Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Color Perception Physiology Processes and Analysis_Skusevich, Matikas_2009.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
4.49 Mб
Скачать

156

M.I. Suero, P.J. Pardo, A.L. Pérez

 

 

Table 4. Total variance explained for Observer 3.

Component

Initial eigenvalues

 

Sums of the squares of the saturations

 

Total

% Variance

Cumulative %

Total

% Variance

Cumulative %

1

2.156

71.878

71.878

2.156

71.878

71.878

2

0.542

18.057

89.935

0.542

18.057

89.935

3

0.302

10.065

100.000

0.302

10.065

100.000

Extraction method: Principal component analysis

In the component matrix (Table 5), it could be seen for the three observers that Component 1 accounts for the contributions of L and M, from which is subtracted the variable S. This coincides with the usual treatment of the channel D in neural models. Component 2 has the form of an opponent channel of type T, with the contribution of the variable M being subtracted from that of the variable L, and an almost negligible contribution of the variable S. Component 3 is a sum of contributions of the three variables L, M, and S with small weights, and may correspond to variations in the achromatic channel A in the determination of the isobrightness curve.

It should be emphasized that Components 2 and 3, which resemble channels T and A, respectively, arose solely from the statistical treatment applied to the experimental data.

Table 5. Component matrix for Observer 1.

 

Ob1’s components

 

Ob2’s components

 

Ob3’s components

 

 

1

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

L

0.827

0.534

0.176

0.821

0.525

0.226

0.803

0.570

0.176

M

0.837

-0.513

0.191

0.822

-0.522

0.228

0.839

-0.459

0.293

S

-0.946

0.013

0.323

-0.913

0.002

0.408

-0.899

0.080

0.430

4. CONCLUSION

The statistical results of the previous section show an underlying structure of the experimental data that is common to all three observers, and coincident with the channels into which neural models of colour vision are usually divided.

The first component reflects the behaviour of a blue/yellow or type D channel in Guth's terminology, in all cases accounting for over 70% of the variance. The second component corresponds to the behaviour of a red/green or type T channel, accounting for 18% of the variance for the three observers. Finally, the third component would correspond to the behaviour of a luminance or achromatic channel accounting for the remainder of the variance, but with certain differences.

These differences bring out the particularities of each observer's colour perception, not only in the physical but also in the perceptive aspect, since this last experiment included a correction for the differences in the optical density of the macular pigment and lenses.

The principal component analysis yielded completely uncorrelated linear combinations of the original variables, which explained 100% of the initial variance in a three-dimensional vector space. Independently of the normalization applied to the principal components which indicates their different weights in the total variance, these principal components indicate the

Individual Differences in Colour Vision

157

 

 

directions in the three-dimensional vector space into which the original variance is mapped. Expressing these components by means of the angles corresponding to their direction cosines is a way of representing them that is independent of the particular weight that they each have in accounting for the total variance.

Thus, for Component 1 or channel D, for Component 2 or channel T and, for Component 3 or channel A one has the angles expressed in the tables 6-8.

Table 6. Direction angles of Principal Component 1.

Component 1

θL

θM

θS

Observer 1

56.79

56.34

128.79

Observer 2

56.24

56.20

128.17

Observer 3

56.85

55.15

127.75

Table 7. Direction angles of Principal Component 2.

Component 2

θL

θM

θS

Observer 1

43.83

133.87

88.99

Observer 2

44.83

134.84

89.84

Observer 3

39.26

128.57

83.76

Table 8. Direction angles of Principal Component 3.

Component 2

θL

θM

θS

Observer 1

64.89

62.58

38.85

Observer 2

64.22

63.97

38.26

Observer 3

71.32

57.78

38.51

This allows one to better appreciate the consistency of the results for Component 1 (channel D) between all three observers, and the small variations, especially for Observer 3, in Component 2 (channel T) and in Component 3 (channel A).

Therefore, the next step in colorimetry should be to provide coverage for all these individual differences [65] which also have great importance for the preservation of metameric matches in digital devices (LCDs, printers, etc.) [66]. To attain this goal, it is essential to develop a straightforward chromatic characterization of observers so that these colorimetric transformations can subsequently be implemented in digital devices. The authors' group has been working on this topic for several years, and is currently carrying out a research project entitled "Intelligent System for the Chromatic Characterization of Observers" which is hoped soon to yield relevant results.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks are due to Prof. Françoise Viénot of the Natural History Museum of Paris and to the Department of Optics of the University of Granada, and in particular to Prof. Enrique Hita

158

M.I. Suero, P.J. Pardo, A.L. Pérez

 

 

Villaverde for his constant support. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Plan Nacional de Investigación Científica, Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica (I+D+I) and the FEDER program of the European Union, grant FIS2006-06110 and by the Consejería de Economía, Comercio e Innovación of the Junta de Extremadura.

