- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •The Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathies
- •Optic Neuritis
- •Optic Disc Edema with a Macular Star and Neuroretinitis
- •Nonarteritic Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
- •Traumatic Optic Neuropathy
- •Papilledema
- •Transient Visual Loss
- •Visual Field Defects
- •Diplopia
- •Third Nerve Palsies
- •Fourth Nerve Palsies
- •Sixth Nerve Palsies
- •Ocular Myasthenia Gravis
- •Ptosis
- •Lid Retraction and Lid Lag
- •Index
r 2 r
Optic Neuritis
Optic neuritis (ON) is a general term for an optic neuropathy resulting from an idiopathic, inflammatory, infectious, or demyelinating etiology. If the optic nerve is swollen on ophthalmoscopy, then the term papillitis or anterior ON is used. If the optic nerve is normal on ophthalmoscopy, then it is called retrobulbar ON. In clinical practice, most ophthalmologists use the term optic neuritis to describe idiopathic or demyelinating ON.
What Are the Features of Typical Optic
Neuritis?
Patients with idiopathic or demyelinating ON usually present with a ‘‘typical’’ clinical profile as shown in Table 2–1 (Beck, 1992a, 1993a,c–e, 1994a; Cleary, 1993; Frederiksen, 1991; Gerling, 1998a,b; Jin, 1999; Keltner, 1993a, 1993b; Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1991; Schneck, 1997; Slamovits, 1991a; Wakakuru, 1999b; Wall, 1998).
The clinical characteristics of 455 patients with ON enrolled in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT), a study sponsored by the National Eye Institute conducted at 15 clinical centers in the United States between the years 1988 and 1991, are outlined in Table 2–2.
The majority of patients with ON with eye or ophthalmic trigeminal distribution pain or pain with eye movement have involvement of the orbital segment of the optic nerve (Kupersmith, 2002). The absence of pain, particularly with eye movement, suggests the disorder is limited to the canalicular or intracranial portion of the optic nerve (Kupersmith, 2002).
What Visual Field Defects Are Noted with
Optic Neuritis?
Analysis of initial perimetry in the ONTT showed that the most common presenting pattern was a diffuse field defect (48%), with altitudinal=arcuate defects in 20%, and
35
36 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Table 2–1. Features of Typical Optic Neuritis (ON)
Acute, usually unilateral loss of vision
Visual acuity (variable visual loss 20=20 to no light perception (NLP) Visual field (variable optic nerve visual field defects)
A relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) in unilateral or bilateral but asymmetric cases Periocular pain (90%), especially with eye movement (Gerling, 1998a)
Normal (65%) or swollen (35%) optic nerve head
A young adult patient (<40 years) but ON may occur at any age Eventual visual improvement
Improvement over several weeks in most patients (90%) to normal or near-normal visual acuity 88% improve at least one Snellen line by day 15
96% improve at least one line by day 30
Visual recovery may continue for months (up to 1 year)
Patients may complain of residual deficits in contrast sensitivity, color vision, stereopsis, light brightness, visual acuity, or visual field (Cleary, 1993, 1997; Frederiksen, 1997b; Steel, 1998)
central=cecocentral loss in only 8%. Classic teaching (in the Goldmann and tangent perimetry era) indicated that central scotoma was the most common pattern of visual field loss in ON, and the finding of only 8% in this category at first seems surprising. However, many early studies involved Goldmann perimetry in which a central scotoma represented depressed sensitivity within the central 30 degrees. The pattern of diffuse field loss in the ONTT actually may represent this same pattern. If one includes both the diffuse and the central=cecocentral categories of the ONTT, this study actually confirms that central visual field loss in the most common defect in ON (Arnold, 1999). Moreover, the study of Fang et al regarding global field loss involvement in ON suggests that within the central 30 degrees even cases with focal (central scotoma, arcuate) defects usually show an element of superimposed general depression (Fang, 1999a). The report of Keltner et al, which incorporated central and peripheral visual field testing (the latter by Goldmann perimetry) in the ONTT, supports this concept; although 97.1% of patients initially showed defects within the central 30 degrees, only 69.9% had abnormal peripheral fields (Keltner, 1999).
Although it is not unusual for patients with ON to have central loss without peripheral loss, it is rare for the peripheral field to be abnormal in the presence of normal central 30 degree fields. Keltner et al showed that in most cases peripheral testing does not increase sensitivity, with only 2.9% of eyes in the study having abnormal peripheral fields with normal central fields (Keltner, 1999). When the results obtained through Humphrey automated central static visual fields and Goldmann peripheral kinetic isopters are compared, the far periphery appears to recover more rapidly than the central field, at least in more severe cases of ON (Keltner, 1999). Thus, in most cases recovery in ON can probably be monitored effectively with automated perimetry of the central visual fields alone. However, in cases of severe loss of central field, a peripheral kinetic visual field obtained with a Goldmann perimeter may provide additional information about the patient’s vision in the far periphery (Keltner, 1999). Gerling et al noted that peripheral testing may better define defects that are diffuse in the central 30 degrees but are actually altitudinal when the nasal periphery is tested (Gerling, 1998b).
Although it has long been postulated that ON tends to affect the papillomacular bundle with resultant central=cecocentral scotoma, the pattern loss in ON in the ONTT revealed
Optic Neuritis |
37 |
Table 2–2. The Clinical Profile of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) Patients
Clinical characteristic |
Patients |
Female |
77% |
White |
85% |
Age (years) (mean SD) |
32 6.7 |
Mean days of visual symptoms before entry |
5.0 1.6 |
Ocular pain present |
92% |
Pain worsened by eye movement |
87% |
Ophthalmoscopic findings |
|
Optic disc appearance |
|
Optic disc swollen |
35% |
Optic disc normal (retrobulbar) |
65% |
Characteristics of swollen optic disc |
|
Mild and focal |
28.6% |
Mild and diffuse |
51% |
Severe and focal |
3.1% |
Severe and diffuse |
16.8% |
Retinal or optic disc hemorrhage |
|
None |
84.5% |
On disc |
6.2% |
On retina |
3.7% |
On both disc and retina |
5.0% |
Vitreous |
|
Normal |
93.8% |
Trace cells |
6.2% |
More than trace cells |
0% |
Retinal exudates |
|
Present on or adjacent to disc |
3.1% |
Present in the macula |
0% |
Present elsewhere |
0.6% |
Visual acuity |
|
20=20 or better |
11% |
20=25–20=40 |
25% |
20=50–20=190 |
29% |
20=200–20=800 |
20% |
Counting fingers |
4% |
Hand motions |
6% |
Light perception |
3% |
No light perception (NLP) |
3% |
Visual field defects in involved eye |
|
Pattern |
|
Diffuse |
48% |
Altitudinal, arcuate, nasal step |
20% |
Central, cecocentral |
8% |
Other types |
24% |
Chiasmal |
5% |
(continued)
38 |
Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition |
|
|
|
|
Table 2–2. (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retrochiasmal |
9% |
|
|
Median visual field mean deviation (quartiles) |
23.02 ( 31.90, 12.25) |
|
Visual function deficits in fellow eye |
67% |
|
|
|
Visual acuity |
14% |
|
|
Contrast sensitivity |
15% |
|
|
Color vision |
22% |
|
|
Visual field (mean deviation) |
48% |
|
Abnormal MRI (one or more white matter lesion) |
49% |
|
Percents represent the percent of patients with the characteristic.
pure papillomacular involvement in only 8%. Fang et al showed that ON affects the entire 30 degrees (global field involvement) even in patients who appear to have localized depression of visual threshold, indicating that ON does not have a true predilection for the papillomacular bundle, or any specific nerve fiber bundle (Fang, 1999a). In another study, Fang et al assessed specific nerve fiber group involvement by analyzing recovery of field within concentric field rings in the central 30 degrees and found that return of field function does not appear to differ between patients with diffuse or localized defects (Fang, 1999b). They postulate that reduced redundancy of axons in the periphery of the field compared with near fixation may be responsible for the greater recovery of threshold near fixation.
What Are the Features of Atypical Optic
Neuritis?
Patients who meet the criteria listed in Table 2–1 are considered to have typical ON. Conversely, patients with the features listed in Table 2–3 have atypical ON (Beck, 1993a–e, 1994b; Biousse, 1999; Lee, 1998a; Moschos, 1990; Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1991). For example, the fundus features that should lead the examiner to consider an alternate diagnosis to ON include lipid maculopathy, very severe disc edema with marked hemorrhages, cotton wools spots, vitreous cells, pale optic disc edema, retinal arteriolar narrowing, and retinopathy.
What Disorders May Be Associated with Optic
Neuritis?
Table 2–4 lists a number of disorders that may be associated with typical or atypical ON. The presence of one of these disorders is usually suggested by the historical or examination findings.
What Are the Clinical Features of Optic
Neuritis in Children?
The clinical features of ON in children differ from those in adults. Table 2–5 summarizes these features. Brady et al reviewed 25 cases and concluded that pediatric ON is usually
Optic Neuritis |
39 |
Table 2–3. Features of Atypical Optic Neuritis (ON)
Bilateral simultaneous onset of ON in an adult patient Lack of pain
Severe headache (e.g., sphenoid sinusitis)
Ocular findings suggestive of an inflammatory process Anterior uveitis
Posterior chamber inflammation more than trace Macular exudate or star figure
Retinal infiltrate or retinal inflammation Severe disc swelling
Marked hemorrhages
Lack of significant improvement of visual function or worsening of visual function after 30 days
Lack of at least one line of visual acuity improvement within the first 3 weeks after onset of symptoms
Age greater than 50 years
Preexisting diagnosis or evidence of other systemic condition
Inflammatory (e.g., sarcoidosis, Wegener’s granulomatosis, systemic lupus erythematosus) Infectious disease (e.g., Lyme disease, tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus infection) Severe hypertension, diabetes, or other systemic vasculopathy
Exquisitely steroid sensitive or steroid-dependent optic neuropathy
associated with visual recovery; however, a significant number of patients (22%) remain visually disabled. A normal magnetic resonance (MR) image of the brain may be associated with a better outcome. Younger patients are more likely to have bilateral disease and a better visual prognosis (Brady, 1999).
In another study of 47 children with multiple sclerosis, 38 (80.9%) had ON at least once, and 10 (21.3%) had two or more attacks of ON (Boiko, 2000). The presence of tumor necrosis factor a7 (TNF-a7) locus on chromosome 6 was proposed as a possible marker of early multiple sclerosis (MS) onset in these patients.
