- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
Chapter 5: Incidental findings (seeing but not believing) |
87 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 5.3 Sagittal non-contrast T1-weighted MRI in the above patient shows mild descent of the cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum. Note very mild compression of the lower brainstem.
include brainstem and cerebellar tumors, strokes, degenerative diseases and hind-brain anomalies such as the Chiari malformation (see Chapter 7, Bouncing vision). Comitant esotropia associated with Chiari I malformation is believed to be related to a disturbance in the vergence mechanism rather than to dysfunction of the sixth nerves. In nearly all cases, it is accompanied by other symptoms and signs of hindbrain overcrowding. In light of the patient’s clinical findings, the tonsillar descent was re-interpreted as a symptomatic Chiari I malformation. Following sub-occipital decompression, her headaches and diplopia resolved, however intermittent paresthesias persisted.
Sphenoid sinus mucocele
Case: A 78-year-old retired teacher had a fourmonth history of progressive horizontal diplopia. Initially her double vision occurred only on extreme
Figure 5.4 Sagittal non-contrast T1-weighted MRI
in 78-year-old woman with a progressive sixth nerve palsy shows a large sphenoid sinus mucocele.
right gaze but over time it came to involve primary position as well, first at distance and then at near. Examination showed a partial right sixth nerve palsy and was otherwise unrevealing. An MR scan was reportedly normal except for a mucocele in the sphenoid sinus, which was assumed to be an incidental finding. Results of additional laboratory testing and a lumbar puncture were non-diagnostic and she was therefore referred for neuro-ophthalmic consultation. Review of her outside scan showed a large, round hyperintensity in the sphenoid sinus consistent with a mucocele. The mass was noted to extend posteriorly, eroding through to the back of the clivus where it was believed to be compromising the sixth nerve (Figure 5.4). She underwent transphenoidal excision of the lesion, histopathologically confirmed as a mucocele, and over the weeks following surgery her diplopia and sixth nerve palsy resolved completely.
Discussion: Sinus disease is so common in the normal population that it is frequently encountered on a radiologic study obtained for another purpose and dismissed as an incidental finding. For example, a study examining the incidence of sinus disease in a series of patients with optic neuritis found
88 Chapter 5: Incidental findings (seeing but not believing)
no difference compared to a group of healthy controls (about 13% in each group). In the above case, however, the mucocele was not incidental. Its significance could be appreciated when the scan appearance was correlated with the clinical findings. The mucocele had grown posteriorly into the pathway of the sixth nerve as it ascends the clivus.
Because sinus disease is so common in certain geographic areas, it is important to have some guidelines to help decide when it has clinical significance. Particular attention should be given to sinus disease when there is bony erosion with extension into neighboring soft tissues. Sinusitis that invades the orbit can mimic any form of the idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome. Sinusitis that seeds the cavernous sinus can result in a life-threatening cavernous sinus thrombosis. In some cases, the patient demographics should arouse suspicion. For example, poorly controlled diabetics, especially those in ketoacidosis, immunosuppressed individuals, patients with hematologic malignancies and those on hemodialysis are especially susceptible to fungal sinusitis. A patient with any of these risk factors who develops an acute orbital inflammatory syndrome with evidence of paranasal sinusitis should be investigated promptly for mucormycosis, as this rapidly invasive infection has a high mortality rate. Such patients are also prone to aspergillosis, which may similarly spread from the adjacent sinuses into the orbit where it may present as a mass lesion.
Dolichoectatic basilar artery
Case: A 70-year-old retired radiologist had a twoyear history of painless horizontal diplopia. At first, his double vision had been intermittent but was now constant and caused him to feel off balance while walking. He reported no other neurologic or systemic symptoms. Past medical history included hypertension, coronary artery disease and a hemispheric TIA due to carotid stenosis, treated with endarterectomy several years earlier. His neurologic status had been stable since then. On examination, there was a moderate right abduction deficit
A
B
C
Figure 5.5 MRI in the above patient with a painless, chronic right sixth nerve palsy. This sequence of axial T2-weighted images shows the course of the basilar artery.
(A) The basilar artery, seen here as a low-intensity signal void (arrow) is positioned in the midline at the ventral medulla. (B) At the pontine level, the basilar artery is slightly enlarged and is clearly shifted to the right where it compresses and flattens the ventral aspect of the pons.
(C) At the midbrain, the basilar artery is seen at an oblique angle as it redirects its course back toward the midline.
Chapter 5: Incidental findings (seeing but not believing) |
89 |
|
|
|
|
causing an esotropia that worsened on right gaze. Abduction saccades in the right eye were slow. The remainder of his examination was unremarkable and a Tensilon (edrophonium chloride) test was negative.
A CBC, ESR, CRP, acetylcholine receptor antibodies and antiGQ1b antibodies were normal. An MRI of brain and orbits was interpreted as normal although the radiologist’s report noted tortuosity of the basilar artery. A lumbar puncture showed a normal opening pressure and CSF constituents. In light of the negative evaluation and progressive cranial nerve palsy, the patient was referred for neuroophthalmic consultation.
A critical review of the MR scan, in the context of the patient’s clinical findings, revealed that the ectatic and tortuous basilar artery was distorting the ventral surface of the pons, particularly on the right side at the exit zone of the sixth nerve (Figure 5.5). Based on a combination of the clinical and radiographic features, a diagnosis of dolichoectatic com-
pression of the sixth nerve was made. His esotropia progressed slightly over the next eight months then stabilized for the next three years. The patient was managed symptomatically with prisms and a follow-up MRI was unchanged.
Discussion: Dolichoectasia describes abnormal elongation, distention and tortuosity of blood vessels. The prevalence of intracranial dolichoectasia is estimated at 0.06 to 5.8%, most frequently involving the vertebrobasilar system in which the anomaly is sometimes referred to as a fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery. The pathogenesis of dolichoectasia is not completely understood but the condition is strongly associated with arteriosclerosis and chronic hypertension. Histopathologically, there is diffuse loss of elastic tissue and atrophy of smooth muscle cells, structures which normally protect the arterial wall from the expansile effects of high systolic pressure.
A B
Figure 5.6 Another example of vertebrobasilar artery dolichoectasia. This patient had a chronic right sixth nerve palsy and a mild bitemporal visual field defect. (A) Axial post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted MR image shows compression and distortion of the ventral pons by the basilar artery. (B) The coronal image shows the ectatic basilar artery extending upward into the suprasellar cistern, causing chiasmal compression.
