- •CONTRIBUTORS
- •PREFACE
- •ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- •1.2 ROUTINE SCREENING
- •1.4 REFERENCES
- •2.3 THE CASE HISTORY
- •2.5 REFERENCES
- •3: ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL FUNCTION
- •3.1 CASE HISTORY
- •3.7 AMSLER CHARTS
- •3.23 REFERENCES
- •4.1 RELEVANT CASE HISTORY INFORMATION
- •4.3 KERATOMETRY
- •4.4 FOCIMETRY
- •4.7 STATIC RETINOSCOPY
- •4.8 AUTOREFRACTION
- •4.14 THE FAN AND BLOCK TEST
- •4.16 MONOCULAR FOGGING BALANCE (MODIFIED HUMPHRISS)
- •4.24 PRESCRIBING
- •4.25 COUNSELLING
- •4.27 REFERENCES
- •5: ASSESSMENT OF BINOCULAR VISION
- •5.1 RELEVANT CASE HISTORY INFORMATION
- •5.4 CLASSIFICATION OF COMITANT HETEROTROPIA (SQUINT OR STRABISMUS)
- •5.5 THE COVER TEST
- •5.6 HIRSCHBERG, KRIMSKY AND BRUCKNER TESTS
- •5.8 MADDOX ROD
- •5.9 MADDOX WING
- •5.16 JUMP CONVERGENCE
- •5.20 WORTH 4-DOT TEST
- •5.22 TNO STEREO TEST
- •5.23 TITMUS FLY TEST
- •5.28 PARK’S 3-STEP TEST
- •5.29 SACCADES
- •5.31 REFERENCES
- •6: OCULAR HEALTH ASSESSMENT
- •6.7 TEAR BREAK-UP TIME
- •6.18 PUPIL LIGHT REFLEXES AND SWINGING FLASHLIGHT TEST
- •6.22 HEADBAND BINOCULAR INDIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY (BIO)
- •6.23 SCLERAL INDENTATION WITH HEADBAND BIO ASSESSMENT
- •6.25 DIGITAL IMAGING
- •6.26 THE PROBLEM–PLAN LIST
- •6.29 REFERENCES
- •7.2 RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM OCULAR HEALTH ASSESSMENT
- •7.4 SPHYGMOMANOMETRY
- •7.7 REFERENCES
- •INDEX
INDEX
References to illustrations are in italics.
3 |
base-in/12 base-out prism |
cover test with, 161 |
antimetropia, 125, 127–128 |
|
flippers test, 187–188 |
danger of missing by use of single |
anxiety, patient, 17–18 |
4 |
base-out test, 199–201 |
letters, 32, 36 |
appointment setting, 19, 148 |
9-point tests, 212–214 |
family history of, 22 |
ARC (abnormal retinal |
|
20 |
base-out test, 183–184 |
microtropia and, 200 |
correspondence), 199, 200 |
|
|
stereoacuity and, 201, 203 |
ARMD (age-related macular |
abnormal retinal correspondence |
suppression assessment, 197 |
degeneration), 41, 48 |
|
|
(ARC), 199, 200 |
VA readings with, 41 |
asthenopia, 83, 145, 249 |
AC/A (accommodative |
ametropia, 89, 93, 146 |
astigmatism, 85, 234 |
|
|
convergence/accommodation) |
as cause of anxiety, 17 |
advantage of trial frame with, 97 |
|
ratio measurement, 178–180 |
checking ocular history for, 83–84 |
astigmatic change, 84, 85, 89, 106, |
accommodation amplitude: push-up/ |
symptoms of, 29, 83, 221 |
113, 117, 145 |
|
|
push-down test, 191–194 |
amplitude of accommodation push- |
determination by fan and block |
accommodation assessments for |
up/push-down test, 191–194 |
test, 117–119 |
|
|
tentative reading addition, |
ampullae, of vortex veins, 229, 306 |
determination by Jackson cross- |
|
137–139 |
(Fig. 6.73) |
cylinder, 113–117 |
accommodation balance, 119–125 |
see also website |
keratometry interpretation and, |
|
accommodative |
Amsler charts, 43, 44–45 |
89–90 |
|
|
convergence/accommodation |
anaesthetics, 249, 252, 258, 273, 279, |
multiple objective measures of, 117 |
|
(AC/A) ratio measurement, |
281 |
streak retinoscopy and, 100 |
|
178–180 |
instillation procedure, 282 |
test comparisons for, 2 |
accommodative facility |
anatomical interpupillary distance |
ataxia, 129 |
|
|
measurement, 195–197 |
measurement, 93–95 |
automated perimetry, 43, 61, 66–67, |
accommodative fluctuations, 102, |
aniseikonia, 145, 197, 203 |
68 |
|
|
128, 129 |
anisocoria, 130, 285 |
use of clinical assistants, 5 |
acquired colour vision testing, 69–70 |
anisometropia, 89, 166, 197, 200 |
autorefraction, 2, 103–104 |
|
|
City University test, 72–74 |
prescribing for, 145 |
axis rotation, simple, 118–119 |
|
Farnsworth–Munsell D-15 test, |
anterior chamber angle |
|
|
69–72 |
assessment before instillation of |
Bailey–Lovie charts, visual acuity, 30 |
|
SPP-2 (Standard |
drugs, 280 |
BAT (Brightness Acuity Tester) glare |
|
Pseudoisochromatic Plates |
gonioscopy examination with |
test, 47 |
|
Part 2), 78–79 |
corneal-type lenses, 269–272 |
Bausch and Lomb keratometers, |
adaptation problems with new |
gonioscopy examination with |
86–88 |
|
|
spectacles, 17, 144, 145 |
Goldmann 3-mirror lens, |
Bayes Theorem, 6 |
‘against’ movement (retinoscopy), |
264–269, 264 (Fig. 6.53) |
bear tracks, peripheral retina, 228 |
|
|
99–100 |
shadow test angle estimation, |
(Fig. 6.15) |
|
see also website |
262–263 |
see also website |
alcohol, 249, 319, 325 |
van Herick angle assessment, |
best vision sphere assessment |
|
aligning prism, 184 |
260–262, 262 (Fig. 6.51), 280 see |
MPMVA technique, 107–108 |
|
|
see also Mallett fixation disparity |
also website |
plus/minus technique, 108–111 |
|
unit |
anterior segment slit-lamp |
beta-blockers, 24, 222, 249 |
Alzheimer’s disease, 216 |
biomicroscopy examination, |
bichrome (duochrome) test, 111–112, |
|
amaurosis fugax, 319, 320, 327 |
236–241 |
114 (Fig. 4.11), 126 |
|
amblyopia |
specialised illumination |
Bielschowsky head tilt test (Park’s |
|
|
with constant unilateral |
techniques for, 241–248 |
3-step test), 214–215 |
|
strabismus, 156 |
antidepressants, 216, 249, 281 |
binocular balancing, 2, 119–125 |
332 Index
binocular Esterman test, 66–67 |
von Graefe phoria technique, |
information for ocular health |
binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy |
176–178 |
assessment, 221–222 |
(BIO) in dilated fundus |
Worth 4-dot test, 197–199 |
information for visual function |
examination, 8 |
BIO see binocular indirect |
assessment, 29 |
headband, 301–308 |
ophthalmoscopy |
interpretation, 27 |
binocular subjective refraction, |
biomicroscopy |
non-disclosure of symptoms, 13 |
125–128 |
indirect fundus biomicroscopy, |
procedure for taking, 22–25 |
binocular vision assessment |
286–294 |
recording, 26–27 |
4 base-out test, 199–201 |
slit-lamp examination of anterior |
safety check information for drug |
9-point tests, 212–214 |
segment and ocular adnexa, |
installation, 279–281 |
accommodative facility |
236–241 |
use in counselling the patient, 147 |
measurement, 195–197 |
specialised spit lamp illumination |
use in problem-oriented |
amplitude of accommodation |
techniques, 241–248 |
examination, 12 |
push-up/push-down test, |
birth history, 152–153 |
see also birth history; family |
191–194 |
Bland–Altman plot, 3 |
medical history; family ocular |
case history information for, |
bleaching, 46–47 |
history (FOH); medical |
151–153 |
blepharitis, 221 |
history; ocular history (OH) |
