- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.2 Method
- •1.2.1 Databases
- •1.2.2 Dates
- •1.2.3 Keywords
- •1.2.4 Criteria for Inclusion
- •1.2.5 Criteria for Exclusion
- •1.2.6 Selection of Papers
- •1.3 Results
- •1.3.1 Subspecialty
- •1.3.2 Type of Telemedicine
- •1.3.3 Study Design
- •1.3.4 Final Conclusions of Papers
- •1.4 Discussion
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2 The Need for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programs
- •2.4 Guidelines for Referring Patients
- •2.7 Program Models for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.9 Program Personnel and Operations
- •2.9.1 Primary Care Providers
- •2.9.2 Photographers
- •2.9.3 Clinical Consultants
- •2.9.4 Administrators
- •2.9.5 A Note to CEOs, Operations Directors, and Clinic Managers
- •2.10 Policies and Procedures
- •2.10.1 Sample Protocol 1
- •2.10.1.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Services
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.2 Sample Protocol 2
- •2.10.2.1 Pupil Dilation Before Diabetic Retinopathy Photography
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.10.3 Sample Protocol 3
- •2.10.3.1 Diabetic Retinopathy Photography Review
- •Policy
- •Background
- •Procedure
- •2.11 Technical Requirements
- •2.11.1 Connectivity
- •2.11.2 Resolution
- •2.11.3 Color
- •2.11.4 Stereopsis
- •2.11.5 Compression
- •2.11.6 Enhancement
- •2.11.7 Pupil Dilation
- •2.11.8 Early California Telemedicine Initiatives Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •2.11.9 The American Indian Diabetes Teleophthalmology Grant Program
- •2.11.10 Central Valley EyePACS Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Project
- •2.12.1 Diabetic Retinopathy
- •2.12.1.1 ADA Guidelines Terms
- •2.12.1.2 Vitrectomy
- •References
- •3: Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2 History of Stereopsis and Stereopsis in Ophthalmology
- •3.3 Technology and Photography
- •3.3.3 Imaging Fields
- •3.3.4 Image Viewing Techniques
- •3.3.5 Image Compression
- •3.4 Stereoscopic Teleophthalmology Systems
- •3.4.1 University of Alberta
- •3.4.4 Joslin Vision Network
- •3.5 Conclusion
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.2 Methods
- •4.2.1 Main Outcome Measures
- •4.3 Results
- •4.3.1 Retinal Video Recording Versus Retinal Still Photography
- •4.3.2 Video Compression Analysis
- •4.4 Discussion
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.1.1 Automated, Remote Image Analysis of Retinal Diseases
- •5.1.2 Telehealth
- •5.2 Design Requirements
- •5.2.1 Telehealth Network Architecture
- •5.2.2 Work Flow
- •5.2.3 Performance Evaluation of the Network
- •5.3 Automated Image Analysis Overview
- •5.3.1 Quality Assessment Module
- •5.3.2 Vascular Tree Segmentation
- •5.3.3 Quality Evaluation
- •5.4 Anatomic Structure Segmentation
- •5.4.1 Optic Nerve Detection
- •5.4.2 Macula
- •5.4.3 Lesion Segmentation
- •5.4.4 Lesion Population Description
- •5.4.5 Image Query
- •5.5 Summary
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction
- •6.3 Optical Coherence Tomography to Detect Leakage
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.2 Patients and Methods
- •7.2.1 Participants
- •7.2.2 Methods
- •7.2.3 Statistics
- •7.3 Results
- •7.3.1 Reliability of Image Evaluation
- •7.3.2 Prevalence of Glaucomatous Optic Nerve Atrophy
- •7.4 Discussion
- •7.5 Perspectives
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.2 Homology Between Retinal and Systemic Microvasculature
- •8.1.3 Need for More Precise CVD Risk Prediction
- •8.2.1 Retinal Microvascular Signs
- •8.2.2 Retinal Vessel Biometry
- •8.2.3 Newer Retinal Imaging for Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.3 Associations of Retinal Imaging and CVD Risk
- •8.3.1.1 Risk of Pre-clinical CVD
- •8.3.1.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.1.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.1 Risk of Hypertension
- •8.3.2.2 Risk of Stroke
- •8.3.2.3 Risk of Coronary Heart Disease
- •8.3.2.4 Risk of Peripheral Artery Disease
- •8.3.3 Newer Morphologic Features of Retinal Vasculature
- •8.4 Retinal Imaging and Its Potential as a Tool for CVD Risk Prediction
- •References
- •9.1 Alzheimer’s Disease
- •9.2 Treatments
- •9.3 Diagnosis
- •9.6 Conclusions
- •References
- •10.1 Introduction
- •10.1.1 Stroke
- •10.1.2 Heart Disease
- •10.1.3 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.2 Purpose
- •10.3 Method
- •10.3.1 Medical Approach
- •10.3.2 Technical Approach
- •10.3.3 Output of Medical Data
- •10.4 Patients
- •10.5 Results
- •10.5.1 Medical History
