- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
54Chapter 3: Congenital anomalies or acquired disease?
look a bit “blurry” when she looked to the left. An MR scan of brain and orbits was unrevealing.
What feature identifies this woman’s abduction deficit as a congenital, rather than acquired, sixth nerve palsy?
In addition to incomplete abduction of the left eye there is narrowing of the palpebral fissure and globe retraction when that eye is adducted. This motility pattern indicates a Type I Duane’s syndrome, i.e. a form of congenital sixth nerve palsy. The patient was reassured as to the benign nature of this defect.
Discussion: Duane’s syndrome is a congenital brainstem anomaly in which there is aberrant innervation of the lateral rectus muscle with resultant co-firing of the ipsilateral medial and lateral rectus muscles. Pathologic studies in this syndrome have shown agenesis of the sixth nerve nucleus with innervation to the lateral rectus muscle supplied instead by branches of the third nerve. This anomalous innervation produces a synkinesis on attempted adduction due to simultaneous activation of the medial and lateral rectus muscles resulting in globe retraction and fissure narrowing. Three subtypes have been defined based on clinical and electromyographic features. Type I is the most common form and is characterized by incomplete abduction, as exemplified in this patient. In Type II, adduction is impaired, and in Type III, both adduction and abduction are incomplete. Duane’s syndrome is more common in women and most often affects the left eye, for reasons that are unknown. Other features that may be present in Duane’s syndrome include exaggerated elevation or depression of the eye in adduction and A-, V-, or X-pattern ocular deviations. Occasional patients have other forms of anomalous innervation such as a Marcus Gunn jaw-wink or paradoxical- gustatory-lacrimal reflex (“crocodile tears”) and some others have developmental anomalies including Goldenhar syndrome, Klippel–Feil anomaly, sensorineural deafness and Wildervanck syndrome (cervico-oculo-acoustic anomaly).
Despite loss of abduction, patients with Type I Duane’s syndrome usually remain well aligned in primary position. This clinical feature is extremely helpful for distinguishing this condition from acquired sixth nerve palsy and from other causes of acquired abduction deficit which typically produce esotropia.
Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
Tip: An abduction deficit that is acquired should produce diplopia. When it does not, a congenital anomaly should be suspected. Look carefully for narrowing of the palpebral fissure and globe retraction when the eye is in adduction.
Intermittent vertical diplopia
Case: A 50-year-old salesman presented with a one-year history of intermittent vertical binocular diplopia unassociated with head or eye pain. His double vision usually occurred at the end of the day when he was tired. He denied other focal neurologic deficits including dysphagia, dysarthria, limb weakness, hoarseness and fatigue with chewing. An MRI of brain and orbits, MRA of the cranial vessels, thyroid function tests, acetylcholine receptor antibodies and results of a lumbar puncture were all normal or negative.
Neuro-ophthalmic examination demonstrated a 10 diopter left hyperphoria in primary position, worse on right gaze and with left head tilt. There was subtle underaction of the left superior oblique with otherwise full extraocular movements. Testing with double Maddox rods indicated five degrees of excyclotorsion OS. Lids and pupils were normal including no fatigability or lid twitch. His examination was consistent with a left superior oblique (fourth nerve) palsy, but investigation for specific causes had been unrevealing. Because of the intermittent nature of his symptoms and worsening of diplopia with fatigue, myasthenia was suspected. A Tensilon (edrophonium chloride) test, however, was negative.
Table 3.3 Causes of fourth nerve palsy
Trauma
Congenital
Idiopathic
Tumor
Brainstem stroke
Demyelinating disease
Increased intracranial pressure
Dural-cavernous fistula
Aneurysm
What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
The most common types of fourth nerve palsy are traumatic, congenital and idiopathic (See Table 3.3). At this point, the possibility of a congenital fourth nerve palsy was considered.
How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
His vertical fusional amplitudes were assessed with a prism bar, yielding a measurement of 12 diopters. Such supra-normal fusional capacity is, for practical purposes, diagnostic of a congenital fourth nerve palsy. Inspection of childhood photographs confirmed a pre-existing and long-standing right head tilt. Based on these observations, a diagnosis of congenital right fourth nerve palsy was made. He was treated with spectacle correction that included a total of 6 diopters of prism (3 base up in the right eye, 3 base down in the left) and enjoyed relief of his intermittent diplopia.
Discussion: Common causes of vertical diplopia include cranial nerve palsy (third or fourth), skew deviation, restrictive orbitopathy and myasthenia. Fourth nerve palsy can usually be distinguished from other mechanisms by means of the Bielschowski three-step test, also known as the head tilt test (Figure 3.14). This useful technique is designed to determine the paretic muscle in
Chapter 3: Congenital anomalies or acquired disease? |
55 |
|
|
|
|
patients with vertical diplopia and is performed as follows:
Step 1 Record which is the higher eye in primary position. If the left eye is higher, for example, there is either failure of elevation of the right eye (weakness of the superior rectus or inferior oblique muscle) or failure of depression of the left eye (weakness of the superior oblique or inferior rectus muscle).
Step 2 Note whether the misalignment is greater on left gaze or right gaze. This step is based on the principle that any ocular motor deviation will be worse in the field of action of the paretic muscle. A left hypertropia that is worse on right gaze must be due to weakness of a muscle acting in that field of gaze, thus narrowing down the choices to the right superior rectus or the left superior oblique.
Step 3 Record the direction of head tilt that worsens the deviation. Tilting to the left normally evokes excyclotorsion of the right eye and incyclotorsion of the left eye. Incyclotorsion is normally accomplished by both the superior rectus and superior oblique, whose vertical actions cancel each other. In the presence of superior oblique weakness, however, head tilt toward the involved side evokes the unopposed vertical action of the intact superior rectus, thus further elevating that eye. It is this mechanism that accounts for the third step of the head tilt test. Thus, a patient with left fourth nerve palsy will have a left hyperdeviation in primary position that is worse on right gaze and with left head tilt.
The most common cause of an acquired fourth nerve palsy is trauma (see Table 3.3). The most common non-traumatic mechanism is a congenital anomaly of the superior oblique muscle or its tendon. Congenital fourth nerve palsy often presents in mid-life rather than childhood, not because of worsening muscle weakness, but rather due to progressive loss of fusion. The range of fusional capacity is variable and tends to decline over a lifetime. Individuals with a congenital fourth nerve palsy initially have sufficiently large fusional capacities to
56 Chapter 3: Congenital anomalies or acquired disease?
Figure 3.14 The three-step test in a patient with a traumatic right fourth nerve palsy. He has a right hypertropia that is worse on left gaze and with right head tilt.
