- •Contents
- •1. Visual Acuity
- •3. Slit-lamp Examination
- •6. Tonometry
- •7. Gonioscopy
- •8. Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma
- •9. Basic Perimetry
- •10. Ophthalmoscopy
- •11. Ophthalmic Photography
- •12. Fluorescein Angiography
- •15. B-scan Ultrasonography
- •16. Ultrasound Biomicroscopy in Ophthalmology
- •17. Optical Coherence Tomography
- •18. Electrophysiological Tests for Visual Function Assessment
- •20. Diagnostic Procedures in Uveitis
- •21. Retinopathy of Prematurity: Diagnostic Procedures and Management
- •23. Comitant Strabismus: Diagnostic Methods
- •24. Incomitant Strabismus
- •25. Diagnostic Procedures in Dry Eyes Syndrome
- •28. Neurological Disorders of Pupil
- •Index
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 115

RAJUL PARIKH, CHANDRA SEKHAR
Optic Disk
8 Assessment in
Glaucoma
An estimated 67 million people worldwide have |
of this communication is to describe the |
|
glaucoma in the year 2000. At least 50% do not |
morphological changes of the optic nerve in |
|
know that they have the disease since it is usually |
glaucoma, highlight the techniques of clinical |
|
without symptoms.1,2 Rapid advances in imaging |
evaluation of the optic disk and discuss the |
|
technologies such as confocal scanning laser |
differential diagnosis. |
|
ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry and |
|
|
optical coherence tomography for detection of |
|
|
early glaucomatous damage have only moderate |
Methods of Optic Disk Examination |
|
sensitivity and specificity.3-5 New psychophy- |
Traditionally, the direct ophthalmoscope has |
|
sical procedures such as short wavelength |
||
been used for the evaluation of the optic nerve |
||
automated perimetry, frequency doubling |
||
head. Though it has the advantage of providing |
||
perimetry and motion automated perimetry |
||
a magnified view of the optic nerve head, it, |
||
which are targeted at specific visual functions |
||
however, lacks stereopsis and can result in |
||
have been shown to be more sensitive and specific |
||
missing of subtle changes. Therefore, the use of |
||
than standard automated perimetry for |
||
identifying early glaucomatous damage.6-8 |
the direct ophthalmoscope is to be strongly |
|
However, these techniques may not be available |
discouraged. |
|
to all clinicians and have the limitations of all |
A variety of contact and noncontact lenses |
|
subjective tests. Several studies have shown that |
are available which allow stereoscopic view of |
|
abnormalities in the appearance of the optic disk |
the fundus at the slit-lamp. Contact lenses such |
|
may precede visual field defects.9,10 Conventional |
as Goldmann lenses are relatively uncomfortable |
|
stereoscopic clinical evaluation and imaging of |
for the patient, take longer time and the coupling |
|
the optic disk with fundus photographs is still |
fluid can cause transient blurring and difficulty |
|
the most frequently used and sensitive means |
in obtaining good quality fundus photographs. |
|
of diagnosing glaucoma. 11 With some training, |
Noncontact lenses include +60D, +78D, +90D |
|
it is possible to clinically evaluate optic nerve |
and Volk superfield lenses (Fig. 8.1). These |
|
head and retinal nerve fiber layer stereoscopically |
provide excellent stereoscopic and magnified |
|
and detect early glaucomatous damage. The aim |
view of the optic disk. |
116 Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
Fig. 8.1: Noncontact lenses: +60D, +78D and Volk superfield lenses
It is important to draw the appearance of the optic nerve head based on these methods. Though drawing of the optic disk suffers from the disadvantage of being subjective in nature, this does offer a quick and inexpensive method of evaluation of the optic nerve head in patients with glaucoma during follow-up. In addition, photographs may not be possible in all cases such as patients with rigid miotic pupils and those with significant media opacities. However, wherever possible, photographs are an indispensable adjunct to clinical evaluation.
