- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
(vitamin A) level was reduced at 0.09 mg/L (normal 0.30–1.20). The patient received a diagnosis of retinal dysfunction due to hypovitaminosis A related to prior gastric bypass surgery. He was treated with 100 000 units of oral vitamin A per day, and over the next six weeks experienced progressive recovery of vision. A repeat ERG showed an increase in the scotopic amplitudes bilaterally (Figure 1.18B).
Discussion: Vitamin A is a fat-soluble vitamin that is absorbed across the small intestinal mucosa and transported to the liver, where it is stored in its esterified form (retinol) and available in protein-bound form to reach target tissues. In the retina it is stored in the retinal pigment epithelial cells and converted to the aldehyde form (retinal), which then combines with opsin to form rhodopsin. Vitamin A deficiency can result from inadequate nutritional intake (common in underdeveloped countries), poor intestinal absorption, impaired liver storage capacity or inadequate enzymatic conversion of retinol to retinal (a process that is dependent upon zinc as a co-factor). Causes of malabsorption include intestinal bypass surgery, regional enteritis and cystic fibrosis. Liver disease may cause hypovitaminosis A by a variety of mechanisms: decreased production of retinol-binding protein, inadequate storage of retinol, malabsorption due to decreased bile salts and depletion of zinc stores. Occasionally, deficiency is caused by the use of a synthetic vitamin A analog such as isotretinoin.
Ophthalmic manifestations of vitamin A deficiency typically include dry eyes and retinopathy. The earliest symptom is usually nyctalopia due to the greater dependency of rods on rapid transport with retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. If the deficiency is not corrected, this is followed by visual field loss, photophobia and decreased acuity. Severe loss of visual acuity and color vision is unusual. Visual field testing may show central and paracentral defects that affect the superior field more than the inferior field.
Funduscopic examination is often normal, especially in early vitamin A deficiency, thus causing confusion with neurologic visual loss. With pro-
Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease? |
21 |
|
|
longed deficiency, multiple yellowish-white dots may appear in the mid-peripheral retina, giving it a stippled appearance. Fluorescein angiography may demonstrate numerous punctate RPE defects which correspond to these retinal lesions. These clinical abnormalities are present to varying degrees and are generally reversible within several months after vitamin repletion. Electrophysiologic tests such as dark adaptometry and full-field ERG are quite sensitive in this condition, revealing abnormal rod function even in the absence of visual symptoms. Eventually there is elevation of the threshold and loss of waveform amplitude for both rods and cones, though rod function is more severely affected. The diagnosis should be suspected on clinical grounds and confirmed by testing the vitamin A level. Following treatment, the electrophysiologic abnormalities are faster to improve than the fundus abnormalities, and the final visual prognosis is generally good although in cases of prolonged depletion permanent damage may occur.
Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
Tip: Even in the absence of ophthalmoscopic abnormalities, a history of acquired, progressive nyctalopia should suggest a retinal disorder.
Swirling vision
Case: A 60-year-old plumber developed visual loss in the right eye accompanied by intermittent “swirling clouds of smoke” and occasional dim flashes of light. He did not have eye pain but did have prominent photophobia and noted that his vision was much worse in bright light. Visual acuity was count fingers OD and 20/25 OS. The visual field in the right eye showed a ring scotoma and was normal in the left eye. Dilated fundus examination and fluorescein angiography were normal. A retrobulbar optic neuropathy was suspected but an MRI of brain and orbits with gadolinium was normal. He received a tentative diagnosis of posterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Two months later, similar though milder visual loss developed in the left eye
22 Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease?
Figure 1.19 Goldmann perimetry in a 60-year-old plumber with bilateral sequential visual loss and photopsias. In the right eye there is a dense ring scotoma breaking out to the periphery. In the left eye there is an inferior arcuate scotoma that breaks out nasally.
(Figure 1.19). As before, the fundus appearance was normal.
A full-field ERG was nearly unrecordable under both scotopic and photopic conditions, indicating severe dysfunction of both rods and cones. Serologic testing showed antibodies to recoverin, diagnostic of cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR). A chest radiograph was normal but a chest computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed a small lesion which, on biopsy, proved to be a small cell lung carcinoma. His primary tumor was treated with radiation and chemotherapy and he received a course of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids followed by rituximab. Vision stabilized but unfortunately showed minimal improvement.
Discussion: Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a paraneoplastic syndrome in which antibodies directed toward a neoplasm also attack specific sites in the retina. It is most commonly associated with small cell lung carcinoma but has been described with various other malignancies including
non-small cell lung cancer, breast and gynecologic malignancies, prostate and bladder cancer. In half of patients with the syndrome, the presence of a malignancy is unsuspected at the onset of visual loss. The typical presentation consists of subacute, bilateral visual deterioration associated with photopsias and a variety of other entoptic phenomena including swirls, clouds, smoke and floaters. Early in the disease, the fundus appearance is normal. Later, attenuated arterioles, mottling of the retinal pigment epithelium, disc pallor and vitreous cells may be seen. The triad of photosensitivity, ring scotomas and attenuated retinal arterioles, particularly in an older patient, should suggest a diagnosis of CAR syndrome.
The autoimmune mechanism of CAR has been established with the discovery of auto-antibodies directed toward retina-specific antigens. To date, more than 15 auto-antibodies to the retina have been identified. The most common is the antirecoverin antibody, which targets a 23 kD protein (recoverin) found in rods and cones. As with other
