- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgements
- •1 When ocular disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Double images
- •What important piece of historical information is still missing in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Monocular diplopia due to cataract
- •Headache and bilateral disc edema
- •What test was done and what was the diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Malignant hypertension
- •Chronic optic neuropathy
- •Diagnosis: Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
- •Painful mydriasis
- •What clues suggest an alternative diagnosis?
- •Diagnosis: Acute angle closure glaucoma
- •Invisible retinal disease
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •What aspect of this patient’s positive visual phenomenon is highly atypical for migraine?
- •Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
- •Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
- •Hazy night vision
- •Diagnosis: Hypovitaminosis A
- •Swirling vision
- •Diagnosis: Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Episodic monocular blur
- •FURTHER READING
- •Monocular diplopia
- •Hypertensive retinopathy
- •Twinkling scotoma
- •Central retinal artery occlusion
- •Hypovitaminosis A
- •Cancer-associated retinopathy
- •Corneal decompensation
- •Glaucoma
- •2 When orbital disease is mistaken for neurologic disease
- •Painless vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Euthyroid Graves’ disease
- •Fatigable ptosis
- •How is lid fatigability objectively demonstrated?
- •Diagnosis: Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •The investigation thus far has revealed no intracranial pathology. How would you proceed?
- •Painful optic neuropathy
- •Is this patient’s clinical course consistent with a diagnosis of optic neuritis?
- •Diagnosis: Idiopathic optic perineuritis
- •FURTHER READING
- •Orbital examination and restrictive orbitopathy
- •Levator dehiscence
- •Painful ptosis and diplopia
- •Optic perineuritis
- •3 Mistaking congenital anomalies for acquired disease
- •Headaches and elevated discs
- •Are there clues to the correct diagnosis in this case?
- •Diagnosis: Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Diagnosis: Type I Duane’s syndrome
- •Intermittent vertical diplopia
- •What other causes of fourth nerve palsy should be considered?
- •How would you pursue a diagnosis of congenital fourth nerve palsy in this patient?
- •Diagnosis: Congenital fourth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudopapilledema
- •Superior segmental hypoplasia
- •Duane’s syndrome
- •Congenital superior oblique palsy
- •4 Radiographic errors
- •Ordering the wrong scan
- •Progressive optic neuropathy
- •Is there a problem with the diagnosis of “chronic optic neuritis”?
- •What clinical features in this case suggest the likely mechanism of her chronic optic neuropathy?
- •What additional radiographic evaluation should be obtained?
- •Headache and papilledema
- •Diagnosis: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
- •Idiopathic ptosis and miosis
- •Why is the current study incomplete?
- •Diagnosis: Postganglionic Horner syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Internal carotid artery dissection
- •Headache and bilateral third nerve palsy
- •Diagnosis: Pituitary apoplexy
- •Progressive sixth nerve palsy
- •What aspect of this patient’s presentation provides the most compelling diagnostic clue?
- •Diagnosis: Petrous ridge meningioma
- •Midline and bilateral abnormalities
- •Bilateral idiopathic sixth nerve palsy
- •Is a diagnosis of vasculopathic sixth nerve palsy still tenable here?
- •Diagnosis: Clivus tumor
- •Atypical pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •What features of this case are atypical for a diagnosis of IIH? What alternative diagnosis should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
- •Vertical diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Symmetric Graves’ disease
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuro-imaging
- •Canalicular meningioma
- •Cerebral venous thrombosis
- •Horner syndrome and carotid dissection
- •Chronic sixth nerve palsy
- •Empty sella
- •Low cerebellar tonsils
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •FURTHER READING
- •Pseudotumor cerebri syndrome
- •Chiari malformation
- •Sphenoid sinus mucocele
- •Dolichoectatic basilar artery
- •6 Failure of pattern recognition
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Where is this patient’s lesion?
- •Diagnosis: Tolosa Hunt syndrome
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia and visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Orbital apex syndrome
- •Painless diplopia
- •Diagnosis: Oculomotor nerve palsy with aberrant regeneration
- •Diagnosis: Lateral geniculate body stroke
- •FURTHER READING
- •Painful ophthalmoplegia
- •Orbital apex syndrome
- •Third nerve misdirection
- •Lateral geniculate body
- •Painless central gray spot in a teenager
- •What is the most likely cause of this patient’s neuroretinitis, and how would you test for it?
- •Diagnosis: Neuroretinitis due to cat scratch disease
- •This patient had an additional non-ocular symptom which she did not volunteer because she didn’t think it was relevant to her eye problem, yet this symptom was an important clue to the correct diagnosis. What question should be asked?
- •Bouncing vision
- •What examination techniques can help in the detection of nystagmus when the oscillatory amplitude is particularly small?
- •Diagnosis: Downbeat nystagmus due to Chiari I malformation
- •Diagnosis: Myasthenic pseudo-INO
- •FURTHER READING
- •Neuroretinitis
- •Downbeat nystagmus
- •Diagnosis: Retinitis pigmentosa
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral occipital stroke with macular sparing
- •What simple “bedside” test could be performed to further investigate this patient’s symptom?
