Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Current Aspects of Pathogenesis and Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy_Kroll_2007
.pdf
be indicated under certain conditions – no such groups |
that immediate focal laser photocoagulation reduced the |
had been identified with the methods used in the ETDRS |
risk of moderate visual loss for CSME by at least 50%. |
[16]. On the other hand methods like OCT and retinal |
Usually several treatment sessions are required. In cases |
thickness analyzer offer sensitive tools to follow changes |
of both PDR and CSME, first the macula should be ad- |
in retinal thickness objectively, which allows better as- |
dressed unless high-risk characteristics warrant simulta- |
sessment of treatment success of e.g. focal laser treatment. |
neous panretinal treatment. |
The OCT can also identify membranes and vitreomacu- |
In summary, laser treatment offers proven treatments |
lar traction [56, 57], cases in which pars plana vitrectomy |
for many problems associated with diabetic retinopathy |
might be more beneficial than other treatment modalities |
at a high evidence level. However, for certain situations |
[25, 58, 59]. |
such as macular ischemia, tractive components, severe |
|
proliferations and maybe diffuse macular edema other |
|
treatment modalities may be more beneficial. Surgery is |
Conclusions |
definitely indicated for some situations and recently |
Laser therapy remains the main treatment modality |
emerging medical therapies offer a variety of new ap- |
proaches, which alone or in adjunction with laser therapy |
|
for diabetic retinopathy. The DRS demonstrated that |
may help to further improve the outcome of treating dia- |
panretinal scatter photocoagulation reduced the risk of |
betic retinopathy. However, their value still has to be |
severe visual loss by 150% in eyes with high-risk charac- |
proven at the same high level of evidence as that which |
teristics. It may also be beneficial in other PDR and severe |
exists for laser therapy. |
NPDR under certain conditions. The ETDRS could show |
|
References
1 Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE: Visual impairment in diabetes. Ophthalmology 1984;91: 1–9.
2 The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 1995; 44:968–983.
3The effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the progression of diabetic retinopathy in in- sulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Arch
Ophthalmol 1995;113:36–51.
4 Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ 1998;317: 703–713.
5 Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the second report of diabetic retinopathy study findings. Ophthalmology 1978;85:82–106.
6Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Am J Ophthalmol
1976;81:383–396.
7Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1981;88:583–600.
8Four risk factors for severe visual loss in diabetic retinopathy. The third report from the Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch
Ophthalmol 1979;97:654–655.
9Indications for photocoagulation treatment of diabetic retinopathy: Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report No 14. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Int Oph-
thalmol Clin 1987;27:239–253.
10 Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, Dills D, Kampik A, Pararajasegaram R, Verdaguer JT: Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1677– 1682.
11Initiativgruppe Früherkennung diabetischer Augenerkrankungen (IFdA): Diagnostik, Therapie und Verlaufskontrolle der diabetischen Retinopathie und Makulopathie (Leitlinie der DDG). 2004. http://www.dieifda.de/downloads/DDGLeitlinie2004.pdf.
12Initiativgruppe Früherkennung diabetischer Augenerkrankungen (IFdA): Stadieneinteilung und Therapie der diabetischen Retinopathie und Makulopathie. 2001. http:// www.die-ifda.de/html/aerzte/bildindex_ aerzte.html.
13American Academy of Ophthalmology: Preferred practice pattern: diabetic retinopathy. 2003. http://www.aao.org/education/ library/ppp/dr_new.cfm.
14 Davies N: Altering the pattern of panretinal photocoagulation: could the visual field for driving be preserved? Eye 1999;13:531–536.
15 Chew EY, Klein ML, Murphy RP, Remaley NA, Ferris FL 3rd: Effects of aspirin on vitreous/preretinal hemorrhage in patients with diabetes mellitus. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report No 20. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:52–55.
16Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:766–785.
17Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group.
Ophthalmology 1987;94:761–774.
18 Ferris FL 3rd, Davis MD: Treating 20/20 eyes with diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:675–676.
19Focal photocoagulation treatment of diabetic macular edema: relationship of treatment effect to fluorescein angiographic and other retinal characteristics at baseline – ETDRS report No. 19. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Arch Oph-
thalmol 1995;113:1144–1155.
20 Lewis H, Schachat AP, Haimann MH, Haller JA, Quinlan P, von Fricken MA, Fine SL, Murphy RP: Choroidal neovascularization after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 1990;97: 503–510; discussion 510–501.
Laser Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:95–102 |
101 |
21 Schatz H, Madeira D, McDonald HR, Johnson RN: Progressive enlargement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1549–1551.
22Hamilton AMP, Ulbig MW, Polkinghorne P: Management of Diabetic Retinopathy. London, BMJ Publishing Group, 1996.
