- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
158 Chapter 10: Over-reliance on negative test results
Table 10.2 Causes of vitamin B12 deficiency
Nutritional deficiency strict vegan diet alcoholism
elderly institutionalized
Gastric disorders
absence of intrinsic factors (pernicious anemia) gastroplasty/gastrectomy
food-cobalamin malabsorption syndrome gastritis with achlorhydria
gastric atrophy (Sjogren’s syndrome, idiopathic) decreased acid (antacids, vagotomy) pancreatic disease (surgical, exocrine failure)
Small-bowel disorders intestinal surgery
ileal disease (Crohn’s, amyloid, lymphoma) infections (Diphylloboturium latum)
effects are indigestion and a smooth tongue (Hunter’s glossitis). Neuropsychiatric changes are widespread, including combined sclerosis of the spinal cord, peripheral neuropathy, cognitive impairment, depression, parkinsonism and optic neuropathy. The visual loss of B12 deficiency is bilateral and symmetric, painless and gradually progressive. Loss of color vision, decreased acuity and central or ceco-central scotomas are characteristic. The optic discs may be normal or hyperemic acutely, pale and atrophic later.
Visual loss and other neurologic manifestations of B12 deficiency can occur well in advance of hematologic changes and therefore a CBC is not an adequate screening test for such vitamin deficiency. Furthermore, the official normal values provided by many laboratories indicate a rather broad range and occasional patients are symptomatically deficient even at levels that are technically within this normal range. This patient’s visual loss was consistent with nutritional deficiency and she was therefore treated with parental hydroxycobalamin even though her B12 serum level was “officially” normal. Her positive response to treatment confirmed this as the mechanism of visual loss.
Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
Tip: The possibility of B12 deficiency should be entertained in patients with characteristic clinical features even in the presence of low-normal serum vitamin levels.
Twinkling after embolic stroke
Case: An 82-year-old woman was hospitalized for treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation. At some point during her hospital course she developed difficulty seeing to the right side and a brain MRI revealed a left occipital infarct (Figure 10.2A). Soon after returning home she noticed continuous “sparkling and twinkling”, along with mild photosensitivity. Over the next four months her sparkles persisted, especially in bright light, prompting neuro-ophthalmic consultation. On examination, visual acuity, pupillary responses and ophthalmoscopic appearance were normal. Goldmann perimetry showed a right homonymous superior quadrantanopic defect consistent with her left occipital infarct (Figure 10.2B).
Now we understand the basis of this patient’s visual field defect. But what is causing her persistent photopsias?
This patient has suffered an embolic stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation. We would consider that the infarct may have produced cortical irritability, i.e. focal seizures, accounting for her positive visual symptoms. The continuous nature of her photopsias, however, would be extremely unusual, and an EEG was normal. Dilated examination of the fundi showed no retinal cause for her symptom.
It was noted that during her hospitalization the patient had been started on digoxin for persistent atrial fibrillation and had been on the same dose (0.25 mg/day) since discharge. The possibility of digitalis toxicity was considered, however her serum digoxin level was only 1.9 ng/ml (therapeutic
Chapter 10: Over-reliance on negative test results |
159 |
|
|
|
|
A B
Figure 10.2 Radiographic and visual field findings in an 82-year-old woman with persistent “twinkling” after an embolic stroke. (A) Coronal post-contrast T1-weighted MRI shows abnormal left occipital cortical enhancement below the calcarine fissure, consistent with subacute infarction. (B) Goldmann perimetry reveals a corresponding congruous right homonymous superior quadrantic scotoma.
range 0.8–2.0 ng/ml). Despite her therapeutic level, this possibility was further pursued. Following discussion with her cardiologist, the digoxin dose was decreased to 0.125 mg per day and within one week her photopsias and light sensitivity completely resolved. She has since remained stable from a cardiovascular standpoint.
Discussion: Digitalis toxicity causes changes in many tissues, including the eye and brain. Visual dysfunction is probably due to its effects on photoreceptors, especially cones. While full-blown digitalis toxicity produces systemic effects including nausea, malaise, confusion and cardiac conduction abnormalities, visual manifestations may occur in the absence of other symptoms and signs. The classic description of digitalis toxicity emphasizes altered color vision, specifically the perception of a yellow-green tinge. In fact, there is a wide spectrum of visual disturbance associated with toxicity from cardiac glycosides, the most common of which is not yellow-green vision but white or “frosty” vision (see Table 10.3). Consistent with a predilection for causing cone dysfunction, visual symptoms from
Table 10.3 Visual symptoms of digitalis toxicity
Blurred or hazy vision Alterations of color
frosted or snowy vision xanthopsia
less commonly red, blue or brown Positive phenomena
flashes, sparkles flickering, shimmering glare or dazzle scintillating scotoma
digitalis are most prominent in bright light and are often accompanied by positive visual phenomena and photosensitivity. Objective findings on examination include decreased acuity, abnormal color vision and central scotomas that are bilateral and symmetric.
Toxicity from cardiac glycosides may occur without a change in the dose or the addition of another medication. Furthermore, symptoms of toxicity may occur even with doses that are within the therapeutic range, as illustrated by this case. Abnormalities of color vision are demonstrable on the Farnsworth
