accuracy of Telescreening
- •13.12.2 Patient Satisfaction in Telescreening
- •13.12.3 Cost Effectivity
- •13.12.4 Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Our Experience
- •13.13 Future of Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Methods
- •14.3 Discussion
- •14.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Description of the EADRSI
- •15.5 State Support of Screening in the Safety Net
- •15.7 Screening Economics for Providers
- •15.8 Patient Sensitivity to Fees
- •15.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Setting Up the New Screening Model
- •16.2.1 Phase 1: Training
- •16.2.2 Phase 2: Evaluation of Agreement
- •16.2.3 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.3 Technologic Requirements
- •16.3.1 Data Management
- •16.3.2 Data Models
- •16.3.2.1 Data Scheme for Patient-Related Information
- •16.3.2.2 Data Scheme for Images
- •Fundus Camera VISUCAM Pro NM
- •PACS Server
- •ClearCanvas DICOM Visualizer
- •16.4 Results
- •16.4.1 Phase 2: Agreement Evaluation
- •16.4.2 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.5 Discussion
- •16.5.1 Evaluation of the Screening Model
- •16.5.2 Prevalence of DR
- •16.5.3 Quality Evaluation
- •16.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1.3 Examination and Treatment
- •17.1.4 Limitations of Current Care
- •17.2 Telemedicine and ROP
- •17.2.2 Accuracy and Reliability of Telemedicine for ROP Diagnosis
- •17.2.3 Operational ROP Telemedicine Systems
- •17.2.4 Potential Barriers
- •17.3 Closing Remarks
- •17.3.1 Future Directions
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Neonatal Stress and Pain
- •18.3 ROP Screening Technique
- •18.4 Effect of Different Examination Techniques on Stress
- •18.5 Future of Retinal Imaging in Babies
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 History of the Program
- •19.3 Telehealth Technologies
- •19.4 Impact of the Program
- •Selected References
- •Preamble
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •The Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)
- •Mission
- •Vision
- •Goals
- •Guiding Principles
- •Ethics
- •Clinical Validation
- •Category 1
- •Category 2
- •Category 3
- •Category 4
- •Communication
- •Medical Care Supervision
- •Patient Care Coordinator
- •Image Acquisition
- •Image Review and Evaluation
- •Information Systems
- •Interoperability
- •Image Acquisition
- •Compression
- •Data Communication and Transmission
- •Computer Display
- •Archiving and Retrieval
- •Security
- •Reliability and Redundancy
- •Documentation
- •Image Analysis
- •Legal Requirements
- •Facility Accreditation
- •Privileging and Credentialing
- •Stark Act and Self-referrals
- •State Medical Practice Acts/Licensure
- •Tort Liability
- •Duty
- •Standards of Care
- •Consent
- •Quality Control
- •Operations
- •Customer Support
- •Originating Site
- •Transmission
- •Distant Site
- •Financial Factors
- •Reimbursement
- •Grants
- •Federal Programs
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Equipment Cost
- •Summary
- •Abbreviations
- •Appendices
- •Appendix A: Interoperability
- •Appendix B: DICOM Metadata
- •Appendix C: Computer-Aided Detection
- •Appendix D: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- •Appendix F: Quality Control
- •Appendix H: Customer Support
- •Level 1
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Appendix I: Reimbursement
- •Medicare
- •Medicaid
- •Commercial Insurance Carrier Reimbursement
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Disease Prevention
- •Resource Utilization
- •American Telemedicine Association’s Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Contributors
- •Second Edition
- •First Edition
- •Index
Appendix |
217 |
|
|
Appendix I: Reimbursement
Medicare
CPT 92227 Ð remote imaging for detection of retinal disease (e.g., retinopathy in a patient with diabetes) with analysis and report under physician supervision, unilateral or bilateral
CPT 92228 Ð remote imaging for monitoring and management of active retinal disease (e.g., diabetic retinopathy) with physician review, interpretation, and report, unilateral or bilateral These new remote retinal imaging codes allow for detection of retinal disease (92227) and the monitoring and management of active retinal disease (92228). They speciÞcally address the clinical application of telemedicine modalities for DR [158]. Although the new codes went into effect January 3, 2011, ATA and other national organizations requested a CMS review contending these codes poorly deÞned role of telemedicine for DR and undervalued services provided by DR telemedicine applications [159]. In its request, ATA noted 92227Õs deÞnition does not reßect actual DR remote retinal imaging clinical applications and that 92228 does not reßect the complexity of care associated with DR remote imaging. CPT 92227 assigns zero RVUs to physiciansÕ work. CPT 92228 signiÞcantly undervalues the physicianÕs responsibility and care. ATA also expressed concern that 92228 restricts reimbursement to only patients with active retinal disease. Total RVUs assigned to these new codes are markedly less than the previously used CPT 92250 (fundus photography), although similar equipment, staff, and physician effort are involved. ATA joined with many teleophthalmology-DR programs and several specialty professional societies to formally contest the description and reimbursement values of the new
codes during the public comment period.
