- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Method
- •1.2.1 Databases
- •1.2.2 Dates
- •1.2.3 Keywords
- •1.2.4 Criteria for Inclusion
- •1.2.5 Criteria for Exclusion
- •1.2.6 Selection of Papers
- •1.3 Results
- •1.3.1 Subspecialty
- •1.3.2 Type of Telemedicine
- •1.3.3 Study Design
- •1.3.4 Final Conclusions of Papers
- •1.4 Discussion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 The Need for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programs
- •2.4 Guidelines for Referring Patients
- •2.7 Program Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.9 Program Personnel and Operations
- •2.9.1 Primary Care Providers
- •2.9.2 Photographers
- •2.9.3 Clinical Consultants
- •2.9.4 Administrators
- •2.9.5 A Note to CEOs, Operations Directors, and Clinic Managers
- •2.10 Policies and Procedures
- •2.10.1 Sample Protocol 1
- •2.10.1.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Services
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.2 Sample Protocol 2
- •2.10.2.1 Pupil Dilation Before Diabetic Retinopathy Photography
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.3 Sample Protocol 3
- •2.10.3.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Photography Review
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.11 Technical Requirements
- •2.11.1 Connectivity
- •2.11.2 Resolution
- •2.11.3 Color
- •2.11.4 Stereopsis
- •2.11.5 Compression
- •2.11.6 Enhancement
- •2.11.7 Pupil Dilation
- •2.11.8 Early California Telemedicine Initiatives Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.11.9 The American Indian Diabetes Teleophthalmology Grant Program
- •2.11.10 Central Valley EyePACS Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Project
- •2.12.1 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •2.12.1.1 ADA Guidelines Terms
- •2.12.1.2 Vitrectomy
- •References
- •3: Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 History of Stereopsis and Stereopsis in Ophthalmology
- •3.3 Technology and Photography
- •3.3.3 Imaging Fields
- •3.3.4 Image Viewing Techniques
- •3.3.5 Image Compression
- •3.4 Stereoscopic Teleophthalmology Systems
- •3.4.1 University of Alberta
- •3.4.4 Joslin Vision Network
- •3.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Main Outcome Measures
- •4.3 Results
- •4.3.1 Retinal Video Recording Versus Retinal Still Photography
- •4.3.2 Video Compression Analysis
- •4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Automated, Remote Image Analysis of Retinal Diseases
- •5.1.2 Telehealth
- •5.2 Design Requirements
- •5.2.1 Telehealth Network Architecture
- •5.2.2 Work Flow
- •5.2.3 Performance Evaluation of the Network
- •5.3 Automated Image Analysis Overview
- •5.3.1 Quality Assessment Module
- •5.3.2 Vascular Tree Segmentation
- •5.3.3 Quality Evaluation
- •5.4 Anatomic Structure Segmentation
- •5.4.1 Optic Nerve Detection
- •5.4.2 Macula
- •5.4.3 Lesion Segmentation
- •5.4.4 Lesion Population Description
- •5.4.5 Image Query
- •5.5 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3 Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Leakage
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Patients and Methods
- •7.2.1 Participants
- •7.2.2 Methods
- •7.2.3 Statistics
- •7.3 Results
- •7.3.1 Reliability of Image Evaluation
- •7.3.2 Prevalence of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Atrophy
- •7.4 Discussion
- •7.5 Perspectives
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Homology Between Retinal and Systemic Microvasculature
- •8.1.3 Need for More Precise CVD Risk Prediction
- •8.2.1 Retinal Microvascular Signs
- •8.2.2 Retinal Vessel Biometry
- •8.2.3 Newer Retinal Imaging for Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.3 Associations of Retinal Imaging and CVD Risk
- •8.3.1.1 Risk of Pre-clinical CVD
- •8.3.1.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.1.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.1 Risk of Hypertension
- •8.3.2.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.2.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.4 Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease
- •8.3.3 Newer Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.4 Retinal Imaging and Its Potential as a Tool for CVD Risk Prediction
- •References
- •9.1 Alzheimer’s Disease
- •9.2 Treatments
- •9.3 Diagnosis
- •9.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Stroke
- •10.1.2 Heart Disease
- •10.1.3 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.2 Purpose
- •10.3 Method
- •10.3.1 Medical Approach
- •10.3.2 Technical Approach
- •10.3.3 Output of Medical Data
- •10.4 Patients
- •10.5 Results
- •10.5.1 Medical History
- •10.5.2 Telemedical Evaluation of Retinal Vessels
- •10.5.2.1 Prevalence of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •10.5.2.2 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.5.2.3 PROCAM-Index
- •10.6 Discussion and Perceptive
- •10.6.1 Estimation of “Stroke Risk” Estimated by the Stage of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 System Requirements
- •11.3 Fundus Camera
- •11.4 Imaging Procedure
- •11.4.1 Reading Center Procedure
- •11.5 Detection of Macular Edema
- •11.6 Implementation
- •11.7 Unreadable Images
- •11.7.1 Impact on Overall Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment Rates