comitant heterotropia |
blink dynamics, 251, 256 |
cataracts |
classification, 155–157 |
blood pressure measurement, |
anticataract drug trials, 48 |
cover test, 157–167 |
319–320, 322–326 |
astigmatic change caused by, 113, |
fusional reserves measurement, |
blurred vision |
117 |
180–184 |
non-disclosure of, 13 |
binocular refraction difficulties |
heterophoria classification, |
questioning concerning, 22, 83 |
with, 125 |
153–155 |
as a symptom, 29, 83, 129, 152, 221, |
contrast sensitivity testing in, 48–50 |
Hirschberg, Krimsky and Bruckner |
249 |
cortical, 84, 113, 117, 153, 233–234, |
tests, 167–169 |
tolerance of, 144 |
234 (Fig 6.27), 244 (Fig. 6.41) |
incomitant heterotropia |
Brightness Acuity Tester (BAT) glare |
see also website |
classification, 155, 206–207 |
test, 47 |
detection by retinoscopy, 98 |
information from other |
broad H test see motility test |
differentiation by illumination of |
assessments for, 153 |
Bruckner test, 168–169 |
optical section of the lens, |
information relevant for |
see also website |
242–243 |
assessment of ocular health, |
|
glare testing in, 47–48 |
222 |
calculations for tentative reading |
as indication for further |
jump convergence tests, 190–191 |
addition, 132–137 |
investigations, 84 |
Maddox rod test, 171–174, 212–214 |
capsular remnants, posterior lens, |
nuclear, 84, 233, 233(Fig. 6.26), 242, |
Maddox wing measurement, |
234 (Fig. 6.28) |
298 see also website |
174–176 |
see also website |
posterior subcapsular, 24, 41, 153, |
Mallett fixation disparity unit, |
carotid artery assessment, 320, |
222, 233, 234 (Fig. 6.28), 243 see |
184–187 |
326–329 |
also website |
modified gradient AC/A ratio test, |
carotid artery stenosis, 319, 320, 326 |
recording, 248 |
178–180 |
carotid bruit, 327, 328–329 |
retro-illumination viewing, 244, |
modified Thorington test, 169–171 |
case history |
244 (Fig. 6.41) |
motility test (broad H test), |
baseline history taken by clinical |
visual function assessment behind, |
207–212 |
assistants, 6 |
41–43 |
near point of convergence test, |
common abbreviations, 25 |
CCLRU (Centre for Contact Lens |
188–190 |
(Tbl. 2.3) |
Research Unit) scale, 248 |
Nott and Mem Dynamic |
common procedure errors, 27 |
cells, floating in anterior chamber, |
retinoscopy, 194–195 |
information areas provided by, |
247 |
Park’s 3-step test, 214–215 |
21–22 |
central visual field analysis, 12, 60–65 |
prism flippers test, 187–188 |
information for binocular vision |
10-2 analysis, 43 |
pursuits test, 211–212 |
assessment, 151–153 |
with Amsler charts, 44–45 |
saccadic movement assessment, |
information for considering |
fast analysis, 53–57 |
215–217 |
physical examination |
HFA 30-2 and 24-2 programmes, |
Titmus Fly test, 204–206, 205 (Fig. |
procedures, 319 |
60–63 |
5.15) |
information for determination of |
information relevant for assessment |
TNO stereo test, 201–204 |
the refractive correction, 83–84 |
of ocular health, 222 |
Index 333
single field analysis, 43, 55, 56 (Fig. |
clock dial test for astigmatism, 117, |
written consent for release of |
3.6), 63–64 |
119 |
medical information, 313 |
central visual field screening |
coefficients of repeatability (COR), |
contact lenses |
frequency doubling perimetry |
4–5 |
anxiety over inability to continue |
(FDP), 50–53 |
collagen plug occlusion, 253–256 |
with, 17 |
multiple stimulus suprathreshold |
see also website |
dry eye with, 249 |
strategy, 57–59 |
colour vision defect implications, 75, |
keratoscopy and, 85, 86 |
single point suprathreshold |
76 (Box. 3.1) |
monitoring complications, 248 |
screening, 59–60 |
colour vision tests |
contrast sensitivity (CS) testing, 12, |
cerebellar disease, 216 |
acquired colour vision testing, |
48–50, 212, 222 |
cerebral palsy, 193 |
69–70 |
information relevant for assessment |
chalazion, 89, 113, 117 |
City University test, 72–74 |
of ocular health, 222 |
children’s eye care |
congenital colour vision testing, 75 |
convergence excess, esophoria, 129, |
20 base-out test, 183–184 |
Farnsworth–Munsell D-15 test, |
144, 155, 179 |
accommodative fluctuations and, |
69–72 |
convergence insufficiency, |
102 |
information relevant for |
exophoria, 155 |
advantage of trial frame for, 97 |
assessment of ocular health, |
convergence tests |
anterior chamber angle depth |
222 |
jump convergence, 190–191 |
estimation, 261, 263 |
Ishihara test, 70, 74–78, 74 |
near point of convergence (NPC) |
avoidance of autorefraction in, |
(Fig. 3.13) |
test, 188–190 |
103–104 |
SPP-2, 78–79 |
convex iris technique, gonioscopy, |
Lang stereotest, 206 |
use of clinical assistants for |
267 |
Mohindra near retinoscopy, 131–132 |
screening, 5 |
Copeland’s straddling technique, |
need for objective measurement of |
comitant heterotropia classification, |
retinoscopy, 101 |
refractive error, 97–98, 103 |
155–157 |
corneal appearance |
objective measurement of |
communication skills, 14–17 |
in normal elderly eye, 231–232 |
heterotropia, 167 |
giving bad news, 20–21 |
in normal eye in young adults, 223 |
Titmus Fly stereopsis test, 204–206 |
listening skills, 18 |
corneal arcus, 231, 231 (Fig. 6.18) |
touching responses to Worth 4-dot |
for putting the patient at ease, 18 |
see also website |
test, 199 |
questioning skills see questioning |
corneal compression technique, |
use of relevant binocular vision |
skills |
gonioscopy, 272 |
information, 222 |
compensated heterophoria, 155 |
corneal erosion, 221 |
visual acuity testing alternatives |
concordance values, 5 |
corneal optical section illumination |
for children, 32, 36 |
concretions, 223, 231 (Fig. 6.21), 232 |
technique, 242 |
chlamydial conjunctivitis, 319, 322 |
see also website |
corneal reflection pupillometers, |
choroidal naevus, 228, 293 (Fig. 6.69) |
confirmation lenses, 141, 141 (Fig. |
93, 95 |
CHRPE (congenital hypertrophy of |
4.17) |
corneal topography, 85–86, 89 |
the retinal pigment |
confrontation field testing, 68–69 |
see also keratometry |
epithelium), 228, 228 |
congenital colour vision testing, 75 |
coronary artery disease, 320, 327 |
(Fig. 6.15), 235 |
Ishihara test, 74–78, 74 (Fig. 3.13) |
Corrected Pattern Standard |
see also website |
congenital hypertrophy of the retinal |
Deviation (CPSD), 7, 64 |
ciliary arteries, long posterior, 229, |
pigment epithelium (CHRPE) |
correlation coefficients, 3, 5 |
306 (Fig. 6.73) |
in normal elderly eye, 235 |
cortical cataract, 84, 113, 117, 153, |
see also website |
in normal eye in young adults, |