Medicaid
The reimbursement for Medicaid is generally 10Ð20% lower than Medicare.
Commercial Insurance Carrier Reimbursement
Most private and commercial carriers reimbursed DR telehealth programs using CPT code 92250. Some used the level II HCPCS code, S0625
(Retinal Telescreening by Digital Imaging of Multiple Different Fundus Areas to Screen for Vision-Threatening Conditions). Some carriers reimburse for the service but require pupil dilation. Due to this variation among carriers, each must be contacted to determine the requirements for reimbursement. How commercial insurance carriers will treat new CPT codes 92227 and 92228 is currently unknown.
Other Financial Factors
Logistic Efficiencies
Geographic disparities in care can result in access to care issues that are costly in terms of time transportation and missed opportunity. Telemedicine can close these distances electronically with a possible overall savings in costs.
Disease Prevention
Increasing the surveillance rate of DR through telemedicine contributes to increased treatment and reduction in diabetes-related vision loss [25, 26]. This can result in signiÞcant healthcare savings through cost avoidance [45, 46].
Resource Utilization
Some DR telehealth programs have shown to be less costly and more effective than convention retinal examinations for the detection of DR [160]. This may allow a reduction in the overall cost of care with the same or expanded scope of services through the retasking of costly human resources.
American Telemedicine Association’s Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy
2nd Edition February 2011
Conclusion
The relentless progress in communications technology, digital imaging, and storage is driving the ever-expanding potential applications for telemedicine around the world. At the same time,
218 |
Appendix |
|
|
governments and health agencies require a detailed knowledge of disease prevalence, incidence and effects of human disease in order to empower planning of medical services. These advances are particularly important for the management of retinal disease, the prevalence of which is rising globally, in particular with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Now that images can be stored with very high resolution and in the form of video strips on a personal mobile phone, the opportunity exists for individuals to own and carry their personal health records and relevant digital images as well as transmit this data to any relevant authority anywhere in the world.
This book, edited by three world leaders in the Þeld, has attracted contributions from multiple countries and demonstrates the growing interest and expertise in teleretinal screening. While the value of screening for diabetic retinopathy is beyond dispute as it is for chronic glaucoma, the contributors also explore other important areas including macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, and analysis of retinal vessels as markers of systemic disease such as hypertension.
The widespread introduction of teleretinal screening will depend on several factors. There is a need for wellplanned research projects which validate sensitivity and speciÞcity of the imaging tests employed as well as the costeffectiveness for the particular condition and community setting. Only then will governments progressively support whole of populationat- risk programs. When that occurs, the very real prospect of early detection of all signiÞcant retinal disease may become a reality.