What Is the Evaluation of Optic Neuritis?
In atypical cases, consideration should be given to doing a lumbar puncture and additional laboratory studies; in the ONTT, syphilis serology, antinuclear antibody, and chest x-ray were performed. The required evaluation depends on the history and examination, with specific attention to infectious or inflammatory etiologies as listed in Table 2–4. In addition, patients with inflammatory autoimmune ON often have progressive or recurrent steroid-responsive or steroid-dependent optic neuropathy (Beck, 1994a; Bielory, 1993; Riedel, 1998).
The association of acute or subacute loss of vision in one or both eyes caused by optic neuropathy preceded or followed by a transverse or ascending myelopathy is referred to as neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease). The clinical features of Devic’s disease are outlined in Table 2–6.
40 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Table 2–4. Disorders Associated with Optic Neuritis
Polyneuropathies
Guillain-Barre´ syndrome (Nadkarni, 1993; Ropper, 1991) Miller Fisher syndrome (Chan, 2002)
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) (Kaufman, 1998; Lee, 1999) Infections
Bacteria
Syphilis (Frohman, 1997) Tuberculosis (Mansour, 1998)
Lyme disease (Arnold, 1993; Jacobson, 1991; Karma, 1995; Lesser, 1990; Winterkorn, 1990) Bartonella henselae (Cat-scratch disease) (Brazis, 1986; Schwartzman, 1994, 1995) Mycoplasma (Nadkarni, 1993; Salzman, 1992; Sheth, 1993)
Whipple’s disease
Brucellosis (Abd Elrazek, 1991; McLean, 1992) b-Hemolytic streptococcus
Meningococcus (Miller, 1995)
Propionibacterium acnes (Kouyoumdjian, 2001) Fungi
Aspergillus
Histoplasmosis (Perry, 1999; Yau, 1996) Cryptococcus (Golnik, 1991)
Rickettsiae (e.g., Q fever, epidemic typhus) Protozoa
Toxoplasmosis (Banta, 2002; Falcone, 1993; Grossniklaus, 1990; Pierce, 1993; Rose, 1991; Song, 2002)
Parasites
Toxocariasis (Komiyama, 1995) Cysticercosis (Chang, 2001; Menon, 2000)
Viruses Adenovirus
Hepatitis A (McKibbin, 1995)
Hepatitis B (Achiron, 1994)
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (Harkins, 1992; Ho, 1995; Mansour, 1997; Patel, 1996; Roarty, 1993) Coxsackie B
Rubella
Chickenpox (Lee, 1997)
Herpes zoster (Deane, 1995; Greven, 2001; Gunduz, 1994; Lee, 1997; Miyashita, 1993; Mori, 1997; Nakazawa, 1999)
Herpes simplex virus 1 (Tornerup, 2000)
Epstein-Barr (EB) virus (infectious mononucleosis) (Anderson, 1994; Beiran, 2000; Corssmit, 1997; Straussberg, 1993)
Measles (Totan, 1999)
Mumps (Sugita, 1991) Influenza
HTLV-1 (Lehky, 1996; Merle, 1997; Yoshida, 1998) Prions (Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease)
HIV (AIDS)-related (Friedman, 1991; Nichols, 1992)
(continued)
Optic Neuritis |
41 |
Table 2–4. (continued)
Primary HIV-related optic neuritis (Burton, 1998; Malessa, 1995; Newman, 1992; Quicenco, 1992; Sadun, 1995; Sweeney, 1993)
Syphilis (McLeish, 1990)
Cat-scratch disease (Bartonella henselae) (Schwartzman, 1994, 1995) Cryptococcus (Golnik, 1991)
Histoplasmosis (Yau, 1996)
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (Mansour, 1997; Patel, 1996; Roarty, 1993)
Herpes zoster (Friedlander, 1996; Lee, 1998b; Litoff, 1990; Margolis, 1998; Meenken, 1998; Shayegani, 1996)
Hepatitis B
Toxoplasmosis (Falcone, 1993)
Postvaccination (Albitar, 1997; Hull, 1997; Kerrison, 2001; Linssen, 1997; Stewart, 1999; Topaloglu 1992; van de Geijn, 1994; Yen, 1991)
Smallpox
Tetanus
Rabies Influenza Hepatitis B
Bacille Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG) Anthrax (Kerrison, 2002)
Trivalent measles-mumps-rubella vaccine Mantoux tuberculin skin test
Focal infection or inflammation (Bath, 1998; Farris, 1990; Fujimoto, 1999; Moorman, 1999) Paranasal sinusitis
Mucocele Postinfectious Malignant otitis externa
Systemic inflammations and diseases Behc¸et’s disease (Vaphiades, 1999) Inflammatory bowel disease (Hutnik, 1996) Reiter’s syndrome
Sarcoidosis (Beck, 1994; Case Records Massachusetts General Hospital, 1996; DeBroft, 1993; Haupert, 1997; Kosmorsky, 1996)
Systemic lupus erythematosus (Ahmadieh, 1994; Galindo-Rodriguez, 1999; Giorgi, 1999a,b; Ninomiya, 1990; Ohnuma, 1996; Rosenbaum, 1997)
Sjo¨gren’s syndrome
Mixed connective tissue disease Rheumatoid arthritis (Agildere, 1999)
Miscellaneous Multifocal choroiditis
Birdshot chorioretinopathy
Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) (Wolf, 1990) Autoimmune optic neuropathy (Bielory, 1993; Riedel, 1998)
Familial Mediterranean fever (Lossos, 1993)
Bee or wasp sting (Berrios, 1994; Choi, 2000; Maltzman, 2000; Song, 1991) Snake bite (Menon, 1997)
(continued)
42 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Table 2–4. (continued)
Postpartum optic neuritis (Leiba, 2000)
Retrobulbar optic neuritis with retinitis pigmentosa sine pigmento (Hatta, 2000)
Neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease) (Ahasan, 1994; Al-Deeb, 1993; Barkhoff, 1991b; Hainfellner, 1992; Hershewe, 1990; Igarishi, 1994; Jain, 1994; Jeffrey, 1996; Khan, 1990; Mandler, 1993, 1998; O’Riordan, 1996; Piccolo, 1990; Ramelli, 1992; Silber, 1990)
Recurrent optic neuromyelitis with endocrinopathies (Vernant, 1997)
Table 2–5. Features of Childhood Optic Neuritis Compared with Adult Optic Neuritis
More likely to be bilateral
More likely to have papillitis
May have worse presenting vision (later presentation?)
More likely to be associated with viral=parainfectious etiology
Less likely to be associated with multiple sclerosis
Table 2–6. Clinical Features of Devic’s Disease
Age: Typically younger patients
Gender: Affects men and women equally Race
May be more common in African Americans who develop ON (Phillips, 1998) May be more common in Asians who develop ON (Sakuma, 1999)
Recurrent optic neuromyelitis with endocrinopathies in eight Antillean women from Martinique and Guadeloupe (Vernant, 1997)
Familial cases: rare (Yamakawa, 2000) Pathology: Differs from multiple sclerosis (MS)
Cerebellum is almost never affected
Excavation of affected tissue with formation of cavities common in Devic’s but rare in MS Gliosis characteristic of MS absent or minimal with Devic’s
Arcuate fibers in cerebral subcortex relatively unaffected in Devic’s but severely damaged in MS Clinical features
May have prodrome of fever, sore throat, and headache Visual loss
May precede or follow paraplegia
Usually bilateral (hours, days, or rarely weeks between eyes) Rapid and usually severe (complete blindness not uncommon) Central scotoma most common visual field defect
Ophthalmoscopy
Majority have mild disc swelling of both discs but may be normal
Occasional severe swelling with dilation of veins and extensive peripapillary exudates May have slight narrowing of retinal vessels
(continued)
Optic Neuritis |
43 |
Table 2–6. (continued)
Visual prognosis
Usually some recovery of vision
Often recovers within weeks to months Some cases severe and permanent
Paraplegia (transverse myelitis) Usually sudden and severe
Often recover to some degree but may be permanent complete paralysis
Spinal cord MRI often shows abnormality extending over three or more segments May have Lhermitte’s symptom, paroxysmal tonic spasms, and radicular pain
Course: monophasic or relapsing Associations
Rarely associated with demyelinating peripheral neuropathy
Rarely associated with HIV-1 infection, systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, and pulmonary tuberculosis
Laboratory studies
Often cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (e.g., >50 WBC, often polymorphonuclear cells) Oligoclonal bands uncommon
Rare increased intracranial pressure Treatment
Possible response to IV steroids IV gamma globulin
Mortality less than 10 to 33%
Source: Ahasan, 1994; Al-Deeb, 1993; Barkhoff, 1991b; Blanche, 2000; Filippi, 1999; Hainfellner, 1992; Hershewe, 1990; Igarishi, 1994; Jain, 1994; Jeffrey, 1996; Khan, 1990; Mandler, 1993, 1998; O’Riordan, 1996; Phillips, 1998; Piccolo, 1990; Ramelli, 1992; Silber, 1990; Vernant, 1997; Wingerchuk, 1999; Yamakawa, 2000.
What Were the Results of the Optic Neuritis
Treatment Trial (ONTT)?
The ONTT was developed to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroid treatment for acute ON and to investigate the relationship between ON and MS (Beck, 1992a, 1993a–e, 1995a). The ONTT was sponsored by the National Eye Institute as a randomized, controlled clinical trial that enrolled 457 patients at 15 clinical centers in the United States between the years 1988 and 1991. The ONTT entry criteria specified that patients be between the ages of 18 and 46 years, that they have a relative afferent pupillary defect as well as a visual field defect in the affected eye, and that they were examined within 8 days of the onset of visual symptoms of a first attack of acute unilateral ON. Patients were excluded if they had previous episodes of ON in the affected eye, previous corticosteroid treatment for ON or MS, or systemic disease other than MS that might be a cause of the ON (Beck, 1992a, 1993a–e, 1995a). The clinical features of the ONTT patients are outlined in Table 2–2.
In the ONTT, all patients underwent testing for collagen vascular disease (antinuclear antibody [ANA]), serologic testing for syphilis (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption [FTA-ABS]), and a chest radiograph for sarcoidosis. Lumbar puncture was optional. An ANA test was positive in a titer less than 1:320 in 13% of patients, and
44 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
1:320 or greater in 3%. Only one patient was eventually diagnosed with a collagen vascular disease.
