- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
Chapter 4: Radiographic errors |
83 |
|
|
A B
Figure 4.21 MRI of a 69-year-old retired coal miner with periorbital swelling and diplopia due to thyroid eye disease. (A) Coronal post-contrast fat-suppressed image shows mild symmetric enlargement of the extraocular muscles in both eyes.
(B) Comparable view of the orbits of a normal subject for comparison. Note that contrast enhancement of the extraocular muscles is a normal feature.
FURTHER READING |
imaging with paramagnetic contrast enhancement. Am |
|
J Roentgenol, 156 (1991), 1059–67. |
Neuro-imaging
J.D. Trobe, S. S. Gebarski, Looking behind the eyes. The proper use of modern imaging. Arch Ophthalmol, 111
(1993), 1185–6.
R. J. Wolnitz, J. D. Trobe, W. T. Cornblath et al., Common errors in the use of magnetic resonance imaging for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis. Surv Ophthalmol, 45 (2000), 107–14.
Canalicular meningioma
C. L. Knight, W. F. Hoyt, C. B. Wilson, Syndrome of incipient prechiasmal optic nerve compression. Arch Ophthalmol, 87 (1972), 1–11.
S.Lessell, Current concepts in ophthalmology: optic neuropathies. N Eng J Med, 299 (1978), 533–6.
M. Pless, S. Lessell, Spontaneous visual improvement in orbital apex tumors. Arch Ophthalmol, 114 (1996), 704– 6.
R.D. Tien, P. K. Chu, J. R. Hesselink, J. Szumowski, Intra and paraorbital lesions: value of fat suppression MR
Cerebral venous thrombosis
R.H. Ayanzen, C. R. Bird, P. J. Keller et al., Cerebral MR venography: normal anatomy and potential diagnostic
pitfalls. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21 (2000), 74–8.
V.Biousse, A. Ameri, M.-G. Bousser, Isolated intracranial hypertension as the only sign of cerebral venous throm-
bosis. Neurology, 53 (1999), 1537–42.
V. Biousse, M.-G. Bousser, Cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurologist, 5 (1999), 326–49.
D. I. Friedman, D. M. Jacobson, Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology, 59 (2002), 1492–5.
A. Lin, R. Foroozan, H. V. Danesh-Meyer et al., Occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in patients with presumed idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Ophthalmology, 113 (2006), 2281–4.
V. Purvin, Venous occlusive disease. In N. R. Miller, N. J. Newman, V. Biousse, J. B. Kerrison, eds., Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-Ophthalmology, 6th edn. Philadelphia:
84 Chapter 4: Radiographic errors
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005, Vol. 2, Chapter 45, pp. 2427–65.
Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
V.Biousse, P. J. Touboul, J. D’Anglejan-Chatillon et al., Ophthalmologic manifestations of internal carotid artery dis-
section. Am J Ophthalmol, 126 (1998), 565–s77.
J.Brown, R. Danielson, S. P. Donahue, Horner’s syndrome in subadvential carotid artery dissection and the role of magnetic resonance angiography. Am J Ophthalmol, 6 (1995), 811–13.
K. B. Digre, W. R. Smoker, P. Johnston et al., Selective MR imaging approach for evaluation of patients with Horner’s syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol, 13 (1992), 223–7.
W. F. Maloney, B. R. Younge, N. J. Moyer, Evaluation of the causes and accuracy of pharmacologic localization in Horner’s syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol, 90 (1980), 394– 402.
B.Mokri, Traumatic and spontaneous extracranial internal carotid artery dissection: early diagnosis and management. J Neurol, 237 (1990), 356–61.
Pituitary apoplexy
V.Biousse, N. J. Newman, N. M. Oyesiku, Precipitating factors in pituitary apoplexy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr, 71 (2001), 542–5.
W. Bonicki, A. Kasperlik-Zaluska, W. Koszewski, W. Zgliczynski,´ J. Wislawski, Pituitary apoplexy: endocrine, surgical and oncological emergency. Incidence, clinical course and treatment with reference to 799 cases of pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir, 120 (1993), 118– 22.
N. J. David, Pituitary apoplexy goes to the bar: litigation for delayed diagnosis, deficient vision, and death. J Neuroophthalmol, 26 (2006), 128–33.
S. Milazzo, P. Toussaint, F. Proust, G. Touzet, D. Malthieu, Ophthalmologic aspects of pituitary apoplexy. Eur J Ophthalmol, 6 (1996), 69–73.
Chronic sixth nerve palsy
J. Currie, J. H. Lubin, S. Lessell, Chronic isolated abducens paresis from tumors at the base of the brain. Arch Neurol, 40 (1983), 226–9.
