Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Current Aspects of Pathogenesis and Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy_Kroll_2007

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
2.1 Mб
Скачать

No macular edema

 

 

+

 

 

 

Any type of NPDR or early PDR

 

 

Immediate

Deferral of

 

ETDRS

 

patients

laser coagulation

laser coagulation

 

 

 

 

Mild scatter + focal later on

 

 

 

Complete scatter + focal later on

 

 

 

 

Macular edema

 

 

 

+

 

 

 

mild-to-moderate NPDR

 

 

Immediate

Deferral of

 

 

laser coagulation

laser coagulation

 

 

Focal + mild scatter later on

 

 

 

Mild scatter + focal later on

 

 

 

Focal + complete scatter later on

 

 

 

Complete scatter + focal later on

 

 

 

 

Macular edema

 

 

 

+

 

 

 

severe NPDR to early PDR

 

 

Immediate

Deferral of

 

 

laser coagulation

laser coagulation

 

 

Mild scatter + focal

 

 

 

Mild scatter + focal later on

 

 

 

Complete scatter + focal

 

 

 

Complete scatter + focal later on

 

Fig. 1. ETDRS randomization scheme. PDR = Proliferative diabetic retinopathy; NPDR = nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

It should be kept in mind, however, that surgical techniques have changed considerably since conclusion of the study and that endolaser coagulation for example was not yet available in the late eighties [23, 54–58].

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial

Between 1983 and 1993 the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) was conducted as a clinical trial in the USA and Canada. Over 1,400 type 1 diabetics between 13 and 39 years of age who were otherwise

healthy were included [23, 48]. The study has an evidence level of 1b.

The study aimed at investigating the effect of improved blood glucose control on the onset and progression of diabetic diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy and retinopathy. For that purpose the participants were divided into a primary prevention and a secondary intervention group. The former consisting of patients who had had diabetes for 1–5 years and did not suffer from diabetic retinoapthy, the latter consisting of patients who

136

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

Hoerle/Kroll

Table 5. Studies dealing with pars plana vitrectomy without peeling of the internal limiting membrane for treatment of diabetic macular edema

Authors

Year

Type of study

Patients

Eyes

Edema

Increase of

ILM

Follow-up

 

 

 

 

 

 

visual acuity, %

peeling

months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lewis

1992

nonrandomized,

10

10

diffuse

602

no

16

et al. [34]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Van Effenterre

1993

nonrandomized,

18

22

diffuse

861

no

14

et al. [62]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harbour

1996

nonrandomized, retrospective,

7

7

diffuse

572

no

14.5

et al. [19]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tachi and

1996

nonrandomized,

41

58

diffuse

532

no

12

Ogino [48]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ferrari

1999

nonrandomized, retrospective,

18

18

9 diffuse

only

no

12

et al. [16]

 

case control study

 

 

9 cystoid

temporary

 

 

Ikeda

1999

nonrandomized,

2

3

cystoid

1001

no

15

et al. [22]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ikeda

2000

nonrandomized,

5

5

cystoid

802

no

6

et al. [21]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Otani and

2000

nonrandomized, prospective,

9

13

13 diffuse

382

no

6

Kishi [39]

 

case control study

 

 

8 cystoid

 

 

 

Pendergast

2000

nonrandomized, retrospective,

50

55

diffuse

49.12

no

23.2

et al. [41]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yang [64]

2000

non randomized, prospectiv,

11

13

diffuse

84.62

no

14.8

 

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

La Heij

2001

nonrandomized, retrospective,

19

21

11 diffuse

47.62

only 2! 3

et al. [33]

 

case control study

 

 

2 cystoid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8 unclear

 

 

 

Yamamoto

2001

nonrandomized, retrospective,

29

30

30 diffuse

432

no

10.8

et al. [63]

 

case control study

 

 

12 cystoid

 

 

 

