- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Method
- •1.2.1 Databases
- •1.2.2 Dates
- •1.2.3 Keywords
- •1.2.4 Criteria for Inclusion
- •1.2.5 Criteria for Exclusion
- •1.2.6 Selection of Papers
- •1.3 Results
- •1.3.1 Subspecialty
- •1.3.2 Type of Telemedicine
- •1.3.3 Study Design
- •1.3.4 Final Conclusions of Papers
- •1.4 Discussion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 The Need for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programs
- •2.4 Guidelines for Referring Patients
- •2.7 Program Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.9 Program Personnel and Operations
- •2.9.1 Primary Care Providers
- •2.9.2 Photographers
- •2.9.3 Clinical Consultants
- •2.9.4 Administrators
- •2.9.5 A Note to CEOs, Operations Directors, and Clinic Managers
- •2.10 Policies and Procedures
- •2.10.1 Sample Protocol 1
- •2.10.1.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Services
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.2 Sample Protocol 2
- •2.10.2.1 Pupil Dilation Before Diabetic Retinopathy Photography
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.3 Sample Protocol 3
- •2.10.3.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Photography Review
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.11 Technical Requirements
- •2.11.1 Connectivity
- •2.11.2 Resolution
- •2.11.3 Color
- •2.11.4 Stereopsis
- •2.11.5 Compression
- •2.11.6 Enhancement
- •2.11.7 Pupil Dilation
- •2.11.8 Early California Telemedicine Initiatives Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.11.9 The American Indian Diabetes Teleophthalmology Grant Program
- •2.11.10 Central Valley EyePACS Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Project
- •2.12.1 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •2.12.1.1 ADA Guidelines Terms
- •2.12.1.2 Vitrectomy
- •References
- •3: Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 History of Stereopsis and Stereopsis in Ophthalmology
- •3.3 Technology and Photography
- •3.3.3 Imaging Fields
- •3.3.4 Image Viewing Techniques
- •3.3.5 Image Compression
- •3.4 Stereoscopic Teleophthalmology Systems
- •3.4.1 University of Alberta
- •3.4.4 Joslin Vision Network
- •3.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Main Outcome Measures
- •4.3 Results
- •4.3.1 Retinal Video Recording Versus Retinal Still Photography
- •4.3.2 Video Compression Analysis
- •4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Automated, Remote Image Analysis of Retinal Diseases
- •5.1.2 Telehealth
- •5.2 Design Requirements
- •5.2.1 Telehealth Network Architecture
- •5.2.2 Work Flow
- •5.2.3 Performance Evaluation of the Network
- •5.3 Automated Image Analysis Overview
- •5.3.1 Quality Assessment Module
- •5.3.2 Vascular Tree Segmentation
- •5.3.3 Quality Evaluation
- •5.4 Anatomic Structure Segmentation
- •5.4.1 Optic Nerve Detection
- •5.4.2 Macula
- •5.4.3 Lesion Segmentation
- •5.4.4 Lesion Population Description
- •5.4.5 Image Query
- •5.5 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3 Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Leakage
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Patients and Methods
- •7.2.1 Participants
- •7.2.2 Methods
- •7.2.3 Statistics
- •7.3 Results
- •7.3.1 Reliability of Image Evaluation
- •7.3.2 Prevalence of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Atrophy
- •7.4 Discussion
- •7.5 Perspectives
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Homology Between Retinal and Systemic Microvasculature
- •8.1.3 Need for More Precise CVD Risk Prediction
- •8.2.1 Retinal Microvascular Signs
- •8.2.2 Retinal Vessel Biometry
- •8.2.3 Newer Retinal Imaging for Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.3 Associations of Retinal Imaging and CVD Risk
- •8.3.1.1 Risk of Pre-clinical CVD
- •8.3.1.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.1.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.1 Risk of Hypertension
- •8.3.2.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.2.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.4 Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease
- •8.3.3 Newer Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.4 Retinal Imaging and Its Potential as a Tool for CVD Risk Prediction
- •References
- •9.1 Alzheimer’s Disease
- •9.2 Treatments
- •9.3 Diagnosis
- •9.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Stroke