23 Lee CM, Olk RJ: Modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema: long-term visual results. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1594–1602.
24 Ladas ID, Theodossiadis GP: Long-term effectiveness of modified grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993;71: 393–397.
25 Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 2000;20:126–133.
26 Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Sofker A, Degenring RF: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:57–61.
27 Xu X, Zhu Q, Xia X, Zhang S, Gu Q, Luo D: Blood-retinal barrier breakdown induced by activation of protein kinase C via vascular endothelial growth factor in streptozotocininduced diabetic rats. Curr Eye Res 2004;28: 251–256.
28Classification of diabetic retinopathy from fluorescein angiograms. ETDRS report number 11. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Ophthal-
mology 1991;98:807–822.
29 Arend O, Wolf S, Harris A, Reim M: The relationship of macular microcirculation to visual acuity in diabetic patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:610–614.
30 Shimura M, Yasuda K, Nakazawa T, Kano T, Ohta S, Tamai M: Quantifying alterations of macular thickness before and after panretinal photocoagulation in patients with severe diabetic retinopathy and good vision. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2386–2394.
31 Benson WE, Brown GC, Tasman W, McNamara JA, Vander JF: Extracapsular cataract extraction with placement of a posterior chamber lens in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1993;100:730– 738.
32 Jaffe GJ, Burton TC, Kuhn E, Prescott A, Hartz A: Progression of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and visual outcome after extracapsular cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;114:448–456.
33 Hainsworth DP, Chen SN, Cox TA, Jaffe GJ: Condensation on polymethylmethacrylate, acrylic polymer, and silicone intraocular lenses after fluid-air exchange in rabbits. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1410–1418.
34 Gabel VP, Birngruber R, Gunther-Koszka H, Puliafito CA: Nd:YAG laser photodisruption of hemorrhagic detachment of the internal limiting membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107:33–37.
35 Kroll P, Busse H: Therapy of preretinal macular hemorrhages. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1986;188:610–612.
36 Ulbig MW, Mangouritsas G, Rothbacher HH, Hamilton AM, McHugh JD: Long-term results after drainage of premacular subhyaloid hemorrhage into the vitreous with a pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1465–1469.
37 Ulbig MW, Hamilton AM: Comparative use of diode and argon laser for panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmologe 1993;90:457–462.
38 Bandello F, Brancato R, Trabucchi G, Lattanzio R, Malegori A: Diode versus argongreen laser panretinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized study in 44 eyes with a long followup time. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1993;231:491–494.
39 Ulbig MR, Arden GB, Hamilton AM: Color contrast sensitivity and pattern electroretinographic findings after diode and argon laser photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;117:583–588.
40 Maeshima K, Utsugi-Sutoh N, Otani T, Kishi S: Progressive enlargement of scattered photocoagulation scars in diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2004;24:507–511.
41 Akduman L, Olk RJ: Diode laser (810 nm) versus argon green (514 nm) modified grid photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1433– 1441.
42 Gupta V, Gupta A, Kaur R, Narang S, Dogra MR: Efficacy of various laser wavelengths in the treatment of clinically significant macular edema in diabetics. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2001;32:397–405.
43 Friberg TR: Infrared micropulsed laser treatment for diabetic macular edema – subthreshold versus threshold lesions. Semin Ophthalmol 2001;16:19–24.
44Luttrull JK, Musch DC, Mainster MA: Subthreshold diode micropulse photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Br J
Ophthalmol 2005;89:74–80.
45 Laursen ML, Moeller F, Sander B, Sjoelie AK: Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1173–1179.
46EDTRS: Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs – an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Re-
search Group. Ophthalmology 1991;98:786– 806.
47 Kinyoun J, Barton F, Fisher M, Hubbard L, Aiello L, Ferris F 3rd: Detection of diabetic macular edema: ophthalmoscopy versus photography – Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 5. The ETDRS Research Group. Ophthalmology 1989;96:746–750; discussion 750–741.
48 Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, Reichel E, Schuman JS, Duker JS, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG: Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1995;102:217–229.
49 Neubauer AS, Priglinger S, Ullrich S, Bechmann M, Thiel MJ, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Comparison of foveal thickness measured with the retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography. Retina 2001;21: 596–601.
50 Neubauer AS, Priglinger S, Thiel MJ, Bechmann M, Ulbig MW: Retinal maps: Retinal thickness analyzer (RTA) compared to optical coherence tomography (OCT). IOVS Suppl 2001;42:S793.
51 Polito A, Shah SM, Haller JA, Zimmer-Galler I, Zeimer R, Campochiaro PA, Vitale S: Comparison between retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography for assessment of foveal thickness in eyes with macular disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2002; 134:240–251.