Otani and

2002

nonrandomized, controlled,

7

14

14 diffuse

572

no

5

Kishi [40]

 

prospective, case control study

 

 

13 cystoid

 

 

 

Sato

2002

nonrandomized, retrospective,

40

45

cystoid

511

no

6

et al. [46]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

ILM = Internal limiting membrane. 1 Visual acuity increase of 1 line. 2 Visual acuity increase of 2 lines.

had had diabetes for 1–15 years who had mild to moder-

blood sugar self-control at least 4 times a day and an ini-

ate nonoproliferative diabetic retinopathy among other

tial hospitalization to start treatment.

complications. The patients from both groups were ran-

The study showed that keeping blood glucose levels as

domized into either a conventional treatment group,

close to normal as possible slows the onset and progres-

treated with insulin once or twice daily, urinary or blood

sion of retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy caused

sugar self-control once daily, clinical examinations every

by diabetes. In fact, it demonstrated that any sustained

3 months, and diet and exercise education or were ran-

lowering of blood glucose helps, even if the person has a

domized into an intensive treatment group, treated with

history of poor control.

an insulin pump or 63 insulin injections daily with an

The DCCT could show that lowering blood glucose in

insulin dosage depending on sugar, diet and exercise,

type 1 diabetics by intensive treatment could reduce the

Evidence-Based Therapy of Diabetic

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

137

Retinopathy

 

 

Table 6. Studies dealing with pars plana vitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane for treatment of diabetic macular edema

Authors

Year

Type of study

Paients

Eyes

Edema

Increase of

ILM

Follow-up

 

 

 

 

 

 

visual acuity, %

peeling

months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gandorfer

2000

nonrandomized, retrospective,

11

12

diffuse

922

yes

16

et al. [17]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kumagai

2002

retrospective

103

135

diffuse

?

in some

20

et al. [32]

 

 

 

 

 

 

cases

 

Ndoye Roth

2003

nonrandomized, retrospective,

15

19

cystoid

57.81

yes

9.5

et al. [38]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dillinger and

2004

nonrandomized, prospective,

55

60

60 diffuse

432

yes

3

Mester [6]

 

case control study

 

 

25 cystoid

 

 

 

Kuhn

2004

nonrandomized, retrospective,

27

30

16 diffuse

662

yes

12

et al. [31]

 

case control study

 

 

14 cystoid

 

 

 

Radetzky

2004

nonrandomized, retrospective,

5

5

diffuse

602

yes

9.4

et al. [42]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stefaniotou

2004

nonrandomized, retrospective,

52

73

diffuse

631

55!

?

et al. [47]

 

case control study

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rosenblatt

2005

nonrandomized, retrospective,

20

26

diffuse and

502

yes

8

et al. [43]

 

case control study

 

 

cystoid

 

 

 

ILM = Internal limiting membrane. 1 Visual acuity increase of 1 line. 2 Visual acuity increase of 2 lines.

risk for developing retinopathy by 76%. In patients with mild or moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy at the beginning of the study, intensive management slowed the progression of the disease by 54%. Furthermore, a reduced risk was found for the development of nephropathy (50%) and for neuropathy (60%) in the intensive treatment group.

The most important side effect observed in this group was a higher risk for hypoglycemia, which is why this treatment was not recommended for younger children, older adults, patients with heart disease or advanced complications and those with a history of frequent severe hypoglycemia [23, 48].

United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study

The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study was conducted between 1977 and 1999. Over 5000 type 2 diabetics were included. The patients without diabetic retinopathy were included into a primary prevention group, those with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy were included into a secondary prevention group [23, 59, 60]. The study has an evidence level of 1b.

In this largest clinical research study both groups were then randomized into either a conventional treatment or

an intensive treatment group. The former received a diet control first, followed by sulfonylurea, insulin and metformin, the latter was treated right away with sulfonylurea and – if necessary – with insulin. Metformin was given to overweight patients.