- •11.7.2 Compliance with Recommendations
- •11.7.3 Challenges
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •References
- •12.1 Screening
- •12.2 Background
- •12.3 Historical Perspective in England
- •12.4 Methodology
- •12.4.1 The Aim of the Programme
- •12.5 Systematic DR Screening
- •12.6 Cameras for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.7 Software for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.9 Implementation in England
- •12.11 Quality Assurance
- •12.12 The Development of External Quality Assurance in the English Screening Programme
- •12.13 Information Technology (IT) Developments for the English Screening Programme
- •12.14 Dataset Development
- •12.15 The Development of External Quality Assurance Test Set for the English Screening Programme
- •12.16 Failsafe
- •12.17 The Epidemic of Diabetes
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Burden of Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in India
- •13.3 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models
- •13.4 Need for Telescreening
- •13.5 Guidelines for Telescreening
- •13.6 ATA Categories of DR Telescreening Validation
- •13.7 Yield of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Telescreening Model
- •13.8 How Are Images Transferred
- •13.10 How Many Fields Are Enough for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •13.11 Is Mydriasis Needed While Using Nonmydriatic Camera?
- •13.12 Validation Studies on Telescreening
- •13.12.1 Accuracy of Telescreening
- •13.12.2 Patient Satisfaction in Telescreening
- •13.12.3 Cost Effectivity
- •13.12.4 Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Our Experience
- •13.13 Future of Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Methods
- •14.3 Discussion
- •14.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Description of the EADRSI
- •15.5 State Support of Screening in the Safety Net
- •15.7 Screening Economics for Providers
- •15.8 Patient Sensitivity to Fees
- •15.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Setting Up the New Screening Model
- •16.2.1 Phase 1: Training
- •16.2.2 Phase 2: Evaluation of Agreement
- •16.2.3 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.3 Technologic Requirements
- •16.3.1 Data Management
- •16.3.2 Data Models
- •16.3.2.1 Data Scheme for Patient-Related Information
- •16.3.2.2 Data Scheme for Images
- •Fundus Camera VISUCAM Pro NM
- •PACS Server
- •ClearCanvas DICOM Visualizer
- •16.4 Results
- •16.4.1 Phase 2: Agreement Evaluation
- •16.4.2 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.5 Discussion
- •16.5.1 Evaluation of the Screening Model
- •16.5.2 Prevalence of DR
- •16.5.3 Quality Evaluation
- •16.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1.3 Examination and Treatment
- •17.1.4 Limitations of Current Care
- •17.2 Telemedicine and ROP
- •17.2.2 Accuracy and Reliability of Telemedicine for ROP Diagnosis
- •17.2.3 Operational ROP Telemedicine Systems
- •17.2.4 Potential Barriers
- •17.3 Closing Remarks
- •17.3.1 Future Directions
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Neonatal Stress and Pain
- •18.3 ROP Screening Technique
- •18.4 Effect of Different Examination Techniques on Stress
- •18.5 Future of Retinal Imaging in Babies
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 History of the Program
- •19.3 Telehealth Technologies
- •19.4 Impact of the Program
- •Selected References
- •Preamble
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •The Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)
- •Mission
- •Vision
- •Goals
- •Guiding Principles
- •Ethics
- •Clinical Validation
- •Category 1
- •Category 2
- •Category 3
- •Category 4
- •Communication
- •Medical Care Supervision
- •Patient Care Coordinator
- •Image Acquisition
- •Image Review and Evaluation
- •Information Systems
- •Interoperability
- •Image Acquisition
- •Compression
- •Data Communication and Transmission
- •Computer Display
- •Archiving and Retrieval
- •Security
- •Reliability and Redundancy
- •Documentation
- •Image Analysis
- •Legal Requirements
- •Facility Accreditation
- •Privileging and Credentialing
- •Stark Act and Self-referrals
- •State Medical Practice Acts/Licensure
- •Tort Liability
- •Duty
- •Standards of Care
- •Consent
- •Quality Control
- •Operations
- •Customer Support
- •Originating Site
- •Transmission
- •Distant Site
- •Financial Factors
- •Reimbursement
- •Grants
- •Federal Programs
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Equipment Cost
- •Summary
- •Abbreviations
- •Appendices
- •Appendix A: Interoperability
- •Appendix B: DICOM Metadata
- •Appendix C: Computer-Aided Detection
- •Appendix D: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- •Appendix F: Quality Control
- •Appendix H: Customer Support
- •Level 1
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Appendix I: Reimbursement
- •Medicare
- •Medicaid
- •Commercial Insurance Carrier Reimbursement
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Disease Prevention
- •Resource Utilization
- •American Telemedicine Association’s Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Contributors
- •Second Edition
- •First Edition
- •Index
6 |
K. Bahaadinbeigy and K. Yogesan |
|
|
focused on cost, patient satisfaction and other issues rather than discussing a particular disease.