- •Diagnosis: Small homonymous scotoma due to occipital stroke
- •Post-cardiac bypass visual loss
- •Is there another possible explanation for this patient’s visual loss, and how would you investigate this alternative mechanism?
- •Diagnosis: Bilateral homonymous hemianopic scotomas secondary to bilateral occipital tip strokes
- •Pseudo-bitemporal defects
- •What is the next step in this patient’s evaluation?
- •Diagnosis: Tilted disc syndrome
- •Diagnosis: Dominant optic atrophy
- •Diagnosis: Rod-cone dystrophy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Tilted disc syndrome
- •Dominant optic atrophy
- •9 Neuro-ophthalmic look-alikes
- •Does his clinical course change your mind about the diagnosis?
- •Acute tonic pupil vs. pharmacologic mydriasis
- •Chronic tonic pupils vs. Argyll Robertson pupils
- •Convergence spasm vs. bilateral sixth nerve palsies
- •What metabolic abnormality can produce this clinical picture?
- •Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia vs. progressive supranuclear palsy
- •This combination of horizontal and vertical gaze limitation with slowed saccades could be due to either supranuclear gaze palsy or ocular myopathy. How can we distinguish these two mechanisms?
- •Orbital myositis vs. sixth nerve palsy
- •FURTHER READING
- •Optic neuritis vs. Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy
- •Acute unilateral mydriasis
- •Light near dissociation
- •Convergence spasm
- •Wernicke’s encephalopathy
- •Progressive supranuclear palsy
- •Sixth nerve palsy vs. orbital myositis
- •10 Over-reliance on negative test results
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •Diagnosis: Pernicious anemia with normal serum B12 level
- •Twinkling after embolic stroke
- •Diagnosis: Digoxin toxicity with therapeutic levels
- •Painless ptosis and diplopia
- •Headache and third nerve palsy
- •What additional test should be obtained?
- •Diagnosis: Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •Truly negative neuro-imaging
- •Brainstem syndrome with negative scan
- •Can you localize this patient’s lesion?
- •Homonymous hemianopia with negative neuro-imaging
- •What disease processes would you consider here?
- •Non-dominant parietal lobe syndrome with negative neuro-imaging
- •Can you localize this patient’s problem?
- •Diagnosis: Visual variant of Alzheimer’s disease
- •Progressive third nerve palsy
- •What other investigations might be helpful?
- •Diagnosis: Third nerve palsy secondary to nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- •Upgaze palsy
- •Diagnosis: Shunt malfunction in the absence of ventriculomegaly
- •FURTHER READING
- •Digoxin toxicity
- •Myasthenia
- •Aneurysmal third nerve palsy
- •One-and-a-half syndrome
- •Cortical visual loss with negative neuro-imaging
- •Skull base tumors with negative imaging
- •Shunt failure with negative neuro-imaging
- •11 Over-ordering tests
- •Isolated unilateral mydriasis
- •If an isolated, enlarged and poorly reactive pupil is not a sign of a pCOM aneurysm, what other causes should be considered?
- •Diagnosis: Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Acute unilateral visual loss with disc edema
- •Diagnosis: Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION)
- •Acute isolated sixth nerve palsy
- •What is the most likely diagnosis and what evaluation would be appropriate?
- •Diagnosis: Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Episodic scintillating scotoma
- •Does this patient need neuro-imaging? An EEG? Other investigation?
- •Diagnosis: Migraine aura
- •Unexplained visual loss
- •What feature in this case suggests nonorganic visual loss? Is additional ancillary testing needed?
- •Diagnosis: Non-organic visual loss
- •FURTHER READING
- •Adie’s tonic pupil
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Vasculopathic cranial mononeuropathy
- •Migraine
- •Non-organic visual loss
- •12 Management misadventures
- •Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Evaluation and treatment of giant cell arteritis
- •Overzealous treatment of blood pressure in NAION
- •Prednisone for demyelinating optic neuritis
- •Over-reliance on pyridostigmine bromide (Mestinon) in ocular myasthenias
- •Failure to provide symptomatic treatment
- •FURTHER READING
- •Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
- •Giant cell arteritis
- •Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy
- •Optic neuritis
- •Ocular myasthenia
- •Nystagmus
- •Index
Figure 1.14 Fundus photograph of a patient with MEWDS, showing the characteristic lesions in the mid-peripheral retina.
case. The peri-papillary retina is the target of inflammation, and the focal area of disturbed photoreceptor function is best demonstrated with multi-focal rather than full-field ERG. In the acute stage, the fundus is normal save for mild optic nerve swelling in some patients. Multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS), a closely related syndrome, is characterized in its acute stage by small whitish lesions in the posterior pole (Figure 1.14), and may also be associated with a persistently enlarged blindspot.