Features of Glaucomatous Disk Damage
Cup-Disk Ratio
Early studies by Armaly et al have reported that the vertical and horizontal cup-disk diameter ratios are useful for the quantification of glaucomatous optic neuropathy and for early detection of glaucoma.12 The ratio has limited value in the identification of glaucomatous damage, because of the wide variability in the size of the optic cup in the normal population.
Diskmarginisdefinedbyinneredgeofwhite scleral ring (outer arrows), and the optic cup isthelevelatwhichneuroretinalrim(NRR)steeps (inner arrow) (Figs 8.2 and 8.3). A large cupdisk ratio can be normal if the optic disk is large13 and a small cup-disk ratio may be glaucomatous if the optic disk is small14 (Fig. 8.4). The problem with estimating cup-disk ratio as a measure of
Fig. 8.2: Disk margin (black arrow) and cup margin (white arrow)
A
B
Figs 8.3A and B: Vertical disk diameter and horizontal disk diameter
A
B
Figs 8.4A and B: Cup-disk ratio in relation to optic disk size. A Optic disk is small with small cup and still has inferior notch (white arrow) with nerve fiber layer defect (black arrows) B Cup-disk ratio in a large disk
glaucomatous damage is that it is difficult to decide if the cup is physiological in a large disk or pathological in a small or normal-sized disk. In a recent study by Garway-Heath et al, vertical cup-disk diameter ratio corrected for the optic disksizewasthebestvariabletoseparatebetween normal subjects and patients of ocular hypertensionwithretinalnervefiberlayerdefect.15 Therefore, in the clinical description of the optic nerve head, it is important to state the vertical cup-disk diameter ratio in combination with the estimated disk size. The disk diameter can be easily measured by adjusting the slit-lamp beam height to the edges of the disk while viewing
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 117
Fig. 8.5: Measurement of disk diameter with slitlamp biomicroscopy with use of noncontact lenses
the disk with a 60D lens (Fig. 8.5).16 The measurement by this method is roughly equal to the measurementobtainedbytheplanimetryofdisk photographs by Litmann’s correction. Measurements can also be made with other lenses by multiplying the measured value with the appropriate magnification factor, Goldmann contact lens X1.26 and Volk superfield lens X1.5.16
It is important to differentiate contour cupping from color cupping. The margin of the cup should be determined by the bend of the small vessels
Fig. 8.6: Asymmetry of cupping in relation to asymmetry of disk size. The left optic disk is larger than right optic disk and has a larger optic cup
118 Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
Fig. 8.7: HRT print out of the same optic disks shown in Fig. 8.6 showing asymmetry of optic disk cup in relation to disk area
across the disk rim and not by the central area of disk pallor.
Asymmetry of Optic Disk Cupping |
|
|
Asymmetry of cupping is seldom seen in normal |
|
|
eyes and until proven otherwise, must be taken |
|
|
as an indication of early glaucomatous damage. |
|
|
However, while assessing asymmetry, it is |
|
|
important to rule out asymmetry of the disk size, |
|
|
which may be due to anisometropia. This can |
|
|
result in difference in the cup-disk ratio between |
|
|
two eyes, in the absence of glaucoma (Figs 8.6 |
Fig. 8.8: Shows ISNT rule, the inferior rim is the thickest |
|
and 8.7). |
||
followed by the superior, the nasal and then the temporal |
||
Neuroretinal Rim Evaluation |
must look carefully for any areas of thinning |
|
of the neuroretinal rim or for notching or in other |
||
|
||
Glaucomatous damage can be diffuse, focal or |
words extension of the cup into the rim tissue. |
|
a combination of both. Diffuse damage results |
If the cup is especially deep in the notch, it is |
|
in symmetrical enlargement of the cup. Focal |
known as a pseudo-pit. Notching and pseudo- |
|
damage usually involves a particular area of the |
pits are usually seen at the superior or inferior |
|
rim. Normally, according to the ISNT rule, the |
poles. The width of the notch tends to correspond |
|
inferior rim is the thickest followed by the |
to the extent of the visual field defect (Figs 8.9A |
|
superior, the nasal and then the temporal (Fig. |
and B, and 8.10A and B). Optic rim pallor is |
|
8.8).17 During optic nerve head evaluation, one |
another important indicator of glaucomatous disk |
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 119
A
B
Figs 8.9A and B: Relation between neuroretinal rim notch and visual field defect. The optic disk photograph shows inferior notch (black arrow) with corresponding superior arcuate field defect
120 Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
A
B
Figs 8.10A and B: Relation between inferior notch (here inferior notch is wider than the one seen in Fig. 8.9) and visual field defect. The optic disk photograph shows neuroretinal notch (black arrow) with corresponding superior arcuate field defect
damage. In the glaucomatous optic disk, the pale and translucent atrophic tissue may replace the normal pink color of the neuroretinal rim which can result in a field defect in the corresponding opposite hemisphere.