At 16%, ROP was the third main reason for the execution of teleophthalmological projects. The majority of papers on this eye disease aimed to evaluate the utility of teleophthalmology in its screening and diagnosis.
1.3.2Type of Telemedicine
Eighty-eight papers (83.02%) focused on store- and-forward projects, eight (7.55%) on real-time projects and ten (9.43%) used a mixed system.
1.3.3Study Design
Only two papers possessed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design [61, 98], and only four had used a control group.
1.3.4Final Conclusions of Papers
Ninety-eight papers had a positive view of teleophthalmology. However, five papers did not arrive at a clear conclusion, and four expressed a negative view towards teleophthalmology [5, 91, 98, 104].
1.4Discussion
This chapter has attempted to locate all the teleophthalmological projects that have been published in peer-reviewed journals and indexed by the three popular bibliographic databases for biomedical research, Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL. It demonstrates that:
(a)There is strong evidence that teleophthalmology is suitable for the treatment of retinal diseases, particularly DR and ROP.
(b)Teleophthalmology has been successful when provided via the store-and-forward method.
(c)Although the majority of studies to date have concluded on a positive note, only a few of these conclusions were based on high-quality
study designs involving controlled or randomised controlled trials.
The results show that most teleophthalmology projects to date have been focused on the treatment of DR. The health complications caused by diabetes and the importance of DR screening are likely major factors in the evaluation of teleophthalmology.
However, other eye problems also require more attention. These include strabismus, cataracts and infectious diseases. Trachoma, for example, is a highly prevalent condition in developing countries.
Although the papers in the ‘general eye problems’ category were very diverse, it appears that the use of teleophthalmology to deliver eye care service to general practice clinics and optometrists has also been reasonably successful.
Teleophthalmology is still largely considered a store-and-forward application; this can be seen from the fact than less than 7% of the papers examined a real-time project. This might be explained by the requirement for high bandwidth. A considerable number of publications indicate that while store- and-forward teleophthalmology is both feasible and reliable, further evidence of the feasibility and reliability of real-time teleophthalmology is needed.
Approximately 90% of the papers held positive views on teleophthalmology. However, 10% took a sceptical or negative view. This favourable statistic shows that teleophthalmology is a reliable method of eye care delivery. It was not possible to compare the feasibility and reliability of teleophthalmology across different subspecialties. Nevertheless, it is important to take into account the significant lack of papers using RCTs or comparable groups. This fact reveals that our evidence is undeniably inadequate and that we are not yet able to draw an informed conclusion.
Acknowledgement This is an updated review of the chapter published in the book INTECH.