233–234, 234 (Fig. 6.27), 244 |
ciliary body (CB), 269 |
228, 228 (Fig. 6.15) |
(Fig. 6.41) |
ciliary nerves, long posterior, 229, |
see also website |
see also website |
306 (Fig. 6.73) |
congenital vascular tortuosity, |
corticosteroids, 24, 222, 233 |
see also website |
229, 229 (Fig. 6.16) |
cost of spectacles, 17, 148 |
cilio-retinal artery, 226 (Fig. 6.9), |
see also website |
counselling the patient, 147–148 |
228–229 |
conical beam illumination technique, |
explaining diagnoses, prognoses |
City University colour vision test, |
slit-lamp biomicroscopy, 247 |
and management plans, 19, |
72–74 |
conjunctival appearance |
147–148, 311 |
clinical assistants |
in normal elderly eye, 232 |
giving bad news, 20–21 |
use in autorefraction, 103 |
in normal eye in young adults, 223 |
cover test, 157–167 |
use in PD measurement, 95 |
consent |
9-point test, 212–214 |
use in routine screening, 5–6 |
informed see informed consent |
alternating, 164 |
334 Index
cover test (contd) |
digital imaging, 310–311 |
entropion, 22 |
detection of comitant heterotropia, |
dilation and irrigation (D&I), 256, |
epicanthus, 223 |
155 |
258–259, 260 |
epiphora, 22, 230, 249, 255 |
subjective, 164 |
dim reflex, retinoscopy, 101–102 |
Jones 1 and 2 and associated tests, |
unilateral, 160–164 |
diplopia, 152, 153, 177, 180–182, 221 |
256–260 |
validity assessment, 2 |
near point of convergence and, |
epithelium, corneal, 246 |
see also examples on website |
188, 189, 190 |
equivalent Snellen notation, 39 |
CPSD (Corrected Pattern Standard |
direct illumination techniques, slit- |
esophoria, 12, 129, 144, 154, 155 |
Deviation), 7, 64 |
lamp biomicroscopy, 242–243 |
convergence excess esophoria, 129, |
cranial nerve palsy, 153 |
direct ophthalmoscopy, 294–299 |
144, 155, 179 |
crystalline lens appearance |
in dilated fundus examination, 8 |
cover test and, 162, 163, 164, 166 |
in normal elderly eye, 232–234 see |
disability glare, 47, 48, 222 |
prism bar measurement of, 164 |
also cataracts |
discriminative ability of tests, 3–4 |
see also examples on website |
in normal eye in young adults, |
distance visual acuity testing |
esotropia, 129, 131, 152, 153, 156, 157 |
224, 224 (Fig. 6.5) see also |
using LogMAR charts, 29–34 |
cover test with, 161, 164 |
website |
as part of penlight glare test, 47–48 |
prism bar measurement of, 164 |
CS (contrast sensitivity) testing, 12, |
using Snellen charts, 34–38 |
see also examples on website |
48–50, 212, 222 |
divergence excess, exophoria, 155 |
ETDRS charts, visual acuity, 30 |
cyclodeviation, 105, 125 |
divergence insufficiency, esophoria, |
evidence-based primary eye care |
cyclopentolate, 129, 130 |
155 |
reviewing the research literature, |
cyclophoria, 105, 125, 154 |
Down’s syndrome, 193, 280 |
1–5 |
cycloplegia, 14, 103, 129–130, 144, |
drugs |
routine screening, 5–8 |
280, 281 |
antidepressant, 216, 249, 281 |
examination of the eye |
cycloplegic refraction, 12, 102, |
case history information on, 21, |
approaches to see primary eye care |
128–132 |
24–25 |
examination approaches |
cyclotropias, 157 |
as cause of dry eye, 249 |
physical examination procedures, |
cylinder changes, prescribing, 145 |
causing maculopathy, 43 |
319–329 |
cystoid degeneration, 229 |
cycloplegic, 129, 279 |
record-keeping, 14 |
cysts, sebaceous, 230, 231 (Fig. 6.18) |
instillation of diagnostic drugs, |
styles of, 11–13 |
see also website |
279–283 |
test order, 13–14 |
|
mydriatic, 279, 280, 281, 283 |
excyclophoria, 154 |
database examination, 11 |
staining agents, 249–251 |
excyclotropia, 157 |
decompensated heterophoria, 155, 221 |
drusen |
exophoria, 125, 154, 155, 162, 163, 166 |
dermatochalasis, 230, 230 (Fig. 6.17) |
at the disc in normal young eye, |
prism bar measurement of, 164 |
see also website |
227 see also website |
see also examples on website |
deuteranopes, 75 |
at the macula in normal elderly |
exotropia, 156, 157, 161 |
DFE (dilated fundus examination), 8 |
eye, 235, 235–236 (Figs 6.31-3) |
prism bar measurement of, 164 |
diabetes, 24, 222 |
see also website |
see also examples on website |
as cause of acquired colour |
dry eyes |
extraocular muscles (EOMs), 154, |
defects, 69 |
caused by medications, 24, 249 |
155, 157 |
as cause of contrast sensitivity |
diagnostic lacrimal occlusion, |
incomitant heterotropia and, |
loss, 48 |
253–256 |
206–211, 213–215 |
as cause of refractive error change, |
dry eye assessment, 249–251 |
eyelids |
84 |
meibomian gland evaluation, 247 |
blepharitis, 221 |
family history of, 22, 319 |
phenol red thread and Schirmer |
chalazion, 89, 113, 117 |
relevance when considering |
tests, 251–253 |
dermatochalasis, 230, 230 |
physical examination |
duochrome (bichrome) test, 111–112, |
(Fig. 6.17) see also website |
procedures, 319, 320, 327 |
114 (Fig. 4.11), 126 |
double eyelid eversion, 247 |
symptoms of, 153 |
dynamic retinoscopy, Nott and |
ectropion, 22, 230 |
diabetic retinopathy, 24, 69, 264, 320, |
MEM, 194–195 |
entropion, 22 |
327 |
|
epicanthus, 223 |
diagnosis communication |
ectropion, 22, 230, 251 |
eyelid eversion, 246–247, 246 |
to patients, 19, 147, 311 |
Efron scale, 248 |
(Fig. 6.44) |
in referral letters and reports, 313 |
empathy, 14, 17 |
lagophthalmos, 251 |
diagnostic drug instillation, 279–283 |
endothelium, corneal, 244–246 |
normal elderly eye, 230–231 |
dichromats, 75 |
see also website |
observation for case history, 22 |
Index 335
papilloma, 230, 232 (Fig. 6.24) see |
frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), |
glaucoma hemifield test, 7, 55, 56, 57, |
also website |
50–53 |
63, 64 |
ptosis, 22, 153, 230 |
Frisby test, 203–204 |
Glaucoma Progression Analysis, 65 |
sebaceous cysts, 230, 231 (Fig. 6.18) |
Frisby test, stereopsis, 201 |
global indices, visual field |
see also website |
fundus assessment |
assessment, 43, 55, 56, 63, |
xanthelasma, 231, 231 (Fig. 6.19) |
with biomicroscopy, 12, 41–42, |
64, 65 |
see also website |
286–294 see also website |
Goldmann 3-mirror universal |
|
with digital imaging, 310–311 |
examination, 264–269, |
FACT chart, contrast sensitivity, 49 |
by direct ophthalmoscopy, 294–299 |
308–310 |
falling risk |
by Goldmann 3-mirror lens, 308–310 |
Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
eye care for those at risk, 25 |
by headband binocular indirect |
(GAT), 272–276 |
prescribing for elderly patients at |
ophthalmoscopy, 301–308 |
as a gold standard, 2, 273 |
risk, 146–147 |
with indirect biomicroscopy, |