52 Shahidi M, Ogura Y, Blair NP, Rusin MM, Zeimer R: Retinal thickness analysis for quantitative assessment of diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1115– 1119.
53 Brown JC, Solomon SD, Bressler SB, Schachat AP, DiBernardo C, Bressler NM: Detection of diabetic foveal edema: contact lens biomicroscopy compared with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:330–335.
54 Browning DJ, McOwen MD, Bowen RM Jr., O’Marah TL: Comparison of the clinical diagnosis of diabetic macular edema with diagnosis by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2004;111:712–715.
55 Sanchez-Tocino H, Alvarez-Vidal A, Maldonado MJ, Moreno-Montanes J, Garcia-Laya- na A: Retinal thickness study with optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43: 1588–1594.
56 Giovannini A, Amato GP, Mariotti C, Ripa E: Diabetic maculopathy induced by vitreomacular traction: evaluation by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Doc Ophthalmol 1999;97:361–366.
57 Gallemore RP, Jumper JM, McCuen BW 2nd, Jaffe GJ, Postel EA, Toth CA: Diagnosis of vitreoretinal adhesions in macular disease with optical coherence tomography. Retina 2000;20:115–120.
58 Massin P, Duguid G, Erginay A, Haouchine B, Gaudric A: Optical coherence tomography for evaluating diabetic macular edema before and after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:169–177.
59 Parolini B, Panozzo G, Gusson E, Pinackatt S, Bertoldo G, Rottini S, Pignatto S: Diode laser, vitrectomy and intravitreal triamcinolone: a comparative study for the treatment of diffuse non tractional diabetic macular edema. Semin Ophthalmol 2004;19:1–12.
60 Ferris F: Early photocoagulation in patients with either type I or type II diabetes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996;94:505–537.
102 |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:95–102 |
Neubauer/Ulbig |
gery are commonly disappointing even if anatomical suc- |
where their vasoproliferative effects may lead to iris neo- |
||||
cess rates have continuously improved with better under- |
vascularizations and neovascular glaucoma [14–18]. |
||||
standing of the pathophysiology and technical instru- |
An altered environment in an eye after vitrectomy is |
||||
mentation [14–18]. |
|
|
probably also responsible for the development of lens |
||
|
|
|
|
opacities and the nearly mandatory acceleration of cata- |
|
|
|
|
|
ract formation after vitrectomy. It is speculated that the |
|
Effect of Surgery on Diabetic Eye Disease |
lens, being a very low oxygen compartment [21], is ex- |
||||
Surgery can address various therapeutical goals in di- |
posed to higher oxygen tension after vitrectomy [19]. |
||||
This may be due to a facilitated diffusion of oxygen if the |
|||||
abetic retinopathy. Media opacities, especially vitreous |
lens is in direct contact with the fluid currents in the vit- |
||||
hemorrhage but also lens opacities, can be removed and |
reous cavity after vitrectomy and not with the vitreous |
||||
a clear optical system can be restored. After removal of |
itself. |
||||
media opacities intraoperative laser treatment of the isch- |
|
|
|||
emic retina becomes possible and the neovascular stimu- |
|
|
|||
lus with production of vasoproliferative growth factors |
Indications |
||||
can be reduced. A detached retina can be surgically reat- |
Vitreous Hemorrhage |
||||
tached and the contact between photoreceptors and reti- |
|||||
nal pigment epithelium can be restored. Mechanical trac- |
Diabetic vitreous hemorrhage is a common indication |
||||
tion on the retina by active or atrophic membranes can |
for surgery. The first pars plana vitrectomy was per- |
||||
be relieved and retinal function can recover. |
formed 35 years ago by Machemer [12, 13] in an eye with |
||||
However, in addition to these more passive effects, vit- |
diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Vitreous hemorrhage oc- |
||||
reous surgery also has effects on the future development |
curs if neovascularizations tear. This usually happens in |
||||
of diabetic eye disease. A partially attached vitreous is an |
eyes which undergo partial vitreous detachment or con- |
||||
ideal schaffold for the ingrowth of diabetic neovascular- |
traction of the fibrovascular membranes which may oc- |
||||
izations. After complete removal of the vitreous the ten- |
casionally occur shortly after retinal photocoagulation. |
||||
dency for ingrowth of fibrovascular membranes is re- |
A ‘nonclearing’ diabetic vitreous hemorrhage is gener- |
||||
duced, since a proper matrix for neovascularizations is |
ally considered to be an indication for surgery. However, |
||||
missing. On the other hand, it is important to realize that |
should we wait 2 weeks or 1 year for clearing before sur- |
||||
active preretinal neovascularizations contribute to the |