- •10.1.2 Heart Disease
- •10.1.3 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.2 Purpose
- •10.3 Method
- •10.3.1 Medical Approach
- •10.3.2 Technical Approach
- •10.3.3 Output of Medical Data
- •10.4 Patients
- •10.5 Results
- •10.5.1 Medical History
- •10.5.2 Telemedical Evaluation of Retinal Vessels
- •10.5.2.1 Prevalence of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •10.5.2.2 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.5.2.3 PROCAM-Index
- •10.6 Discussion and Perceptive
- •10.6.1 Estimation of “Stroke Risk” Estimated by the Stage of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 System Requirements
- •11.3 Fundus Camera
- •11.4 Imaging Procedure
- •11.4.1 Reading Center Procedure
- •11.5 Detection of Macular Edema
- •11.6 Implementation
- •11.7 Unreadable Images
- •11.7.1 Impact on Overall Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment Rates
- •11.7.2 Compliance with Recommendations
- •11.7.3 Challenges
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •References
- •12.1 Screening
- •12.2 Background
- •12.3 Historical Perspective in England
- •12.4 Methodology
- •12.4.1 The Aim of the Programme
- •12.5 Systematic DR Screening
- •12.6 Cameras for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.7 Software for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.9 Implementation in England
- •12.11 Quality Assurance
- •12.12 The Development of External Quality Assurance in the English Screening Programme
- •12.13 Information Technology (IT) Developments for the English Screening Programme
- •12.14 Dataset Development
- •12.15 The Development of External Quality Assurance Test Set for the English Screening Programme
- •12.16 Failsafe
- •12.17 The Epidemic of Diabetes
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Burden of Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in India
- •13.3 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models
- •13.4 Need for Telescreening
- •13.5 Guidelines for Telescreening
- •13.6 ATA Categories of DR Telescreening Validation
- •13.7 Yield of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Telescreening Model
- •13.8 How Are Images Transferred
- •13.10 How Many Fields Are Enough for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •13.11 Is Mydriasis Needed While Using Nonmydriatic Camera?
- •13.12 Validation Studies on Telescreening
- •13.12.1 Accuracy of Telescreening
- •13.12.2 Patient Satisfaction in Telescreening
- •13.12.3 Cost Effectivity
- •13.12.4 Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Our Experience
- •13.13 Future of Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Methods
- •14.3 Discussion
- •14.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Description of the EADRSI
- •15.5 State Support of Screening in the Safety Net
- •15.7 Screening Economics for Providers
- •15.8 Patient Sensitivity to Fees
- •15.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Setting Up the New Screening Model
- •16.2.1 Phase 1: Training
- •16.2.2 Phase 2: Evaluation of Agreement
- •16.2.3 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.3 Technologic Requirements
- •16.3.1 Data Management
- •16.3.2 Data Models
- •16.3.2.1 Data Scheme for Patient-Related Information
- •16.3.2.2 Data Scheme for Images
- •Fundus Camera VISUCAM Pro NM
- •PACS Server
- •ClearCanvas DICOM Visualizer
- •16.4 Results
- •16.4.1 Phase 2: Agreement Evaluation
- •16.4.2 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.5 Discussion
- •16.5.1 Evaluation of the Screening Model
- •16.5.2 Prevalence of DR
- •16.5.3 Quality Evaluation
- •16.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1.3 Examination and Treatment
- •17.1.4 Limitations of Current Care
- •17.2 Telemedicine and ROP
- •17.2.2 Accuracy and Reliability of Telemedicine for ROP Diagnosis
- •17.2.3 Operational ROP Telemedicine Systems
- •17.2.4 Potential Barriers
- •17.3 Closing Remarks
- •17.3.1 Future Directions
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Neonatal Stress and Pain
- •18.3 ROP Screening Technique
- •18.4 Effect of Different Examination Techniques on Stress
- •18.5 Future of Retinal Imaging in Babies
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 History of the Program
- •19.3 Telehealth Technologies
- •19.4 Impact of the Program
- •Selected References
- •Preamble
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •The Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)