References
1. Yogesan K, Kumar S, Goldschmid L, Cuadros J
(2006) Teleophthalmology. Springer, Berlin
2. Ngoh LH, Zhao Z, Yao H, Wei Z, Wu Y, Deng RH, Yu S (2010) TeleOph: a secure real-time teleophthalmology
1 A Literature Review of Teleophthalmology Projects from Around the Globe |
7 |
|
|
system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 14(5):1259– 1266, Epub 2010 Jul 26
3.Ng M, Nathoo N, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT (2009) Improving access to eye care: teleophthalmology in Alberta, Canada. J Diabetes Sci Technol 3(2):289–296
4.Liesenfeld B, Kohner E, Piehlmeier W, Kluthe S, Aldington S, Porta M et al (2000) A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: digital fundus photography. Diabetes Care 23(3):345–348
5.Chun DW, Bauer RM, Ward TP, Dick JS 2nd, Bower KS (2007) Evaluation of digital fundus images as a diagnostic method for surveillance of diabetic retinopathy. Mil Med 172(4):405–410
6.Luzio S, Hatcher S, Zahlmann G, Mazik L, Morgan M, Liensenfeld B et al (2004) Feasibility of using the TOSCA telescreening procedures for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 21(10):1121–1128
7.Taylor CR, Merin LM, Salunga AM, Hepworth JT, Crutcher TD, O’Day DM et al (2007) Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicinebased digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill Study. Diabetes Care 30(3):574–578
8.Conlin PR, Fisch BM, Cavallerano AA, Cavallerano JD, Bursell S, Aiello LM (2006) Nonmydriatic teleretinal imaging improves adherence to annual eye examinations in patients with diabetes. J Rehabil Res Dev 43(6):733–739
9.Schneider S, Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Luzio S, Owens DR, Schmidt V et al (2005) Quality assurance for diabetic retinopathy telescreening. Diabet Med 22(6):794–802
10.Cummings DM, Morrissey S, Barondes MJ, Rogers L, Gustke S (2001) Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural areas: the potential of telemedicine. J Rural Health 17(1):25–31
11.Rotvold G, Knarvik U, Johansen MA, Fossen K (2003) Telemedicine screening for diabetic retinopathy: staff and patient satisfaction. J Telemed Telecare 9(2):109–113
12.Stillman JK, Gole GA, Wootton R, Woolfield N, Price D, Williams M et al (2004) Telepaediatrics and diabetic retinopathy screening of young people with diabetes in
Queensland. J Telemed Telecare 10(S1):92–94
13. Gomez-Ulla F, Alonso F, Aibar B, Gonzalez F (2008) A comparative cost analysis of digital fundus imaging and direct fundus examination for assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health 14(9):912–918
14.Boucher MC, Desroches G, Garcia-Salinas R, Kherani A, Maberley D, Olivier S et al (2008) Teleophthalmology screening for diabetic retinopathy through mobile imaging units within Canada. Can J Ophthalmol 43(6):658–668
15.Massin P, Chabouis A, Erginay A, Viens-Bitker C,
Lecleire-Collet A, Meas T et al (2008) OPHDIAT: a telemedical network screening system for diabetic retinopathy in the Ile-de-France. Diabetes Metab 34(3):227–234 16. Fonda SJ, Bursell SE, Lewis DG, Garren J, Hock K, Cavallerano J (2007) The relationship of a diabetes telehealth eye care program to standard eye care and change in diabetes health outcomes. Telemed J E
Health 13(6):635–644
17. Raman R, Rani PK, Mahajan S, Paul P, Gnanamoorthy P, Krishna MS et al (2007) The Tele-screening model for diabetic retinopathy: evaluating the influence of mydriasis on the gradability of a single-field 45 degrees digital fundus image. Telemed J E Health 13(5):597–602
18.Zimmer-Galler I, Zeimer R (2006) Results of implementation of the DigiScope for diabetic retinopathy assessment in the primary care environment. Telemed J E Health 12(2):89–98
19. Wei JC, Valentino DJ, Bell DS, Baker RS (2006) A Web-based telemedicine system for diabetic retinopathy screening using digital fundus photography. Telemed J E Health 12(1):50–57
20.Whited JD, Datta SK, Aiello LM, Aiello LP, Cavallerano JD, Conlin PR et al (2005) A modeled economic analysis of a digital tele-ophthalmology system as used by three federal health care agencies for detecting proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health 11(6):641–651
21.Boucher MC, Nguyen QT, Angioi K (2005) Mass community screening for diabetic retinopathy using a nonmydriatic camera with telemedicine. Can J Ophthalmol 40(6):734–742
