- •Corneal Disease
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Core Messages
- •Organisms
- •Detection
- •Acid Fast Smears
- •Culture Media
- •Molecular Tests
- •Nucleic Acid Hybridization Probes
- •Line Probes
- •DNA Sequencing
- •FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) Assay
- •DNA Microarray
- •Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
- •Management
- •Clinical Diagnosis
- •Medical Therapy
- •Surgical Intervention
- •Penetrating Keratoplasty
- •Corneal Cross-Linking
- •Summary for the Clinician
- •References
- •Core Messages
- •Introduction
- •Epidemiology
- •Visual Morbidity
- •Documentation
- •Causative Factors
- •Causative Bacteria
- •Investigation of Keratitis
- •Laboratory Diagnosis: Susceptibility Testing
- •Susceptibility and Resistance of Bacterial Isolates
- •Treatment: Antimicrobials
- •Current Antimicrobials in Use
- •The Fluoroquinolones
- •Aminoglycosides
- •Cephalosporins
- •Other Antimicrobials Used
- •Development of Existing and New Classes of Drugs
- •Tigecycline
- •Linezolid
- •Meropenem
- •Combination Therapy
- •Drug Delivery to the Cornea
- •Novel Methods of Drug Delivery to the Cornea
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •3: Heredity of Keratoconus
- •Introduction
- •Is Keratoconus a Heritable or Genetic Disease?
- •Mutational Screening of Candidate Genes in Keratoconus
- •Visual System Homeobox Gene 1 (VSX1)
- •Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1)
- •Interleukin 1 (IL1) Superfamily
- •Collagen Genes
- •Genetic Mapping in Keratoconus
- •Genetics of Keratoconus – Mendelian or Complex?
- •References
- •4: Advance in Corneal Imaging
- •Introduction
- •In Vivo Confocal Microscopy (IVCM)
- •Principles of Confocal Microscopy
- •The Normal Cornea
- •Clinical Applications
- •Infectious Keratitis
- •Corneal Dystrophies
- •Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Surgery
- •Other Clinical Applications
- •Limitations of IVCM
- •Anterior Segment Ocular Coherence Tomography (OCT)
- •Clinical Applications
- •Corneal Thickness Assessment
- •Refractive Surgery
- •Corneal Grafts
- •Limitations
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Core Messages
- •Introduction
- •“Angiogenic Privilege of the Cornea” or “How Does the Normal Corneal Maintain Its Avascularity?”
- •General Mechanisms
- •Corneal Hemangiogenesis After Low-Risk Keratoplasty
- •Corneal Hemangiogenesis After High-Risk Keratoplasty
- •Corneal Lymphangiogenesis: Essential for Corneal Graft Rejection
- •Corneal Lymphangiogenesis in Dry Eye
- •Imaging of Corneal Lymphatic Vessels
- •Novel Anti(lymph)Angiogenic Treatment Options at the Cornea
- •Current Treatment Options for Immature Corneal (Blood and Lymphatic) Vessels
- •Steroids
- •Anti-VEGFs (Bevazicumab, Ranibuzumab, Pegaptanib, VEGF Trap)
- •Anti-IRS 1-Strategies (Antisense Oligonucleotides Against IRS 1)
- •Treatment Options for Mature Corneal Vessels
- •Unmet Needs and Future Directions
- •References
- •Core Messages
- •Introduction
- •Retrieval of Donor Tissue
- •Technical Aspects
- •Microbiological Aspects
- •Tissue Evaluation Aspects
- •Corneal Storage
- •Moist Chamber Storage of the Donor Eye
- •Technical Aspects
- •Storage Period
- •Microbiological Safety
- •Tissue Evaluation
- •Hypothermic Storage of the Corneoscleral Button
- •Technical Aspects
- •Storage Period
- •Microbiological Safety
- •Tissue Evaluation
- •Organ Culture (Normothermic Storage) of the Corneoscleral Button
- •Technical Aspects
- •Storage Period
- •Microbiological Safety
- •Tissue Evaluation
- •Other Aspects
- •Pre-cutting of Corneal Tissue for Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK)
- •Microkeratome Cutting
- •Femtosecond Laser Cutting
- •Stripping of Descemet’s Membrane with Endothelium
- •Donor Considerations for EK
- •References
- •7: Infant Keratoplasty
- •Core Messages
- •Introduction
- •Indications for Surgery
- •Visual Outcome
- •Patient Selection
- •Patient Assessment
- •Ancillary Testing
- •Donor Tissue
- •Intraoperative Considerations
- •Concurrent Surgical Procedures
- •Postoperative Considerations
- •Suture Management
- •Optical Correction and Amblyopia Therapy
- •Postoperative Complications
- •Glaucoma
- •Graft Rejection
- •Graft Failure
- •Alternatives to Penetrating Keratoplasty
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Index
8 |
D. Miller et al. |
|
|
the media for susceptibility testing. No multicenter trials have been conducted evaluating the utility of the media in low, medium, or high prevalence areas [20].