gery is advised? The individual decision for surgery is |
||||
oxygen and nutrient supply of the inner retina. After sur- |
commonly not as easy and other factors have to be in- |
||||
gical removal of these neovascularizations it must be as- |
cluded in the considerations for or against surgery. In the |
||||
sumed that retinal ischemia is worsened and the neovas- |
presence of retinal detachment, iris neovascularizations |
||||
cular stimulus is increased by surgery. Therefore, eyes in |
or macular edema, irreversible damage may be avoided if |
||||
which active neovascularizations are removed require in- |
immediate surgery is performed. If the hemorrhage is |
||||
tense immediate intraoperative photocoagulation. |
very dense or recurrent, it may also be advisable to per- |
||||
In addition, removal of the vitreous and replacement |
form early surgery. Other patients however will regain |
||||
by a balanced salt solution and later by aqueous humor |
vision without surgery if the hemorrhage clears sponta- |
||||
changes diffusion properties and fluid currents in the vit- |
neously within several months. |
||||
reous cavity. On the one hand, oxygen [19, 20] and nutri- |
The Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study had ran- |
||||
ents (possibly from the ciliary body) can more easily dif- |
domized eyes with vitreous hemorrhage for early surgery |
||||
fuse from the vitreous cavity to the inner retina, improv- |
or observation. This study only showed a benefit for ear- |
||||
ing the metabolic situation for the ischemic retina. On the |
ly surgery in younger diabetics [22, 23]. Younger diabet- |
||||
other hand, growth factors can more easily leave the ret- |
ics more commonly have an attached vitreous and trac- |
||||
inal tissue into the vitreous cavity. This may have 2 ef- |
tion on the retina. Ultrasound echography allows identi- |
||||
fects. First, the concentration of these cytokines within |
fying tractional membranes at the posterior pole, even if |
||||
the retinal tissue is decreasing. This may have a positive |
the ophthalmoscopic view is obscured by the hemor- |
||||
effect, possibly explaining the improvement of diabetic |
rhage. In eyes with known traction on the central retina |
||||
macular edema after removing an attached vitreous. And |
or evidence of traction in ultrasound echography [24] |
||||
second, these cytokines derived from the ischemic retina |
surgery should not be delayed (fig. 1). |
||||
can more easily reach the anterior segment of the eye, |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
Helbig |
||
Fig. 1. Vitreous and subhyaloidal hemorrhage. Fibrovascular membranes were visible and tractional detachment of the retina was suspected. Vision was hand movement. Surgery was recommended.
Fig. 2. Long-standing tractional detachment of the macula. The retina was covered by extensive active fibrovascular membranes. The retina itself was barely visible. Vision was light perception. Vitrectomy was performed anatomically successfully, but vision did not improve.
Eyes with iris neovascularizations require immediate retinal coagulation therapy to avoid irreversible obstruction of the chamber angle by progressive growth of fibrovascular membranes. If media opacities make adequate coagulation therapy impossible, surgical removal of the hemorrhage and intense endolaser treatment become necessary.
It is therefore not possible to give general recommendations about how long to wait for surgery in diabetic vitreous hemorrhage. Vitreous hemorrhage is a dramatic event for the patient, but the prognosis for vision in the long term is often dependent on other factors.
Tractional Detachment of the Fovea
Eyes with tractional detachment of the fovea have very poor vision and if left untreated will not improve (fig. 2). Surgery is the only therapeutic option and it is generally assumed that there is little to lose even if surgery fails. The functional results of surgery are usually disappointing, even after anatomically successful surgery. The poor visual outcome is mostly due to advanced ischemia of macula and optic disc. Analysis of risk factors revealed extension of the retinal detachment, dura-
tion of macular detachment and iris neovascularizations being associated with poor visual outcome [17, 25]. In eyes with these risk factors, chances for significant visual improvement are so small that one has to consider not performing any surgery, especially if the fellow eye is good and general health is poor. Even if these eyes have little vision to lose, failed surgery with complications may even accelerate the loss of the remaining function and loss of the globe. If both eyes have reduced vision, surgical attempts will nevertheless have to be performed despite a poor prognosis.