gonioscopy examination |
recording history of falls, 25 |
286–294 |
convex iris technique, 267 |
false negatives, visual field |
by monocular indirect |
corneal compression technique, 272 |
assessment, 63 |
ophthalmoscopy, 299–306 |
with corneal-type lenses, 269–272 |
false positives, visual field |
with pupillary dilation, 8 |
with Goldmann 3-mirror |
assessment, 6–8, 63 |
relevance for considering physical |
(universal) lens, 264–269 |
family medical history, 21–22, 25 |
examination procedures, 320 |
|
information for considering |
scleral indentation with headband |
Haag–Streit slit-lamps, 237 |
physical examination |
BIO, 306–308 |
hallucinations, 129 |
procedures, 319–340 |
fundus biomicroscopy, 12, 41–42 |
haloes, 221, 249 |
information for visual function |
indirect, 286–294 |
headaches, 12, 13, 83, 221 |
assessment, 29 |
see also website |
as indication for visual field |
family ocular history (FOH), 21–24 |
fundus pigmentation |
testing, 29, 61 |
information for determination of |
in normal elderly eye, 235 |
non-ocular causes of, 146 |
the refractive correction, 84 |
in normal eye in young adults, |
questioning concerning, 18, 22, |
information for ocular health |
226–228 (Figs 6.10-6.15), |
23, 24 |
assessment, 222 |
227–228 see also website |
reassurance concerning, 147 |
fan and block test, for astigmatism, |
fusion assessment with Worth 4-dot |
suboccipital, 319, 323 |
114 (Fig. 4.11), 117–119 |
test, 197–199 |
as symptom of aniseikonia, 145 |
Farnsworth–Munsell D-15 test, |
fusional reserves measurement, |
as symptom of decompensated |
69–72, 69 (Fig. 3.10) |
180–184 |
heterophoria, 152, 221 |
fast central visual field analysis, 53–57 |
20 base-out test, 183–184 |
headband binocular indirect |
FDP (frequency doubling perimetry), |
fusional vergence facility |
ophthalmoscopy (BIO), |
50–53 |
measurement, 187–188 |
301–306 |
filters for slit-lamp biomicroscopes, |
|
scleral indentation with, 306–308 |
237 (Tbl. 6.1) |
GAT see Goldmann Applanation |
health assessment of the eye see |
fixation disparity, 12 |
Tonometry |
ocular health assessment |
Mallett unit, 184–187, 184 |
Gaze Tracking plots, visual field |
health, general, 24–25, 84 |
(Figs 5.8–5.9) |
assessment, 43, 55, 63 |
see also family medical history; |
measurement device, 114 (Fig. 4.11) |
glare testing, 47, 48, 222 |
medical history |
fixation losses, visual field |
glaucoma |
Heidelberg Retina Tomograph |
assessment, 63 |
angle measurement as precaution |
(HRT), 311 |
fixation sticks, 159 (Fig. 5.1) |
against inducing, 262–263 |
Henson Pro perimeter, 53, 57–59, |
flare, aqueous, 247 |
as cause of acquired colour |
61, 65 |
recording, 248 |
defects, 69 |
Hering’s Law of equal eye |
flashes, 221, 234–235 |
closed-angle, 222 |
movements, 163, 166, 167, 213 |
floaters see vitreous floaters |
family history of, 22 |
Hess screen method, 213, 214 |
fluorescein dye, 246, 249, 250, 273 |
FDP testing for early glaucoma, 51 |
heterochromia, 223–224, 223 (Fig. 6.1) |
dye disappearance test, 256, 257, |
following LASIK, 273 |
see also website |
259, 260 |
as indication for gonioscopy, 264 |
heterophoria |
staining patterns, 251 (Fig. 6.46) |
NRR thinning with, 293 |
classification of, 153–155 |
see also website |
POAG (primary open-angle |
cover test and, 2, 157–167 see also |
focimeters, 90–92, 96, 97 |
glaucoma), 6–7, 8, 221, |
website |
foveal suppression, 200 |
222, 264 |
decompensated, 155, 221 |
336 Index
heterophoria (contd )
fixation disparity assessment, 184–187
fusional reserves measurement, 180–184
Maddox rod test, 171–174 Maddox wing measurement,
174–176
modified gradient AC/A ratio test, 178–180
modified Thorington test, 169–171 and prescriptions for young
people, 144
subjective assessment of, 169–178 symptoms of, 12
Turville Infinity Balance and, 125 von Graefe phoria measurement,
176–178 heterotropia
comitant, 155–157
cover test and, 157–167 see also website
incomitant, 155, 156, 206–216, 222 objective measurement of, 167–169 as sign of diabetes, 153
see also strabismus
HIC see Humphriss Immediate Contrast
Hirschberg test, 167–168 see also website
history taking, 6
see also case history homonymous hemianopias, 68, 69 Hudson–Stähli lines, 232, 232
(Fig. 6.23) see also website
Humphrey Field Analyser, 43, 53–57, 59–63, 65, 66–67
Humphriss Immediate Contrast (HIC), 123–124, 125
modified Humphriss (monocular fogging balance), 121–123
hydroxychloroquine, 43 hyperlipidemia, 319, 320, 327 hyperopia/hyperopes, 2, 89
accommodation and, 84, 157 anterior chamber angle depth estimation and, 261
binocular add technique for, 127–128
binocular refraction and, 125 cycloplegic refraction and, 128 hyperopia as cause of anxiety, 17 keratometry interpretation and, 89 latent hyperopia, 122, 128, 131 with no accommodation, 34, 37
older hyperopes, 34, 37, 84 prescribing for, 144
symptoms of hyperopia, 12, 83, 84 unreliability of monocular
subjective refraction with, 122 young hyperopes, 84, 103, 104
hyperphoria, 154, 162 hyperpigmentation, iris, 223–224, 223
(Figs 6.1–6.2) see also website
hypertension, 24, 25, 146, 222, 327 blood pressure measurement,
319–320, 322–326
family history of, 22, 222, 319, 320 hypertensive retinopathy, 235,
323, 325 hypertropia, 156, 161 hypophoria, 154, 162 hypopigmentation, 223 hypotropia, 156, 161
Imbert–Fick law, 272
incomitant heterotropia, 155, 156, 222 9-point tests, 212–214
classification of, 206–207 motility test (broad H test),
207–212
Park’s 3-step test, 214–215 pursuits test, 211–212
see also website incyclophoria, 154 incyclotropia, 157
indirect fundus biomicroscopy, 286–294
see also website
indirect illumination technique, 240 (Fig. 6.35), 243
see also website information for patients
of diagnoses, prognoses and management plans, 19, 147–148, 311
giving bad news, 20–21 information leaflets, 19–20
informed consent, 257, 280, 293, 302, 310
for gonioscopy, 265
for instillation of diagnostic drugs, 129, 279, 280, 287
for lacrimal occlusion, 254 for tonometry, 273
written consent for release of medical information, 313
interferometers, 42 interpupillary distance (PD)
measurement, 93–95
intraocular implants, 48, 234, 234 (Fig. 6.28)
see also website intraocular pressure (IOP)
measurement
Goldmann applanation tonometry, 272–276
non-contact tonometry (NCT), 276–279
iris appearance
in normal elderly eye, 232
in normal eye in young adults, 223–224, 223 (Figs 6.1–6.2) see also website
iris transillumination, 244, 244 (Fig. 6.42)
see also website
irrigation see dilation and irrigation (D&I)