REFERENCES

[1]MacAdam, D.L. Sources of color science; M.I.T. Press: Cambridge, 1970.

[2]Helmholtz, H. v. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik; 2nd ed.; Voss: Hamburg, 1896.

[3]Hering, E. Zur lehre vom Lichtsinne; Carl Gerold’s Sohn: Viena, 1878.

[4]Romero, J.; García, J. A.; García-Beltrán, A. Curso introductoria a la Óptica Fisiológica; Ed. Comares: Granada, 1996.

[5]Müller, G.E., Darstellung und Erklärung der verschieden Typen der Farbemblindheit; Vandenhock y Ruprecht: Göttingen, 1924.

[6]Schrödinger, E. Annalen der Physik und CEIME 1920, 63, 481-520.

[7]Judd, D.B. J. Res. Nat. Bur. 1949, 42, 1.

[8]García J.A. Determinación experimental de diferencias de color: normalización colorimétrica y modelos de visión; Universidad de Granada: Ph.D. Tesis, 1990.

[9]Hurvich, L. M.; Jameson, D. Outline of a Theory of the light sense; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1964.

[10]Capilla P.; Artigas, J. M.; Pujol, J.; Luque, M. J.; Malo, J.; Martínez-Verdú, F. Fundamentos de Colorimetría; Ed. Universidad de Valencia: Valencia, 2002.

[11]Estevez, O. On the fundamental data-base of normal and dichromatic color vision; Universidad de Amsterdan: Ph.D. Tesis, 1979.

[12]Rushton, W.A.H. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology; Springer-Berlag: NY, 1972; Vol. VII/1, pp. 364-394.

[13]Maxwell, J.C. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 1857, 21, 275.

[14]Wyszecki, G.; Stiles, W. S.; Color Science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae; Second edition; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1982.

[15]König, A. Gesammelte Abhandlungen; Barth-Verlag: Leipzig, 1903.

[16]Pardo, P.J.; Pérez, A.L.; Suero M.I. Displays 2001, 22, 165-168.

[17]Vos, J.J., Walraven, P.L. Vision Res. 1971, 11, 799-818.

[18]Judd, D. B. in Proceedings of the Twelfth Session of the CIE, Stockholm; Bureau Central de la CIE: Paris, 1951; Vol. 1, pp. 11.

[19]Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J. Vision Res. 1975, 15, 161-71.

[20]Walraven, P. L. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1961, 51, 1113–6

[21]MacLeod, D.I.A.; Boynton, R. M. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1979, 69 1183–6

[22]Vos, J. J.; Estévez, O.; Walraven, P. L. Vision Res. 1990, 30, 936-943.

[23]Stiles, W. S.; Burch, J. M. Optica Acta 1955, 2, 168-181.

[24]Stockman, A.; MacLeod, D.I.; Johnson, N.E. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1993, 10, 491-521.

[25]Vos, J.J. Color Res. Appl. 1978, 3, 125-128.

[26]Stockman, A.; Sharpe, L.T. Vision Res 2000, 40, 1711-1737.

[27]Webster, M.A.; MacLeod, D.I.A. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 1988, 5, 1722-1735.

Individual Differences in Colour Vision

159

 

 

[28]Stockman, A.; Sharpe, L.T. Vision Res. 1999, 38, 3193-3206.

[29]Brainard, D.H.; Roorda, A.; Yamauchi, Y.; Calderone, J.B.; Metha, A.; Neitz, M.; Neitz, J.; Williams D.R.; Jacobs,G.H. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2000, 17, 607-614.

[30]Nathans, J.; Thomas, D.; Hogness, D. S. Sci. 1986, 232, 193-202.

[31]Neitz, J.; Jacobs, G.H. Nat. 1986, 323, 623-625.

[32]Deeb, S.S.; Motulsky, A.G. Beh. Gen. 1996, 26, 195-206.

[33]Hayashi, T.; Motulsky, A.G.,; Deeb, S.S. Nat. Gen. 1999, 22, 90-93.