- •Mission
- •Vision
- •Goals
- •Guiding Principles
- •Ethics
- •Clinical Validation
- •Category 1
- •Category 2
- •Category 3
- •Category 4
- •Communication
- •Medical Care Supervision
- •Patient Care Coordinator
- •Image Acquisition
- •Image Review and Evaluation
- •Information Systems
- •Interoperability
- •Image Acquisition
- •Compression
- •Data Communication and Transmission
- •Computer Display
- •Archiving and Retrieval
- •Security
- •Reliability and Redundancy
- •Documentation
- •Image Analysis
- •Legal Requirements
- •Facility Accreditation
- •Privileging and Credentialing
- •Stark Act and Self-referrals
- •State Medical Practice Acts/Licensure
- •Tort Liability
- •Duty
- •Standards of Care
- •Consent
- •Quality Control
- •Operations
- •Customer Support
- •Originating Site
- •Transmission
- •Distant Site
- •Financial Factors
- •Reimbursement
- •Grants
- •Federal Programs
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Equipment Cost
- •Summary
- •Abbreviations
- •Appendices
- •Appendix A: Interoperability
- •Appendix B: DICOM Metadata
- •Appendix C: Computer-Aided Detection
- •Appendix D: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- •Appendix F: Quality Control
- •Appendix H: Customer Support
- •Level 1
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Appendix I: Reimbursement
- •Medicare
- •Medicaid
- •Commercial Insurance Carrier Reimbursement
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Disease Prevention
- •Resource Utilization
- •American Telemedicine Association’s Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Contributors
- •Second Edition
- •First Edition
- •Index
9 Retinal Screening for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease |
97 |
|
|
sibly be detected by non-invasive optical scattering [60], Raman spectroscopy or fluorescent tagging techniques. Given the homology between the retinal and cerebral microvasculatures [61], it is not unexpected that changes in the retinal vasculature might also occur in AD. Vascular topography, including the angles at which blood vessels bifurcate and the relationship between the widths of parent to daughter blood vessels at vascular junctions, is optimized in healthy subjects in order to minimize shear stress across a vascular network [62, 63]. Variations from the optimal geometrical topography are known to occur in particular vascular conditions [64, 65] and to be associated with deficiencies in cognitive ability [66]. Similar variations may occur in AD due to the disease’s vascular component and hence are worthy of being explored with retinal photography.
Retinal photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) have both been used to demonstrate optic disc changes in AD, including optic disc pallor, pathologic disc cupping and thinning of the neuroretinal rim [39, 40]. Some of the retinal morphologies found in AD are also found in the eye disease glaucoma, specifically RNFL thinning, optic disc cupping and visual field loss. The fivefold higher chance of visual field defects and/or optic disc cupping found in AD has been interpreted as a higher occurrence rate of glaucoma in AD [67]. A greater than 10% per year decay in visual field and optic disc cupping was demonstrated in glaucoma patients who were later diagnosed with AD, whereas an average 3% per year decay in visual field was observed in glaucoma patients who did not develop AD, indicating that both diseases are contributing to these ocular effects [68].
Ab plaques as well as retinal microvascular deposition of Ab have been identified in the retinas of AD transgenic mouse models [47]. If retinal Ab plaques occur in human AD, as supported by one recent study [41], they could possibly be detected by non-invasive optical scattering [60], Raman spectroscopy or fluorescent tagging techniques. AD brain tissues exhibit visual and infraredexcited auto-fluorescence (AF) [69]. Retinal AF changes are observed in a number of eye disorders including glaucoma, in which lipofuscin accumulation in parapapillary retinal pigment
epithelial (RPE) cells causes AF changes [70]. Given the similarity of the retinal cell death process reported in glaucoma and AD [71, 72], AF changes are also worthy of being investigated in the AD retina. It is hoped that these techniques could prove useful for non-invasive, early diagnosis of AD using the eye.