Ishihara test, 70, 74–78, 74 (Fig. 3.13) ISNT rule, 293, 297
itching of the eye, 221, 249
Jackson cross-cylinder technique, 112–117, 114 (Fig. 4.12)
best vision sphere assessment and, 107, 109
duochrome test and, 111, 112 see also examples on website
Jackson cross-cylinders (JCCs), 95, 96, 97, 108, 113–117
Jaeger notation, 39
Javal Schiotz keratometer, 86 Javal’s rule, 90
JCCs see Jackson cross-cylinders Jones 1 test, 256, 257–258, 259, 260 Jones 2 test, 256–257, 259, 260 jump convergence tests, 190–191
Kay crowded picture test, visual acuity, 32, 36
Keeler crowded logMAR visual acuity charts, 30, 32, 36
Keeler Wide-Angle Twin Mag, 299
Keir vs. United States case, 8 keratic precipitates, 221 keratoconus, 89, 98, 113, 117 keratometry, 85–90 keratoscopy, 85–86 Krimsky test, 167, 168
see also website
lacrimal drainage system assessment, 256–260
lacrimal occlusion, 253–256
Index 337
lamina cribosa, 226, 226 (Fig. 6.9), 227 |
in normal eye in young adults, 225 |
Monet, Claude, 70 |
(Fig. 6.13) |
(Fig. 6.7), 227 see also website |
monocular accommodation values, |
see also website |
maculopathy, 20, 43, 44, 70, 104, 221 |
193 |
Lang stereotest, 206 |
progression of macular |
monocular examiners |
LASIK refractive surgery, 2 |
pigmentary changes to, 235 |
indirect ophthalmoscopy by, 299 |
lacrimal occlusion following, |
Maddox rod test, 171–174 |
retinoscopy method for, 101 |
253, 255 |
9-point test, 212–214 |
monocular fogging balance, 121–123, |
late detection of glaucoma |
double rod test, 214 |
125–126 |
following, 273 |
Maddox wing measurement, |
monocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, |
latent deviation see heterophoria |
174–176 |
299–301 |
latent hyperopia, 122, 128, 131 |
malingerers, 44, 74, 98, 103 |
monocular subjective refraction, |
prescribing for latent hyperopes, 144 |
Mallett fixation disparity unit, |
104–107, 120–121, 122 |
latent nystagmus, 54, 58, 62, 105, 125 |
184–187, 184 (Figs 5.8–5.9), 197 motility test (broad H test), 207–211 |
|
Lea symbols, visual acuity, 36 |
management plans |
pursuits test, 211–212 |
lens appearance, crystalline see |
giving plans to patients, 19 |
MPMVA (maximum plus to |
crystalline lens appearance |
problem–plan list, 311–312 |
maximum visual acuity) |
lens optical section illumination |
Matrix perimeter, 50, 51, 53, 61 |
technique, 107–108, 121 |
technique, 242–243, 243 |
maximum plus to maximum visual |
multifocal lens spectacles |
(Fig. 6.39) |
acuity (MPMVA) technique, |
falling risks with, 147 |
see also website |
107–108, 121 |
lens identification, 92, 93 |
lensometers see focimeters |
media opacities, 102 |
multiple sclerosis, 49, 222 |
letters of referral, 312–314 |
see also cataracts |
multiple stimulus suprathreshold |
limbal girdle of Vogt, 232, 232 |
medical history, 21 |
strategy, 57–59 |
(Fig. 6.22) |
information for binocular vision |
myasthenia gravis, 216 |
see also website |
assessment, 152, 153 |
mydriatics, 279, 280, 281, 283 |
Lissamine green staining, 250–251 |
information for considering |
myelinated nerve fibres, 227, 227 |
listening skills, 18 |
physical examination |
(Fig. 6.12) |
Llandolt C chart, visual acuity, 36 |
procedures, 319–340 |
see also website |
LOFTSEA acronym, case history, 22–23 |
information for determination of |
myopia/myopes |
logMAR notation, visual acuity, 39 |
the refractive correction, 84 |
amount of visual acuity loss, |
logMAR visual acuity (VA) charts, |
information for visual function |
33–34, 37, 83–84 |
29–34, 84–85 |
assessment, 29 |
appearance of the myopic eye, 226 |
low contrast charts, 50 |
medication information, 21, 24–25 |
(Figs 6.9, 6.11), 227 (Fig. 6.13), |
lymph node palpation, 320–322 |
Medmont M-700 perimeter, 53, 61, 65 |
229–230 see also website |
see also website |
meibomian gland evaluation, 247 |
calculating refractive corrections |
|
melanoma, 224 |
for, 85 |
M-scale notation, 39 |
benign choroidal, 228, 228 (Fig. 6.14) |
family history of, 22, 84 |
macular assessment |
see also website |
juvenile onset, 84 |
10-2 central visual field analysis, 43 |
malignant, 228, 306 |
keratometry interpretation and, 89 |
with Amsler Grid, 44–45 |
melanosis, 223 |
prescribing for non-progressive |
direct ophthalmoscopy |
see also website |
myopes, 144 |
examination, 298 |
MEM (Monocular Estimation |
progression, 84 |
with Goldmann 3-mirror |
Method) dynamic |
symptoms of myopia, 84 |
(universal) lens, 308–310 |
retinoscopy, 194–195 |
myopic crescents, 226 (Fig. 6.9), 230 |
indirect fundus biomicroscopy |
Ménière’s disease, 25, 147 |
|
examination, 293 |
microtropia, 199–201 |
N notation near card test, 38–41 |
macular degeneration |
migraine, 29, 61, 146 |
naevi, 223–224, 235 |
age-related (ARMD), 41, 48 |
Mittendorf dot, 224, 224 (Fig. 6.4) |
choroidal naevus, 228, 293 (Fig. |
exudative, 41 |
see also website |
6.69) see also website |
macular function, in photostress |
modified gradient AC/A ratio test, |
nasolacrimal stenosis and blockage |
recovery time, 46 |
178–180 |
(epiphora), 22, 230, 249, 255, |
macular oedema, 45, 47, 295 |
modified Humphriss (monocular |
256–260 |
VA readings with, 41 |
fogging balance), 121–123, 125 |
NCT (non-contact tonometry), 5, |
macular pigmentation |
modified Thorington test, 169–171 |
276–279 |
in normal elderly eye, 235, 235 |
9-point test, 212–214 |
near point of convergence (NPC) |
(Fig. 6.31) see also website |
Mohindra near retinoscopy, 131–132 |
test, 188–190 |
338 Index
near visual acuity, 38–41 |
gonioscopy with Goldmann |
Oculus programs, 43 |
near visual adequacy testing, 38–41 |
3-mirror lens, 264–269 |
ophthalmodynamometry, 327 |
see also reading addition |
headband binocular indirect |
ophthalmoplegia, internuclear, 216 |
nerve fibre layer examination, |
ophthalmoscopy (BIO), |
ophthalmoscopy, binocular indirect |
290–291, 292 |
301–308 |
(BIO) |
nerve fibre layer striations, 225–226, |
indirect fundus biomicroscopy, |
in dilated fundus examination, 8 |
225–226 (Figs 6.6-6.10), 291 |
286–294 |
headband, 301–308 |
see also website |
information for considering |
ophthalmoscopy, direct, 294–299 |
neural retinal rim (NRR), 291, 292, |
physical examination |
in dilated fundus examination, 8 |
293, 297 |
procedures, 320 |
ophthalmoscopy, headband |
‘neutral point’, retinoscopy, 99, 100 |
information from other |
binocular indirect, 301–306 |
see also website |
assessments for, 222 |
scleral indentation with, 306–308 |
NIBUT (non-invasive break-up |
Jones 1 and 2 and associated tests, |