22.Ruamviboonsuk P, Wongcumchang N, Surawongsin P, Panyawatananukul E, Tiensuwan M (2005) Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images. J Med Assoc Thai 88(2):176–180
23.Massin P, Aubert JP, Eschwege E, Erginay A, Bourovitch JC, BenMehidi A et al (2005) Evaluation of a screening program for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care setting Dodia (Depistage ophtalmologique du diabete) study. Diabetes Metab 31(2): 153–162
24.Murray RB, Metcalf SM, Lewis PM, Mein JK, McAllister IL (2005) Sustaining remote-area programs: retinal camera use by Aboriginal health work-
ers and nurses in a Kimberley partnership. Med J Aust 182(10):520–523
25. Jin AJ, Martin D, Maberley D, Dawson KG, Seccombe DW, Beattie J (2004) Evaluation of a mobile diabetes care telemedicine clinic serving Aboriginal communities in Northern British Columbia, Canada. Int J Circumpolar Health 63(Suppl 2):124–128
26. Baker CF, Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, Sanghera P, Hinz BJ, De Leon AR et al (2004) JPEG compression of stereoscopic digital images for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 39(7):746–754
27.Massin P, Aubert JP, Erginay A, Bourovitch JC, Benmehidi A, Audran G et al (2004) Screening for diabetic retinopa-
thy: the first telemedical approach in a primary care setting in France. Diabetes Metab 30(5):451–457
28. Choremis J, Chow DR (2003) Use of telemedicine in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 38(7):575–579
29. Kawasaki S, Ito S, Satoh S, Mori Y, Saito T, Fukushima H et al (2003) Use of telemedicine in periodic screening of diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J E Health 9(3):235–239
8 |
K. Bahaadinbeigy and K. Yogesan |
|
|
30. Gomez-Ulla F, Fernandez MI, Gonzalez F, Rey P, Rodriguez M, Rodriguez-Cid MJ et al (2002) Digital retinal images and teleophthalmology for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 25(8): 1384–1389
31. Zeimer R, Zou S, Meeder T, Quinn K, Vitale S (2002) A fundus camera dedicated to the screening of diabetic retinopathy in the primary-care physician’s office. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43(5):1581–1587
32. Bjorvig S, Johansen MA, Fossen K (2002) An economic analysis of screening for diabetic retinopathy. J Telemed Telecare 8(1):32–35
33.Shiba T, Yamamoto T, Seki U, Utsugi N, Fujita K, Sato Y et al (2002) Screening and follow-up of diabetic retinopathy using a new mosaic 9-field fundus photography system. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 55(1):49–59
34. Tennant MT, Greve MD, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ (2001) Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: a comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol 36(4):187–196
35.Bursell SE, Cavallerano JD, Cavallerano AA, Clermont AC, Birkmire-Peters D, Aiello LP et al (2001) Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal
imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 108(3):572–585
36. Lawrenson RA (1992) Mobile retinal screening – a Waikato Area Health Board initiative. N Z Health Hospital 44(4):4, 6
37. Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MTS, Weis E, Ting A, Hinz BJ, Greve MDJ (2007) Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 114(9):1748–1754
38.Abramoff MD, Suttorp-Schulten MSA (2005) Webbased screening for diabetic retinopathy in a primary care population: the EyeCheck project. Telemed J E Health 11(6):668–674
39. Stumpf SH, Verma D, Zalunardo R, Aly T, Chen R, Labree L (2004) Online continuous quality improvement for diabetic retinopathy tele-screening. Telemed J E Health 10(suppl 2):S-35–S-39
40. Bar-Sela SM, Glovinsky Y (2007) A feasibility study of an internet-based telemedicine system for consultation in an ophthalmic emergency room. J Telemed Telecare 13(3):119–124
41. Kennedy C, Bowman R, Fariza N, Ackuaku E, NtimAmponsah C, Murdoch I (2006) Audit of web-based telemedicine in ophthalmology. J Telemed Telecare 12(2):88–91
42. Chen L, Tsai C, Liu T, Tung T, Chiu Y, Chan C et al (2004) Feasibility of tele-ophthalmology for screening for eye disease in remote communities. J Telemed Telecare 10(6):337–341