Ian Constable M.D., FRCS
Professor in Ophthalmology Lions Eye Institute
Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science
University of Western Australia
References
1.Telemedicine DeÞned. Available at http://www.americantelemed.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3333
2. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P (2003) Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care 26: 917Ð932
3. Diabetes Public Health Resource. Available at http:// www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheets/atwork.htm
4.Harris M (1995) Diabetes mellitus: summary. National Institutes of Health 1Ð36
5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007)
National diabetes fact sheet: general information and national estimates on diabetes in the United States. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta 6. Kempen JH, OÕColmain BJ, Leske MC et al (2004) The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 122:
552Ð563
7. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047Ð1053
8.Saaddine JB, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, Zhang X, Klein R, Boyle JP (2008) Projection of diabetic retin-
opathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005Ð2050. Arch Ophthalmol 126:1740Ð1747
9. IDF Diabetes Atlas (2010) Global burden: prevalence and projections, 2010 and 2030. http://www. diabetesatlas.org/content/diabetes-and-impaired-glu- cose-tolerance
10. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 102:520Ð526
11. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 102:527Ð532
12.World Health Organization (2008) Diabetes estimates and projections. WHO. Last copyright date: 2008. Available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/ en/index.html. Last accessed 2 June 2009
13.Klein R (1987) The epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy: Þndings from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic
Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 27:230Ð238
14. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE (1989) The Wisconsin epidemiological study of diabetic retinopathy: a review. Diabetes Metab Rev 5:559Ð570
15. Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM et al (1998) United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-depen- dent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 116:297Ð303
16. Aiello LP, Gardner TW, King GL et al (1998) Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 21:143Ð156
17.Ferris FL, 3rd Patz A (1984) Macular edema. A complication of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 28(Suppl):452Ð461
Appendix |
219 |
|
|
18. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ (1995) The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. XV. The long-term incidence of macular edema. Ophthalmology 102:7Ð16
19. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL (1984) The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 91:1464Ð1474
20.(1981) Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) Þndings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 88:583Ð600
21.(1981) Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: relationship of adverse treatment effects to retinopathy severity. Diabetic retinopathy study report no. 5. Dev Ophthalmol 2:248Ð261
22. (1979) Four risk factors for severe visual loss in diabetic retinopathy. The third report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 97:654Ð655
23. (1992) Aspirin effects on mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report 14. JAMA 268: 1292Ð1300
24.(1991) Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 98:823Ð833
25.(1991) Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 98:766Ð785
26.(1985) Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch Ophthalmol 103:1796Ð1806
27.(1995) Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema. Relationship of treatment effect to ßuorescein angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline: ETDRS report no. 19. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 113:1144Ð1155
28.(2000) Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. N Engl J Med 342:381Ð389
29.(1999) Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC). Design, implementation, and
preliminary results of a long-term follow-up of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial cohort. Diabetes Care 22:99Ð111
30. (1998) Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 116:874Ð886
31.(1996) Lifetime beneÞts and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications
trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. JAMA 276:1409Ð1415