ophthalmoscopy, monocular indirect, |
time), 250 |
256–260 |
299–301 |
non-compliance, 19 |
monocular indirect |
opsin, 46 |
non-contact tonometry (NCT), 5, |
ophthalmoscopy, 299–301 |
optic cupping, 225–226, 225–226 |
276–279 |
non-contact tonometry (NCT), |
(Figs 6.6-6.10), 291–292 |
Nott Dynamic retinoscopy, 194–195 |
276–279 |
see also website |
NPC (near point of convergence) |
Perkins tonometry, 275–276 |
optic nerve head appearance |
test, 188–190 |
phenol red thread and Schirmer |
ISNT rule, 293 |
NRR (neural retinal rim), 291, 292, |
tests, 251–253 |
with myopia, 230 |
293, 297 |
problem–plan list, 311–312 |
in normal eye in young adults, |
nuclear cataracts, 84, 233, 233 |
pupil light reflexes and swinging |
225–227, 225–227 (Figs |
(Fig. 6.26), 242, 298 |
flashlight test, 283–286 |
6.6–6.13) see also website |
see also website |
referrals and reports, 312–314 |
optic nerve head examination, 289, |
nystagmus, 104, 161, 208, 216 |
scleral indentation with headband |
291–292, 293 |
latent nystagmus, 54, 58, 62, 105, 125 |
BIO assessment, 306–308 |
optic neuritis, 48, 49 |
|
shadow test angle estimation, |
optometry, patient-centred, 14 |
objective measurement of |
262–263 |
orthokeratology, 85 |
heterotropia, 167–169 |
slit-lamp biomicroscopy |
orthophoria, 154 |
objective measurement of refractive |
examination, 236–248 |
|
error, 97–98, 103 |
tear break-up time, 249–251 |
palisades of Vogt, 223 |
autorefraction, 103–104 |
van Herick angle assessment, |
see also website |
retinoscopy, 97–103 see also website |
260–262 |
PanOptic, Welch Allyn, 299, 300–301 |
Octopus perimeter, 43, 53, 59, 61, |
variations in appearance of |
Panum’s areas, 184 |
64, 65 |
the normal elderly eye, |
papilloedema, 294 |
ocular disease |
230–236 |
papilloma, 230, 232 (Fig. 6.24) |
giving bad news of, 20 |
variations in appearance of the |
see also website |
hereditary diseases, 222 |
normal eye in young adults, |
Parinaud oculoglandular |
providing instructions on |
222–230 |
conjunctivitis, 319, 322 |
managing, 19 |
ocular history (OH), 21, 23–24 |
Parkinson’s disease, 216 |
symptoms of, 29, 221 |
information for binocular vision |
Park’s 3-step test, 214–215 |
ocular health assessment |
assessment, 152, 153 |
Pascal tonometer, 273 |
case history information for, |
information for determination |
patient anxiety, 17–18 |
221–222 |
of the refractive correction, |
patient-centred optometry, 14 |
diagnostic drug instillation, 279–283 |
83–84 |
patient information |
diagnostic lacrimal occlusion, |
information for ocular health |
collecting information from |
253–256 |
assessment, 221–222 |
patients see case history |
digital imaging, 310–311 |
information for visual function |
giving information to patients see |
direct ophthalmoscopy, 8, 294–299 |
assessment, 29 |
information for patients |
Goldmann 3-mirror universal |
ocular motor nerve paresis, 216 |
patient satisfaction |
examination, 264–269, 308–310 |
ocular motor palsy, 206–207 |
complaints about incorrect reading |
Goldmann Applanation |
see also incomitant heterotropia |
addition, 139 |
Tonometry (GAT), 272–276 |
oculovisual systems, 12 |
as a gold standard, 2, 3 |
gonioscopy with corneal-type |
Oculus perimeters, 53, 59–60, 61, |
importance of, 14 |
lenses, 269–272 |
64, 65 |
patient vocation, 22, 25 |
Index 339
patients and responses requiring adapted techniques, 108, 110, 116–117, 127–128
paving stone degeneration, 229, 236 see also website
PD (interpupillary distance) measurement, 93–95
Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart, 47, 48–50, 48 (Fig. 3.4)
penlight glare test, simple, 47–48 Percival’s rule, 183
perimetry
automated, 5, 43, 61, 66–67, 68 binocular Esterman test, 66–67 central field analysis see central
visual field analysis frequency doubling perimetry
(FDP), 50–53
functional assessment perimetry, 66–69
Goldmann perimetry, 66 visual field screening see visual
field screening
peripapillary atrophy (PPA), 227, 235 (Fig. 6.32)
see also website
peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), 268, 269
peripheral cystoid degeneration, 229 peripheral fundus appearance
in normal elderly eye, 236
in normal eye in young adults, 229 see also website
peripheral fundus examination binocular indirect
ophthalmoscopy, 301–308 indirect fundus biomicroscopy, 290
peripheral iridotomies, 244 peripheral retinal disease, 8 peripheral vision loss, with ocular
disease, 221
peripheral visual field screening, 65–66
Perkins tonometry, 275–276, 275 (Fig. 6.58)
PERRL acronym, 285
persistent pupillary membrane, 224,
224 (Fig. 6.3) see also website
phenol red test, 251–253 phenylephrine, 281 phoropter advantages, 95–96 photophobia, 129, 221, 249 photopigments, 46, 75
photostress recovery time (PSRT), 12, 45–47
physiological interpupillary distance PD measurement, 95
pigment changes, iris, 223–224, 223 (Figs 6.1–6.2)
see also website pigment spots, 223 see also website
pinguecula, 223, 232, 232 (Fig. 6.24) see also website
placebo effect, 146 pleomorphism, 244
plus/minus technique for best vision sphere determination, 108–111
see also monocular fogging balance
POAG (primary open-angle glaucoma), 6–7, 8, 221, 222, 264
polaroid refraction, 126–127 polymegethism, 244
positive predictive value (+PV), 6–8 posterior capsular remnants, 221,
234, 234 (Fig. 6.28) see also website
posterior pole examination, 286–290 posterior subcapsular cataracts
as cause of disability glare, 222 caused by corticosteroids, 24,
222, 233 differentiation of, 243 diplopia generated by, 153 near VA readings with, 41
in normal elderly eye, 233, 234 (Fig. 6.28) see also website
posterior vitreous detachments (PVDs), 234–235, 235 (Fig. 6.30)
see also website
potential acuity meter (PAM), 42 potential vision assessment, 41 preauricular lymph node
palpation, 321 see also website
precision see reliability of tests; repeatability of tests
presbyopia/presbyopes anisometropia in, 145 prescribing for, 144–145
and the reading addition, 132 see also reading addition
symptoms of, 83, 84
prescriptions for spectacles, 143–147 preseptal cellulitis, 319, 322 primary eye care examination
approaches
communicating with patients, 14–17 dealing with patient anxiety, 17 format of examination, 11–14
giving bad news, 20–21 patient-centred optometry, 14 providing information and
explanations, 19–20, 147 relaxing the patient and building
a rapport, 18
taking a case history, 21–27 primary open-angle glaucoma
(POAG), 6–7, 8, 221, 222, 264 prism-dissociated blur balance of