43.Kumar S, Tay-Kearney M, Chaves F, Constable IJ, Yogesan K (2006) Remote ophthalmology services: cost comparison of telemedicine and alternative service delivery options. J Telemed Telecare 12(1):19–22
44.Hanson C, Tennant MT, Rudnisky CJ (2008) Optometric referrals to retina specialists: evaluation and triage via teleophthalmology. Telemed J E Health
14(5):441–445
45. Bai VT, Murali V, Kim R, Srivatsa SK (2007) Teleophthalmology-based rural eye care in India. Telemed J E Health 13(3):313–321
46. Paul PG, Raman R, Rani PK, Deshmukh H, Sharma T (2006) Patient satisfaction levels during teleophthalmology consultation in rural South India. Telemed J E Health 12(5):571–578
47. Kumar S, Yogesan K, Hudson B, Tay-Kearney ML, Constable IJ (2006) Emergency eye care in rural Australia: role of internet. Eye (Lond) 20(12): 1342–1344
48. Taleb AC, Bohm GM, Avila M, Wen CL (2005) The efficacy of telemedicine for ophthalmology triage by a general practitioner. J Telemed Telecare 11 (Suppl 1):83–85
49.Blomdahl S, Calissendorff B, Jacobsson U (2002) Patient-focused urban tele-ophthalmology services. J Telemed Telecare 8(Suppl 2):43–44
50. Gonzalez F, Iglesias R, Suarez A, Gomez-Ulla F, Perez R (2001) Teleophthalmology link between a primary health care centre and a reference hospital. Med Inform Internet Med 26(4):251–263
51. Yogesan K, Henderson C, Barry CJ, Constable IJ (2001) Online eye care in prisons in Western Australia. J Telemed Telecare 7(Suppl 2):63–64
52. Blomdahl S, Maren N, Lof R (2001) Teleophthalmology for the treatment in primary care of disorders in the anterior part of the eye. J Telemed Telecare 7(Suppl 1):25–26
53. Kennedy C, Van Heerden A, Cook C, Murdoch I (2001) Utilization and practical aspects of teleophthalmology between South Africa and the UK. J Telemed Telecare 7(Suppl 1):20–22
54. Lamminen H, Lamminen J, Ruohonen K, Uusitalo H (2001) A cost study of teleconsultation for primarycare ophthalmology and dermatology. J Telemed Telecare 7(3):167–173
55. Cook HL, Heacock GL, Stanford MR, Marshall J (2000) Detection of retinal lesions after telemedicine transmission of digital images. Eye (Lond) 14(Pt 4): 563–571
56.Lattimore MR Jr (1999) A store-forward ophthalmic telemedicine case report from deployed U. S. army forces in Kuwait. Telemed J 5(3):309–313
57.Lamminen H, Salminen L, Uusitalo H (1999)
Teleconsultations between general practitioners and ophthalmologists in Finland. J Telemed Telecare 5(2):118–121
58. Marcus DM, Brooks SE, Ulrich LD, Bassi FH, Laird M, Johnson M et al (1998) Telemedicine diagnosis of eye disorders by direct ophthalmoscopy. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 105(10):1907–1914
59. Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Eikelboom RH, van Saarloos PP (1998) Tele-ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 26(Suppl 1): S9–S11
1 A Literature Review of Teleophthalmology Projects from Around the Globe |
9 |
|
|
60. Rosengren D, Blackwell N, Kelly G, Lenton L, Glastonbury J (1998) The use of telemedicine to treat ophthalmological emergencies in rural Australia. J Telemed Telecare 4(Suppl 1):97–99
61. Shanit D, Lifshitz T, Giladi R, Peterburg Y (1998) A pilot study of tele-ophthalmology outreach services to primary care. J Telemed Telecare 4(Suppl 1):1–2
62.Blackwell NA, Kelly GJ, Lenton LM (1997) Telemedicine ophthalmology consultation in remote Queensland. Med J Aust 167(11–12):583–586
63. Bowman RJ, Kennedy C, Kirwan JF, Sze P, Murdoch IE (2003) Reliability of telemedicine for diagnosing and managing eye problems in accident and emergency departments. Eye (Lond) 17:743–746
64. Taylor P, Kennedy C, Murdoch I, Johnston K, Cook C, Godoumov R (2003) Assessment of benefit in teleophthalmology using a consensus panel. J Telemed Telecare 9:140–145
65.Lorenz B, Elflein H (2002) Preventing blindness in premature infants: a telemedical solution gains acceptance. Neonatal Intensive Care 15(6):42–49
66.Lorenz B, Spasovska K, Elflein H, Schneider N (2009) Wide-field digital imaging based telemedicine for screening for acute retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Six-year results of a multicentre field study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247(9):1251–1262
67. Richter GM, Sun G, Lee TC, Chan RV, Flynn JT, Starren J et al (2009) Speed of telemedicine vs ophthalmoscopy for retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis. Am J Ophthalmol 148(1):136–142, e2