After 10 years of follow-up a 17% reduction of diabetic retinopathy progression could be observed, as well as a 29% reduction in need for laser coagulation, a 23% reduction in vitreous hemorrhage and a 16% reduction in legal blindness. The study could also show that each of the existing therapies for treating diabetes (metformin, sulphonylureas, acarbose and insulin) were effective in reducing elevated blood glucose levels.

Furthermore, elevated blood pressure could be identified as an independent risk factor for progression of diabetic retinopathy in that trial. Beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors as blood pressure therapy were found to be equally effective in reducing the risk of diabetic complications [23, 59, 60].

Vitrectomy for Diabetic Maculopathy

Vitrectomy in cases of diabetic maculopathy was first described in 1992 by Lewis et al.. They found an improvement in patients with a taught, thickened posterior hya-

138

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

Hoerle/Kroll

Table 7. Studies dealing with intravitreal triamcinolone injection for treatment of diabetic macular edema

Authors

Year

Type of study

Patients

Eyes

Increase of

Dosage

Follow-up

 

 

 

 

 

visual acuity, %

mg

months

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jonas and

2001

interventional case report

1

1

1002

20

5

Söfker [24]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Martidis

2002

prospective, non-comparative,

15

16

502

4

6

et al. [36]

 

interventional case study

 

 

 

 

 

Jonas and

2002

prospective, non-randomized, interventional,

8

10

85.71

25

3.5

Degenring [25]

 

case study with control group

 

 

 

 

 

Jonas

2003

prospective, non-randomized, interventional,

20

26

811

25

6.64

et al. [26]

 

case study with control group

 

 

 

 

 

Degenring

2004

prospective, interventional, case study

26

32

81.31

25

6.8

et al. [5]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Massin

2004

prospective, interventional, case study

12

12

41.72

4

3

et al. [37]

 

with control group

 

 

 

 

 

1 Visual acuity increase of 1 line. 2 Visual acuity increase of 2 lines.

loid if vitrectomy was performed. Their study was an observational , nonrandomized clinical study consisting of 10 patients [33, 34]. In the following years several studies on vitrectomy for diabetic maculopathy were conducted. Table 5 lists all the studies that we found in MedLine. All these studies have in common that they are nonrandomized case reports with a maximum of 58 eyes in the largest study. Most studies were retrospective, a few were prospective. A minimum was controlled. Some authors performed the procedure in cases of diffuse macular edema, some in cases of cystoid macular edema and a few in both. Improvement of visual acuity was observed in 38–100% of cases. Some authors regarded a visual acuity increase of 1 line as improvement, others required a 2-line improvement. The follow-up time varied greatly amongst the studies (3–23 months). The level of evidence for these studies is therefore a maximum of 4.

More recently, peeling of the internal limiting membrane was described as adjunct to vitrectomy in cases of diabetic maculopathy. The studies describing this are listed in table 6. For these reports the same holds true as for vitrectomy without peeling of the internal limiting membrane: the authors state that the new therapy might be helpful for some patients. However, the follow-up time is short, the number of cases in each study is small, and they are mostly retrospective case reports. There are practically no larger randomized, controlled, prospective trials. The level of evidence is therefore low as well (level 4).

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection for Diabetic Maculopathy

In 2001, Jonas and Sofker [24] described the first case of intravitreal triamcinolone injection in a 73-year-old patient with a clinically significant diffuse diabetic macular edema, whose disease progressed despite grid laser coagulation. After the intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide visual acuity improved over a 5-month follow-up period. Both Jonas and Sofker other authors applying that treatment regimen describe it as a possibly useful treatment for diabetic macular edema [27]. Table 7 lists studies using that new therapy. Most of them are interventional case reports. They are nonrandomized studies, only some had a control group. The authors still use very different dosages of the intravitreally applied triamcinolone. These studies have a level of evidence of 4 or 5 according to the grading of the Centre for EvidenceBased Medicine as well (table 1).