- •10.5.2 Telemedical Evaluation of Retinal Vessels
- •10.5.2.1 Prevalence of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •10.5.2.2 Arteriovenous Ratio
- •10.5.2.3 PROCAM-Index
- •10.6 Discussion and Perceptive
- •10.6.1 Estimation of “Stroke Risk” Estimated by the Stage of Retinal Microangiopathy
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2 System Requirements
- •11.3 Fundus Camera
- •11.4 Imaging Procedure
- •11.4.1 Reading Center Procedure
- •11.5 Detection of Macular Edema
- •11.6 Implementation
- •11.7 Unreadable Images
- •11.7.1 Impact on Overall Diabetic Retinopathy Assessment Rates
- •11.7.2 Compliance with Recommendations
- •11.7.3 Challenges
- •11.7.4 Summary
- •References
- •12.1 Screening
- •12.2 Background
- •12.3 Historical Perspective in England
- •12.4 Methodology
- •12.4.1 The Aim of the Programme
- •12.5 Systematic DR Screening
- •12.6 Cameras for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.7 Software for Use in the English Screening Programme
- •12.9 Implementation in England
- •12.11 Quality Assurance
- •12.12 The Development of External Quality Assurance in the English Screening Programme
- •12.13 Information Technology (IT) Developments for the English Screening Programme
- •12.14 Dataset Development
- •12.15 The Development of External Quality Assurance Test Set for the English Screening Programme
- •12.16 Failsafe
- •12.17 The Epidemic of Diabetes
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Burden of Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy in India
- •13.3 Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Models
- •13.4 Need for Telescreening
- •13.5 Guidelines for Telescreening
- •13.6 ATA Categories of DR Telescreening Validation
- •13.7 Yield of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Telescreening Model
- •13.8 How Are Images Transferred
- •13.10 How Many Fields Are Enough for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •13.11 Is Mydriasis Needed While Using Nonmydriatic Camera?
- •13.12 Validation Studies on Telescreening
- •13.12.1 Accuracy of Telescreening
- •13.12.2 Patient Satisfaction in Telescreening
- •13.12.3 Cost Effectivity
- •13.12.4 Telescreening for Diabetic Retinopathy: Our Experience
- •13.13 Future of Diabetic Retinopathy Screening
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.2 Methods
- •14.3 Discussion
- •14.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Introduction
- •15.1.1 Description of the EADRSI
- •15.5 State Support of Screening in the Safety Net
- •15.7 Screening Economics for Providers
- •15.8 Patient Sensitivity to Fees
- •15.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.2 Setting Up the New Screening Model
- •16.2.1 Phase 1: Training
- •16.2.2 Phase 2: Evaluation of Agreement
- •16.2.3 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.3 Technologic Requirements
- •16.3.1 Data Management
- •16.3.2 Data Models
- •16.3.2.1 Data Scheme for Patient-Related Information
- •16.3.2.2 Data Scheme for Images
- •Fundus Camera VISUCAM Pro NM
- •PACS Server
- •ClearCanvas DICOM Visualizer
- •16.4 Results
- •16.4.1 Phase 2: Agreement Evaluation
- •16.4.2 Phase 3: Implementation of the Screening Model
- •16.5 Discussion
- •16.5.1 Evaluation of the Screening Model
- •16.5.2 Prevalence of DR
- •16.5.3 Quality Evaluation
- •16.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1.3 Examination and Treatment
- •17.1.4 Limitations of Current Care
- •17.2 Telemedicine and ROP
- •17.2.2 Accuracy and Reliability of Telemedicine for ROP Diagnosis
- •17.2.3 Operational ROP Telemedicine Systems
- •17.2.4 Potential Barriers
- •17.3 Closing Remarks
- •17.3.1 Future Directions
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.2 Neonatal Stress and Pain
- •18.3 ROP Screening Technique
- •18.4 Effect of Different Examination Techniques on Stress
- •18.5 Future of Retinal Imaging in Babies
- •References
- •19.1 Introduction
- •19.2 History of the Program
- •19.3 Telehealth Technologies
- •19.4 Impact of the Program
- •Selected References
- •Preamble
- •Introduction
- •Background
- •The Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS)
- •Mission
- •Vision
- •Goals
- •Guiding Principles
- •Ethics
- •Clinical Validation
- •Category 1
- •Category 2
- •Category 3
- •Category 4
- •Communication
- •Medical Care Supervision
- •Patient Care Coordinator
- •Image Acquisition
- •Image Review and Evaluation
- •Information Systems
- •Interoperability
- •Image Acquisition
- •Compression
- •Data Communication and Transmission
- •Computer Display
- •Archiving and Retrieval
- •Security
- •Reliability and Redundancy