[34]Hayashi, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Kitahara, K.; Sharpe, L.T.; Jägle, H.; Yamade, S. et al. Color Res. Appl. 2001, 26, S79-S83.

[35]Nagy, A.L.; MacLeod, D.I.A.; Heyneman, N.E.; Eisner, A. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1981, 71, 719-722.

[36]Jordan, G.; Mollon, J.D. Vision Res. 1993, 33, 1495-1508.

[37]Neitz, M.; Neitz, J.; Jacobs, G.H. Sci. 1991 252, 971–974.

[38]Sharpe, L.T.; Stockman, A.; Jägle, H.; Nathans, J. in Color Vision: From genes to perception; K.R. Gegenfurtner & L.T. Sharpe, Eds.; Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, 1999; pp. 14.

[39]Lyon M.F. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 2002, 439, 107-112.

[40]Neitz, M.; Kraft, T. W.; Neitz, J. Vision Res. 1998, 38, 3221-3225.

[41]Jameson, K.A.; Bimler, D.; Wasserman, L.M.; in Progress in Colour Studies 2: Cognition; Pitchford, N.J. & Biggam, C.P. Eds; John Benjamins Publishing Co: Amsterdam, 2006.

[42]Jameson, K.A.; Highnote, S; Wasserman, L.M. Psych Bull. Rev. 2001, 8, 244-261.

[43]Bimler, D.L.; Kirkland, J.; Jameson, K.A. Color Res. Appl. 2004, 29, 128-134.

[44]Sayim, B.; Jameson, K.A.; Alvarado, N.; Szeszel, M.K. J. Cog. Cult. 2005, 5, 427-486.

[45]Jakab, Z.; Wenzel, K. Perception 2004, 33, S64.

[46] Winderickx, J. D.; Lindsey, T.; Sanocki, E.; Teller,D.Y.; Motulsky, A.G.; Deeb,

S.S. Nat. 1992, 356, 431 - 433.

[47]Sanocki, E.; Lindsey, D.T.; Winderickx, J.; Teller, D.Y.; Deeb, S.S.; Motulsky, A.G. Vision Res. 1993, 33, 2139-2152.

[48]Sanocki, E.; Shevell, S.K.; Winderickx, J. Vision Res. 1994, 34, 377-382.

[49]Melgosa, M,; Rivas, M.J.; Hita, E.; Viénot, F. Color Res. Appl. 2000, 25, 356-367.

[50]Webster, M.A.; Miyahara, E.; Malkoc, G.; Raker, V.E. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2000, 17, 1545-1555.

[51]Stockman, A.; Sharpe, L.T.; Fach, C.C. Vision Res. 1999, 39, 2901-2927.

[52]Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J. T.; Cains, A. Vision Res. 1992, 32, 105-110.

[53]Dartnall, H.J.A.; Bowmaker, J.K.; Mollon, J.D. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon. 1983;B220:115130.

[54]Working-Group-41. Procedures for Testing Color Vision, NAS-NRC Committee on Vision. In Washington: DC National Academy Press, 1981.

[55]Pardo, P.J.; Pérez, A.L.; Suero, M.I. Rev. Sci. Instr. 2004, 75, 42-45.

[56]CIE 41, Light as a true visual quality: principles of measurement; Bureau central de la CIE: Paris, 1978.

[57]Hammond, Jr.B.R.; Nanez, J.E.; Fair, C.; Snodderly, D.M. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 2000, 20, 381–386.

[58]Lerman, S. Radiant energy and the eye; Macmillan Publishing Co.: New York, 1980.

160

M.I. Suero, P.J. Pardo, A.L. Pérez

 

 

[59]CIE 170-1, Fundamental Chromaticity Diagram with Physiologically Significant Axes Part I ; Bureau central de la CIE: Paris, 2006.

[60]Vienot, F.; Serreault, L.; Pardo, P.J. Vis. Neurosci. 2006, 23, 419-427.

[61]Jolliffe, I. T., Principal component analysis; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1986.

[62]Hotelling, H. J. Educ. Psychol. 1933, 24, 417-441, 498-520.

[63]Boynton, R.M.; Gordon, J. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1965, 55, 78–86.

[64]Hunt, R.W.G. Color. Res. Appl. 1989, 14, 235–239.

[65]Pardo, P.J.; Perez, A.L.; Suero, M.I. Color Res. Appl. 2007, 32, 433-439.

[66]Oicherman, B.; Luo, M.R.; Rigg, B.; Robertson, A.R. Color Res. Appl. 2008, 33, 346359.