J. R. Keane, Bilateral sixth nerve palsy. Analysis of 125 cases. Arch Neurol, 33 (1976), 681–3.
F.Kimura, K. S. Kim, H. Friedman, E. J. Russell, R. Breit, MR imaging of the normal and abnormal clivus. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol, 11 (1990), 1015–21.
P.J. Savino, J. K. Hilliker, G. H. Casell, N. J. Schatz, Chronic sixth nerve palsies: are they really harbingers of serious intracranial disease? Arch Ophthalmol, 100 (1982), 1442–4.
5
Incidental findings (seeing but not believing)
Certain signs and symptoms are seen frequently as a normal variant in some individuals but may also signify illness in others. An example of this is the decreased sense of smell that may be normal in a long-term smoker but is also a classic symptom of a subfrontal meningioma. Similarly, facial asymmetry may be written off as a normal congenital variant but can also be a subtle sign of mild seventh nerve paresis from a growing brainstem tumor. Deciding when a sign or symptom should be pursued and when it should be ignored is a valuable clinical skill. This is also true when interpreting radiographic findings. Certain scan abnormalities that may occur in some individuals as a normal variant or an incidental finding (sometimes termed an “incidentaloma”) may be a sign of a disease process in others. In this section we look at a few such examples. In each case, it is the responsibility of the clinician to correlate the scan finding with the clinical information in order to appreciate its diagnostic significance. Part of this process should include personally reviewing the scan in the context of the clinical abnormalities, rather than relying on a written radiographic report.
Empty sella
Case: A 36-year-old homemaker sought medical attention because of intermittent horizontal diplopia. She had gained weight following each of her three pregnancies and had a long history of chronic daily headaches but was otherwise healthy.
Figure 5.1 Empty sella. Coronal non-contrast T1-weighted MRI of a 36-year-old homemaker with IIH shows enlargement of the sella turcica and downward flattening of the pituitary gland.
Examination showed mild fullness of the optic discs with normal optic nerve function and normal ocular motility. A brain MRI was unremarkable except for an enlarged and “empty” sella, reported as a normal variant (Figure 5.1). She was treated with a series of medications for muscle contraction headaches and then for migraine without much success. Eventually, a lumbar puncture was performed which demonstrated elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) of 300 mm of water with normal cerebrospinal fluid constituents, leading to a diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
85
86 Chapter 5: Incidental findings (seeing but not believing)
Discussion: An enlarged sella without associated enlargement of the pituitary gland sometimes occurs following treatment of a pituitary tumor or after pituitary apoplexy and, in this context, is referred to as “secondary” empty sella syndrome. In contrast, patients with this finding and no prior history of pituitary enlargement are said to have “primary” empty sella syndrome. This radiographic finding may occur as a normal variant, reportedly seen in up to 20% of normal individuals, or it may be a sign of long-standing increased ICP.
Although the original definition of IIH stipulates that radiographic studies must be normal, minor abnormalities are in fact commonly seen, particularly on MR rather than CT scans. A study examining the MRI findings in a group of 20 patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension found that subtle radiographic abnormalities indicative of increased ICP were common in IIH. Flattening of the posterior globe was seen in 80% of patients, an empty sella in 70% and expansion of the perioptic spaces in 45% (Figure 5.2A and B). In addition, papilledema was frequently visible, appearing as enhancement of the prelaminar optic nerve in 50% and as intraocular protrusion of the optic nerve in 30% (Figure 5.2C). A small degree of cerebellar tonsillar descent is also seen in some patients with chronically increased ICP.
Low cerebellar tonsils
Case: A 27-year-old woman with a history of chronic headaches experienced new onset of blurred vision, intermittent horizontal diplopia and occasional paresthesias in her arms and legs. Her examination revealed normal visual function and fundus appearance. She had a comitant esophoria that broke down easily to an esotropia but no ductional deficit and no saccadic slowing. She had a little difficulty with tandem gait and an otherwise normal neurologic examination. Demyelinating disease was suspected and an MR scan was obtained (Figure 5.3). The scan showed no white-matter lesions although the official report did mention mild protrusion of the cerebellar tonsils through the foramen magnum. The patient’s physician noted this on the report but considered it to be an incidental finding. The patient was reassured that there was no sign of multiple sclerosis.
Discussion: A comitant esodeviation without a ductional deficit is most often due to congenital esotropia in children, and to decompensation of a pre-existing esophoria when encountered in adults. Less commonly, comitant esotropia is due to acquired disease, usually related to increased ICP or involving the posterior fossa. Specific causes
A B C
Figure 5.2 Radiographic abnormalities commonly seen in increased intracranial pressure. (A) Axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted MRI shows expansion of the perioptic spaces. (B) Similar study of a different patient shows flattening of the posterior globe, more on the right than the left, due to pressure from expanded perioptic spaces. (C) Bilateral papilledema appears as nodular enhancement of the optic nerve heads on this axial post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted
MRI.