68.Silva RA, Murakami Y, Jain A, Gandhi J, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM (2009) Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 18-month experience with telemedicine screening. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247(1):129–136
69.Lajoie A, Koreen S, Wang L, Kane SA, Lee TC, Weissgold DJ et al (2008) Retinopathy of prematurity management using single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations. Am J Ophthalmol 146(2):298–309
70. Scott KE, Kim DY, Wang L, Kane SA, Coki O, Starren J et al (2008) Telemedical diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity intraphysician agreement between ophthalmoscopic examination and image-based interpretation. Ophthalmology 115(7):1222–1228, e3
71. Skalet AH, Quinn GE, Ying GS, Gordillo L, Dodobara L, Cocker K et al (2008) Telemedicine screening for retinopathy of prematurity in developing countries using digital retinal images: a feasibility project. J AAPOS 12(3):252–258
72.O’Keefe M, Kirwan C (2008) Screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Early Hum Dev 84(2):89–94
73. Chiang MF, Wang L, Busuioc M, Du YE, Chan P, Kane SA et al (2007) Telemedical retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: accuracy, reliability, and image quality. Arch Ophthalmol 125(11):1531–1538
74.Balasubramanian M, Capone A Jr, Hartnett ME, Pignatto S, Trese MT (2006) The photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity study (photoROP): study design and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Retina 26(7 Suppl):S4–S10
75.Chiang MF, Starren J, Du YE, Keenan JD, Schiff WM, Barile GR et al (2006) Remote image based retinopathy of prematurity diagnosis: a receiver operating characteristic analysis of accuracy. Br J Ophthalmol
90(10):1292–1296
76. Ells AL, Holmes JM, Astle WF, Williams G, Leske DA, Fielden M et al (2003) Telemedicine approach to screening for severe retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot study. Ophthalmology 110(11):2113–2117
77.Yen KG, Hess D, Burke B, Johnson RA, Feuer WJ, Flynn JT (2000) The optimum time to employ telephotoscreening to detect retinopathy of prematurity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 98:145–150; discussion 50–51
78.Schwartz SD, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ, Trese MT
(2000) Telemedical evaluation and management of retinopathy of prematurity using a fiberoptic digital fundus camera. Ophthalmology 107(1):25–28
79. Yen KG, Hess D, Burke B, Johnson RA, Feuer WT, Flynn JT (2002) Telephotoscreening to detect retinopathy of prematurity: preliminary study of the optimum time to employ digital fundus camera imaging to detect ROP. J AAPOS 6(2):64–70
80. Murakami Y, Jain A, Silva RA, Lad EM, Gandhi J, Moshfeghi DM (2008) Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 12-month experience with telemedicine screening. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1456–1460
81.Lamminen H (2003) Picture archiving and fundus imaging in a glaucoma clinic. J Telemed Telecare 9(2):114–116
82.Labiris G, Fanariotis M, Christoulakis C, Petounis A, Kitsos G, Aspiotis M et al (2003) Tele-ophthalmology and conventional ophthalmology using a mobile medical unit in remote Greece. J Telemed Telecare 9(5):296–299
83.Bergua A, Mardin CY, Horn FK (2009) Teletransmission of stereoscopic images of the optic nerve head in glaucoma via internet. Telemed J E Health 15(5):439–444
84.Pasquale LR, Asefzadeh B, Dunphy RW, Fisch BM, Conlin PR (2007) Detection of glaucoma-like optic
discs in a diabetes teleretinal program. Optometry 78(12):657–663
85. de Mul M, de Bont AA, Reus NJ, Lemij HG, Berg M (2004) Improving the quality of eye care with teleophthalmology: shared-care glaucoma screening. J Telemed Telecare 10(6):331–336
86. Li HK, Tang RA, Oschner K, Koplos C, Grady J, Crump WJ (1999) Telemedicine screening of glaucoma. Telemed J 5(3):283–290
87.Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Morgan W, Soebadi DY (2000) International transmission of tele-ophthalmol- ogy images. J Telemed Telecare 6(1):41–44
88.Michelson G, Striebel W, Prihoda W, Schmidt V (2000) Telemedicine in the control of intra-ocular pressure. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):S126–S128
