- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
2Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease?
In some instances, the history is non-specific, and localization rests on specific examination findings and techniques. The photostress test and Amsler grid are two such examples. The photostress test measures the time it takes to recover central visual function, e.g. acuity following exposure to a bright light, and is very useful for distinguishing maculopathy from optic neuropathy. Recovery times are prolonged in a variety of macular disorders but are normal in optic neuropathies. Amsler grid testing is an objective way to assess alteration of object shape and size, a characteristic of macular disease (see Chapter 8, Sudden difficulty reading the paper). In yet other cases, a particular aspect of the eye examination that requires some experience and expertise, such as inspection of the drainage angle (gonioscopy) or visualization of the peripheral retina (scleral depression), provides the key to the correct diagnosis. While such examination techniques are beyond the purview of the nonophthalmologist, it is crucial to know when the patient should be referred for such examination. The section that follows looks at some examples of cases in which the findings that indicate ocular disease were either subtle, absent or misinterpreted.
Double images
Case: A 60-year-old seamstress sought medical attention because of a three-month history of intermittent diplopia that was most noticeable in the evening, particularly when driving. She found she could relieve her diplopia by closing her right eye. She had no head or eye pain and no recent systemic symptoms. On examination, ocular alignment was normal and eye movements in all directions were full. Refixation saccades were brisk and accurate and there was no ptosis or lid fatigability. Thyroid function tests and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of brain and orbits were normal. Her history of intermittent diplopia that was worse at night suggested the possibility of myasthenia, and further work-up was initiated accordingly. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies were negative, electromyography (EMG) with repetitive stimulation
showed no decrement, and a trial of Mestinon (pyridostigmine bromide) did not bring symptomatic relief.
The patient returned several months later reporting that her diplopia had now become constant. Her examination was unchanged.
What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
The work-up so far has assumed this patient’s diplopia was binocular but in fact all that we know is that it was relieved by closing her right eye. In order to establish that this is not monocular double vision we also need to know what happens when she closes the left eye. With her left eye closed, viewing just with the right, she described persistence of her double images.
What maneuver might be helpful for confirming our suspicion that this patient’s double vision is ocular in nature?
The pinhole test is useful when aberration of the ocular media or refractive error is the basis of visual disturbance, including both blurring and doubling of vision (Figure 1.2). By allowing only a small bundle of incoming light rays to enter the eye, only those that are parallel to the visual axis reach the retina. The amount of light scatter onto the retina, and thus image degradation, is therefore greatly reduced. Patients who complain of blur, halos, shadowy margins and monocular double vision will note improved image clarity or even complete resolution of symptoms when viewing through a pinhole.
This patient’s diplopia was indeed relieved by pinhole. Slit-lamp examination demonstrated a developing cataract in the right eye and was otherwise normal. In retrospect, her history had been misleading. Because she reported resolution of diplopia upon covering her right eye, it was thought that she had binocular diplopia, but in reality, her diplopia was present only in the right eye. Further questioning would have revealed that diplopia
Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease? |
3 |
|
|
A B
Figure 1.2 Monocular diplopia due to aberration of the ocular media. (A) Double image is present with just one eye viewing. Note the second image has a faded appearance, sometimes termed a “ghost” image. (B) A pinhole occluder relieves diplopia due to ocular aberration.
resolved only with covering the right eye and not the left eye, clearly indicating monocular diplopia.
Her diplopia resolved completely after cataract extraction.
Discussion: For practical purposes, monocular diplopia or polyopia (multiple images present with just one eye viewing) is due to an aberration of the ocular media, not neurologic disease. Common causes include uncorrected refractive errors, corneal disease, cataract and macular distortion. Monocular diplopia is often less noticeable when outdoors or in a brightly lit room, because the resulting pupillary constriction induces a pinholelike effect. Symptoms are often more noticeable in dim illumination and at nighttime, especially when driving.
Corneal surface disease related to dry eyes is an important cause of monocular diplopia. Drying of the corneal surface is a common age-related change and also occurs in a variety of other settings, including after blepharoplasty (due to increased lid height and tear evaporation), with the use of anticholinergic or antihistaminic agents (decreased tear production), contact lens wear (surface irritation),
and low-humidity environments. Patients with thyroid eye disease are particularly prone to dry eyes because of lid retraction and lacrimal gland infiltration. Symptoms include burning, foreign-body sensation, blur, photosensitivity, halos around lights, and diplopia. Paradoxically, excessive watering is also a common symptom of dry eyes, caused by increased reflex tearing which produces thin, watery tears that are less effective than normal tear secretion. Symptoms related to dry eyes are often intermittent, typically made worse by prolonged viewing (e.g. reading or computer use) during which the cornea dries out from decreased blinking. Patients with parkinsonian syndromes are also prone to this condition, as a consequence of their decreased blink rate.
The one exception to the dictum that monocular diplopia indicates ocular disease is a rare neurologic condition called cerebral polyopia. Cerebral polyopia is a visual illusion, usually due to parietal lobe dysfunction, in which objects are seen as multiple (two or more) in each eye. In most cases, cerebral polyopia is associated with other forms of higher cortical visual disturbance, such as abnormal persistence of images and spatial distortion.