Visual and neurologic outcomes in these patients were no different from those of the other ONTT patients. The FTA-ABS was positive in six patients (1.3%), but none had syphilis. A chest radiograph did not reveal sarcoidosis in any patient. However, in a separate report, Jacobson et al described 4 of 20 patients with isolated ON with a positive serology for Lyme disease (Jacobson, 1991). These authors recommended serologic testing for Lyme disease in patients with ON, with or without the typical rash of erythema migrans, who live in or have visited Lyme endemic areas. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was recommended for patients with positive serology and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for unexplained pleocytosis (Jacobson, 1991). We do not order Lyme titers for patients with ON from nonendemic regions (class IV, level C).
The evaluation recommendations of the ONTT study group for patients with typical acute ON are listed in Table 2–7.
What Are the Neuroimaging Findings in Optic
Neuritis?
Periventricular white matter signal abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consistent with MS (Baumhefner, 1990; Jacobs, 1991) have been reported in 40 to 70% of cases of isolated ON (Christiansen, 1992; Feinstein, 1992; Francis, 1995; Frederiksen, 1991a; Jacobs, 1991; Morrissey, 1993). MRI with gadolinium may show enhancing lesions in 26 to 37% of patients with isolated ON (Christiansen, 1992; Merandi, 1991) and may increase the detection of disease activity (Guy, 1990; Merandi, 1991; Thompson, 1990).
Although computed tomography (CT) scan of the head may also show abnormalities in MS and ON, CT has been relatively insensitive to the detection of MS plaques compared to MRI. MRI is a very sensitive test for detecting lesions consistent with MS (Baumhefner, 1990). Paty reported 19 cases of clinically definite MS (CDMS) out of 200 consecutive patients with suspected MS comparing predictive value of MR scanning
Table 2–7. Modified Evaluation Recommendations of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) for Optic Neuritis (ON)
No laboratory studies or lumbar puncture required for typical optic neuritis Potential testing for atypical optic neuritis
Chest radiograph Syphilis serology
Collagen vascular disease screen Serum chemistries
Complete blood counts Lumbar puncture
Lyme serology in patients from endemic areas Neuroimaging
MR imaging of the brain for all optic neuritis (class I–II, level B)
Consider MR of head and orbit with fat suppression views to examine optic nerve course, especially in atypical optic neuritis
Optic Neuritis |
45 |
with CT scanning, evoked potentials (EPs), and CSF analysis for oligoclonal bands (Paty, 1988). Eighteen of these 19 (95%) patients had MR scans that were ‘‘strongly suggestive of MS’’ at first evaluation. Fourteen of 19 (74%) patients had positive oligoclonal bands. Ten of 19 (53%) patients had abnormal somatosensory EPs, 9 of 19 (47%) patients had abnormal visual EPs (VEPs), and 9 of 19 (47%) patients had abnormal CT scans. Combining multiple reports, the risk of developing MS within 1 to 4 years is about 30% (range 23–35%) in patients with isolated ON and an abnormal MR scan (Beck, 1993a; Frederiksen, 1992; Jacobs, 1997; So¨ derstro¨ m, 1998). Morrisey et al reported 89 patients (44 with ON, 17 with brainstem involvement, and 28 with spinal cord involvement) with an acute clinical demyelinating attack (Morrisey, 1993). Of these 89 patients, 57 (64%) had one or more MR scan abnormalities and 32 had no MR scan abnormalities. Only one of the 32 patients with normal MR scans developed MS, versus development of MS in 37 of 57 patients (65%) with an abnormal MR scan. Of the three isolated clinical syndromes (optic nerve, brainstem, spinal cord), ON with an abnormal MR scan had the highest rate of progression to MS—82%. Jacobs et al reported 42 patients with isolated monosymptomatic optic neuritis (Jacobs, 1991). During 5.6 years of follow-up, 21 patients developed MS. Of these 21 patients, 16 (76%) had abnormal MR scans and 5 had normal MR scans (Jacobs, 1991).
So¨derstro¨m et al performed a prospective study of 147 consecutive patients with acute monosymptomatic ON (So¨ derstro¨ m, 1998). Of 116 patients examined with MR scans, 64 (55%) had three or more high signal lesions, 11 (9%) had one or two high signal lesions, and 41 (35%) had a normal MRI. Among 146 patients undergoing CSF studies, oligoclonal bands were demonstrated in 103 (71%) patients. During the 6-year study period, 53 patients (36%) developed CDMS. Three or more MS lesions on MR scan or CSF oligoclonal bands were strongly associated with MS. Jacobs et al found that 42 of 74 (57%) patients with isolated monosymptomatic ON had 1 to 20 brain lesions by MR scans (Jacobs, 1997). All of the brain lesions were clinically silent and had characteristics consistent with MS. During 5.6 years of follow-up, 21 patients (28%) developed CDMS. Sixteen of the 21 converting patients (76%) had abnormal MR scans; the other 5 (24%) had MR scans that were normal initially (when they had ON only) and normal in 4 of the 5 when repeated after they had developed clinical MS. Of the 53 patients who had not developed CDMS, 26 (49%) had abnormal MR scans and 27 (51%) had normal MR scans. The authors concluded that the findings of an abnormal MR scan at the time of ON was significantly related to the subsequent development of MS. The interpretation of the strength of that relationship must be tempered by the fact that some of the converting patients had normal MR scans and approximately half of the patients who did not develop clinical MS had abnormal MR scans. Thus, it should be emphasized that MS is a clinical diagnosis that cannot be made on the basis of MR scan abnormalities alone (Guy, 1994; Paty, 1993), and the absence of MR scan abnormalities does not protect against the future development of MS (Beck, 1993d; Jacobs, 1991).
The ONTT prospectively studied 388 patients who did not have probable or definite MS at study entry and who were followed for the development of CDMS (Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1997a). The 5-year cumulative probability of CDMS was 30% and did not differ by treatment group (see below). Neurologic impairment in patients who developed CDMS was generally mild. Brain MR scans performed at study entry was a strong predictor of CDMS, with the 5-year risk of CDMS ranging from 16% in 202 patients with no MR lesions to 51% in 89 patients with three or more MR lesions. The 5-year risk of CDMS following optic neuritis is dependent on the number of lesions
46 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
present on brain MR scan. Even a normal brain MRI, however, did not preclude the development of CDMS.
MR scans may demonstrate contrast-enhancing lesions within the optic nerve in patients with ON (Cornblath, 1997; Dunker, 1996; Kupersmith, 2002a). Less complete visual recovery in ON was associated with longer lesions of the optic nerve and with involvement of the intracanicular segment in one study (Dunker, 1996). In another study, however, lesions involving the canal or longer segments of the optic nerve had worse starting vision, but the location and length of enhancement were not predictive of recovery (Kupersmith, 2002a).
Should a Lumbar Puncture Be Performed in
Patients with Optic Neuritis?
Patients with ON may show abnormalities in CSF analysis consistent with MS. These CSF abnormalities include increased cell count (>5 cells per cubic millimeter), increased total protein, increased CSF–immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration, oligoclonal bands, antibodies to myelin basic protein (MBP) and proteolipid protein (PLP), and increased CSF MBP levels (Cole, 1998; Fredericksen, 1992; Jacobs, 1997; Sellebjerg, 1994, 1995; Simon, 2000; So¨derstro¨m, 1993, 1998; Warren, 1994). Lumbar puncture, however, did not produce any additional unsuspected diagnosis in the 141 patients in the ONTT undergoing CSF analysis. In addition, a normal initial CSF after ON did not preclude the eventual development of MS (Sandberg-Wollheim, 1975).
Cole et al investigated the predictive value of CSF oligoclonal banding for MS 5 years after optic neuritis in patients enrolled in the ONTT (Cole, 1998). In 76 patients, the presence of oligoclonal bands was associated with development of CDMS. However, the results suggested that CSF analysis was useful in the risk assessment of optic neuritis patients only when the brain MR scan was normal and was not of predictive value when brain MR scan lesions were present at the time of optic neuritis. CDMS developed within 5 years in 22 of the 76 patients (29%); in 16 of 38 patients (42%) with oligoclonal bands present and in 6 of 38 patients (16%) without bands. Among the 39 patients with normal MR scans, CDMS developed in three of 11 patients (27%) with bands present but in only one patient (4%) without bands. In contrast, among 37 patients with abnormal MR scans, CDMS developed in 13 of 27 (48%) with bands and 5 of 10 (50%) without bands. The positive predictive value of bands was 42% and the negative predictive value was 84%. Among the 39 patients with normal MR scans, the positive predictive value was 27% and the negative predictive value was 96%, whereas among the 37 patients with abnormal MR scans the positive predictive value was 48% and the negative predictive value was 50%.
Although several authors have reported that abnormal CSF results may be predictive of eventual MS (Cole, 1998; Frederiksen, 1992; Jacobs, 1997; Sandberg-Wollheim, 1990; So¨derstro¨m, 1998), others have not found CSF abnormalities to have predictive value (Sandberg-Wollheim, 1975). Although a lumbar puncture was optional in the ONTT, it should be considered in atypical ON or in cases where the diagnosis of MS might be clarified by CSF analysis (class I–II, level B).
Optic Neuritis |
47 |
Should Visual Evoked Potentials Be
Performed on Patients with Optic Neuritis?
Although the VEP is often abnormal in patients with ON (Ashworth, 1994; Brusa, 1999; Fotiou, 1999; Frederiksen, 1999; Fuhr, 2001; Honan, 1990; Rinalduzzi, 2001), an abnormal VEP in the setting of a clinically diagnosed ON does not alter the diagnostic or treatment plan. The VEP does not provide additional prognostic information for visual recovery or for the development of MS. We do not recommend routine use of VEP in typical ON (class III–IV, level C). VEP may be useful in identifying a second site of neurologic involvement (previous ON) to strengthen the clinical diagnosis of MS in patients with no history or examination findings of an optic neuropathy (Celesia, 1990).
What Is the Treatment of Optic Neuritis?
Although corticosteroids have been used for acute ON (Lessell, 1992; Sellebjerg, 1999; Silberberg, 1993) and have been shown to improve symptoms in MS (Kapoor, 1998), well-controlled data to support the treatment efficacy of steroids in ON have been lacking until recently (Beck, 1992a). IV methylprednisolone (MP) treatment has been reported to decrease CSF anti-MBP levels, intrathecal IgG synthesis, and CSF oligoclonal bands; to decrease gadolinium enhancement of MS plaques (and presumably blood– brain barrier disruption) on MR scan; and to improve clinical disability. Modulation of the function of inflammatory cells may also contribute to the clinical efficacy or highdose corticosteroids (Sellebjerg, 2000). The clinical effect of treatment might be due to reduction of inflammation and myelin breakdown (Barkhoff, 1991a, 1992; Warren, 1994).