9.6Conclusions
AD has a terrible impact on both those directly affected and on society in general. Thus, there is a pressing need for more effective treatments. By the time a person is diagnosed with ‘probable AD’ using current techniques, substantial irreversible neuronal degeneration has already occurred. Therefore, research into better treatments must be paralleled by research into technologies to screen the population for AD, to identify cases before cognitive symptoms arise.
Ocular morphologies reported in AD give hope for a non-invasive, cost-effective screening test for AD. Evidence is accumulating in support of AD-related changes in the eye, but finding a sufficiently sensitive and specific ocular biomarker is proving to be a major challenge. Many reported ocular changes in AD also occur in other disorders such as glaucoma and hypertension. Also, most studies into ocular morphology in AD have been limited by small participant numbers, few study groups and little relevant medical information on participants. Hence, larger studies are required to confirm and investigate further these ocular changes in AD.
There is no doubt that the significant diagnostic error rate in AD is confounding many aspects of AD research. A combination of new brain imaging techniques and CSF biomarkers has the potential to alleviate this problem, leading to more robust results in AD research, including ocular morphology. However, no studies have yet compared ocular morphology in AD to brain Ab loading or CSF protein changes, an approach that has the potential to shed light on connections between ocular changes and AD. In addition, there are also many more ocular parameters left to investigate in AD.
98 |
S. Frost et al. |
|
|
Thus, there remains scope for ocular changes to be utilized for AD screening or diagnosis, providing greater sensitivity and specificity and detection at an earlier stage in the disease process. An ocular screening test for AD would benefit AD sufferers and researchers, providing new insight into the molecular processes and genetic determinants of the disease. An ocular biomarker or biomarkers could turn out to be highly specific for AD or to be a useful component in a multidisciplinary approach aimed at producing an earlier and more accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.
References
1. Brookmeyer R, Gray S, Kawas C (1998) Projections of Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset. Am J Public Health 88:1337–1342
2. Tiraboschi P, Hansen LA, Thal LJ, Corey-Bloom J (2004) The importance of neuritic plaques and tangles to the development and evolution of AD. Neurology 62:1984–1989
3. Parker MH, Chen R, Conway KA, Lee DH, Luo C, Boyd RE, Nortey SO, Ross TM, Scott MK, Reitz AB (2002) Synthesis of (−)-5,8-dihydroxy-3R-methyl- 2R-(dipropylamino)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthale ne: an inhibitor of beta-amyloid(1–42) aggregation. Bioorg Med Chem 10:3565–3569
4. Bush AI (2002) Metal complexing agents as therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 23:1031–1038
5.Bush AI (2003) The metallobiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci 26:207–214
6. Schenk D, Barbour R, Dunn W, Gordon G, Grajeda H, Guido T, Hu K, Huang J, Johnson-Wood K, Khan K, Kholodenko D, Lee M, Liao Z, Lieberburg I, Motter R, Mutter L, Soriano F, Shopp G, Vasquez N, Vandevert C, Walker S, Wogulis M, Yednock T, Games D, Seubert P (1999) Immunization with amy- loid-beta attenuates Alzheimer-disease-like pathology in the PDAPP mouse. Nature 400:173–177
7. Lazarov O, Robinson J, Tang YP, Hairston IS, KoradeMirnics Z, Lee VM, Hersh LB, Sapolsky RM, Mirnics K, Sisodia SS (2005) Environmental enrichment reduces Abeta levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice. Cell 120:701–713
8. Wilson RS, Mendes De Leon CF, Barnes LL, Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA (2002) Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. JAMA 287:742–748