Vascular Changes
Splinter hemorrhages on the optic disk are a common finding in glaucoma patients (Fig. 8.11). Various studies have shown that disk hemorrhages in association with localized nerve fiber layer defects and notches of the neuroretinal rim are more common among patients of normal tension glaucoma.18, 19 A possible explanation for the difference in frequency has been suggested by Jonas et al. They stated that the amount of blood leaking out of a vessel into the surrounding tissue depends on the intraocular pressure when the bleeding occurs.19 High transmural pressure gradient in normal pressure glaucoma leads to larger disk hemorrhages. Also, since the absorption rate of disk hemorrhages depends on the size of the disk bleed, the hemorrhages in patients of normal pressure glaucoma may take a longer time to disappear and thus have a higher chance to be detected than the disk
Fig. 8.11: Disk hemorrhage
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 121
hemorrhages in patients of high pressure glaucoma.20
Hemorrhages in glaucoma usually appear as splinter-shaped or flame-shaped hemorrhages on the disk surface21 (Fig. 8.11). They usually precede neuroretinal rim changes and visual field defects. The defects corresponding to the location of the hemorrhage may be expected to appear weeks to year later.22 The presence of disk hemorrhages is considered an indication for the enhancement of treatment of glaucoma.
Configuration of Vessels
The retinal vessels on the optic nerve head can provide clues about the topography of the disk. Nasalization of the vessels and baring of circumlinear vessels can be seen in glaucoma as well as in other diseases of the optic nerve. Bayoneting of the vessels can be seen if the rim is absent or very thin. This causes the vessels to pass under the overhanging edge of the cup and then make a sharp bend as they cross the disk surface. This convoluted appearance of the vessels is called ‘bayoneting’.
Peripapillary Atrophy
The zone closer to the optic nerve head with retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and choroidal atrophy and baring of sclera is called zone β. The more peripheral zone with only RPE atrophy is called zone α (Fig. 8.12). A highly significant correlation has been reported between the location of peripapillary atrophy and visual field defects.23 Sometimes, these changes may represent a congenital anomaly, especially in myopic eyes. However, appearance of these changes de novo or their presence in small, nonmyopic disks should be viewed with suspicion. Peripapillary atrophy may be focal or circumferential (Figs 8.13 and 8.14).
122 Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
Fig. 8.12: Peripapillary atrophy. The diagram shows atrophic zone closer to the optic nerve head called zone β and the more peripheral zone called zone α
Fig. 8.13: Peripapillary atrophy: Localized in the temporal area of the disk
Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Abnormalities
Examination of the nerve fiber layer is often useful in detecting early glaucomatous damage among patients of ocular hypertension with normal disk appearance and normal visual fields. The neuroretinal rim is formed by axons converging from the retina to the scleral canal. Since the axons are spread out in a thin layer in the retina, even minor losses of the axons can be observed in the retinal nerve fiber layer. In healthy eyes, the nerve fiber layer appears opaque with
Fig. 8.14: Peripapillary atrophy: generalized
radially oriented striations. The small retinal blood vessels have a blurred and crosshatched appearance, as they lie buried in the nerve fiber layer. The best way to see the nerve fiber layer defect is through a dilated pupil with a stereoscopic lens, at the slit-lamp, using white or green light and a wide-slit beam. In the presence of nerve fiber layer atrophy, the small retinal blood vessels become more clearly visible and appear unusually sharp, clear and well focused (Fig. 8.15). The fundus in the affected area appears darker and deeper red in contrast to the silvery or opaque hue of the intact nerve fiber layer. Defects may be in the form of a wedge shape arising from the disk margin and widening towards the periphery, are pathological (Fig. 8.16), while slit-like defects narrower than the adjacent blood vessels may be physiological. Diffuse areas of atrophy are less common in early glaucoma and more difficult to identify.