Rawson et al reported a more rapid visual recovery, but no difference in visual outcome after 1 year in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study of 50 patients with ON treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (Rawson, 1966). Rose et al observed similarly more rapid improvement in patients with ON treated with ACTH compared with placebo (Rose, 1970). Bowden et al, however, reported no benefit from ACTH compared with placebo in 54 patients with ON (Bowden, 1974). Gould et al reported a prospective, single-blind, controlled, randomized clinical trial of 74 patients with ON who experienced more rapid improvement with a retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone, but patients had no difference in outcome after 6 months (Gould, 1977).
In the ONTT, the patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms in the study:
1.IV methylprednisolone sodium succinate (250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days) followed by oral prednisone (1 mg=kg daily) for 11 days.
2.Oral prednisone (1 mg=kg daily) for 14 days.
3.Oral placebo for 14 days, followed by a short oral taper.
The major conclusions of the ONTT related to treatment are summarized in Table 2–8. Wakakura et al also performed a randomized trial of IV megadose methylprednisolone in ON and found that treatment with steroids improved visual recovery at 3 weeks. Visual function at 12 weeks and at 1 year, however, was the same as in control patients (Wakakura, 1999a). Sellebjerg et al performed a randomized, controlled trial of oral
48 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Table 2–8. Summary of the ONTT Findings
Intravenous (IV) steroids followed by oral corticosteroids accelerated visual recovery but provided no long-term visual benefit.
‘‘Standard dose’’ oral prednisone alone did not improve the visual outcome and was associated with an increased rate of new attacks of ON.
IV followed by oral corticosteroids reduced the rate of development of clinically definite MS (CDMS) during the first 2 years, but by 3 years the effect had subsided (Beck, 1993b, 1995a).
MR findings were of prognostic significance for MS. Treatment was well tolerated with few major side effects.
high-dose methylprednisolone (500 mg daily for 5 days with a 10-day taper) in 30 patients compared to 30 control patients (Sellebjerg, 1999). The visual analog scale but not spatial visual function was better in the steroid group at 3 weeks. After 8 weeks, the visual analog scale and spatial visual function were comparable in both groups. The risk of new demyelinating attacks within 1 year was unaffected by treatment. In another study, 55 patients with acute ON received IV saline or IV MP and were assessed at 6 months (Kapoor, 1998). Patients with short lesions of the optic nerve on MR scan presented earlier than those with long lesions (involving three or more 5-mm-thick slices of any part of the optic nerve, as well as its intracanalicular portion). Lesion length was significantly less in patients presenting within a week of onset of symptoms. Treatment did not limit lesion length in either the long or short lesion subgroups and had no significant effect on final visual outcome. The authors conclude that steroids do not improve visual outcome or lesion length in patients with acute ON (Kapoor, 1998).
Based on the ONTT results, it is recommended that treatment with oral prednisone in standard doses be avoided in ON (Kaufman, 2000) (class I, level A). Treatment with IV MP should be considered in patients with abnormal MR scans of the brain or a particular need (e.g., monocular patient or occupational requirement) to recover visual function more rapidly (class I, level B). Beck et al thought that although brain MR scan may not be necessary for the diagnosis of ON, imaging was valuable for prognostic purposes (Beck, 1992, 1993a–e). In the ONTT, patients with multiple signal abnormalities on MR scans most clearly benefited from IV corticosteroid therapy in terms of development of MS. The rate of development of MS was too low in the patients with normal MR scans to assess treatment benefit in this group. ON patients in the ONTT had MR scans within 9 days of the onset of visual loss. Some authors have suggested that patients presenting later than this interval with an abnormal MR scan may still benefit from treatment with IV MP within a treatment window of about 2 months (Guy, 1994). The results of the ONTT have led to a reduction in the use or oral corticosteroids in the treatment of ON (Trobe, 1999).
Even though the ONTT was a large, well-designed study, several criticisms have been raised:
1.The lack of an intravenous control group.
2.Incomplete masking of all patients (i.e., in-hospital IV-treated patients knew they had received IV MP).
3.Data regarding treatment effect of IV MP on the development of MS was obtained from a retrospective analysis that was primarily designed for a different purpose (to evaluate the treatment effect).
Optic Neuritis |
49 |
4.The role of retrobulbar steroids was not assessed.
5.The role of higher doses of MP, such as 30 mg per kg dose suggested for the treatment of acute spinal cord injury, was not determined.
6.The efficacy of oral prednisone at higher doses was not assessed.
7.The need or lack of need for oral tapering doses of corticosteroids following IV MP was not addressed.
Despite these concerns, the ONTT is the best well-controlled prospective clinical trial (class I) available in the literature to date on the treatment and evaluation of ON. We follow the evaluation and the treatment recommendations of the ONTT (class I, level B).
Should Interferon Therapy Be Instituted in
Patients with Optic Neuritis?
In a double-blind, randomized trial, 383 patients who had a first acute demyelinating event (optic neuritis, incomplete transverse myelitis, or a brainstem or cerebellar syndrome) were studied. All had evidence of prior subclinical demyelination on MR imaging of the brain (two or more silent lesions of at least 3 mm in diameter thought characteristic of MS). Patients received either weekly intramuscular injections of 30 mg of interferon-b-1a (193 patients) or placebo (190 patients) (CHAMPS Study Group, 2001; Jacobs, 2000). The patients had received initial treatment with corticosteroids. During 3 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of the development of CDMS was significantly lower in the interferon-b-1a group than in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.56). At 3 years, the cumulative probability was 35% in the interferon-b-1a group and 50% in the placebo group. As compared with the patients in the placebo group, patients in the interferon-b-1a group had a relative reduction in the volume of brain lesions, fewer new lesions or enlarging lesions, and fewer gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 18 months. The authors concluded that initiating treatment with interferon-b-1a at the time of a first demyelinating event is beneficial for patients with brain lesions on MRI that indicate high risk of CDMS (CHAMPS Study Group, 2001; Jacobs, 2000).
Are There Treatments Other than Steroids for
Optic Neuritis?
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) had been initially reported to improve visual acuity in an uncontrolled study of five patients with definite MS and unilateral or bilateral but stable demyelinating ON (van Engelen, 1992). However, in a randomized trial in 55 patients, this agent did not reverse persistent visual loss from ON to a degree that merits general use (Noseworthy, 2001).
What Is the Long-Term Vision Prognosis of
Patients with Optic Neuritis?
In patients with ON, visual recovery generally begins within the first 2 weeks, with much of the recovery occurring by the end of 1 month. If recovery is incomplete at 6 months, some further improvement may continue for up to 1 year.
50 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
In the ONTT, there was no significant difference in visual acuity comparing the three treatment groups at 6 months. After 12 months, visual acuity was 20=40 or greater in 93% of patients, greater than 20=20 in 69%, and 20=200 or lower in 3%. Results were similar in each treatment group. The only predictor of poor visual outcome was poor visual acuity at the time of study entry; even so, of 160 patients starting with a visual acuity of 20=200 or worse, all had at least some improvement and only 8 (5%) had visual acuities that were still 20=200 or worse at 6 months. Of 30 patients whose initial visual acuity was light perception (LP) or no light perception (NLP), 20 (67%) recovered to 20=40 or better. Baseline acuity was the best predictor of 6-month visual acuity outcome; older age was statistically associated with a slightly worse outcome but this appeared to be of no clinical importance.
Thus, in most patients with ON, visual recovery is rapid. The only factor of value in predicting the visual outcome is initial severity of visual loss. However, even when initial loss is severe, visual recovery is still good in most patients. Patients not following the usual course of visual recovery should be considered atypical and further investigation in regard to etiology of the visual loss is appropriate.
At the 5-year follow-up for 347 (64%) of 545 patients in the ONTT, the affected eyes had normal or only slightly abnormal visual acuities in most patients, and results did not significantly differ by treatment group (Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1997b). Visual acuity in affected eyes was 20=25 or better in 87%, 20=25 to 20=40 in 7%, 20=50 to 20=190 in 3%, and 20=200 or worse in 3%. Recurrence of ON in either eye occurred in 28% of patients and was more frequent in patients with MS and in patients without MS who were in the prednisone treatment group. Most eyes with a recurrence retained normal or almost normal visual function. In conclusion, most patients with ON retain good or excellent vision 5 years following an attack of ON, even if the ON recurs. Recurrences are more frequent in patients with MS and in those treated with oral prednisone alone. Recurrence of ON in either eye occurs in 28% of patients and are twofold more frequent in patients who had or developed CDMS (46%) compared with patients without CDMS (22%).
What Is the Risk of Developing Multiple
Sclerosis following Optic Neuritis?
The risk for the development of MS following ON is quite variable in the literature, with reports ranging from 8 to 85% (Cole, 1998; Frith, 2000; Jacobs, 1997; Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1997a; Rodriguez, 1995; So¨derstro¨m, 1998; Sorensen, 1999). Most studies indicate a 25 to 35% risk of patients with ON developing MS. This variability is probably related to numerous factors including:
Differences in patient populations (e.g., clinic or hospital versus population based); sample sizes; study design (retrospective versus prospective)
Duration of follow-up (longer interval studies tend to report higher incidence rates)
Differences in selection criteria and diagnostic evaluation of ON cases
Different study diagnostic criteria for both ON and MS
Rodriguez et al found a cumulative probability of developing CDMS of 24% after 5 years and 39% after 10 years and noted no difference in the risk of developing MS
Optic Neuritis |
51 |
between men and women (Rodriguez, 1995). Rizzo and Lessell studied 60 patients with ON, with a mean follow-up of 14.9 years (Rizzo, 1988). Life table analysis indicated that 74% of the women and 34% of the men developed MS 15 years after their attack of ON, and 91.3% of the women and 44.8% of the men would develop MS after 20 years. MR scan abnormalities may be the best predictor for the eventual development of MS after ON. As noted above, in the ONTT prospective study of 388 patients who did not have probable or definite MS at study entry, the 5-year cumulative probability of CDMS was 30% (Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1997a). Brain MR scans performed at study entry were a strong predictor of CDMS, with the 5-year risk of CDMS ranging from 16% in 202 patients with no MR lesions to 51% in 89 patients with three or more MR lesions. The 5-year risk of CDMS following ON is highly dependent on the number of lesions present on brain MR scan. Sorensen et al studied the predictive value on survival of ON as onset manifestation of MS and concluded that ON as onset manifestation of MS (vs. another or unknown onset manifestation of MS) indicates a more favorable prognosis of survival of MS in women (Sorensen, 1999). ON was the presenting manifestation of MS in 10% of MS cases.