Extrafoveal Tractional Detachment
Tractional retinal detachment usually does not start in the fovea. Fibrovascular membranes mostly grow along the vascular arcades and close to the optic disc, where traction and tractional detachment usually begin. Extrafoveal tractional retinal detachment is not an absolute indication for surgery. In many cases the situation may remain stable (fig. 3) and a detached retina may even spontaneously reattach [26]. It is important, however, that eyes with extrafoveal tractional detachment must be carefully watched, especially after laser treatment. Active
Surgery for Diabetic Retinopathy |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
105 |
Fig. 3. Tractional retinal detachment nasally to the fovea. The membranes were atrophic after scatter laser treatment and the traction did not threaten the fovea. Vision was 20/25 and no further therapy was performed.
fibrovascular membranes require retinal photocoagulation. Laser treatment induces fibrotic transformation of the neovascularizations and possibly contraction of the membranes, which may eventually lead to progression of the tractional detachment [27]. Before vitreous surgery was available, these eyes had a very poor prognosis and laser treatment was considered to be dangerous in these eyes. Now that we can surgically treat these tractional membranes, scatter laser treatment is recommended if active neovascularizations are present, but a close followup is mandatory. Vitrectomy is recommended if the detachment progresses and threatens the fovea or if significant vitreous hemorrhage develops.
Tractional Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Traction by diabetic fibrovascular membranes may create retinal tears and a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment may develop (fig. 4). This combined tractional and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is relatively rare and shows both features of a tractional detachment with membranes tightly adhering to the retina and a retinal tear. The retinal tear itself may be difficult to identify, but the shape of the retinal detachment is quite different. A pure tractional detachment is usually concave, tent-like shaped and the retina is not mobile. The appearance of rhegmatogenous detachment is convex, bullous and mobile. While a tractional detachment progresses slowly and does not require emergency surgery, a tractional-rhegmatogenous detachment usually progresses rapidly and has to be operated without delay. The prognosis of tractional rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is less favorable than for pure tractional detachments. Intraoperatively it is more difficult to separate the membranes from a mobile retina than from a fixed and relatively stable retina. Perfluorcarbon should not be used until the membranes are removed from the posterior pole. Intraoperative complications are relatively common in this type of surgery [28]. In addition, we occasionally observe reproliferations in the postoperative course which represent a combination of diabetic fibrovascular membranes and the typical proliferative vitreoretinopathy. These proliferations are surgically very difficult to manage.
Fig. 4. Tractional rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, visual acuity hand movement. The retinal tear is marked with an arrow.
Tractive Macular Edema
In some cases traction on the fovea may cause tractive macular edema, even if the fovea itself is not detached. Traction of diabetic fibrovascular membranes may cause an ophthalmoscopic appearance with typical hard exudates (fig. 5). Atrophic fibrovascular membranes may
106 |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
Helbig |
Fig. 5. a Diabetic tractional macular edema with hard exudates. Vision was 20/400. Vitrectomy with removal of the tractional membranes was performed in combination with endolaser treatment. b One year later, slow resolution of exudates and edema was observed, vision had improved to 20/40.
also create a picture similar to macular pucker with distortion of the central retina. The best therapy for tractional edema is to remove the traction. Tractional membranes may often be easily visible, but in other cases biomicroscopy only shows minimal changes. In some instances ocular coherence tomography can clearly demonstrate the fine membranous structures exerting tractional forces and creating swelling of the macula [29]. Thus, ocular coherence tomography imaging should be included in the diagnostic workup of diabetic macular edema. In cases without traction, laser treatment is a valuable approach; focal laser treatment is not recommended if mechanical traction is the cause for macular edema. Visual recovery after surgery is mainly dependent on the degree of macular ischemia; therefore preoperative fluorescein angiography is helpful to give a picture of the status of macular microcirculation.
Diffuse Macular Edema
Several recent reports have described an improvement of diffuse diabetic macular edema without visible traction after vitrectomy in eyes with attached vitreous [30]. The pathophysiological basis for this attempt was to improve access of oxygen and nutrients from the vitreous to
the retina, and vice versa, to facilitate diffusion of cytokines from the retinal tissue into the vitreous, avoiding accumulation of factors triggering macular edema within the macular tissue. Despite significant anatomical improvement of the edema after removal of the vitreous, recovery of vision was rather unsatisfactory in many cases. It is still controversial whether this approach with or without removal of the inner limiting membrane significantly improves the long-term course of the disease in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema without traction [31, 32].
