- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
6
Failure of pattern recognition
Some neuro-ophthalmic signs and symptoms are non-specific, produced by a variety of disease processes in more than one location within the neuraxis. In certain cases, however, a particular combination of findings can only be due to a disease process in one place. For example, the combination of an ipsilateral optic neuropathy and contralateral superior temporal defect indicates a lesion at the junction of the optic nerve and chiasm, referred to as a “junctional scotoma”. So-called “crossed brainstem syndromes” in which there is an ipsilateral cranial neuropathy and contralateral long tract deficit are another such example. Similarly, the presence of an ipsilateral Horner syndrome and contralateral fourth nerve palsy is exquisitely localizing to an area in the midbrain lateral to the cerebral aqueduct, involving the descending sympathetic fibers and the fascicles from the trochlear nucleus prior to their decussation. In some of these conditions, the responsible lesion is small or otherwise subtle, and in these cases the clinical findings are particularly valuable for pointing to the correct diagnosis. This chapter consists of several such examples in which accurate diagnosis depends on familiarity with these patterns.
Painful ophthalmoplegia
Case: A 35-year-old construction worker developed pain behind the left eye radiating up to the brow and vertex on that side. Several days later he experienced oblique diplopia and drooping of the left upper lid that worsened over several days. Examination
three weeks after onset showed complete left upper lid ptosis and marked external ophthalmoplegia of the left eye, including absence of incyclotorsion on attempted downgaze (Figure 6.1). There was mild anisocoria, left pupil smaller than the right, that was best seen in dim illumination; but both pupils reacted briskly to light stimulation. Afferent visual function was normal. There was decreased sensation to pain and temperature in the distribution of the ophthalmic division of the left trigeminal nerve, as well as a decreased corneal reflex on that side. An MRI was reportedly normal (Figure 6.2), as were the results of a number of blood tests, urinalysis, tuberculosis skin test and chest radiograph.
Where is this patient’s lesion?
This patient presented with painful unilateral ophthalmoplegia. His examination indicated dysfunction of cranial nerves three, four, six, the ophthalmic branch of five, and the oculosympathetics on the left side. This constellation of findings is exquisitely localizing to the region of the cavernous sinus and superior orbital fissure. Though anatomically distinct spaces, there is not a way to distinguish clinically between a lesion of the cavernous sinus and one in the superior orbital fissure, and therefore the constellation of findings that results from a lesion in this area is sometimes referred to as the “sphenocavernous syndrome”. Because so many nerves pass through so small a space, even a very small lesion in this area can produce multiple cranial nerve deficits.
91
92 Chapter 6: Failure of pattern recognition
Figure 6.1 Motility examination in the above 35-year-old construction worker with acute painful ophthalmoplegia. There is moderate left upper lid ptosis and marked limitation of left eye movements in all directions. (The pupils are pharmacologically dilated.)
Figure 6.2 MRI of the same patient. This axial post-contrast T1-weighted image was read as normal.
Careful inspection of this patient’s MRI disclosed an abnormal hyperintensity within the superior orbital fissure on post-contrast T1-weighted images (Figure 6.3). Despite the severity of this patient’s clinical findings, the radiographic abnormality was surprisingly subtle. Tests for specific systemic inflammatory disorders were unrevealing and a presumptive diagnosis of Tolosa Hunt syndrome was made. He was treated with high-dose oral prednisone (80 mg per day), which brought prompt relief of his pain. Re-examination one month later showed dramatic improvement of ocular motility with normal trigeminal sensation. He continued a slow taper of his steroids over the next several months, with eventual resolution of his clinical deficits and radiographic abnormality.
Discussion: Tolosa Hunt syndrome is an idiopathic granulomatous inflammatory process involving the area of the cavernous sinus and superior orbital fissure, causing painful ophthalmoplegia. There are no serologic markers for this condition and it is rarely necessary or appropriate to biopsy these structures,
Chapter 6: Failure of pattern recognition |
93 |
|
|
A B
Figure 6.3 MRI of the above patient with a left spheno-cavernous syndrome. (A) Close-up view of the axial image shown in Figure 6.2 reveals a small area of enhancement within the left superior orbital fissure (arrow). (B) Coronal post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted image confirms the abnormality (arrow).
Table 6.1 International Headache Society criteria for the diagnosis of Tolosa Hunt syndrome (Cephalalgia, 24 Suppl 1 (2004))
1.One or more episodes of unilateral orbital pain lasting weeks if untreated
2.Paralysis of one or more cranial nerves three, four, six and/or demonstration of granuloma by MRI or biopsy
3.Paresis coincides with onset of pain or follows it within two weeks
4.Pain and paresis resolve within 72 hours when treated adequately with steroids
5.Other causes have been excluded by appropriate investigations
and thus the diagnosis is typically a clinical one (see Table 6.1).
Tolosa Hunt syndrome (THS) typically presents with acute onset of periorbital or hemi-cranial pain associated with numbness or paresthesias if the trigeminal nerve is involved. In addition, there is ipsilateral paralysis of one or more ocular motor cranial nerves and Horner syndrome in varying combination. In up to 20% of cases the inflammation extends anteriorly to produce optic nerve dysfunction. Involvement of the seventh nerve is an
uncommon manifestation. It is important to recognize that this constellation of findings simply localizes a lesion to the cavernous sinus/superior orbital fissure region and is not specific for THS. The list of diseases that can affect the parasellar region is broad, and a diagnosis of Tolosa Hunt syndrome is one of exclusion after other causes have been ruled out (see Table 6.2).
MR imaging is often abnormal in patients with THS. The contents of the cavernous sinus are usually best assessed by inspection of thin section T1weighted post-contrast views in the coronal plane. In most cases of THS there is enlargement and increased enhancement of the cavernous sinus. When mild, this may appear as loss of the normal concavity of the lateral wall as seen on both coronal and axial images (Figure 6.4). There may also be enhancement of the adjacent dural wall and abnormal soft tissue surrounding and narrowing the cavernous internal carotid artery. In occasional cases there is extension of this abnormal soft tissue into the orbital apex, sphenoid sinus or floor of the middle cranial fossa. However it is important to be aware that in some cases even high quality imaging may be normal. In other cases, a radiographic