32. (1996) The absence of a glycemic threshold for the development of long-term complications: the perspective of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes 45:1289Ð1298
33.(1995) The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 44:968Ð983
34.(1995) Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Ophthalmology
102:647Ð661
35. Babaya N (2002) Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 287:2563Ð2569
36. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA et al (2008) Prolonged effect of intensive therapy on the risk of retinopathy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: 10 years after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 126:1707Ð1715
37.(1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2
diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 352:837Ð853
38. (1998) Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ 317:703Ð713
39.Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA (2008) 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1577Ð1589
40.Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (2005) DRCRnet manual of operations. Version 3.0. Tampa: Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation
41.Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCRnet) public web site. Available at http://drcrnet. jaeb.org/ViewPage.aspx?PageName=Home_Page
42.National Committee for Quality AssuranceÕs 2009 State of Health Care Quality Report. Available at http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/836/Default.aspx
43.Witkin SR, Klein R (1984) Ophthalmologic care for persons with diabetes. JAMA 251:2534Ð2537
44.Sprafka JM, Fritsche TL, Baker R, Kurth D, Whipple D (1990) Prevalence of undiagnosed eye disease in highrisk diabetic individuals. Arch Intern Med 150:857Ð861
45.Javitt JC, Aiello LP, Chiang Y, Ferris FL III, Canner JK, GreenÞeld S (1994) Preventive eye care in people with diabetes is cost-saving to the federal government. Implications for health-care reform. Diabetes Care 17:909Ð917
46.Javitt JC, Aiello LP (1996) Cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic retinopathy. Ann Intern Med 124:164Ð169
220 |
Appendix |
|
|
47.World Health Organization (WHO) (2002). Telehealth and telemedicine will henceforth be part of the strategy for health for all
48.American Diabetes Association (2009) Standards of medical care in diabetes Ð 2009. Diabetes Care 32(Suppl 1):S13ÐS61
49.Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL (2002) Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy: accuracy of the Inoveon diabetic retinopathy-3DT system. Ophthalmology 109:595Ð601
50.Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA et al (2001) Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard Þeld 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108:572Ð585
51. Rudnisky CJ, Hinz BJ, Tennant MT, de Leon AR, Greve MD (2002) High-resolution stereoscopic digital fundus photography versus contact lens biomicroscopy for the detection of clinically signiÞcant macular edema. Ophthalmology 109:267Ð274
52. Cavallerano AA, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Tolson AM, Aiello LP, Aiello LM (2003) Use of Joslin Vision Network digital-video nonmydriatic retinal imaging to assess diabetic retinopathy in a clinical program. Retina 23:215Ð223
53. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE et al (2003) Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 110:1677Ð1682
54. Scanlon PH, Foy C, Malhotra R, Aldington SJ (2005) The inßuence of age, duration of diabetes, cataract, and pupil size on image quality in digital photographic retinal screening. Diabetes Care 28: 2448Ð2453
55.Murgatroyd H, Ellingford A, Cox A et al (2004) Effect of mydriasis and different Þeld strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol 88:920Ð924
56.Pandit RJ, Taylor R (2000) Mydriasis and glaucoma: exploding the myth. A systematic review. Diabet Med 17:693Ð699
57.Whited JD (2006) Accuracy and reliability of teleophthalmology for diagnosing diabetic retinopathy and macular edema: a review of the literature. Diabetes Technol Ther 8:102Ð111
58.Bresnick GH, Mukamel DB, Dickinson JC, Cole DR (2000) A screening approach to the surveillance of patients with diabetes for the presence of visionthreatening retinopathy. Ophthalmology 107:19Ð24
59.Blum J (2003) Internet medicine and the evolving
legal status of the physician-patient relationship. J Leg Med 4:413Ð455
60.Kasztelowicz P (2003) Security of medical data transfer and storage in internet cryptography, antiviral security and electronic signature problems, which must be solved in nearest future in practical contest. Pol J Pathol 3:209Ð214