9. Schaffer C, Donlon P (1983) Medical causes of psychiatric symptoms in the elderly. Clin Gerontol 1: 3–18
10. Thal LJ, Kantarci K, Reiman EM, Klunk WE, Weiner MW, Zetterberg H, Galasko D, Pratico D, Griffin S, Schenk D, Siemers E (2006) The role of biomarkers in clinical trials for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 20:6–15
11.Sunderland T, Linker G, Mirza N, Putnam KT, Friedman DL, Kimmel LH, Bergeson J, Manetti GJ, Zimmermann M, Tang B, Bartko JJ, Cohen RM (2003) Decreased beta-amyloid1–42 and increased tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA 289:2094–2103
12.Katz B, Rimmer S (1989) Ophthalmologic manifestations of Alzheimer’s disease. Surv Ophthalmol 34:31–43
13.Sadun AA, Borchert M, DeVita E, Hinton DR, Bassi CJ (1987) Assessment of visual impairment in patients with
Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Ophthalmol 104:113–120 14. Trick GL, Trick LR, Morris P, Wolf M (1995) Visual
field loss in senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Neurology 45:68–74
15.Whittaker KW, Burdon MA, Shah P (2002) Visual field loss and Alzheimer’s disease. Eye (Lond) 16:
206–208
16. Pache M, Smeets CH, Gasio PF, Savaskan E, Flammer J, Wirz-Justice A, Kaiser HJ (2003) Colour vision deficiencies in Alzheimer’s disease. Age Ageing 32:422–426
17.Cogan DG (1987) Alzheimer syndromes. Am J Ophthalmol 104:183–184
18.Cronin-Golomb A, Sugiura R, Corkin S, Growdon JH (1993) Incomplete achromatopsia in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 14:471–477
19.Lakshminarayanan V, Lagrave J, Kean ML, Dick M, Shankle R (1996) Vision in dementia: contrast effects. Neurol Res 18:9–15
20. Crow RW, Levin LB, LaBree L, Rubin R, Feldon SE (2003) Sweep visual evoked potential evaluation of contrast sensitivity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:875–878
21.Nissen MJ, Corkin S, Buonanno FS, Growdon JH, Wray SH, Bauer J (1985) Spatial vision in Alzheimer’s disease. General findings and a case report. Arch Neurol 42:667–671
22.Mendola JD, Cronin-Golomb A, Corkin S, Growdon JH (1995) Prevalence of visual deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Optom Vis Sci 72:155–167
23.Schlotterer G, Moscovitch M, Crapper-McLachlan D (1984) Visual processing deficits as assessed by spatial frequency contrast sensitivity and backward mask-
ing in normal ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 107(Pt 1):309–325
24. Mielke R, Kessler J, Fink G, Herholz K, Heiss WD (1995) Dysfunction of visual cortex contributes to disturbed processing of visual information in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Neurosci 82:1–9
25. Morrison JH, Hof PR, Bouras C (1991) An anatomic substrate for visual disconnection in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 640:36–43
26. Wong-Riley M, Antuono P, Ho KC, Egan R, Hevner R, Liebl W, Huang Z, Rachel R, Jones J (1997) Cytochrome oxidase in Alzheimer’s disease: bio-
9 Retinal Screening for Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease |
99 |
|
|
chemical, histochemical, and immunohistochemical analyses of the visual and other systems. Vision Res 37:3593–3608
27. Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Koss E (1994) Motion perception and Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol 49:P52–P57
28. Sadun AA, Bassi CJ (1990) Optic nerve damage in Alzheimer’s disease. Ophthalmology 97:9–17
29.Fletcher WA, Sharpe JA (1988) Smooth pursuit dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 38:272–277
30.Mendez MF, Tomsak RL, Remler B (1990) Disorders of the visual system in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 10:62–69
31.Leuba G (1995) Pathology of subcortical visual centres in relation to cortical degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 21:410