Surgery for Neovascular Glaucoma
The cause for neovascularizations of the iris and chamber angle is believed to be the ischemic retina, which produces vasoproliferative growth factors. These cytokines may diffuse to the anterior segment of the eye, triggering anterior segment neovascularizations. In aphacic and vitrectomized eyes there is no diffusion barrier between the anterior and posterior segment of the eye. Therefore these eyes are particularly at risk for the development of neovascular glaucoma. Therapy has to be primarily directed to the cause of the neovascular stimulus, the ischemic retina. The most important element of treatment is there-
Surgery for Diabetic Retinopathy |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
107 |
fore retinal ablation by laser or cryotreatment [33]. Since this treatment can induce fibrotic regression but not complete dissolution of the membranes in the chamber angle, retinal ablation is often not sufficient to regulate intraocular pressure. Therefore additional treatment to lower intraocular pressure is usually necessary. Filtering surgery has a poor prognosis, since the high levels of cytokines in the aqueous humor stimulate fibrosis which is obstructing the fistula. Antimetabolites or glaucoma drainage devices [34] may be used to improve success rates but have an increased risk for complications. Transscleral cryotherapy [35] or transscleral laser treatment to the ciliary body is an alternative to reduce aqueous humor production but has a relatively narrow therapeutic window; overtreatment may induce phthisis of the globe. If other diabetic complications are present, requiring vitreoretinal surgery, direct endolaser treatment to the ciliary processes can be applied to reduce aqueous humor production [36]. In severe cases instillation of liquid silicone can form a diffusion barrier between the retina and the anterior segment of the eye and may contribute to a stabilization of anterior segment neovascularization [37].
Cataract Surgery
Second to age, diabetes is the main epidemiological risk factor for the development of cataracts. Cataract surgery in eyes with diabetic retinopathy is performed to improve vision for the patient, but it also allows a clear view to the fundus for diagnosis and treatment of the retinopathy. However, cataract surgery may worsen retinopathy [38]. Neovascularizations and macular edema may be stimulated to grow after cataract surgery [39, 40]. Nevertheless, conventional cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and implantation of an intraocular lens can be safely performed in most eyes with diabetic retinopathy [41, 42]. Intracapsular surgery is associated with an increased risk for neovascular glaucoma [43] and should be avoided in diabetic eyes. Several other aspects should be taken into account. Whenever possible retinopathy should be treated and stabilized before surgery using adequate laser photocoagulation. Especially eyes with iris neovascularizations require intense preoperative laser coagulation or transscleral cryotreatment of the retina. If this is not possible before surgery or not sufficient, a combined procedure with cataract and vitreous surgery including endolaser treatment of the retina should be considered. Fibrinous reaction after cataract surgery alone may render postoperative laser treatment in eyes with iris rubeosis difficult.
108 |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
If macular edema is present, preoperative focal laser treatment should be used. If it is not possible to have a completely dry macula at the time of cataract surgery, there is a high risk for worsening of macular edema and visual loss. If cataract surgery has to be performed in the presence of diabetic macular edema, it may be recommended to combine cataract surgery with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone [44–46]. Intravitreal triamcinolone has been shown to successfully improve vision and retinal thickening in diabetic macular edema [47].
Other specific aspects for cataract surgery in eyes with diabetic retinopathy include a large capsulorhexis and an intraocular lens with large optics to facilitate possible subsequent diagnosis and laser treatment of the retina. Silicone intraocular lenses should be avoided because they interact with liquid silicone which possibly has to be used for endotamponade in the later course of diabetic eye disease. Diabetic eyes have an increased risk for postoperative fibrin exudation and formation of synechiae between the lens capsule and the iris due to an impaired blood retinal barrier [48–50].
Complications of Surgery for Diabetic Retinopathy
Cataract
Opacification of the lens is a mandatory consequence of vitrectomy independently of the cause for vitrectomy. Generally, development of cataracts appears to occur faster in diabetic eyes after vitrectomy than after vitrectomy in nondiabetic eyes. Silicone tamponade leads to an acceleration of cataract formation. Gas tamponade induces an immediate posterior subcapsular opacification occurring a few hours after surgery, which is mostly reversible. Later nuclear sclerosis develops, which does not appear to be much faster after gas tamponade than after vitrectomy with Ringer’s solution [48]. In young patients cataract formation occurs more slowly, and the lens may remain clear for many years or decades before surgery becomes necessary [51]. In older patients significant cataracts may form within a few months after vitrectomy.
The rapid development of cataract after vitrectomy especially in older diabetics has led some surgeons to perform combined viteoretinal and cataract surgery even for eyes with primarily clear lenses. This approach has been shown to be successful and saves the patient a second surgery [52, 53]. Combined surgery however appears to be associated with a higher rate of inflammatory responses with fibrin in the anterior chamber and the formation of synechiae compared to a 2-step procedure [50]. It may
Helbig
therefore be safer to operate on the lens in a second surgery if possible. Combined cataract and vitreoretinal procedure may only be performed if lens opacities are disturbing intraoperative visualization of the posterior segment.