61.Brebner E, Bebner J, Ruddick-Bracken H, Wootton R, Ferguson J (2003) The importance of setting and evaluating standards of telemedicine training. J Telemed Telecare 9:7Ð9
62.Lee P (1999) Telemedicine: opportunities and challenges for the remote care of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 117:1639Ð1640
63. Zeimer R, Zou S, Meeder T et al (2002) A fundus camera dedicated to the screening of diabetic retinopathy in the primary-care physicianÕs ofÞce. Invest Ophthalmol 43:1581Ð1587
64.Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 91: Ophthalmic Photography Image SOP Classes. Available at ftp://medical.nema. org/medical/dicom/Þnal/sup91_ft2.pdf. Last accessed on 8 Dec 2009
65.DICOMª Digital IMaging and Communications in Medicine. Available at http://medical.nema.org/
66.Health Level Seven International (HL7). Available at http://www.hl7.org/
67.IHE Eye Care (EYECARE) Technical Framework Volume 1 (EYECARE TF-1) Integration ProÞles. Revision 3.7 Ð Final Text. Avaiable at http://www.ihe. net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_eyecare_tf_ rev3-7_vol1_Final_Text_2010-02-15.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2010
68.IHE Eye Care (EYECARE) Technical Framework Volume 2 (EYECARE TF-1) Transactions. Revision 3.7 Ð Final Text. Avaiable at http://www.ihe.net/Technical_ Framework/upload/ihe_eyecare_tf_rev3-7_vol2_Final_ Text_2010-02-15.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2010
69.SNOMED Terminology Solutions. Available at http:// www.cap.org/apps/docs/snomed/sts/snomed_ct.html
70.HITSP. Available at http://www.hitsp.org/
71.Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Supplement 61: JPEG 2000 transfer syntaxes. Available at ftp://medical.nema.org/medical/ dicom/Þnal/sup61_ft.pdf. Last accessed on 8 Dec 2009
72.Kuzmak PM, Dayhoff RE (2001) Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)
Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors. J Digit Imaging 14:153Ð157
73.Csipo D, Dayhoff RE, Kuzmak PM (2001) Integrating Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-structured reporting into the hospital environment. J Digit Imaging 14:12Ð16
74.American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern¨. Diabetic retinopathy (2008) http:// o n e . a a o . o r g / C E / P r a c t i c e G u i d e l i n e s / P P P. aspx?sid=ab789157-5312-4bbe-86ed-8d164ffa9567
75.American Academy of Ophthalmology Summary Benmarks for Preferred Practice Pattern¨ Guidlines Retinopathy (2008). Avaialbe at http://one.aao.org/ CE/PracticeGuidelines/default.aspx?=783ead7d- 3e06-433b-8f17-2971eb3816f8
76.Optometric clinical practice guideline: care of the patient with diabetes mellitus. Available at http:// www.aoa.org/documents/CPG-3.pdf
Appendix |
221 |
|
|
77.Silverman R (2003) Current legal and ethical concerns in telemedicine and e-medicine. J Telemed Telecare 9:7Ð9
78.Bilimoria N (2003) Telemedicine: laws still need a dose of efÞciency. J Med Pract Manage 6:289Ð294
79.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2003). Health information privacy: summary of HIPAA Privacy Rule. Accessed at http://www.hhs. gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/summary/index. html. Last updated May 2003
80.National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2001) Diabetes public health resource: age-adjusted rates of seeing a health professional for diabetes in the last year per 100 adults with diabetes, United States, 2001. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed at http://www.cdc. gov/diabetes/statistics/preventive/Þg4g.htm
81.Eliasson A, Poropatich R (1998) Performance improvement in telemedicine: the essential elements. Mil Med 8:530Ð535
82.Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (2008) The OfÞcial Handbook.MS.4.120. MS.4.130.:
The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
83. AMA, Physician licensure: an update of trends. http:// www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/ member-groups-sections/young-physicians-section/ advocacy-resources/physician-licensure-an-update- trends.shtml
84.OAT Telemedicine Licensure Report. ftp://ftp.hrsa. gov/telehealth/licensure.pdf
85.Rigelhaupt JL (1982) Annotation, what constitutes physician-patient relationship for malpractice purposes. 17 A.L.R. 4th 132
86.E-Health and Antitrust (2008) Telemedicine and E-Health law. Rel 7. Ch7,1.04[3a]. Law Journal Press
87.AMA, Policy Statement H-480.968, Telemedicine. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/16/
a08_hod_resolutions.pdf
88. VA (2003) VHA informed consent for clinical treatments and procedures: VA
89. Stanberry B (2001) Legal ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 64:225Ð233