32. McKee AC, Au R, Cabral HJ, Kowall NW, Seshadri S, Kubilus CA, Drake J, Wolf PA (2006) Visual association pathology in preclinical Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65:621–630
33.Bentley P, Driver J, Dolan RJ (2008) Cholinesterase inhibition modulates visual and attentional brain responses in Alzheimer’s disease and health. Brain 131:409–424
34.Herholz K, Weisenbach S, Zundorf G, Lenz O, Schroder H, Bauer B, Kalbe E, Heiss WD (2004) In vivo study of acetylcholine esterase in basal forebrain, amygdala, and cortex in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neuroimage 21:136–143
35.Nobili L, Sannita WG (1997) Cholinergic modulation, visual function and Alzheimer’s dementia. Vision Res 37:3559–3571
36.Berisha F, Feke GT, Trempe CL, McMeel JW,
Schepens CL (2007) Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:2285–2289
37. Paquet C, Boissonnot M, Roger F, Dighiero P, Gil R, Hugon J (2007) Abnormal retinal thickness in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 420:97–99
38.Hedges TR 3rd, Perez Galves R, Speigelman D, Barbas NR, Peli E, Yardley CJ (1996) Retinal nerve
fiber layer abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 74:271–275
39. Tsai CS (1991) Optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer in Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Ophthalmol 109:199
40. Danesh-Meyer HV, Birch H, Ku JY, Carroll S, Gamble G (2006) Reduction of optic nerve fibers in patients with Alzheimer disease identified by laser imaging. Neurology 67:1852–1854
41.Koronyo-Hamaoui M, Koronyo Y, Ljubimov AV, Miller CA, Ko MK, Black KL, Schwartz M, Farkas DL (2011) Identification of amyloid plaques in retinas
from Alzheimer’s patients and noninvasive in vivo optical imaging of retinal plaques in a mouse model. Neuroimage 54(Suppl 1):S204–S217
42. Katz B, Rimmer S, Iragui V, Katzman R (1989) Abnormal pattern electroretinogram in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence for retinal ganglion cell degeneration? Ann Neurol 26:221–225
43.Trick GL, Barris MC, Bickler-Bluth M (1989) Abnormal pattern electroretinograms in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Ann Neurol 26:226–231
44.Sun C, Wang JJ, Mackey DA, Wong TY (2009) Retinal vascular caliber: systemic, environmental, and genetic associations. Surv Ophthalmol 54:74–95
45. Suo Z, Humphrey J, Kundtz A, Sethi F, Placzek A, Crawford F, Mullan M (1998) Soluble Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid constricts the cerebral vasculature in vivo. Neurosci Lett 257:77–80
46. Loffler KU (1995) Immunoreactivity against tau, amyloid precursor protein, and beta-amyloid in the human retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36:24
47. Liu B, Rasool S, Yang Z, Glabe CG, Schreiber SS, Ge J, Tan Z (2009) Amyloid-peptide vaccinations reduce {beta}-amyloid plaques but exacerbate vascular deposition and inflammation in the retina of Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 175:2099–2110
48. Perez SE, Lumayag S, Kovacs B, Mufson EJ, Xu S (2009) Beta-amyloid deposition and functional impairment in the retina of the APPswe/PS1DeltaE9 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:793–800
49. Parisi V, Restuccia R, Fattapposta F, Mina C, Bucci MG, Pierelli F (2001) Morphological and functional retinal impairment in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Clin Neurophysiol 112:1860–1867
50. Iseri PK, Altinas O, Tokay T, Yuksel N (2006) Relationship between cognitive impairment and retinal morphological and visual functional abnormalities in Alzheimer disease. J Neuroophthalmol 26:18–24
51. Blanks JC, Hinton DR, Sadun AA, Miller CA (1989) Retinal ganglion cell degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res 501:364–372
52. Blanks JC, Schmidt SY, Torigoe Y, Porrello KV, Hinton DR, Blanks RH (1996) Retinal pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. II. Regional neuron loss and glial changes in GCL. Neurobiol Aging 17: 385–395