- •Documentation
- •Image Analysis
- •Legal Requirements
- •Facility Accreditation
- •Privileging and Credentialing
- •Stark Act and Self-referrals
- •State Medical Practice Acts/Licensure
- •Tort Liability
- •Duty
- •Standards of Care
- •Consent
- •Quality Control
- •Operations
- •Customer Support
- •Originating Site
- •Transmission
- •Distant Site
- •Financial Factors
- •Reimbursement
- •Grants
- •Federal Programs
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Equipment Cost
- •Summary
- •Abbreviations
- •Appendices
- •Appendix A: Interoperability
- •Appendix B: DICOM Metadata
- •Appendix C: Computer-Aided Detection
- •Appendix D: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
- •Appendix F: Quality Control
- •Appendix H: Customer Support
- •Level 1
- •Level 2
- •Level 3
- •Appendix I: Reimbursement
- •Medicare
- •Medicaid
- •Commercial Insurance Carrier Reimbursement
- •Other Financial Factors
- •Disease Prevention
- •Resource Utilization
- •American Telemedicine Association’s Telehealth Practice Recommendations for Diabetic Retinopathy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Contributors
- •Second Edition
- •First Edition
- •Index
32 |
B.K. Wong et al. |
|
|
However, it was not until 1909 that the Þrst stereoscopic photographs were published by W. Thorner, who ßipped the camera between exposures to capture a stereo image. In 1926, Metzger described the technique of side-to-side shift, which is still commonly used today. Eventually, simultaneous stereophotography was developed in the 1950s [25]. Although slide Þlm is still considered the gold standard, it is gradually yielding to the many beneÞts of digital imaging including ease of storage and sharing, internet transmission and reduced cost. These beneÞts are timely in that many manufacturers have announced an end to the production and sale of slide Þlm [6, 16, 22, 29]. In addition, the recent introduction of high-resolution, full-frame digital imaging has eliminated many of the detriments once associated with digital imaging.
3.3.1Non-simultaneous Versus Simultaneous
Non-simultaneous or sequential photography is the technique that is most commonly employed by ophthalmic photographers. It is known as the Allen Stereo Technique as it was initially described by Lee Allen in 1964 [25]. In this technique, the camera is positioned as for a normal fundus photograph. The camera is then shifted to the left and right of central to take the photographs needed from separate positions. The desired stereo base will determine the distance the camera is shifted, and can vary due to media opacities (such as cataract) or the degree of pupillary dilation. For example, if the pupil is dilated to 8 mm, then a displacement of the camera by 3.5 mm will allow a convergence on the retina of 15¡, which is sufÞcient for a stereoscopic view [13]. One problem
3.3Technology and Photography associated with this technique is that photogra-
The basic element of stereophotography is to obtain two separate images of an object from two different positions in order to simulate the viewing position of an individualÕs eyes. The distance between the two positions at which the pictures are taken is known as the stereo base. Changes in the stereo base determine the stereo effect. The ideal stereo base would be approximately 65 mm, as this is the average interpupillary distance. When each unique image of the same object is presented to the appropriate eye, a three-dimensional image is observed. The techniques used to capture the two photographs needed for a stereo image can be done by a horizontal shift of the camera, or by rotation of the camera towards a single point on the object. The latter technique can cause some distortion, which is reduced if the object is fairly ßat and close to the camera [25]. Stereo fundus photography uses the horizontal shift technique, by corneal-induced parallax [22]. This is successful because of the optics of the eye itself induce convergence of light to a single point on the fundus, which allows photography of one point on the fundus from two different locations. Today, paired retinal images are captured on conventional slide Þlm or using a digital camera and computer [9].
pher and patient movement may create an inconsistent stereo base. Thus, Lee Allen developed the Allen Stereo Separator, which is a plano glass lens placed in front of a fundus camera [25]. Changing the angle of this plane displaces the optical position of the camera horizontally. Other cameras have a locking mechanism which prevents lateral movement of the camera beyond a certain point.