Myopic Changes vs Glaucoma
Myopic disks can present difficulty in evaluation for glaucoma due to the tilted disks, peripapillary atrophy and shallow cupping. One needs to
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 123
Fig. 8.15: Retinal nerve fiber layer defect: Wedge-shaped RNFL defect can be seen between two black arrows. It is more easily marked in red free photograph
|
|
Fig. 8.17: Myopic disk with primary open-angle |
|
|
|
glaucoma |
|
Fig. 8.16: Retinal nerve fiber layer defect. Wedge-shaped |
|
||
RNFL defect reaching up to optic disk margin |
and it is, therefore, important to rule out these |
||
|
|
||
carefully examine the disk to look for changes |
possibilities before making the diagnosis of |
||
in the contour of the blood vessels, as well |
glaucoma. |
||
delineate the disk margin from the peripapillary |
|
||
changes (Fig. 8.17). |
Physiological Cupping |
||
|
|
Assessment of the size of the optic disk, careful |
|
|
|
examination of the neuroretinal rim and the |
|
Differential Diagnosis |
|||
retinal nerve fiber layer can help distinguish |
|||
|
|
||
In addition to glaucoma, other abnormalities can |
physiological cupping from glaucomatous |
||
cause excavation and or pallor of the optic disk |
damage in most cases. |
||
124Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
Optic Nerve Coloboma
Optic nerve colobomas typically demonstrate enlargement of the papillary region, partial or complete excavation, blood vessels entering and exiting from the border of the defect and a glistening white surface. The visual field defects can be in the form of generalized constriction, centrocecal scotomas, altitudinal defects, arcuate scotomas, enlargement of the blind spot and ring scotomas that can mimic those found in glaucomatous eyes.
Morning glory syndrome is a variant of optic disc coloboma and is characterized by a large excavated disk, central core of white or gray glial tissue surrounded by an elevated annulus of variably pigmented subretinal tissue (Fig. 8.18). The retinal vessels appear to enter and exit from the margins of the disk, are straightened and often sheathed.
Fig. 8.18: Optic disk photograph showing characteristic morning glory syndrome
Congenital Optic Disk Pit
Congenital optic disk pits appear gray or yellowish-white, round or oval, localized depression within the optic nerve (Fig. 8. 19). They are located within the temporal aspect of the disk in over half of the cases and centrally
Fig. 8.19: Optic disk photograph showing congenital optic disk pits
in about one-third. Involvement is usually unilateral in about 80% cases and the optic disk is larger on the involved side. Approximately 55-60% of the eyes have a field defect in the form of arcuate scotomas, paracentral scotoma, altitudinal defect, generalized constriction and nasal or temporal steps.24
In the absence of other indicators of congenital anomaly (like associated fundus coloboma, the differential diagnosis may be difficult and the absence of progression on follow-up may be the only indicator that the patient has a congenital anomaly and not glaucoma.
Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
A history of acute visual loss, initial swelling of the optic disk, absence of marked cupping, rise in ESR, presence of centrocecal scotoma or altitudinal defects can help differentiate it from glaucoma (Fig. 8.20). In the late stages the cupping in some cases may be exactly the same as is seen in glaucoma.