Brex et al performed high-resolution, multisequence brain and spinal cord MRI in 60 patients after their first demyelinating event, including 38 patients with ON (Brex, 1999). At baseline, 73% of patients had lesions on T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) brain images and 42% had asymptomatic spinal cord lesions. Of the 38 patients with ON, 29 had lesions in the brain on FSE images and 16 had spinal cord lesions. Repeat MRI demonstrated new FSE lesions in 43% of the patients overall. After 1 year, 26% of the patients developed MS. The MRI features that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the development of MS were new FSE lesions at followup and enhancing lesions at baseline. The authors concluded that the combination of baseline MR abnormalities on multisequence MRI and new lesions at follow-up,
Table 2–9. Risk Factors for Developing Multiple Sclerosis Following Optic Neuritis
Factor |
References |
|
|
Increased risk |
|
Abnormal MR scan (three or more lesions) |
Jacobs, 1997; Optic Neuritis Study Group, 1997a; |
|
So¨derstro¨m, 1998 |
Prior nonspecific neurologic symptoms |
ONTT |
Increased CSF oligoclonal bands |
Cole, 1998 |
Increased CSF IgG |
Jacobs, 1997; So¨derstro¨ m, 1998 |
Previous optic neuritis |
ONTT |
HLA-DR2 and HLA-B7 |
Morrissey, 1993 |
Decreased risk |
|
Normal MR scan |
ONTT |
Absence of pain* |
ONTT |
Marked disc edema* |
ONTT |
Retinal exudates or macular star* |
ONTT |
Bilateral simultaneous onset* |
Frederiksen, 1997a |
Onset in childhood* |
Lucchinetti, 1997 |
*We consider these findings in a patient with ON to be atypical and thus likely require further evaluation. ONTT, Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.
52 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
indicating dissemination in space and time, are associated with a high sensitivity and specificity for the early development of clinical MS.
Ghezzi et al evaluated the risk of SDMS after acute isolated ON in 102 patients with follow-up duration 6.3 years (10 patients were lost to follow-up) (Ghezzi, 1999, 2000). The risk of developing SDMS was 13% after 2 years, 30% after 4 years, 37% after 6 years, and 42% after 8 and 10 years. Gender, age, and season of ON onset did not affect the risk. CDMS occurred in 37 of 71 patients (52.1%) with one MRI lesion or more; no
Figure 2-1. Evaluation of optic neuritis.
Optic Neuritis |
53 |
patient with a normal MRI developed CDMS. CDMS developed more frequently in patients with intrathecal IgG synthesis than in those without (43% vs. 28%), but the difference was not statistically significant (Ghezzi, 1999, 2000).
Increased risk of MS has been reported in patients with human leukocyte antigen HLA-DR2 and HLA-B7 tissue types, but we do not recommend routine HLA screening for ON (Hauser, 2000; Morrissey, 1993). Risk factors for developing MS following ON are outlined in Table 2–9.
Our approach to ON is summarized in Figure 2–1.
References
Abd Elrazek M. (1991). Brucella optic neuritis. Arch Intern Med 151:776–778. Achiron LR. (1994). Postinfectious hepatitis B optic neuritis. Optom Vis Sci 71:53–56.
Agildere AM, Tutar NU, Yucel E, et al. (1999). Pachymeningitis and optic neuritis in rheumatoid arthritis: MRI findings. Br J Radiol 72:404–407.
Ahasan HA, Jafiqueuddin AK, Chowdrhury MA, et al. (1994). Neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease) following chicken pox. Trop Doct 24:75–76.
Ahmadieh H, Roodpeyma S, Azarmina M, et al. (1994). Bilateral simultaneous optic neuritis in childhood systemic lupus erythematosus. A case report. J Neuro-ophthalmol 14:84–86.
Albitar S, Bourgeon B, Genin R, et al. (1997). Bilateral retrobulbar optic neuritis with hepatitis B vaccination.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 12:2169–2170.
Al-Deeb SM, Yaqub BA, Khoja WO. (1993). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica and varicella. J Neurol 240:450–451. Anderson MD, Kennedy CA, Lewis AW, Christensen GR. (1994). Retrobulbar neuritis complicating acute Epstein-
Barr virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 18:799–801.
Arnold AC. (1999). Visual field defects in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial: central vs peripheral, focal vs global.
Am J Ophthalmol 128:632–634.
Arnold RW, Schriever G. (1993). Lyme amaurosis in a child. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 30:268–270. Ashworth B, Aspinall PA, Mitchell JD. (1994). Visual function in multiple sclerosis. Doc Ophthalmol 73:209–224. Banta JT, Lam BL. (2002). Toxoplasmic anterior optic neuropathy. Presented at the 28th annual meeting of the
North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society. Copper Mountain, Colorado, February 9–14.
Barkhoff F, Frequin STFM, Hommes OR, et al. (1992). A correlative triad of gadolinium-DTPA MRI, EDSS, and CSF-MBP in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone.
Neurology 42:63–67.
Barkhoff F, Hommes OR, Lamers KJB, et al. (1991a). High dose intravenous methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 41:1219–1222.
Barkhoff F, Scheltens P, Valk J, et al. (1991b). Serial quantitative MR assessment of optic neuritis in a case of neuromyelitis optica, using gadolinium-‘‘enhanced’’ STIR imaging. Neuroradiology 33:70–71.
Bath AP, Rowe JR, Innes AJ. (1998). Malignant otitis externa with optic neuritis. J Laryngol Otol 112:274–277. Baumhefner RO, Tourtellotte WW, Syndulko K, et al. (1990). Quantitative multiple sclerosis plaque assessment
with magnetic resonance imaging: its correlation with clinical parameters, evoked potentials, and intra- blood-barrier IgG synthesis. Arch Neuro1 47:19–26.
Beck AD, Newman NJ, Grossniklaus HE, et al. (1994a). Optic nerve enlargement and chronic visual loss. Surv Ophthalmol 38:555–566.
Beck RW. (1992a). Corticosteroid treatment of optic neuritis. Neurology 42:1133–1135.
Beck RW. (1995a). The optic neuritis treatment trial: three year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol 113:136–137. Beck RW, Arrington I, Murtagh FR, et al. (1993a). Brain magnetic resonance imaging in acute optic neuritis:
experience of the optic neuritis study group. Arch Neurol 50:841–846.
Beck RW, Cleary PA. (1993b). Recovery from severe visual loss in optic neuritis. Arch Ophthalmol 111:300.
Beck RW, Cleary PA. (1993c). Optic neuritis treatment trial. One year follow-up results. Arch Ophthalmol 111:773–775.
Beck RW, Cleary PA, Anderson MA, et al. (1992b). A randomized, controlled trial of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 326:581–588.
Beck RW, Cleary PA, Backlund JC. (1994b). The course of visual recovery after optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 101:1771–1778.
54 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Beck RW, Cleary PA, Trobe JD, et al. (1993d). The effect of corticosteroids for acute optic neuritis on the subsequent development of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 329:1764–1769.
Beck RW, Kupersmith MJ, Cleary PA, Katz B. (1993e). Fellow eye abnormalities in acute unilateral optic neuritis.
Ophthalmology 100:691–698.
Beck RW, Trobe J. (1995b). What we have learned from the optic neuritis treatment trial. Ophthalmology 102:1504–1508.
Beiran I, Krasnitz I, Zimhoni-Eibsitz M, et al. (2000). Paediatric chiasmal neuritis—typical of post-Epstein-Barr virus infection? Acta Ophthalmol 78:226–227.
Berrios RR, Serrano LA. (1994). Bilateral optic neuritis after a bee sting. Am J Ophthalmol 117:677–678.
Bielory L, Kupersmith M, Warren F, et al. (1993). Skin biopsies in the evaluation of atypical optic neuropathies.
Ocul Immunol Inflam 1:231–241.
Biousse V, Trichet C, Bloch-Michel E, Roullet E. (1999). Multiple sclerosis associated with uveitis in two large clinic-based series. Neurology 52:179–181.
Blanche P, Diaz E, Gombert B, et al. (2000). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica and HIV-1 infection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:795–796.
Boiko AN, Guseva ME, Guseva MR, et al. (2000). Clinico-immunogenetic characteristics of multiple sclerosis optic neuritis in children. J Neurovirol 6(suppl 2):S152–S155.
Bowden AN, Bowden PMA, Friedmann AI, et al. (1974). A trial of corticotrophin gelatin injection in acute optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 37:869–873.
Brady KM, Brar AS, Lee AG, et al. (1999). Optic neuritis in children: clinical features and visual outcome. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 3:98–103.
Brazis PW, Stokes HR, Ervin FR. (1986). Optic neuritis in cat scratch disease. J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 6:172–174. Brex PA, O’Riordan JI, Miszkiel KA, et al. (1999). Multisequence MRI in clinically isolated syndromes and the
early development of MS. Neurology 53:1184–1190.
Brodsky MC, Beck RW. (1994). The changing role of MR imaging in the evaluation of acute optic neuritis.
Radiology 192:22–23.
Brusa A, Jones SJ, Kapoor R, et al. (1999). Long-term recovery and fellow eye deterioration after optic neuritis, determined by serial visual evoked potentials. J Neurol 246:776–782.
Burton BJL, Leff AP, Plant GT. (1998). Steroid-responsive HIV optic neuropathy. J Neuro-ophthalmol 18:25–29. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 37-1996. (1996). N Engl J Med 335:1668–1674. Celesia GG, Kaufman DI, Brigell M, et al. (1990). Optic neuritis: A prospective study. Neurology 40:919–923.
CHAMPS Study Group. (2001). Interferon beta-1a for optic neuritis patients at high risk for multiple sclerosis.
Am J Ophthalmol 132:463–471.
Chan JW. (2002). Optic neuritis in anti-GQ1b positive Miller Fisher syndrome. Presented at the 28th annual meeting of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Copper Mountain, Colorado, February 9–14.
Chang GY, Keane JR. (2001). Visual loss in cysticercosis: analysis of 23 patients. Neurology 57:545–548. Choi MY, Cho SH. (2000). Optic neuritis after bee sting. Korean J Ophthalmol 14:49–52.