accommodation, 119–121 see also website
prism flippers test, 187–188
prism vergences see fusional reserves measurement
problem-oriented examination, 12–13, 22
problem–plan list, 311–312 prognosis explanations, 19, 148, 311 pseudoisochromatic plate tests
Ishihara test, 74–78, 74 (Fig. 3.13) SPP-2, 78–79
pseudomyopia, 125, 128, 131 pseudophakes, 172, 234
PSRT see photostress recovery time pterygium, 89
ptosis, 22, 153, 230
Pulsair non-contact tonometry, 278–279
pupil light reflexes, 283–286 pupil size, 64–65, 102, 104, 125,
283, 284 fluctuating, 129
pupillary membrane, 224, 224 (Fig. 6.3)
see also website pupillometers, 93, 95 pursuits test, 211–212 push-up/push-down test, for
amplitude of accommodation, 191–194
PVDs (posterior vitreous detachments), 234–235, 235 (Fig. 6.30)
see also website
questioning skills, 18
for obtaining general health information, 24–25
use of LOFTSEA acronym for case history, 22–23
range of clear vision measurement, 96, 121, 139–143
RAPD (relative afferent pupillary defect), 284, 285
340 Index
rapport with patient, 6, 13 |
plus/minus best vision sphere |
in normal elderly eye, 235–236, 235 |
relaxation and, 18 |
assessment, 108–111 |
(Fig. 6.31–6.32) see also website |
reading addition |
prism-dissociated blur balance of |
in normal eye in young adults, |
tentative reading addition |
accommodation, 119–121 |
228–229, 229 (Fig. 6.16) see also |
using assessments of |
simple axis rotation, 118–119 |
website |
accommodation, 137–139 |
static retinoscopy, 97–103 |
retinal detachment, 8, 23 |
tentative reading addition using |
tentative reading addition using |
retinal pigment epithelium see RPE |
calculations, 132–137 |
assessments of |
retinal tears, 235 |
test comparisons for, 2–3 |
accommodation, 137–139 |
retinopathy |
trial frame determination of |
tentative reading addition using |
diabetic, 24, 69, 264, 320, 327 |
reading addition and range of |
calculations, 132–137 |
hypertensive, 235, 323, 325 |
clear vision, 139–143 |
trial frame determination of |
venous stasis, 327 |
reassurance, 18, 19, 147–148 |
reading addition and range of |
retinoscopy |
receiver operating characteristic |
clear vision, 139–143 |
with cycloplegic refraction, 130–132 |
(ROC) curves, 4 |
Turville Infinity Balance (TIB), |
information relevant for |
record-keeping, 14, 25 |
124–125 |
assessment of binocular |
for individual tests see individual |
refractive error prescriptions, |
vision, 153 |
tests |
143–147 |
Mohindra near retinoscopy, 131–132 |
of poor adaptation to spectacles, |
refractive surgery, 2, 47, 48, 50, 85, |
Nott and Mem Dynamic |
145 |
273 |
retinoscopy, 194–195 |
record cards, 14, 15–16 (Fig. 2.1) |
lacrimal occlusion following |
reflexes see reflexes, retinoscopy |
recording the case history, 26–27 |
LASIK, 253, 255 |
refractive error determination see |
redness of the eye, 221, 249, 319, 320 |
Reichart non-contact tonometry, |
refractive error determination |
referral letters, 312–314 |
277–278 |
spot, 98, 101 |
reflexes, retinoscopy |
relationship with patient |
static, 97–103 |
‘against’ movement, 99–100 see also |
communication skills for see |
streak, 98–101 |
website |
communication skills |
wet and dry, 130–131 |
dim reflex, 101–102 |
counselling the patient, 147–148 |
retro-illumination |
‘scissors’ reflex, 102 |
demonstrating changes to the |
from the fundus, 244, 244 (Figs |
‘with’ movement, 99–100 see also |
patient, 143 |
6.41–6.42) see also website |
website |
explaining diagnoses, prognoses |
from the iris, 243–244 |
refractive error determination |
and management plans, 19, |
rhodopsin, 46 |
autorefraction, 2, 103–104 |
147–148, 311 |
Risley prisms, 95–96, 120, 180 |
binocular subjective refraction, |
rapport, 6, 13, 18 |
Rose Bengal staining, 250–251 |
125–128 |
relative afferent pupillary defect |
rotary prisms see Risley prisms |
case history information for, 83–84 |
(RAPD), 284, 285 |
routine screening, 5–8 |
clock dial test, 117, 119 |
relaxing the patient, 18 |
RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) |
counselling the patient after, |
reliability indices, visual field |
fundus pigmentation and, 226–228 |
147–148 |
assessment, 43, 52, 55, 59, 61, |
(Figs 6.10-6.15), 227, 235 see |
cycloplegic refraction, 12, 102, |
63 |
also website |
128–132 |
reliability of tests, 4–5 |
hyperplasia, 229, 236 |
duochrome/bichrome test, 111–112 |
see also validity assessment |
loss with peripapillary atrophy, 227 |
fan and block test, 114 (Fig. 4.11), |
repeatability of PD measurements, 95 |
soft drusen and, 235 |
117–119 |
repeatability of tests, 4–5 |
window defects, 228 see also website |
Humphriss Immediate Contrast |
repetition of tests, 65 |
|
(HIC), 123–124 |
of NCT readings, 278 |
saccadic movement assessment, |
Jackson cross-cylinder test, 112–117 |
to overcome false positives, 7–8 |
215–217 |
see also examples on website |
reports, 312–314 |
Sampaolesi’s line, 266 (Fig. 6.55), 268 |
Mohindra near retinoscopy, 131–132 |
research literature, 1–5 |
Schirmer tear test, 251–253 |
monocular fogging balance, |
on routine screening, 5–8 |
Schlemm’s canal, 268, 269 |
121–123 |
Retinal Acuity Meter, 42 |
Schwalbe’s line, 266 (Fig. 6.55), |
monocular subjective refraction, |
retinal blood vessel appearance |
267, 268 |
104–107, 120–121, 122 |
indirect fundus biomicroscopy |
‘scissors’ reflex, 102 |
MPMVA best vision sphere |
recording of, 292 |
scleral indentation, 306–308 |
assessment, 107–108, 121 |
with myopia, 226 (Fig. 6.11), 230 |
scleral spur (SS), 269 |
Index 341
sclerotic scatter illumination |
specificity, 4, 6–7 |
superficial punctate staining (SPS), |
technique, 241–242, 241 |
spectacle costs, 17, 148 |
251 (Fig. 6.46) |
(Fig. 6.37) |
spectacle lens identification, 90–93 |
suppression testing |
see also website |
specular reflection, slit-lamp |
4 base-out test, 199–201 |
screening |
biomicroscopy, 244–246, 245 |
Worth 4-dot, 197–199 |
central field see central visual field |
(Fig. 6.43) |
suprathreshold screening |
screening |
see also website |
30 to 60 degree screening, 65–66 |
FDP screening, 50–53 |
sphygmomanometry, 319–320, |
multiple stimulus, 57–59 |
gross visual field, 68 |
322–326 |
single point, 59–60 |
multiple stimulus suprathreshold |
spot retinoscopy, 98, 101 |
swinging flashlight test, 284–286 |
screening, 57–59 |
SPP-2 (Standard Pseudoisochromatic |
symptom checks, from case |
peripheral field, 65–66 |
Plates Part 2), 78–79 |
history, 23 |
routine screening, 5–8 |