53. Blanks JC, Torigoe Y, Hinton DR, Blanks RH (1996) Retinal pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. I. Ganglion cell loss in foveal/parafoveal retina. Neurobiol Aging 17:377–384
54. Hinton DR, Sadun AA, Blanks JC, Miller CA (1986) Optic-nerve degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 315:485–487
55. Sadun AA, Bassi CJ (1990) The visual system in Alzheimer’s disease. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 67:331–347
56.Curcio CA, Drucker DN (1993) Retinal ganglion cells in Alzheimer’s disease and aging. Ann Neurol 33: 248–257
57.Davies DC, McCoubrie P, McDonald B, Jobst KA (1995) Myelinated axon number in the optic nerve is unaffected by Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Ophthalmol 79:596–600
58.Ravona-Springer R, Davidson M, Noy S (2003) The role of cardiovascular risk factors in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Spectr 8:824–833
100 |
S. Frost et al. |
|
|
59.Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Orantes M, Wiestler OD (2003) Vascular pathology in Alzheimer disease: cor-
relation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and arteriosclerosis/lipohyalinosis with cognitive decline. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 62:1287–1301
60. Goldstein LE, Moir R, Lu S, Fu L, Chadwick O, Arnett E, Ericsson M, Klunk W, Mathis C, Chylack LT Jr, Clark J, Tanzi R, Moncaster JA (2006) Noninvasive early detection of beta-amyloid molecular pathology by quasi-elastic light scattering in vivo. Alzheimers Dement 2:S133
61. Patton N, Aslam T, Macgillivray T, Pattie A, Deary IJ, Dhillon B (2005) Retinal vascular image analysis as a potential screening tool for cerebrovascular disease: a rationale based on homology between cerebral and retinal microvasculatures. J Anat 206:319–348
62. Zamir M, Brown N (1982) Arterial branching in various parts of the cardiovascular system. Am J Anat 163:295–307
63. Zamir M, Medeiros JA (1982) Arterial branching in man and monkey. J Gen Physiol 79:353–360
64. Chapman N, Dell’omo G, Sartini MS, Witt N, Hughes A, Thom S, Pedrinelli R (2002) Peripheral vascular disease is associated with abnormal arteriolar diameter relationships at bifurcations in the human retina. Clin Sci (Lond) 103:111–116
65. Stanton AV, Wasan B, Cerutti A, Ford S, Marsh R, Sever PP, Thom SA, Hughes AD (1995) Vascular network changes in the retina with age and hypertension. J Hypertens 13:1724–1728
66. Patton N, Pattie A, MacGillivray T, Aslam T, Dhillon B, Gow A, Starr JM, Whalley LJ, Deary IJ (2007) The association between retinal vascular network geometry and cognitive ability in an elderly population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:1995–2000
67. Bayer AU, Ferrari F, Erb C (2002) High occurrence rate of glaucoma among patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol 47:165–168
68.Bayer AU, Ferrari F (2002) Severe progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Eye 16:209–212
69.Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Christie R, Nikitin AY, Hyman BT, Webb WW (2003) Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7075–7080
70.Viestenz A, Langenbucher A, Mardin CY (2006) Parapapillary autofluorescence as indicator for glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 223:315–320
71.McKinnon SJ, Lehman DM, Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Merges CA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Ransom NL, Tahzib NG, Reitsamer HA, Levkovitch-Verbin H, Quigley HA, Zack DJ (2002) Caspase activation and amyloid precursor protein cleavage in rat ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1077–1087
72.Yin H, Chen L, Chen X, Liu X (2008) Soluble amyloid beta oligomers may contribute to apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma. Med Hypotheses 71:77–80