Christiansen P, Frederiksen JL, Henriksen O, et al. (1992). Gd-DTPA-enhanced lesions in the brain of patients with acute optic neuritis. Acta Neurol Scand 85:141–146.
Cleary PA, Beck RW, Anderson MM, et al. (1993). Design, methods and conduct of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Controlled Clin Trials 24:123–142.
Cleary PA, Beck RW, Bourque LB, et al. (1997). Visual symptoms after optic neuritis: results from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. J Neuro-ophthalmol 17:1–28.
Cole SR, Beck RW, Moke PS, et al. (1998). The predictive value of CSF oligoclonal banding for MS 5 years after optic neuritis. Neurology 51:885–887.
Cornblath WT, Quint DJ. (1997). MRI of optic nerve enlargement in optic neuritis. Neurology 48:821–825. Corssmit EP, Leverstein-van Hall MA, Portegies P, Bakker P. (1997). Severe neurological complications in
association with Epstein-Barr virus infection. J Neurovirol 3:460–464.
Deane JS, Bibby K. (1995). Bilateral opiic neuritis following herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Arch Ophthalmol 113:972–973.
DeBroft BM, Donahue SP. (1993). Bilateral optic neuropathy as the initial manifestation of systemic sarcoidosis.
Am J Ophthalmol 116:108–110.
Dunker S, Wiegand W. (1996). Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Ophthalmology 103:1768–1773.
Falcone PM, Notis C, Merhige K. (1993). Toxoplasmosis papillitis as the initial manifestation of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Ophthalmol 25:56–57.
Fang JP, Donahue SP, Lin RH. (1999a). Global visual field involvement in acute unilateral optic neuritis.
Am J Ophthalmol 128:554–565.
Optic Neuritis |
55 |
Fang JP, Lin RH, Donahue SP. (1999b). Recovery of visual field function in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial.
Am J Ophthalmol 128:566–572.
Farris BK, Pickard DJ. (1990). Bilateral postinfectious optic neuritis and intravenous steroid therapy in children.
Ophthalmology 97:339–345.
Feinstein A, Youl B, Ron M. (1992). Acute optic neuritis. Brain 115:1403–1415.
Filippi M, Rocca MA, Moiola L, et al. (1999). MRI and magnetization transfer imaging changes in the brain and cervical cord of patients with Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 53:1705–1710.
Fotiou F, Koutlas E, Tsorlinis I, et al. (1999). The value of neurophysiological and MRI assessment in demyelinating optic neuritis. Electromyograph Clin Neurophysiol 39:397–404.
Francis CS, Evens AC, Arnold DL. (1995). Neuroimaging in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 23:147–170. Frederiksen JL. (1997a). Bilateral acute optic neuritis: prospective clinical, MRI, CSF, neurophysiological and HLA
findings. Neuro-ophthalmology 17:175–183.
Frederiksen JL, Larsson HBW, Olesen J. (1992). Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and CSF findings in patients with acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Acta Neurol Scand 86:317–322.
Frederiksen JL, Larsson HBW, Olesen J, Stigsby B. (1991a). MR, VEP, SEP, and biothesiometry suggest monosymptomatic acute optic neuritis to be a first manifestation of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 83:34–350.
Frederiksen JL, Larsson HBW, Ottovay E, Stigsby B, Olesen J. (1991b). Acute optic neuritis with normal visual acuity. Acta Ophthalmol 69:357–366.
Frederiksen JL, Petrera J. (1999). Serial visual evoked potentials in 90 untreated patients with acute optic neuritis.
Surv Ophthalmol 44(suppl 1):S54–S62.
Frederiksen JL, Sorensen TL, Sellebjerg FT. (1997b). Residual symptoms and signs after untreated acute optic neuritis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:544–547.
Friedlander SM, Rahhal FM, Ericson L, et al. (1996). Optic neuropathy preceding acute retinal necrosis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 114:1481–1485.
Friedman DI. (1991). Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Neurol Clin 9:55–72.
Frith JA, McLeod JG, Hely M. (2000). Acute optic neuritis in Australia: a 13 year prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:246.
Frohman L, Wolansky L. (1997). Magnetic resonance imaging of syphilitic optic neuritis=perineuritis. J Neuroophthalmol 17:57–59.
Fuhr P, Borggrefe-Chappuis A, Schindler C, Kappos L. (2001). Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 124:2162–2168.
Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E, Saito E, Nagata H. (1999). Optic nerve blindness due to paranasal sinus disease.
Ophthalmologica 213:262–264.
Galindo-Rodriguez G, Avina-Zubieta JA, Pizarro S, et al. (1999). Cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in optic neuritis due to systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 106:65–69.
Gerling J, Jancknecht P, Kommerell G. (1998a). Orbital pain in optic neuritis and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Neuro-ophthalmology 19:93–99.
Gerling J, Meyer JH, Kommerell G. (1998b). Visual field defects in optic neuritis and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: distinctive features. Graefes Arch Clin Experimental Ophthalmol 236:188–192.
Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, et al. (2000). The prognosis of idiopathic optic neutritis. Neurol Sci 21: S865–S869.
Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Torri V. (1999). Long-term follow-up of isolated optic neuritis: the risk of developing multiple sclerosis, its outcome, and the prognostic role of paraclinical tests. J Neurol 246:770–775.
Giorgi D, Balacco Gabrieli C. (1999a). Optic neuropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS): clinical features, pathogenesis, review of the literature and proposed ophthalmological criteria for APS diagnosis. Clin Rheumatol 18:124–131.
Giorgi D, Balacco Gabrieli C, Bonomo L. (1999b). The association of optic neuropathy with transverse myelitis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 38:191–192.
Golnik KC, Newman SA, Wispelway B. (1991). Cryptococcal optic neuropathy in acquired deficiency syndrome.
J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 11:96–103
Gould ES, Bird AC, Leaver PK, McDonald WI. (1977). Treatment of optic neuritis by retrobulbar injection of triamcinolone. Br Med J 1:1495–1497.
Greven CM, Singh T, Stanton CA, Martin TJ. (2001). Optic chiasm, optic nerve, and retinal involvement secondary to Varicella-zoster virus. Arch Ophthalmol 119:608–610.
Grossniklaus HE, Specht CS, Allaire G, et al. (1990). Toxoplasma gondii retinochoroiditis and optic neuritis in acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Ophthalmology 97:1342–1346.
56 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Gunduz K, Ozdermir O. (1994). Bilateral retrobulbar neuritis following unilateral herpes tester ophthalmicus.
Ophthalmologica 208:61–64.
Guy JR, Mancuso AA, Quisling R. (1994). The role of magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuritis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 7:449–458.
Guy J, Mancuso A, Quisling R, Beck R, Moster M. (1990). Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuropathies. Ophthalmology 97:592–599.
Harkins T, Maino JH. (1992). Cytomegalovirus retinitis complicated by optic neuropathy: a longitudinal study.
J Am Optom Assoc 63:21–27.
Hatta M, Hayasaka S, Kato T, Kadoi C. (2000). Retrobulbar optic neuritis and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a fourteen-year-old girl with retinitis pigmentosa sine pigmento. Ophthalmologica 214:153–155.
Haupert CL, Newman NJ. (1997). Prolonged Uhthoff phenomenon in sarcoidosis. Am J Ophthalmol 124:564–566 Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR, Lincoln R, et al. (2000). Interaction between HLA-DR2 and abnormal brain MRI in optic
neuritis and early MS. Neurology 54:1859–1861.
Hainfellner JA, Schmidbauer M, Schmutzhard E, et al. (1992). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica and Schilder’s myelinoclastic diffuse sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:1194–1196.
Hershewe GL, Corbett JJ, Thompson HS. (1990). The NANOS Devic’s Study Group. Presented at the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society Meeting, Steamboat Springs, Colorado, February 4–8.
Ho M. (1995). Cytomegalovirus. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Disease. 4th ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, pp. 1351–1364.
Honan WP, Heron JR, Foster DH, et al. (1990). Visual loss in multiple sclerosis and its relation to previous optic neuritis, disease duration, and clinical classification. Brain 113:975–987.
Hull TP, Bates JH. (1997). Optic neuritis after influenza vaccination. Am J Ophthalmol 124:703–704.
Hutnik CML, Nicolle DA, Canny CLB. (1996). Papillitis: a rare initial presentation of Crohn’s disease.
Can J Ophthalmol 31:373–376.
Igarishi Y, Oyachi H, Nakamura Y, et al. (1994). Neuromyelitis optica. Ophthalmology 208:226–229.
Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al. (2000). Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. N Eng J Med 343:898–904.
Jacobs LD, Kaba SE, Miller CM, et al. (1997). Correlation of clinical, magnetic resonance imaging, and cerebrospinal fluid findings in optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 41:392–398
Jacobs L, Munschauer FE. Kaba SE. (1991). Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging in optic neuritis. Neurology 41:15–19.
Jacobson DM, Marx JJ, Dlesk A. (1991). Frequency and clinical significance of Lyme seropositivity in patients with isolated optic neuritis. Neurology 41:706–711.
Jain S, Hiran S, Sarma PS. (1994). Devic’s disease. J Assoc Phys India 42:166.
Jeffrey AR, Buncic JR. (1996). Pediatric Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 33:223–229. Jin Y-P, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Soderstrom M, Link H. (1999). Incidence of optic neuritis in Stockholm, Sweden,
1990–1995. II. Time and space patterns. Arch Neurol 56:975–980.
Kakisu Y, Adachi-Usami E, Fujimoto N. (1991). Pattern visually evoked cortical potential and magnetic resonance Imaging in optic neuritis. J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 11:205–212.
Kapoor R, Miller DH, Jones SJ, et al. (1998). Effects of intravenous methylprednisolone on outcome in MRI-based prognostic subgroups in acute optic neuritis. Neurology 50:230–237.
Karma A, Seppala I, Mikkila H, et al. (1995). Diagnosis and clinical characteristics of ocular Lyme borreliosis.
Am J Ophthalmol 119:127–135.
Kaufman DI. (1998). Peripheral demyelinating and axonal disorders. In: Miller NR, Newman NJ, eds. Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology. 5th ed. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, pp. 5677–5719.
Kaufman DI, Trobe JD, Eggenberger ER, Whitaker JN. (2000). Practice parameter: the role of corticosteroids in the management of acute monosymptomatic optic neuritis. Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 54:2039–2044.
Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Beck RW, Clearly PA, Spurr JO, and the Optic Neuritis Study Group. (1993a). Quality control functions of the visual field reading center (VFRC) for the optic neuritis treatment trial (ONTT).
