- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
Chapter 9: Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes |
149 |
|
|
A B
Figure 9.11 MRI of a different patient with Wernicke’s encephalopathy. (A) Axial post-contrast T1-weighted image shows characteristic enhancement of the mamillary bodies. (B) Axial FLAIR image also demonstrates hyperintense signal in the dorsal midbrain and periaqueductal region. (Courtesy of Dr. Benjamin Kuzma.)
neurologic morbidity, including Korsakoff’s amnesia as well as oculomotor and other brainstem deficits.
The clinical scenario: Conjugate gaze palsy and upbeat nystagmus
The look-alikes: Brainstem stroke vs. thiamine depletion (Wernicke’s encephalopathy)
Tip: Eye movement abnormalities in Wernicke’s encephalopathy are varied, and the classic clinical triad is frequently incomplete. Recognizing that the patient is at risk for thiamine deficiency is key to making the diagnosis.
Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
Case: A 64-year-old retired plumber noted difficulty reading and trouble refocusing between distance and near. He was generally healthy but described progressive difficulty with balance for the preceding two years. Afferent visual function, pupillary examination and biomicroscopy were normal. Ocular motility testing revealed moderate limitation of horizontal eye movements and profound impairment of vertical gaze, especially downgaze, which was essentially absent. Saccades in all directions were markedly slowed. He had a small esophoria at distance and larger exophoria at near.
150 Chapter 9: Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
A B C
Figure 9.12 A 64-year-old man with PSP looking straight ahead (A) and attempting to look down on command (B). Notice that he cannot voluntarily move his eyes below primary position. When his head is tipped back quickly (C), downgaze is full, indicating the supranuclear basis for his ophthalmoplegia.
This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
The status of reflex eye movements should differentiate these two disorders. The vestibulo-ocular reflex (Doll’s head maneuver) is preserved, and even enhanced, in supranuclear gaze palsy, whereas in ocular myopathy (or any other disorder from the nucleus to the eye muscles), ocular excursions are no greater with reflex movements.
Although this patient had virtually no voluntary eye movement below midposition, when asked to fixate a target while his head was quickly tipped back, downgaze was full (Figure 9.12). The range of eye movements in other directions was similarly improved with reflex maneuvers. In performing this test, it was noted that there was some resistance to passive head movements. He also displayed a decreased blink rate and a general paucity of facial expression. Based on these clinical features,
a diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) was made.
Discussion: Progressive supranuclear palsy is an idiopathic neurodegenerative disease characterized by parkinsonian features, subcortical dementia and supranuclear gaze palsy. The earliest manifestation is usually a non-specific gait disorder which usually precedes other symptoms by about two years. At this stage, it is not usually possible to make a definitive diagnosis. As the disease progresses, accurate diagnosis remains a challenge, reflected in the mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis of about four years. Typical neurologic features include increased axial tone, bradykinesia, dysarthria and dysphagia. Three clinical types of PSP have recently been distinguished. The most common is the classic syndrome described by Steele et al., in which falls occur early in the course, tremor is absent, neurologic signs are symmetric and response to levodopa is poor. In one-third of patients, falls are delayed in onset and there is tremor, asymmetry, and a
positive, though unfortunately transient, response to levodopa. Less commonly, gait apraxia is the initial and most prominent manifestation. With rare exceptions, ocular motor deficits are prominent in all three subtypes.
Most patients exhibit progressive loss of voluntary conjugate gaze, initially affecting vertical movements more than horizontal, and involving both pursuit and saccades. Prominent slowing of saccadic velocity is an invariable and sensitive sign. Pursuit is saccadic, consistent with cerebellar involvement, but nystagmus is not prominent due to loss of the fast (refixation) component. As the name indicates, the ophthalmoplegia in this disease is supranuclear so that reflex eye movements (Doll’s head, Bell’s phenomenon) are preserved as voluntary gaze is progressively lost. In more advanced cases, the Doll’s head maneuver may be difficult to perform due to increased axial tone causing resistance to passive neck movement.
Vergence movements are also impaired, causing an exodeviation at distance and esodeviation at near. When diplopia occurs, it is due to this misalignment at varying distances rather than an imbalance in conjugate eye movements. Fixation is unstable, interrupted by frequent saccadic intrusions, termed macro square wave jerks based on their appearance on infrared oculography. The blink rate is decreased and some patients also experience blepharospasm and/or apraxia of eyelid opening. The constellation of eye movement abnormalities in this disease is so characteristic that the diagnosis can usually be made on clinical grounds.
There is no definitive test to confirm a diagnosis of PSP but clinical criteria established for research purposes have proved highly sensitive and specific. In addition, several characteristic MRI changes have been described. Atrophy of the dorsal midbrain is most prominent, sometimes causing an appearance on mid-sagittal sections termed the “hummingbird sign” in which thinning of the midbrain tegmentum mimics the tapered head and long, narrow beak of this bird (Figure 9.13). Additional changes that similarly reflect the predilection for certain areas of the brain in this disease include dilation of the posterior
Chapter 9: Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes |
151 |
|
|
Figure 9.13 Mid-sagittal non-contrast T1-weighted MRI of a patient with PSP, showing the “hummingbird sign” due to thinning of the rostral end of the midbrain tegmentum (arrow). The tectal plate is thin and flat. (Photo courtesy of Dr. Benjamin Kuzma.)
third ventricle, atrophy of the anterior temporal lobes, iron deposition in the lateral putamen and wisps of high-T2 signal in the midbrain and pons due to gliosis. The role of functional imaging in the diagnosis of this disorder remains to be established.
Central cholinergic deficits are thought to be the basis for the postural instability, gait disturbance and cognitive impairment associated with PSP, however cholinergic replacement therapies have been generally ineffective. Management in patients with PSP remains symptomatic (see Chapter 12, Failure to provide symptomatic treatment). Unfortunately, the disease is relentlessly progressive and is usually fatal on average seven years after onset of symptoms.
Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) is similarly characterized by progressive, symmetric, bilateral loss of voluntary eye movements affecting horizontal and vertical gaze. The biochemical defect in this disorder consists of mutations or deletions of mitochondrial DNA that encode respiratory chain enzymes involved in the