90. Iserson K (2000) Telemedicine: a proposal for an ethical code. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 9:404Ð406
91.Mossman K (1997) Medical testing: issues and ethics. Forum Appl Res Public Policy 3:90Ð101
92.Borkowski W, Mielniczuk H (2003) Telemedical management system of structured clinical documenta- tion-application for quality assurance and multicenter clinical trials. Pol J Pathol 3:193Ð195
93.McCrossin R (2003) Managing risk in telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 9:6Ð9
94.Spencer T, Olson JA, McHardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (1996) An image-processing strategy for the segmentation and quantiÞcation of microaneurysms in ßuorescein angiograms of the ocular fundus. Comput Biomed Res 29:284Ð302
95. Fleming AD, Goatman KA, Philip S, Olson JA, Sharp PF (2007) Automatic detection of retinal anatomy to assist diabetic retinopathy screening. Phys Med Biol 52:331Ð345
96. Usher D, Dumskyj M, Himaga M, Williamson TH, Nussey S, Boyce J (2004) Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in digital retinal images: a tool for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabet Med 21:84Ð90
97. Staal J, Abramoff MD, Niemeijer M, Viergever MA, van Ginneken B (2004) Ridge-based vessel segmentation in color images of the retina. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:501Ð509
98. Lowell J, Hunter A, Steel D et al (2004) Optic nerve head segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:256Ð264
99.Martinez-Perez ME, Hughes AD, Thom SA, Bharath AA, Parker KH (2007) Segmentation of blood vessels from red-free and ßuorescein retinal images. Med Image Anal 11:47Ð61
100.Solouma NH, Youssef AB, Badr YA, Kadah YM (2002) A new real-time retinal tracking system for
image-guided laser treatment. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49:1059Ð1067
101. Smith RT, Chan JK, Nagasaki T et al (2005) Automated detection of macular drusen using geometric background leveling and threshold selection. Arch Ophthalmol 123:200Ð206
102. Gregson PH, Shen Z, Scott RC, Kozousek V (1995) Automated grading of venous beading. Comput Biomed Res 28:291Ð304
103. Hejlesen O, Ege B, Englmeier KH, Aldington S, McCanna L, Bek T (2004) TOSCA-ImagingÐ developing Internet based image processing software for screening and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Stud Health Technol Inform 107:222Ð226
104. Kozousek V, Shen Z, Gregson P, Scott RC (1992) Automated detection and quantiÞcation of venous beading using Fourier analysis. Can J Ophthalmol 27:288Ð294
105. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Goldberg MF, Zou S (1997) Application of rapid scanning retinal thickness analysis in retinal diseases. Ophthalmology 104: 1145Ð1151
106.Sadda SR, Tan O, Walsh AC, Schuman JS, Varma R, Huang D (2006) Automated detection of clinically signiÞcant macular edema by grid scanning optical coher-
ence tomography. Ophthalmology 113:1187, e1Ð12 107. van Dijk HW, Kok PH, Garvin M et al (2009)
Selective loss of inner retinal layer thickness in type 1 diabetic patients with minimal diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:3404Ð3409
108.Cabrera Debuc D, Somfai GM (2010) Early detection of retinal thickness changes in diabetes using optical coherence tomography. Med Sci Monit
16(3):MT15ÐMT21
109. Larsen M, Godt J, Larsen N et al (2003) Automated detection of fundus photographic red lesions in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 761Ð766
222 |
Appendix |
|
|
110. Englmeier KH, Schmid K, Hildebrand C et al (2004) Early detection of diabetes retinopathy by new algorithms for automatic recognition of vascular changes. Eur J Med Res 9:473Ð478
111.Larsen N, Godt J, Grunkin M, Lund-Andersen H, Larsen M (2003) Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy in a fundus photographic screening population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 767Ð771
112.Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman KA, Williams GJ, Olson JA, Sharp PF (2007) Automated detection of exudates for diabetic retinopathy screening. Phys Med Biol 52:7385Ð7396
113.Junge J, Boon KL, Ottens DE (1975) Automatic information processing in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 171:3Ð6
114. Muller W, Spittel U, Gobel H (1986) First results of the computer-aided classiÞcation of electroretinograms. Ophthalmologica 192:228Ð233
115.Guo W, Marshall G (1995) ORDMKV: a computer program Þtting proportional odds model for multistate Markov process. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 46:257Ð263