Retinal Detachment
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is a typical complication of vitrectomy [54]. Retinal holes may be created intraoperatively when traction to the vitreous base is exerted. The most common location of iatrogenic holes is close to the sclerotomies where intraocular instruments are introduced into the eye. The more instruments are exchanged during surgery, the higher the risk for creating holes. The risk can be reduced by carefully removing the anterior vitreous next to the sclerotomies with the cutter before instruments like scissors are introduced. In righthanded surgeons the most common location is temporal superior in the right eye and nasal superior in the left eye. Careful inspection of the peripheral retina out to the ora serrata at the end of the surgery under indentation using a wide angle viewing system may identify such retinal tears [55]. Adequate treatment can reduce the risk for postoperative retinal detachment. If postvitrectomy rhegmatogenous retinal detachment occurs, pneumatic retinopexy as a minimum invasive procedure is often the treatment of choice. The tears are anteriorly located and can be reached with transscleral cryotherapy without opening the conjunctiva. The holes are mostly located in the superior quadrants and gas injection in a vitrectomized eye is not associated with a high risk of creating new holes.
Another possible cause for postoperative retinal detachment after vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy are retinal holes located more posteriorly. These holes may be created during the preparation of membranes tightly adhering to the thin and atrophic retina mostly being located close to the major vascular arcades. If such holes are recognized intraoperatively, all traction surrounding the hole has to be released, the hole should be encircled with laser spots and an adequate internal tamponade, often liquid silicone, should be used.
Tractive redetachment may occur if severe reproliferations develop. The traction of reproliferation may also tear off laser scars and create a combined tractional rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Reproliferations
Reproliferation of diabetic fibrovascular membranes is a severe complication after vitrectomy for diabetic ret-
inopathy. Since the ischemic retina is believed to secrete the proliferative stimuli, the ischemic retina has to be adequately treated with laser. Especially in eyes with silicone tamponade growth factors may concentrate in the shallow interface between silicone and retina and provide an intense stimulus for reproliferations [56, 57]. Complete removal of all fibrovascular tissue using various techniques (‘segmentation’ technique [58], ‘delamination’ [59] or ‘en bloc’ [60] technique) eliminates the starting point and the substrate for reproliferations. In rare cases fibrovascular membranes may also develop along the anterior vitreous remnants creating anterior hyaloid fibrovascular membranes. Neovascularizations at the internal side of the sclerotomies may be the source for recurrent hemorrhage, if no neovascularizations are present in the posterior pole. In advanced cases it may be difficult to differentiate between diabetic reproliferations and proliferative vitreoretinopathy reactions, which we also occasionally see after surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in nondiabetic eyes.
Hemorrhage
Small amounts of blood are found in most eyes after vitreous surgery for diabetic retinopathy and significant rebleeding is not exceptionally rare. Diabetic neovascularizations are cut or torn off during surgery creating opening of the vessel lumen and a potential source for a vitreous hemorrhage. Bleeding vessels may be identified intraoperatively by lowering the intraocular pressure and should be coagulated intraoperatively using endodiathermia. If the source of hemorrhage is a large vessel or the optic disk, this may not be possible. The bleeding often stops spontaneously or after increasing the infusion pressure, but it may cause hemorrhages in the early postoperative phase when the blood pressure increases. Very dense hemorrhages after vitrectomy may be removed by revitrectomy or by fluid-air exchange [61].
Iris Rubeosis and Neovascular Glaucoma
Neovascularizations of the iris and chamber angle may occur if growth factors from the ischemic retina reach the anterior segment of the eye. Obstruction of the trabecular meshwork by fibrovascular membranes and increased intraocular pressure is a severe complication of diabetic retinopathy. Two aspects of vitreous surgery may contribute to the development of postoperative iris rubeosis. First, the removal of preretinal neovascularizations may worsen retinal ischemia and further stimulate the production of growth factors. Second, after removal of the vitreous these cytokines can more easily diffuse to
Surgery for Diabetic Retinopathy |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
109 |
the anterior segment of the eye. Especially after additional intracapsular cataract surgery there is no diffusion barrier left between iris and retina. To reduce the stimulus for neovascularizations, endolaser treatment should be applied at the end of vitreous surgery whenever possible.
Iris rubeosis is associated with retinal detachment in diabetic eyes. Sudden appearance of rubeosis in the postoperative course should alert the ophthalmologist to carefully inspect the peripheral retina [62].
References
1Duke-Elder S, Dobree JH: Diabetes mellitus; in Duke-Elder D (ed): System of Ophthal-
mology. London, Kimpton, 1967, pp 408– 448.
2 Ray BS, Pazianos AG, Greenberg E, Peretz WL, McLean JM: Pituitary ablation for diabetic retinopathy. I. Results of hypophysectomy (a ten-year evaluation). JAMA 1968; 203:79–84.