Discussion

EBM is practiced quite self-evidently in ophthalmodiabetology on the basis of the studies mentioned above. Treatment regimens such as laser coagulation and vitrectomy for different stages of diabetic retinopathy have been firmly established in clinical practice on a sound evidence-based foundation for many years.

Evidence-Based Therapy of Diabetic

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

139

Retinopathy

 

 

EBM should be regarded as a helpful tool for any therapeutic situation which still leaves room for one’s personal clinical experience to be included. EBM is by no means restricted to large, prospective, randomized, controlled trials or meta-analyses, although these are the ‘gold’ standard for most therapeutic questions where different treatment options are compared. One can apply EBM even for special problems and very individual, difficult therapeutic questions, although at a lower level of evidence, using today’s modern means of literature research.

It is interesting to note that today’s modern therapy of diabetic retinopathy includes both high levels of evidence (1b) and very low levels (4 and 5) but hardly any studies of the 2nd or 3rd level of evidence. For established types of therapy such as laser treatment several level 1b studies exist. Newer and smaller studies regarding that established treatment regimen are no longer undertaken, and

therefore lower level of evidence studies are missing. Innovative, new therapies, however, start as a case report or a smaller case control study with a low level of evidence. They are then taken up and frequently modified by other authors. The effort of setting up larger higher level of evidence studies seems to be undertaken only if the new treatment regimen is promising or if it is regarded as highly controversial.

Despite the importance of EBM, even studies with high levels of evidence such as the Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study need to be evaluated in the context of their time and must be questioned from time to time later on, when treatment techniques change or improve (such as development of endolaser coagulation or 25gauge minimally invasive vitrectomy), just as clinical guidelines are revised every few years and adapted to the newest scientific findings.

References

1 Aiello LM: Perspectives on diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:122–135.

2 American Academy of Ophthalmology.

2002. http://www.aao.org.

3 Bresnick GH: Diabetic macular edema: a review. Ophthalmology 1986;93:989–997.

4Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2004. http://www.cebm.net.

5 Degenring RF, Kreissig I, Jonas JB: Intraokulare Triamcinolongabe bei diffusem diabetischen Makulaödem [Intraocular triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema]. Ophthalmologe 2004;101:251–254.

6 Dillinger P, Mester U: Vitrectomy with removal of the internal limiting membrane in chronic diabetic macular oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:630– 637.

7 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group: Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report No. 1. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1796–1806.

8 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report No. 2. Ophthalmology 1987;94:761–774.

9Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report No. 9.

Ophthalmology 1991;98(suppl 5):766–785.

10Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs – an extension of the modified Airlie

House classification. ETDRS report No. 10. Ophthalmology 1991;98(suppl 5):786–806.

11Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS report No. 11. Ophthalmology 1991; 98(suppl 5):807–822.

12Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report No. 12. Ophthalmology 1991;98(suppl 5):823–833.

13Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Fluorescein angiographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report No. 13. Ophthalmol-

ogy 1991;98(suppl 5):834–840.

14 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Pars plana vitrectomy in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. ETDRS report No. 17. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1351–1357.

15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Causes of severe visual loss in the early treatment diabetic retinopathy study: ETDRS report No. 24. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:137–141.

16 Ferrari TM, Cardascia N, Durante G, Vetrugno M, Cardia L: Pars plana vitrectomy in diabetic macular edema. Doc Ophthalmol 1999;97:471–477.

17 Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 2000;20:126–133.

18 Grüner F: Prävalenz, Inzidenz und Ursache von Blindheit und wesentlicher Sehbehinderung in Hessen (doctoral thesis). Marburg, University of Marburg, 2001.

19 Harbour JW, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr, Rubsamen PE: Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema associated with a thickened and taut posterior hyaloid membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:405–413.