89.Yogesan K, Cuypers M, Barry CJ, Constable IJ, Jitskaia L (2000) Tele-ophthalmology screening for retinal and anterior segment diseases. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):S96–S98
10 |
K. Bahaadinbeigy and K. Yogesan |
|
|
90. Tuulonen A, Ohinmaa T, Alanko HI, Hyytinen P, Juutinen A, Toppinen E (1999) The application of teleophthalmology in examining patients with glaucoma: a pilot study. J Glaucoma 8(6):367–373
91. de Bont A, Bal R (2008) Telemedicine in interdisciplinary work practices: on an IT system that met the criteria for success set out by its sponsors, yet failed to become part of every-day clinical routines. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8:47
92.Helveston EM, Neely DE, Cherwek DH, Smallwood LM (2008) Diagnosis and management of strabismus using telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 14(6):
531–538
93. Dawson E, Kennedy C, Bentley C, Lee J, Murdoch I (2002) The role of telemedicine in the assessment of strabismus. J Telemed Telecare 8(1):52–55
94. Helveston EM, Orge FH, Naranjo R, Hernandez L (2001) Telemedicine: strabismus e-consultation. J AAPOS 5(5):291–296
95. Cheung JC, Dick PT, Kraft SP, Yamada J, Macarthur C (2000) Strabismus examination by telemedicine. Ophthalmology 107(11):1999–2005
96. Verma M, Raman R, Mohan RE (2009) Application of tele-ophthalmology in remote diagnosis and management of adnexal and orbital diseases. Indian J Ophthalmol 57(5):381–384
97.Rayner S, Beaconsfield M, Kennedy C, Collin R, Taylor P, Murdoch I (2001) Subspecialty adnexal ophthalmological examination using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 7(Suppl 1):29–31
98. Threlkeld AB, Fahd T, Camp M, Johnson MH (1999) Telemedical evaluation of ocular adnexa and anterior segment. Am J Ophthalmol 127(4):464–466
99.Shimmura S, Shinozaki N, Fukagawa K, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (1998) Real-time telemedicine in the clinical assessment of the ocular surface. Am J Ophthalmol 125(3):388–390
100.Cavallerano AA, Cavallerano JD, Katalinic P, Blake B, Rynne M, Conlin PR et al (2005) A telemedicine program for diabetic retinopathy in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center–the Joslin Vision Network Eye Health Care Model. Am J Ophthalmol 139(4): 597–604
101.Tennant MT, Rudnisky CJ, Hinz BJ, MacDonald IM, Greve MD (2000) Tele-ophthalmology via stereoscopic digital imaging: a pilot project. Diabetes Technol Ther 2(4):583–587
102.Ulrich JN, Poudyal G, Marks SJ, Vrabec TR, Marks B, Thapa AB et al (2009) Ocular telemedicine between Nepal and the USA: prevalence of vitreoretinal disease in rural Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol 93(5):698–699
103.Zimmer-Galler IE, Zeimer R (2005) Feasibility of screening for high-risk age-related macular degeneration with an internet-based automated fundus camera. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 36(3): 228–236
104.Peter J, Piantadosi J, Piantadosi C, Cooper P, Gehling N, Kaufmann C et al (2006) Use of real-time telemedicine in the detection of diabetic macular oedema: a pilot study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34(4):312–316
105.Rudnisky CJ, Tennant MT, de Leon AR, Hinz BJ, Greve MD (2006) Benefits of stereopsis when identifying clinically significant macular edema via teleophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 41:727–732
106.Castro AF, Silva-Turnes JC, Gonzalez F (2007) Evaluation of retinal digital images by a general practitioner. Telemed J E Health 13(3):287–292
107.Murdoch I, Bainbridge J, Taylor P, Smith L, Burns J, Rendall J (2000) Postoperative evaluation of patients following ophthalmic surgery. J Telemed Telecare 6(Suppl 1):S84–S86
108.Saleh M, Schoenlaub S, Desprez P, Bourcier T, Gaucher D, Astruc D et al (2009) Use of digital camera imaging of eye fundus for telemedicine in children suspected of abusive head injury. Br J Ophthalmol 93(4):424–428
109.Qaddoumi I, Nawaiseh I, Mehyar M, Razzouk B, Haik BG, Kharma S et al (2008) Team management, twinning, and telemedicine in retinoblastoma: a 3-tier approach implemented in the first eye salvage program in Jordan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51(2): 241–244