3 Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS Report Number 8. Ophthalmology 1981;88:583–600.
4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Ophthalmology 1991;98:766–785.
5 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Group: Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2002;287:2563–2569.
6 Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: Progression of retinopathy with intensive versus conventional treatment in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Ophthalmology 1995;102:647– 661.
7 United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group: Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703–713.
8 Donnelly R, Idris I, Forrester JV: Protein kinase C inhibition and diabetic retinopathy: a shot in the dark at translational research. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:145–151.
9 Protein Kinase C beta Inhibitor Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group: The effect of ruboxistaurin on visual loss in patients with moderately severe to very severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy: initial results of the Protein Kinase C beta Inhibitor Diabetic Retinopathy Study (PKC-DRS) multicenter randomized clinical trial. Diabetes 2005;54: 2188–2197.
10 Hauner H, von Ferber L, Koster I: Ambulante Versorgung von Diabetikern: eine Analyse von Krankenkassendaten der AOK Dortmund. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1994; 119:129–134.
11 Hoerle S, Gruner F, Kroll P: Epidemiology of diabetes-induced blindness – a review. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2002;219:777–784.
12 Machemer R: Reminescences after 25 years of pars plana vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:505–510.
13 Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton RWD, Parel JM: Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1971;75:813–820.
14 Gandorfer A, Kampik A: Pars plana vitrectomy in diabetic retinopathy: from pathogenetic principle to surgical strategy. Ophthalmologe 2000;97:325–330.
15 Ho T, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr: Vitrectomy in the management of diabetic eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;37:190–202.
16Helbig H, Sutter FK: Surgical treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp
Ophthalmol 2004;242:704–709.
17 Joussen A, Llacer H, Mazciewicz J, Kirchhof B: Chirurgische Therapie der diabetischen Retinopathie und Makulopathie. Ophthalmologe 2004;101:1138–1146.
18 Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr: Vitrectomy in the management of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol 1999;43:491–507.
19 Stefansson E: Oxygen and diabetic eye disease. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990;228:120–123.
20 Stefansson E, Landers MB 3rd, Wolbarsht ML: Vitrectomy, lensectomy, and ocular oxygenation. Retina 1982;2:159–166.
21 Helbig H, Hinz JP, Kellner U, Foerster MH: Oxygen in the anterior chamber of the human eye. Ger J Ophthalmol 1993;2:161–164.
22 Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Group: Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy: twoyear results of a randomized trial. Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:1644–1652.
23 Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Group: Early vitrectomy for severe vitreous hemorrhage in diabetic retinopathy: fouryear results of a randomized trial – Diabetic Retinopathy Vitrectomy Study Report 5. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:958–964.
24 Capeans C, Santos L, Tourino R, Otero JL, Gomez-Ulla F, Sanchez-Solario M: Ocular echography in the prognosis of vitreous hemorrhage in type II diabetes mellitus. Int Ophthlmol 1997;21:269–275.
25 Helbig H, Kellner U, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH: Grenzen und Möglichkeiten der Glaskörperchirurgie bei diabetischer Retinopathie. Ophthalmologe 1996;93:647–654.
26 Charles S, Flinn CE: The natural history of diabetic extramacular traction retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:66– 68.
27 Packer AJ: Vitrectomy for progressive macular traction associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105:1679–1682.
28 Thompson JT, de Bustros S, Michels RG, Rice TA: Results and prognostic factors in vitrectomy for diabetic traction-rhegmatog- enous retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:503–507.
29 Gallemore RP, Jumper JM, McCuen BW 2nd, Jaffe GJ, Postel EA, Toth CA: Diagnosis of vitreoretinal adhesions in macular disease with optical coherence tomography. Retina 2000;20:115–120.
30 Pendergast SD, Hassan TS, Williams GA, Cox MS, Margherio RR, Ferrone PJ, Garretson BR, Trese MT: Vitrectomy for diffuse diabetic macular edema associated with a taut premacular posterior hyaloid. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:178–186.
31 Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 2000;20:126–133.
32 Yamamoto T, Hitani K, Sato Y, Yamashita H, Takeuchi S: Vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema with and without internal limiting membrane removal. Ophthalmologica 2005; 219:206–213.
33 Pauleikhoff D, Gerke E: Photocoagulation in diabetic rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1987; 190:11–16.
34 Honrubia FM, Gomez ML, Hernandez A, Grijalbo MP: Long-term results of silicone tube in filtering surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97:501–504.
35 Nabili S, Kirkness CM: Trans-scleral diode laser cyclophoto-coagulation in the treatment of diabetic neovascular glaucoma. Eye 2004;18:352–356.
110 |
Ophthalmologica 2007;221:103–111 |
Helbig |