The etiology of AIBSE is unknown. The disorder usually affects healthy young women, and evaluation discloses no evidence of an underlying systemic disease. There is no established treatment but the natural history usually includes spontaneous improvement of the scotoma, although photopsias may persist.
As in the above case, prominent photopsias in patients with AIBSE may be mistaken for the visual disturbance of migraine. Because this disorder presents as acute onset of a monocular scotoma, it may also suggest a diagnosis of demyelinating optic neuritis. The absence of pain and the continuous nature of the scintillations are important distinguishing features.
Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease? |
17 |
|
|
Diagnosis: Acute idiopathic blindspot enlargement
Tip: Continuous photopsias indicate a disorder of the outer retina.
Sudden monocular visual loss with normal fundus
Case: This 70-year-old gentleman experienced sudden, painless visual loss in the left eye while watching television. At the onset of his visual loss he saw an arc of yellow lights briefly passing across the superior visual field in the left eye. He was generally healthy except for prostate cancer for which he was taking diethylstilbesterol. Examination in a local emergency room within six hours after onset of visual loss showed 20/20 acuity in the right eye (OD) and count fingers vision in the left eye (OS), but revealed no basis for his acute visual loss. Based on the normal fundus appearance, he was thought to have a retrobulbar optic neuropathy, but an MRI of brain and orbits was completely normal.
What other mechanism of visual loss would you consider? Are there any historical features that are helpful here?
A compressive or infiltrative optic nerve lesion should be in the differential, however the very abrupt onset of visual loss in this case would be unusual and his MRI was unrevealing. Optic neuritis is a possibility, but the patient’s age would be highly atypical for demyelinating disease. Acute painless monocular visual loss in a patient over the age of 50 years is most often ischemic in origin, and that should be the main consideration in this case. The question is whether this ischemia affects the optic nerve or the retina. In the large majority of cases, ischemic optic neuropathy affects the most anterior portion of the nerve so that disc edema is seen acutely, termed anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION). In this patient, however, the disc was normal. Ischemia of the retrobulbar segment of the optic nerve, termed posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION), is rare. When PION does occur,
18Chapter 1: Ocular disease or neurologic disease?
it is generally in the setting of severe prolonged hypotension, often accompanied by blood loss (e.g. peri-operative, cardiac arrest or massive hemorrhage) or due to giant cell arteritis. A diagnosis of PION in any other setting should be suspect. In addition, the presence of photopsias heralding the onset of visual loss would be highly unusual in either form of ischemic optic neuropathy but sometimes accompanies a retinal ischemic event. Retinal artery occlusion is therefore the leading diagnosis in this case.
Why might a retinal stroke not have been apparent on examination?
Retinal whitening due to arterial occlusion may take up to 24 hours to develop. Other fundus features related to lack of flow in the retinal circulation, such as ghost vessels and segmentation of the blood column (termed “boxcarring”) in retinal arteries may be seen hyperacutely, but if flow has been restored in the occluded vessel the fundus may have a completely normal appearance during this interval.
Based on the above considerations, the patient was treated presumptively for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) including ocular massage, anterior chamber paracentesis, oxygen/carbon dioxide breathing and acetazolamide. Ophthalmic examination three days later showed no change of visual acuity in the left eye. There was a large central scotoma and small relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Dilated fundus examination now showed retinal whitening (edema) of the posterior pole with a macular cherry-red spot, confirming a diagnosis of CRAO (Figure 1.15). Ancillary investigation revealed no embolic source, and testing for vasculitis and coagulation disorders was similarly unrevealing. His CRAO was attributed to a hypercoaguable state secondary to treatment with diethystilbesterol.
Discussion: Retinal artery occlusion typically produces acute, painless, monocular visual loss. Unlike individuals with ischemic optic neuropathy, who often note visual loss upon awakening, patients
Figure 1.15 Fundus photograph of the above 70-year-old man with acute painless visual loss in his left eye three days previously. There is diffuse retinal whitening and a cherry-red spot in the macula, indicating central retinal artery occlusion.
with retinal artery occlusion can often describe just what they were doing when visual loss occurred. Permanent visual loss due to retinal artery occlusion is sometimes preceded by episodes of transient monocular visual loss, usually lasting for less than five minutes, often with an altitudinal pattern described as a “curtain” descending over vision. In contrast, such episodes of preceding transient monocular visual loss are distinctly uncommon in patients with non-arteritic AION.
The fundus appearance in retinal artery occlusion depends on the timing of the examination. In the hyperacute phase there may be obvious attenuation and segmentation of the blood column within retinal arteries, and the responsible embolus may be visible. If the embolic material has moved on through the retinal circulation, however, and flow has already been restored, the retina may have a completely normal appearance. This phase may last up to 24 hours. As edema develops, areas of retinal whitening appear. This may take the form of cottonwool spots (indicating small nerve fiber infarcts) or of patchy or diffuse retinal whitening. The distribution of retinal edema varies depending on whether the central or a branch retinal artery was involved (Figure 1.16). In cases of central retinal artery