20Hörle S, Grüner F, Kroll P: Epidemiology of diabetes-induced blindness – a review Klin

Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002;219:777–784. 21 Ikeda T, Sato K, Katano T, Hayashi Y: Im-

proved visual acuity following pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic cystoid macular edema and detached posterior hyaloid. Retina 2000;20:220–222.

22 Ikeda T, Sato K, Katano T, Hayashi Y: Vitrectomy for cystoid macular oedema with attached posterior hyaloid membrane in patients with diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83:12–14.

23Important trials in ophthalmology website. 2004. http://www.mrcophth.com/impor-

tanttrialsinophthalmology/mainpageimportanttrialsinophthalmology.html.

24 Jonas JB, Sofker A: Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:425–427.

25 Jonas JB, Degenring R: Intravitreale Injektion von kristallinem Triamcinolon Acetonid als Therapie des diffusen diabetischen Makulaödems [Intravitreal injection of crystalline triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002;219:429–432.

140

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

Hoerle/Kroll

26 Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Sofker A, Degenring RF: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:57–61.

27 Jonas JB, Sofker A: Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:425–427.

28 Jonas JB: Intravitreales Triamcinolonacetonid (editorial). Ophthalmologe 2004;101: 111–112.

29 Kroll P, Meyer-Rusenberg HW, Busse H: Recommendation for staging of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (article in German). Fortschr Ophthalmol 1987;84:360–363.

30 Krumpaszky HG, Klauss V: Epidemiology of blindness and eye disease. Ophthalmologica 1996;210:1–84.

31 Kuhn F, Kiss G, Mester V, Szijarto Z, Kovacs B: Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal for clinically significant macular oedema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:402–408.

32 Kumagai K, Ogino N, Furukawa M, Demizu S, Atsumi K, Kurihara H, Iwaki M, Ishigooka H, Tachi N: Internal limiting membrane peeling in vitreous surgery for diabetic macular edema. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2002;106:590–594.

33 La Heij EC, Hendrikse F, Kessels AG, Derhaag PJ: Vitrectomy results in diabetic macular oedema without evident vitreomacular traction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:264–270.

34 Lewis H, Abrams GW, Blumenkranz MS, Camp RV: Vitrectomy for diabetic macular traction and edema associated with posterior hyaloidal traction. Ophthalmology 1992; 99:753–759.

35 Lewis H: The role of vitrectomy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:123–125.

36 Martidis A, Duker JS, Greenberg PB, Rogers AH, Puliafito CA, Reichel E, Baumal C: Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:920–927.

37 Massin P, Audren F, Haouchine B, Erginay A, Bergmann JF, Benosman R, Caulin C, Gaudric A: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial. Ophthalmology 2004;111:218– 224; discussion 224–225.

38 Ndoye Roth PA, Grange JD, Hajji Z: Oedème maculaire cystoide du diabétique et vitrectomie – résultats préliminaires: à propos de 19 cas. J Fr Ophthalmol 2003;26:38–46.

39 Otani T, Kishi S: Tomographic assessment of vitreous surgery for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:487–494.

40 Otani T, Kishi S: A controlled study of vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:214–219.

41 Pendergast SD, Hassan TS, Williams GA, Cox MS, Margherio RR, Ferrone PJ, Garretson BR, Trese MT: Vitrectomy for diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with a taut premacular posterior hyaloid. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:178–186.

42 Radetzky S, Walter P, Fauser S, Koizumi K, Kirchhof B, Joussen AM: Visual outcome of patients with macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy and indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242:273–278.

43 Rosenblatt BJ, Shah GK, Sharma S, Bakal J: Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membranectomy for refractory diabetic macular edema without a taut posterior hyaloid. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:20–25.

44 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS: Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312:71–72.

45Sackett DL: Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on use of antithrombotic

agents. Chest 1986;89(suppl 2):2S–3S.

46 Sato Y, Lee Z, Shimada H: Vitrectomy for diabetic cystoid macular edema. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002;46:315–322.