Controlled Clin Trials 14:143–159.
Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW. (1993b). Baseline visual field profile of optic neuritis: the experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 111:231–234.
Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Spurr JO, Beck RW, for the Optic Neuritis Study Group. (1999). Comparison of central and peripheral visual field properties in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Am J Ophthalmol 128:543–553.
Kerrison JB, Lounsbury D, Lane G, et al. (2001). Optic neuritis following anthrax vaccination. Presented at the 27th
Optic Neuritis |
57 |
annual meeting of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Rancho Mirage, California, February 18–22.
Kerrison JB, Lounsbury D, Thirkill CE, et al. (2002). Optic neuritis after anthrax vaccination. Ophthalmology 109:99–104.
Khan MA, Mahar PS, Raghuraman VU. (1990). Neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease). Br J Clin Pract 44:667–668. Komiyama A, Hasegawa O, Nakamura S, et al. (1995). Optic neuritis in cerebral toxocariasis. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry 59:197–198.
Kosmorsky GS, Prayson R. (1996). Primary optic pathway sarcoidosis in a 38-year-old white man.
J Neuro-ophthalmol 16:188–190.
Kouyoumdjian GA, Larkin TP, Blackburn PJ, Mandava N. (2001). Optic disk edema as a presentation of propionibacterium acnes endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 132:259–261.
Kupersmith MJ, Alban T, Zeiffer B, Lefton D. (2002a). Contrast-enhanced MRI in acute optic neuritis: relationship to visual performance. Brain 125:812–822.
Kupersmith MJ, Fazzone HE, Lefton D. (2002b). Localization of the pain with optic neuritis. Presented at the 28th annual meeting of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, Copper Mountain, Colorado, February 9–14.
Lee AG, Brazis PW. (1998a). The 5-year risk of MS after optic neuritis. Neurology 51:1236–1238.
Lee AG, Galetta SL, Lepore FE, Appel SH. (1999). Optic atrophy and chronic acquired polyneuropathy.
J Neuro-ophthalmol 19:67–69.
Lee CC, Venketasubramanian N, Lam MS. (1997). Optic neuritis: a rare complication of primary varicella infection. Clin Infect Dis 24:515–516.
Lee MS, Cooney EL, Stoessel KM, Gariano RF. (1998b). Varicella zoster virus retrobulbar optic neuritis preceding retinitis in patients with acquired deficiency syndrome. Ophthalmology 105:467–471.
Lehky TJ, Flerlage N, Katz D, et al. (1996). Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type II-associated myelopathy: clinical and immunologic profiles. Ann Neurol 40:714–723.
Leiba H, Glaser JS, Schatz NJ, Siatkowski RM. (2000). Postpartum optic neuritis: etiologic and pathophysiologic considerations. J Neuro-ophthalmol 20:85–88.
Lessell S. (1992). Corticosteroid treatment of acute optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 326:634–635.
Lesser RL, Kornmehl EW, Pachner WR, et al. (1990). Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of Lyme disease.
Ophthalmology 97:699–706.
Linssen WH, Kruisdijk JJ, Barkhof F, Smit LM. (1997). Severe irreversible optic neuritis following Mantoux tuberculin skin test in child with multiple sclerosis—a case report. Neuropediatrics 28:338–340.
Litoff D, Catalano RA. (1990). Herpes zoster optic neuritis in human immunodeficiency syndrome virus infection.
Arch Ophthalmol 108:782–783.
Lossos A, Eliashiv S, Ben-Chetrit E, et al. (1993). Optic neuritis associated with familial Mediterranean fever.
J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 13:141–143.
Lucchinetti CF, Kiers L, O’Duffy A, et al. (1997). Risk factors for developing multiple sclerosis after childhood optic neuritis. Neurology 49:1413–1418.
Malessa R, Agelink MW, Diener H. (1995). Dysfunction of visual pathways in HIV-1 infection. J Neurol Sci 130:82–87.
Maltzman JS, Lee AG, and Miller NR. (2000). Optic neuropathy occurring after bee and wasp sting. Ophthalmology 107:193–195.
Mandler RN, Davis LE, Jeffrey DR, Kornfeld M. (1993). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica: a clinicopathological study of 8 patients. Ann Neurol 34:162–168.
Mandler RN, Ahmed W, Dencoff JE. (1998). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica: a prospective study of seven patients treated with prednisone and azathioprine. Neurology 51:1219–1220.
Mansour AM. (1997). Cytomegalovirus optic neuritis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 8:55–58 Mansour AM. (1998). Optic disk tubercle. J Neuro-ophthalmol 18:201–203.
Margolis TP, Milner MS, Shama A, et al. (1998). Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am J Ophthalmol 125:285–291.
McKibbin M, Cleland PG, Morgan SJ. (1995). Bilateral optic neuritis after hepatitis A. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 58:508.
McLean DR, Russell N, Khan MY. (1992). Neurobrucellosis: clinical and therapeutic features. Clin Infect Dis 15:582–590.
McLeish WM, Pulido JS, Holland S, et al. (1990). The ocular manifestations of syphilis in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected host. Ophthalmology 97:196–203.
58 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Meenken C, van den Horn GJ, de Smer MD, van der Meer JTM. (1998). Optic neuritis heralding varicella zoster virus retinitis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Ann Neurol 43:534–536
Menon V, Tandon R, Khanna S, et al. (2000). Cysticercosis of the optic nerve. J Neuro-ophthalmol 20:59–60. Menon V, Tandon R, Sharma T, Gupta A. (1997). Optic neuritis following snake bite. Indian J Ophthalmol
45:236–237.
Merandi SF, Kudryk BT, Murtagh FR, Arrington JA. (1991). Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of optic nerve lesions in patients with acute optic neuritis. AJNR 12:923–926.
Merle D, Smadja D, Bera O, et al. (1997). Uveitis and papillitis in association with HTLV-I associated myelopathy.
Ann Ophthalmol 29:258–261.
Miller NR. (1995). Walsh and Hoyt’s Clinical Neuro-ophthalmology. 4th ed., vol. 5, pt 1. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, pp. 2895–2896.
Miyashita K, Kigasawa K, Mashima Y, Fujino T. (1993). Superior altitudinal hemianopia and herpes zoster.
Ann Ophthalmol 25:20–23.
Moorman CM, Anslow P, Elston JS. (1999). Is sphenoid sinus opacity significant in patients with optic neuritis. Eye 13:76–82.
Mori T, Terai T, Hatano M, et al. (1997). Stellate ganglion block improved loss of visual acuity caused by retrobulbar optic neuritis after herpes zoster. Anesth Analg 85:870–871.
Morrissey SP, Miller DH, Kendall BE, et al. (1993). The significance of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. A 5-year follow-up study. Brain 116:135–146.
Moschos M. (1990). Acute bilateral optic neuritis. Doc Ophthalmol 73:225–230.
Nadkarni N, Lisak RP. (1993). Guillain-Barre´ syndrome (GBS) with bilateral optic neuritis and central white matter disease. Neurology 43:842–843.
Nakazawa T, Abe T, Ohmura M. (1999). Varicella zoster-associated optic neuropathy with choroidal involvement.
Neuro-ophthalmology 21:39–45.
Newman NJ, Lessell S. (1992). Bilateral optic neuropathies with remission in two HIV-positive men.
J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 12:1–5.
Newman NJ, Lessell S, Winterkorn JS. (1991). Optic chiasmal neuritis. Neurology 41:1203–1210.
Nichols JW, Goodwin JA. (1992). Neuro-ophthalmologic complications of AIDS. Semin Ophthalmol 7:24–29. Ninomiya M, Ohashi K, Sasaki N, et al. (1990). A case of optic neuritis accompanying systemic lupus
erythematosus several years after onset. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn 41:636.
Noseworthy JH, O’Brien PC, Petterson TM, et al. (2001). A randomized trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in inflammatory demyelinating optic neuritis. Neurology 56:1514–1522.
Ohnuma I, Yamaguchi K, Takahashi S. (1996). Retrobulbar neuritis in a patient with mixed connective tissue disease. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn 47:828–831.
Optic Neuritis Study Group. (1991). The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1673–1678.
Optic Neuritis Study Group. (1997a). The 5-year risk of MS after optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Neurology 49:1404–1413.
Optic Neuritis Study Group. (1997b). Visual function 5 years after optic neuritis. Experience of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1545–1552
O’Riordan JI, Gallagher HL, Thompson AJ, et al. (1996). Clinical, CSF, and MRI findings in Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60:382–387.
Patel SS, Rutzen AR, Marx JL, et al. (1996). Cytomegalovirus papillitis in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome: visual prognosis of patients treated ganciclovir and foscarnet. Ophthalmology 103:1476–1482.
Paty DW, Li DKB, the UBC MS=MRI Study Group, et al. (1993). Interferon beta-1b is effective in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis, II: MRI analysis results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Neurology 43:662–667.
Paty DW, Oger JJF, Kastrukoff LF, et al. (1988). MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding and CT. Neurology 38:180–185.
Percy AK, Norbrega FT, Kurland LT. (1992). Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Arch Ophthalmol 87: 135–139.
Perry JD, Girkin CA, Miller NR, Mann RB. (1999). Disseminated histoplasmosis causing reversible gaze palsy and optic neuropathy. J Neuro-ophthalmology 19:140–143.
Phillips PH, Newman NJ, Lynn MJ. (1998). Optic neuritis in African Americans. Arch Neurol 55:186–192. Piccolo G, Franciotta DM, Camana C, et al. (1990). Devic’s neuromyelitis optica: long-term follow-up and serial
CSF findings in two cases. J Neurol 237:262–264.
Optic Neuritis |
59 |
Pierce EA, D’Amico DJ. (1993). Ocular toxoplasmosis: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Semin Ophthalmol 8:40–52.
Quicenco JI, Capparelli E, Sadun AA, et al. (1992). Visual dysfunction without retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 113:8–13.
Ramelli GP, Deonna T, Roulet E, et al. (1992). Transverse myelitis and optic neuromyelitis in children: apropos of 3 case reports. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 81:661–663.
Rawson MD, Liversedge LA, Goldfarb G. (1966). Treatment of acute retrobuibar neuritis with corticotrophin. Lancet 2:1044–1046.
Riedel P, Wall M, Grey A, et al. (1998). Autoimmune optic neuropathy. Arch Neurol 116:1121–1124.
