- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
156 Chapter 10: Over-reliance on negative test results
Figure 10.1 Goldmann visual field of a 59-year-old accountant shows bilateral ceco-central scotomas.
manifestations of these disorders and the limitations of the tests that we use to diagnose them.
serum B12 level was 240 pg/mL (normal 220–1000). An MRI of brain and orbits with and without contrast was normal.
Unexplained visual loss
Case: A 59-year-old accountant developed difficulty with near vision during her busy taxpreparation season. Along with blurring of vision in both eyes, she noticed that colors appeared less bright. There were no other focal deficits and no systemic symptoms. She was generally healthy and on no medications, had a normal diet, was a non-smoker and consumed occasional alcohol.
Examination showed best corrected visual acuity of 20/50 OD and 20/40 OS. She identified 7 of 15 Ishihara color plates in each eye and pupillary responses were normal. Goldmann perimetry revealed a relative ceco-central scotoma in each eye (Figure 10.1) and the fundus examination was completely normal. Laboratory testing showed a normal hemoglobin of 14 g/dL but elevated mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of 120 fL (normal 81–99). The
In the absence of any objective abnormalities, would you consider that this might be non-organic visual loss, perhaps due to job-related stress?
While this might be a consideration, the visual field pattern in this case (bilateral ceco-central scotomas) would be most unusual for functional visual loss. This particular visual field pattern usually indicates a disease process involving the papillomacular bundle. Specific forms of optic neuropathy that produce bilateral ceco-central scotomas include certain toxins, nutritional deficiencies, hereditary optic neuropathies and demyelinating disease (see Table 10.1). It is extremely unusual for this pattern of visual loss to be produced by a mass lesion; optic nerve or chiasmal compression can cause central loss but when it does there is almost always paracentral and/or peripheral field loss as well.
Table 10.1 Optic neuropathies that produce bilateral ceco-central scotomas
Toxins ethambutol isoniazide disulfiram
chloramphenicol linezolide
chemotherapy (cisplatin, vincristine, 5-FU) Nutritional deficiency
B-vitamins (B12, B6, B1) folate
Hereditary disorders
Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy dominant optic atrophy
Demyelinating disease multiple sclerosis neuromyelitis optica
Visual loss due to nutritional deficiency was suspected based on her macrocytosis, however her serum B12 level was within the normal range. What would you like to do next?
There are other methods for investigating the possibility of B12 deficiency which might be helpful in this case. Because vitamin B12 is an important co-factor in the metabolism of homocysteine and methylmalonic acid, altered levels of these metabolites can be used as supportive evidence of a deficiency state. A comitant elevation of serum homocysteine (≥13 µmol/L) or methylmalonic acid (≥0.4 µmol/L) in the absence of renal failure, folate deficiency or insufficient level of B6 lends support to a diagnosis of B12 deficiency. A Schilling test is the standard method for demonstrating B12 malabsorption, but at many institutions this cumbersome test is no longer unavailable. Anti-parietal cell antibody assay is a useful test for the diagnosis of pernicious anemia although it is not helpful for identifying other mechanisms of B12 deficiency.
This patient’s serum demonstrated a high titer of anti-parietal cell antibodies consistent with pernicious anemia. She was treated with 1000 micrograms of intramuscular hydroxycobalamin each
Chapter 10: Over-reliance on negative test results |
157 |
|
|
|
|
week for one month followed by monthly injections. At her two-month follow-up visit, visual acuities had improved to 20/25 OU with normal color vision in each eye and the visual fields had returned to normal. She has been well on monthly maintenance B12 injections since.
Discussion: Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency is an important cause of optic neuropathy because visual loss is preventable and, to some extent, reversible with treatment. Important dietary sources of B12 are meat, liver, fish, cheese and eggs. The typical western diet contains 3–30 µg of B12 daily and hepatic reserves are sufficient for 5 to 10 years, thus symptoms of deficiency typically develop years after the causative event. Absorption of B12 requires gastric acid, pancreatic enzymes, intrinsic factor and intact mucosal cells in the ileum.
Those at risk for insufficient dietary intake of B12 are strict vegans, alcoholics, institutionalized patients and the elderly. The prevalence of cobalamin deficiency in the elderly population has been estimated at about 20%. A number of conditions can interfere with the normal absorption process of B12 and eventually lead to a deficiency state. These include gastrectomy, pernicious anemia, food-cobalamin malabsorption syndrome, pancreatectomy, and a variety of intestinal disorders (see Table 10.2). Food-cobalamin malabsorption syndrome is an increasingly recognized cause of B12 deficiency in patients with normal dietary intake and a normal Schilling test. The malabsorption stems from an inability to release cobalamin from ingested food so that it is unavailable for intrinsic factor-mediated absorption. The release of food cobalamin requires stomach pepsin and acid, so the main risk for this form of malabsorption is gastric dysfunction due to a number of underlying conditions (see Table 10.2).
The clinical sequelae of B12 deficiency can be divided into hematologic, neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal manifestations. Hematologic changes consist of macrocytosis, hypersegmented neutrophils and anemia. Typical gastrointestinal