Molecular Tests
Molecular assays based on amplification techniques targeting insertion element IS 6110, 16 S rRNA gene, internal transcribed spacer gene, or the hsp65 gene that can detect or confirm the presence of mycobacteria in clinical samples include routine, nested, real-time PCR, and PCR combined with enzyme restriction analysis (PCR-REA). Mycobacteria identification is confirmed by species-specific probes and/or their distinct enzymatic profile or patterns [21, 22].
Nucleic Acid Hybridization Probes
Nucleic acid probes allow rapid identification of select, common mycobacteria species. Probes can be employed for direct detection of mycobacteria in smear positive or highly suspicious tissue samples. Acridinium ester-labeled DNA probes complementary to the16S rRNA mycobacteria gene (AccuProbe; Gen-Probe Inc, San Diego, CA) are available for confirmation of M. tuberculosis complex, M. avium complex, M. kansaii, and M. gordonae. Probes are added to sonicated colonies, form a DNA–rRNA hybrid and are detected by a luminometer. Turnaround time is about 2 h. Sensitivity varies depending on the species. Comparison with Bactec, AccuProbes sensitivity was >85–100 and 100% specificity. Turnaround time is 2 h [21, 22].
Line Probes
Several line probe assays have been developed for the detection of mycobacteria species targeting either the 16S-23S rRNA internal spacer region (INNO LiPA Mycobacteria v2, Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) or the 23S rRNA gene (GenoType Mycobacteria MTBC, GenoType Mycobacterium CM, GenoType AS, GenoType LepraeDR, Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) [21, 22].
The assays are based on the reverse hybridization of biotinylated PCR products to their complementary probes immobilized as parallel lines on a membrane strip. Detection and identification is via colorimetric detection using an automated instrument. Seventeen of the most frequently encountered mycobacteria species, including M. tuberculosis complex, M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. chelonae, M. gordonae,
M. smegmatis, M. fortuitum complex, and M. marinum are identified with the InnoLiPA kit, while the combination of the first three Hain Lifescience kits (GenoType MTBC, CM, AS) can identify M. tuberculosis and 30 different nontuberculous mycobacteria including the most frequently species isolated from mycobacterial keratitis. Colonies growing on solid or liquid media can be used with these two
1 New Aspects in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Mycobacterial Keratitis |
9 |
|
|
systems. Turnaround time is 6 h. The M. leprae kit can confirm the presence of M. leprae as well as resistance to dapsone, ofloxacin, and rifampicin [21, 22].
DNA Sequencing
DNA sequencing is considered the “gold standard” for definitive identification of mycobacteria species. The procedure includes amplification with universal mycobacterial primers (6S rRNA gene or the hsp65 gene) followed by product (DNA) sequencing in an automated sequencer. Sequences are then compared with a database with known mycobacteria sequences [21, 22].
FISH (Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization) Assay
PNA-FISH-Fluorescent in situ hybridization tests using peptide nucleic acid coupled to a fluorescent probe are available for the detection of Mycobacteria tuberculosis, M. leprae, and nontuberculous mycobacteria from clinical samples, cultures, tissues, and paraffin sections [23]. It is a rapid and accurate technique for species identification and direct detection in tissues [24].
DNA Microarray
Hybridization of species-specific probes on a DNA chip allows for rapid identification of M. tuberculosis and other mycobacteria species. This technique is currently restricted to reference or research laboratories. Due to expense, this technique is currently restricted to reference or research laboratories [21, 22].
Pyrosequencing technology is a unique technique based on nucleic acid sequencing by addition and detection of released pyrophosphate during synthesis [25]. Tuohy et al. used it as a tool for the identification of mycobacterial species and documented it as a rapid and acceptable method for identifying the most frequent mycobacterial species recovered from clinical samples. Galor et al. used it to identify a case of Nocardia keratitis [26]. It could provide a rapid method for identification of unusual ocular pathogens including mycobacteria species [25].
Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)
Pulse field gel electrophoresis is a molecular typing method that can characterize mycobacterial species associated with outbreaks. It has been instrumental in confirming LASIK outbreaks in the United States and Brazil [4, 27, 28]. It is timeconsuming and requires molecular expertise.
The polymerase chain reaction and other molecular diagnostics are ideal for the detection and/or confirmation of mycobacteria species in ocular samples due to