47 Stefaniotou M, Aspiotis M, Kalogeropoulos C, Christodoulou A, Psylla M, Ioachim E, Alamanos I, Psilas K: Vitrectomy results for diffuse diabetic macular edema with and without inner limiting membrane removal. Eur J Ophthalmol 2004;14:137–143.

48 Tachi N, Ogino N: Vitrectomy for diffuse macular edema in cases of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:258–260.

49 The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986.

50 The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Preliminary report on the effect of photocoagulation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;81:383–396.

51The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic reinopathy: the second report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study.

Arch Ophthalmol 1978,85:81–106.

52 The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Four risk factors for severe visual loss in diabetic retinopathy: the third report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1979,97:654–655.

53 The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Assessing possible late treatment effects in stopping a clinical trial early: a case study. Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) report No. 9. Control Clin Trials 1984,5:373– 381.

54 The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Indications for photocoagulation treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Retinopathy Study report No. 14. Invest Ophthalmol Clin 1994,27:239–253.

55 The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group: Two-year course of visual acuity in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy with conventional management. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report No. 1. Ophthalmology 1985;92:492– 502.

56 The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group: Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy: two-year results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report No. 2. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103: 1644–1652.

57 The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group: Early vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy in eyes with useful vision: results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report No. 3. Ophthalmology 1988,95:1307– 1320.

58 The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group: Early vitrectomy for severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy in eyes with useful vision: clinical application of results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report No. 4. Ophthalmology 1988;95:1321–1334.

59 The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Research Group:Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy: four-year results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report No. 5. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:958– 964.

60 UKPDS Group: UK prospective study of therapies of maturity-onset diabetes. I. Effect of diet, sulphonylurea, insulin or biguanide therapy on fasting plasma glucose and body weight over one year. Diabetologia 1983;24:404–411.

61 UKPDS Group: UKPDS 50: risk factors for incidence and progression of retinopathy in Type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis. Diabetologia 2001;44:156–163.

62 Van Effenterre G, Guyot-Argenton C, Guiberteau B, Hany I, Lacotte JL: Oedèmes maculaires induits par la contraction de la hyaloide postérieure dans la rétinopathie diabétique: traitement chirurgical sur une série de 22 cas. J Fr Ophtalmol 1993;16:602– 610.

63 Yamamoto T, Akabane N, Takeuchi S: Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: the role of posterior vitreous detachment and epimacular membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132:369–377.

64 Yang CM: Surgical treatment for severe diabetic macular edema with massive hard exudates. Retina 2000;20:121–125.

Evidence-Based Therapy of Diabetic

Ophthalmologica 2007;221:132–141

141

Retinopathy

 

 

Author Index Vol. 221, No. 2, 2007

Büchele Rodrigues, E. 75, 78

Lang, G.E. 112

Helbig, H. 103

Meyer, C.H.

118

Hoerle, S. 78, 132

Neubauer, A.S. 95

Kroll, P. 77, 78, 132

Ulbig, M.W.

95

Subject Index Vol. 221, No. 2, 2007

Diabetes 78, 95

Diabetic macular edema 118

retinopathy 103, 112, 132

Retinopathy Study 95 Intravitreal injection 118 Laser photocoagulation 118

therapy 95 Neovascularization 78 Octreotide 112

Pars plana vitrectomy 118 Proliferative diabetic retinopathy 78

– vitreoretinopathy 78

Protein kinase C inhibitor 112 Retina 78

Ruboxistaurin mesylate 112 Somatostatin analogue 112 Surgery 103

Tractional retinal detachment 103 Treatment, evidence-based 132 Vascular endothelial growth factor 78 Vitrectomy 103, 132

Vitreous hemorrhage 103

© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel

Fax +41 61 306 12 34

E-Mail karger@karger.ch Accessible online at: www.karger.com www.karger.com/oph