Simultaneous photography has the advantage of a consistent stereo base. Thus, all stereo photos will have identical stereoscopic depth. This method is also easier on the patient since one ßash will take two photographs. Disadvantages of this technique are that it can be difÞcult to illuminate two images evenly and that both images must be aligned simultaneously. In most simultaneous cameras, the stereo base is Þxed; however, others will allow adjustment to avoid lens opacities if needed [25].
3.3.2Mydriatic Versus Non-mydriatic Imaging
The need for pupillary dilation when obtaining stereo images is controversial. Mydriasis allows retinal photographs to be captured more easily and with improved image quality [20, 27] while facilitating peripheral retinal image capture.
3 Stereopsis and Teleophthalmology |
33 |
|
|
Others argue that these beneÞts are outweighed by the increased risk of angle-closure glaucoma, patient time and discomfort. There are stereoscopic retinal imaging systems described in the literature that incorporate both mydriatic [10, 24] and non-mydriatic photography [2, 11, 21].
3.3.3Imaging Fields
The retinal imaging standard for photography of the retina for diabetic retinopathy was deÞned by the Airlie House ClassiÞcation to be seven Þelds of 30¡ stereo images [1]; this standard is often referred to as Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) standard photography. However, it is time-consuming to capture all seven Þelds in stereo for both photographers and patients. Thus, many systems have evaluated modiÞcations to the standard seven Þelds. Moss et al. [19] compared two, three and four Þelds of stereoscopic images to the standard seven and found that the sensitivity and speciÞcity of detecting the level of diabetic retinopathy increased as the number of Þelds captured increased. The Joslin Vision Network (JVN) system [6] demonstrated substantial agreement (k =0.74) when comparing three Þelds of nonsimultaneous 45¡ stereo images to ETDRS standard photography for the detection of clinically signiÞcant macular oedema (CSME) and fair to almost perfect agreement (k =0.31Ð0.85) for the detection of levels of diabetic retinopathy. Salti et al. [26] compared two Þelds of 45¡ stereoscopic photographs along with a single monochromatic image to a dilated fundus examination. They found that the addition of a red-free photograph increased the sensitivity and speciÞcity in detecting the presence of diabetic retinopathy. At the University of Alberta, seven 30¡ images are obtained but only the anterior segment, disc (Þeld 1) and macula (Þeld 2) are captured in stereo [24].
3.3.4Image Viewing Techniques
also be a split frame 35 mm slide, in which twohalf frame images are placed into one 2 × 2 mount. A View-Master disc is a format that was used in the 1950s with stereo pairs on a circular disc and a hand-held viewer [25].
Electronic images can be viewed using the same principles but with a computer monitor. They can be viewed using side-by-side images and a four-mirror stereoscope and can also come with a viewing hood. Another method utilizes a polarized liquid crystal display (LCD) panel over a computer monitor with the viewer wearing polarized glasses. With the proper Þlters, even red-cyan glasses can be used. The method that is most commonly utilized when viewing stereoscopic digital images of the retina involves LCD shutter glasses linked to a cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor. This involves a computer monitor that alternately displays each image of a stereo pair with a high refresh rate (for example, 120 Hz). The computer then sends a signal to LCD shutter glasses through an emitter to synchronize the opacity of the lenses with the display of the contralateral image [25]. Thus, the right eye views only the right image, and the left eye views only the left image. Most recently, LCD monitor technology has evolved to allow high refresh rates, thereby enabling the same technology to be utilized.
The validity of stereoscopic digital photography when compared to stereoscopic slide Þlm photography has been well established in clinical studies. Rudnisky et al. [22] demonstrated that high-resolution stereo digital imaging correlates with contact lens biomicroscopy and is both sensitive and speciÞc when identifying clinically signiÞcantmacularoedema(CSME).Stereoscopic digital imaging has also been compared to slide Þlm photography for Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) grading of macular degeneration, and correlated well [29]. High-resolution digital imaging has also been shown to be accurate for the evaluation of ETDRS levels of diabetic retinopathy [10, 24].
3.3.5Image Compression
The traditional way of viewing stereoscopic slide Þlm utilizes a 2 × 2 stereo viewer over slides placed side by side on a light table. There can
There have been concerns regarding the effect of digital image compression on picture quality and,