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma 125
Fig. 8.20: Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. The right-sided optic disk photograph is from patients with longstanding AION showing typical glaucomatous cupping
A |
|
|
B |
Figs 8.21A and B: A Optic disk |
photograph showing significant cupping, but with out of proportion pallor. |
|
B Visual field defect |
showing a temporal hemianopia suggestive of pituitary tumor |
|
126Diagnostic Procedures in Ophthalmology
Neurological Causes
Pallor disproportionate to cupping, normal intraocular pressure or unusual history of onset, progression and age should arouse suspicion of a neurological disorder causing optic disk damage (Fig. 8.21).
Presence of visual field defects that respect vertical midline and the pattern of the field defects should be able to suggest the possible site of the intracranial lesion.
Summary
In summary, the optic disk evaluation in glaucoma is best done stereoscopically at the slitlamp with a dilated pupil using one of the 60D, 78D or 90D lenses. Changes in the neuroretinal rim, optic disk hemorrhages, peripapillary atrophy and nerve fiber layer defects are more important features than the cup-disk ratio. The cup-disk ratio is to be documented and interpreted along with the disk size and not in isolation. The diagnosis of glaucoma will depend on the presence of a visual field defect that correlates with the anatomic changes on the optic nerve head and the peripapillary retina.
References
1.Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.
2.Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, et al. Openangle glaucoma in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(9): 170209.
3.Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, Williams J, Blumenthal EZ, SanchezGoleans CA, Vasilie C, Wainreb RN. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph, GDx nerve fibre analyser and optical coherence tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:985-93.
4.Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual functions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2001;42:2001-03.
5.Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122;827-37.
6.Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:645-50.
7.Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb C. Detection of optic neuropathyinglaucomatouseyeswithstandard visualfields using a battery of shortwave-length automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. Ophthalmology 2002;109: 1009-17.
8.Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1783-90.
9.Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Baginski TA, et al. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of larger optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1988;95:357-63.
10.Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenne AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous field loss: I Methods and changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:1444-48.
11.Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43(1):140-45.
12.Armaly MF, Saydegh RE. The cup/disc ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:191-96.
13.Jonas JB, Zach F-M, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:137-44.
14.Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GOH. Glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy in small disks with low cup-to-disc ratios. Ophthalmology 1990;97:1211-15.
15.Garway-Heath DF, Ruben ST, Viswanathan A, Hitchings R. Vertical cup/disk ratio in relation to optic disk size: its value in the assessment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optic Disk Assessment in Glaucoma |
127 |
|
of the glaucoma suspect. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; |
20. |
Jonas JB, Xu L. Optic disc hemorrhages in |
|
|
82:1118-24. |
|
glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:1-8. |
|
16. |
Jonas JB, Dichtl A. Advances in the assessment |
21. |
Drance S.M, Fairclough M, Butler DM, Kottler |
|
|
of the optic disc changes in early glaucoma. |
|
MS. The importance of disc haemorrhage in |
|
|
Cur Opi Ophthalmol 1995;6:61-66. |
|
the prognosis of chronic open-angle glaucoma. |
|
17. |
Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disc, |
|
Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:226-28. |
|
|
cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration, |
22. |
Heijl A. Frequent disc photography and |
|
|
and correlations in normal eyes. Invest |
|
computerized perimetry in eyes with optic |
|
|
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;29,1151-58, Invest |
|
disc haemorrhage. Acta Ophthalmol 1986;64: |
|
|
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;32. |
|
274-81. |
|
18. |
Kitazawa Y, Shirato S, Yamamoto T. Optic disc |
23. |
Jonas JB. Naumann GOH. Parapapillary |
|
|
hemorrhage in low-tension glaucoma. |
|
chorioretinal atrophy in normal and glaucoma |
|
|
Ophthalmology 1986;93:853-57. |
|
eyes. II. Correlations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci |
|
19. |
Jonas JB, Budde WM. Optic nerve head |
|
1989;30:919-26. |
|
|
appearance in juvenile-onset chronic high- |
24. |
Brown GC. Congenital fundus abnormalities. |
|
|
pressure glaucoma and normal-pressure |
|
In: Duane TD (Ed). Clinical Ophthalmology 1991, |
|
|
glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:704-11. |
|
Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