116. Marshall G, Guo W, Jones RH (1995) MARKOV: a computer program for multi-state Markov models with covariables. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 47:147Ð156
117.Zana F, Klein JC (1999) A multimodal registration algorithm of eye fundus images using vessels detec-
tion and Hough transform. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:419Ð428
118. Zahlmann G, Kochner B, Ugi I et al (2000) Hybrid fuzzy image processing for situation assessment. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 19:76Ð83
119.Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Staal J, SuttorpSchulten MS, Abramoff MD (2005) Automatic detection of red lesions in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24:584Ð592
120.Chanwimaluang T, Fan G, Fransen SR (2006) Hybrid
retinal image registration. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10:129Ð142
121. Walter T, Klein JC, Massin P, Erginay A (2002) A contribution of image processing to the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy Ð detection of exudates in color fundus images of the human retina. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21:1236Ð1243
122.Sanchez CI, Garcia M, Mayo A, Lopez MI, Hornero R (2009) Retinal image analysis based on mixture models to detect hard exudates. Med Image Anal 13:650Ð658
123.Goldberg RE, Varma R, Spaeth GL, Magargal LE, Callen D (1989) QuantiÞcation of progressive diabetic macular nonperfusion. Ophthalmic Surg 20: 42Ð45
124.Abramoff MD, Niemeijer M, Suttorp-Schulten MS, Viergever MA, Russell SR, van Ginneken B (2008) Evaluation of a system for automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy from color fundus photographs in a large population of patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:193Ð198
125.Bouhaimed M, Gibbins R, Owens D (2008) Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy: results of a screening study. Diabetes Technol Ther 10:142Ð148
126.Sinthanayothin C, Boyce JF, Williamson TH et al (2002) Automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on digital fundus images. Diabet Med 19:105Ð112
127.Gonzalez Villalpando C, Gonzalez Villalpando ME, Martinez Diaz S et al (1997) A diabetic retinopathy screening program as a strategy for blindness prevention. Arch Med Res 28:129Ð135
128.Goatman KA, Cree MJ, Olson JA, Forrester JV, Sharp PF (2003) Automated measurement of microaneurysm turnover. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 5335Ð5341
129.Hipwell JH, Strachan F, Olson JA, McHardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (2000) Automated detection of microaneurysms in digital red-free photographs: a diabetic retinopathy screening tool. Diabet Med 17: 588Ð594
130.Cree MJ, Olson JA, McHardy KC, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (1997) A fully automated comparative microaneurysm digital detection system. Eye (Lond) 11(Pt 5):622Ð628
131.Baudoin CE, Lay BJ, Klein JC (1984) Automatic detection of microaneurysms in diabetic ßuorescein angiography. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 32: 254Ð261
132.Fleming AD, Philip S, Goatman KA, Olson JA, Sharp PF (2006) Automated microaneurysm detection using local contrast normalization and local vessel detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25:1223Ð1232
133. Spencer T, Phillips RP, Sharp PF, Forrester JV (1992) Automated detection and quantiÞcation of microaneurysms in ßuorescein angiograms. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 230:36Ð41
134.Sleightholm MA, Arnold J, Aldington SJ, Kohner EM (1984) Computer-aided digitisation of fundus photographs. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 5:295Ð301
135.Frame AJ, Undrill PE, Cree MJ et al (1998) A comparison of computer based classiÞcation methods applied to the detection of microaneurysms in ophthalmic ßuorescein angiograms. Comput Biol Med 28:225Ð238
136.Sivakumar R, Ravindran G, Muthayya M, Lakshminarayanan S, Velmurughendran CU (2005) Diabetic retinopathy analysis. J Biomed Biotechnol
2005:20Ð27
137. Nayak J, Bhat PS, Acharya R, Lim CM, Kagathi M (2008) Automated identiÞcation of diabetic retinopathy stages using digital fundus images. J Med Syst 32:107Ð115
138. Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Cree MJ et al (2010) Retinopathy online challenge: automatic detection of microaneurysms in digital color fundus photographs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:185Ð195
139.Abramoff MD, Reinhardt JM, Russell SR et al (2010) Automated early detection of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 117(6):1147Ð1154
140.Niemeijer M, van Ginneken B, Russell SR, SuttorpSchulten MS, Abramoff MD (2007) Automated detection and differentiation of drusen, exudates,