squint see strabismus |
systems examination, 11–12 |
suprathreshold screening, 57–60, |
static retinoscopy, 97–103 |
|
65–66 |
stereopsis testing |
tapetochoroidal degeneration, 236 |
sebaceous cysts, 230, 231 (Fig. 6.18) |
Frisby test, 201, 203–204, 204 |
|
see also website |
(Fig. 5.14) |
tear break-up time (TBUT), 249–251 |
Seidel’s test, 246 |
Lang stereotest, 206 |
non-invasive (NIBUT), 250 |
sensitivity, 4, 6–7 |
Titmus Fly test, 204–206, 205 |
Rose Bengal and Lissamine green |
shadow test angle estimation, 262–263 |
(Fig. 5.15) |
staining, 250–251 |
Shaefer system, 268 |
TNO stereo test, 201–204, 202 |
tear deficiency see dry eyes |
Shafer’s sign, 235 |
(Fig. 5.13) |
tearing, 221, 249 |
Sheard’s rule, 183 |
use of clinical assistants for |
lacrimal drainage system |
Sheard’s technique, 192 |
screening, 5–6 |
assessment, 256–260 |
Sheridan-Gardner chart, visual |
strabismus |
retinal tears, 235 |
acuity, 36 |
advantage of trial frame with, 97 |
teleophthalmology, 311 |
short sightedness see |
Bruckner test for strabismus in |
temporal arteritis, 222 |
myopia/myopes |
infants, 168–169 see also website |
tentative reading addition using |
simple axis rotation, 118–119 |
comitant heterotropia |
assessments of |
simple penlight glare test, 47–48 |
classification, 155–157 |
accommodation, 137–139 |
single field analysis, 43, 55, 56 |
cover test and, 2, 157–167 see also |
tentative reading addition using |
(Fig. 3.6), 63–64 |
website |
calculations, 132–137 |
single point suprathreshold |
family history of, 22 |
tessellated fundus, 226 (Fig. 6.10), |
screening, 59–60 |
microtropia and, 200 |
227 |
SITAFast, 53–57, 61 |
retinoscopy in patients with, 102 |
see also website |
SITAStandard, 43, 55, 56, 61–63 |
stereoacuity and, 201, 203 |
test validity see validity assessment |
Sjögren’s syndrome, 251, 252 |
see also heterotropia |
Thorington test, modified, 169–171 |
slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination |
streak retinoscopy, 98–101 |
9-point test, 212–214 |
of the anterior segment and ocular |
subjective refraction, 2 |
threshold estimation strategies, 53, |
adnexa, 236–241 see also |
binocular, 125–128 |
60, 61 |
website |
hyperopia and, 122 |
thyrotoxicosis, 222 |
checks prior to mydriatic |
information relevant for |
tigroid fundus, 227, 227 (Fig. 6.13) |
instillation, 280 |
assessment of binocular |
see also website |
with fluorescein, 246 |
vision, 153 |
tilted discs, 226–227, 226 (Fig. 6.10) |
relevance for considering physical |
monocular, 104–107, 120–121, 122 |
see also website |
examination procedures, 320 |
submandibular lymph node |
Titmus Fly stereopsis test, 204–206, |
specialised illumination |
palpation, 321–322 |
205 (Fig. 5.15) |
techniques, 241–248 |
see also website |
TNO stereo test, 201–204, 202 |
small letter contrast sensitivity, 50 |
submandibular lymphadenopathy, |
(Fig. 5.13) |
smoking, 249, 319, 320, 324, 325, 327 |
322 |
tonometer validity assessment, 2 |
Snellen charts, visual acuity, 34–38, |
submental lymph node palpation, |
tonometry |
114 (Fig. 4.11) |
321–322 |
Goldmann Applanation Tonometry |
Snellen notation, 32, 33, 34–35 |
see also website |
(GAT), 2, 272–276 |
SOAP (Subjective, Objective, |
super pinhole visual acuity test, |
non-contact (NCT), 5, 276–279 |
Assessment, Plan) acronym, 14 |
41–43 |
Perkins tonometry, 275–276 |
342 Index
tortuosity, retinal blood vessels, 229,
229 (Fig. 6.16) see also website
trabecular meshwork (TM), 268–269 treatment options, 19, 148
trial frames advantages of, 96–97
determination of reading addition and range of clear vision with, 139–143
trichiasis, 221 trichromats, 74, 75 tropia, 155, 158–167
see also heterotropia and examples on website
tropicamide, 129, 279, 281 tumbling E chart, 36
Turville Infinity Balance (TIB), 124–125, 197
upper respiratory tract infection, 319, 322
urogenital infection, 319
VA testing see visual acuity (VA) testing
validity assessment, 2–3 discriminative ability, 3–4 repeatability, 4–5
van Herick angle assessment, 260–262,
262 (Fig. 6.51), 280 see also website
vascular tortuosity, 229, 229 (Fig. 6.16) see also website
venous pulsation, 228, 294 Verhoeff rings, 113, 114 (Fig. 4.11) vertometers see focimeters
video recording, 17 videokeratoscopes, 85, 86 vision loss
amaurosis fugax, 319, 320, 327 contrast sensitivity testing for, 48–50 fear of, 17
giving bad news of, 20–21
gradual, 221 monocular, 203, 221 stages of response to, 21
as symptom of ocular disease, 221 Vistech chart, contrast sensitivity, 49 Visual Acuity Rating (VAR) scores,
32–34
visual acuity (VA) testing
case history information for, 29 distance, as part of simple penlight
glare test, 47–48
distance, using LogMAR charts, 29–34
distance, using Snellen charts, 34–38 information relevant for
assessment of binocular vision, 153
information relevant for assessment of ocular health, 222
information relevant for determination of refractive correction, 84–85
MPMVA technique, subjective refraction, 107–108
near vision adequacy, using
N- or M-notation near cards, 38–41
photostress recovery time for, 45–47
recording before instillation of drugs, 280
super pinhole test, 41–43 symptom indications for, 29 use of clinical assistants, 6
VA conversion tables, 33 (Tbl. 3.1), 127 (Tbl. 4.3)
visual field progression, 64–65 visual field screening
central field see central visual field screening
confrontation test, 68–69 gross field, 68
information relevant for assessment of ocular health, 222
peripheral field, 65–66
suprathreshold screening, 59–60, 65–66
vitreous, 224, 234–235, 293 anterior examination, 241 direct ophthalmoscopy
examination, 294, 296, 298 posterior examination, 290
vitreous floaters
as cause of anxiety, 17 with myopia, 229–230
in normal elderly eye, 234
seen by direct illumination, 241 (Fig. 6.36) see also website
as symptom of ocular disease, 221 of younger patients, 224
Vogt, limbal girdle, 232, 232 (Fig. 6.22) see also website
Vogt, palisades, 223 see also website
von Graefe phoria measurement, 176–178
validity assessment, 2 vortex vein ampullae, 229
see also website
wall charts, 36, 113, 114 (Fig. 4.11) Weiss ring, 234, 235 (Fig. 6.30)
see also website
Welch Allyn PanOptic, 299, 300–301 Wirt test, 205
‘with’ movement, retinoscopy, 99–100 see also website
Worth 4-dot test, 197–199
xanthelasma, 231, 231 (Fig. 6.19) see also website
Y-sutures, 224, 224 (Fig. 6.5) see also website
YAG laser capsulotomy, 234
zones of discontinuity, 224, 224 (Fig. 6.5)
see also website