Rinalduzzi S, Brusa A, Jones SJ. (2001). Variation of visual evoked potential delay to stimulation of central, nasal, and temporal regions of the macula in optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70:28–35.
Rizzo JF, Lessell S. (1988). Risk of developing multiple sclerosis after uncomplicated optic neuritis: a long term prospective study. Neurology 38:185–190.
Roarty JD, Fisher EJ, Nussbaum JJ. (1993). Long-term morbidity of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Ophthalmology 100:1685–1688.
Rodriguez M, Siva A, Cross SA, et al. (1995). Optic neuritis: a population based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology 45:244–250.
Ropper AH, Wijdicks EFM, Truax BT. (1991). Guillain-Barre´ Syndrome. Philadelphia, FA Davis.
Rose AS, Kuzma JW, Kurtzke JF, et al. (1970). Cooperative study in the evaluation of therapy in multiple sclerosis. ACTH vs. placebo—final report. Neurology 20:1–59.
Rose GE. (1991). Papillitis, retinal neovascularization and recurrent retinal vein occlusion in Toxoplasma retinochoroiditis: a case report with uncommon clinical signs. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol 19:155–157.
Rosenbaum JT, Simpson J, Neuwelt CM. (1997). Successful treatment of optic neuropathy in association with systemic lupus erythematosus using intravenous cyclophosphamide. Br J Ophthalmol 81:130–132.
Sadun AA, Pepose JS, Madigan MC, et al. (1995). AIDS-related optic neuropathy: a histological, virological and ultrastructural study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233:387–398.
Sakuma R, Fujihara K, Sato N, et al. (1999). Optic-spinal form of multiple sclerosis and anti-thyroid autoantibodies. J Neurol 246:449–453.
Salzman MB, Sood SK, Slavin ML, et al. (1992). Ocular manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.
Clin Infect Dis 14:1137–1139.
Sandberg-Wollheim M. (1975). Optic neuritis: studies on the cerebrospinal fluid in relation to clinical course in 61 patients. Acta Neurol Scand 52:167–178.
Sandberg-Wollheim M, Bynke H, Cronqvist S, et al. (1990). A long-term prospective study of optic neuritis: evaluation of risk factors. Ann Neurol 27:386–393.
Schneck ME, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G. (1997). Color vision defect type and spatial vision in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:2278–2289.
Schwartzman WA, Patnaik M, Angula FJ, et al. (1995). Bartonella (Rochalimaea) antibodies, dementia, and cat ownership among men infected with immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 21:954–959.
Schwartzman WA, Patnaik M, Barka NE, et al. (1994). Rochalimara antibodies in HIV associated neurologic disease. Neurology 44:1312–1316.
Sedwick LA. (1991). Optic neuritis. Neurol Clin 9:97–112.
Sellebjerg F, Christiansen M, Jensen J, Frederiksen JL. (2000). Immunological effects of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 7:281–289.
Sellebjerg FT, Frederkisen JT. Olsson T. (1994). Anti-myelin basic protein and anti-proteolipid protein antibodysecreting cells in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with acute optic neuritis. Arch Neurol 51:1032–1036.
Sellebjerg F, Madsen HO, Frederiksen JL, et al. (1995). Acute optic neuritis: myelin basic protein and proteolipid protein antibodies, affinity and the HLA system. Ann Neurol 38:943–950.
Sellebjerg F, Nielsen S, Frederiksen JL, Olesen J. (1999). A randomized, controlled trial of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis. Neurology 52:1479–1484.
Shayegani A, Odel JG, Kazim M, et al. (1996). Varicella-zoster virus retrobulbar optic neuritis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus. Am J Ophthalmol 112:586–588.
Sheth RD, Goulden KJ, Pryse-Phillips WE. (1993). The focal encephalopathies associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Can J Neurol Sci 20:319–323.
Silber MH, Willcox PA, Bowen RM, et al. (1990). Neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease) and pulmonary tuberculosis. Neurology 40:934–938.
Silberberg DH. (1993). Corticosteroids and optic neuritis. N Engl J Med 329:1808–1810.
60 Clinical Pathways in Neuro-Ophthalmology, second edition
Simon JH, McDonald WI. (2000). Assessment of optic nerve damage in multiple sclerosis using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 172(suppl 1):S23–S26.
Slamovits TL, Macklin R. (1991a). What to tell the patient with optic neuritis about multiple sclerosis. Surv Ophthalmol 36:47–50.
Slamovits TL, Rosen CE, Cheng KP, Striph GG. (1991b). Visual recovery in patients with optic neuritis and visual loss to no light perception. Am J Ophthalmol 111:209–214.
So¨derstro¨m M, Link H, Sun J-B, et al. (1994). Autoimmune T cell repertoire in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: T cells recognizing multiple myelin proteins are accumulated in cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:544–551.
So¨derstro¨m M, Link H, Xu Z, Fredriksson S. (1993). Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis: anti-MBP and anti-MBP peptide antibody-secreting cells are accumulated in CSF. Neurology 43:1215–1222.
So¨derstro¨m M, Ya-Ping J, Hillert J, Link H. (1998). Optic neuritis. Prognosis for multiple sclerosis from MRI, CSF, and HLA findings. Neurology 50:708–714.
Song A, Scott IU, Davis JL, Lam BL. (2002). Atypical anterior optic neuropathy caused by toxoplasmosis. Am J Ophthalmol 133:162–164.
Song HS, Wray SH. (1991). Bee sting optic neuritis. A case report with visual evoked potentials. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 11:45–49.
Sorensen TL, Frederiksen JL, Bronnum-Hansen H, Petersen HC. (1999). Optic neuritis as onset manifestation of multiple sclerosis. A nationwide, long-term survey. Neurology 53:473–478.
Staedt D, Kappos L, RohrbachE, Heun R, Ratzka M. (1990). Occurrence of MRI abnormalities in patients with isolated optic neuritis. Eur Neurol 30:305–309.
Steel DH, Waldock A. (1998). Measurement of the retinal nerve fibre layer with scanning laser polarimetry in patients with previous demyelinating optic neuritis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 64:505–509.
Stewart O, Chang B, Bradbury J. (1999). Simultaneous administration of hepatitis B and polio vaccines associated with bilateral optic neuritis. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1200–1201.
Straussberg R, Amir J, Cohen HA, et al. (1993). Epstein-Barr virus infection associated with encephalitis and optic neuritis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 30:262–263.
Sugita K, Ando M, Minamitani K, et al. (1991). Magnetic resonance imaging in a case of mumps postinfectious encephalitis with asymptomatic optic neuritis. Eur J Pediatr 150:773–775.
Sweeney BJ, Manji H, Gilson RJC, et al. (1993). Optic neuritis and HIV-1 infection. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56:705–707.
Thompson AJ, Kermode A, MacManus DG, et al. (1990). Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Br Med J 300:631–634.
Thompson AJ, Miller D, Youl B, et al. (1992). Serial gadolinium-enhanced MRI in relapsing=remitting multiple sclerosis of varying disease duration. Neurology 42:60–63.
Tomsak RL, Lystad LD, Katirji MB, et al. (1992). Rapid response of syphilitic optic neuritis to posterior subTenon’s steroid injection. J Clin Neuro-ophthalmol 12:6–7.
Topaloglu H, Berker M, Kansu T, et al. (1992). Optic neuritis and myelitis after booster tetanus toxoid vaccination.
Lancet 339:178–179.
Tornerup NR, Fomsgaard A, Nielsen NV. (2000). HSV-1-induced acute retinal necrosis syndrome presenting with severe inflammatory orbitopathy, proptosis, and optic nerve involvement. Ophthalmology 107:397–401.
Totan Y, Cekic O. (1999). Bilateral retrobulbar neuritis following measles in an adult. Eye 13:383–384.
Trobe JD. (1994). High-dose corticosteroid regimen retards development of multiple sclerosis in optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 112:35–36.
Trobe JD, Sieving PC, Guire KE, Fendrick AM. (1999). The impact of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial on the practices of ophthalmologists and neurologists. Ophthalmology 106:2047–2053.
van de Geijn EJ, Tukkie R, van Phillips LA, Punt H. (1994). Bilateral optic neuritis with branch retinal artery occlusion associated with vaccination. Doc Ophthalmol 86:403–408.
van Engelen BGM, Hommes OR, Pinckers A, et al. (1992). Improved vision after intravenous immunoglobulin in stable demyelinating optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 32:834.
Vaphiades MS, Lee AG. (1999). A bad eye and a sore lip. Surv Ophthalmol 44:148–152.
Vernant J-C, Cabre P, Smadje D, et al. (1997). Recurrent optic neuromyelitis with endocrinopathies: a new syndrome. Neurology 48:58–64.
Wakakura M, Mashimo K, Oono S, et al. (1999a). Multicenter clinical trial for evaluating methylprednisolone pulse treatment of idiopathic optic neuritis in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 43:133–138.
Wakakura M, Minei-Higa R, Oono S, et al. (1999b). Baseline features of idiopathic optic neuritis as determined by a multicenter treatment trial in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 43:127–132.
Optic Neuritis |
61 |
Wall M, Johnson CA, Kutzko KE, et al. (1998). Longand short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 116:53–61.
Warren KG, Catz I, Bauer C. (1988). Cerebrospinal fluid antibodies to myelin basic protein in acute idiopathic optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 23:297–299.
Warren KG, Catz I, Johnson E, Mielke B. (1994). Anti-myelin basic protein and anti-proteolipid protein specific forms of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 35:280–289.
Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. (1999). The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease). Neurology 53:1107–1114.
Winterkorn JMS. (1990). Lyme disease: neurologic and ophthalmologic manifestations. Surv Ophthalmol 35:191–204.
Wolf MD, Folk JC, Goeken NE. (1990). Acute posterior multifocal pigment epitheliopathy and optic neuritis in a family. Am J Ophthalmol 110:89–90.
Yamakawa K, Kuroda H, Fujihara K, et al. (2000). Familial neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome) with late onset in Japan. Neurology 55:318–320.
Yau TH, Rivera-Velasquez PM, Mark AS, et al. (1996). Unilateral optic neuritis caused by Histoplasma capsulatum in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 121:324–326.
Yen MY, Liu JH. (1991). Bilateral optic neuritis following bacille Calmette-Gue´rin (BCG) vaccination. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 11:246–249.
Yoshida Y, Saiga T, Takahashi H, Hara A. (1998). Optic neuritis and human T-lymphotropic virus type 1-associated myelopathy: a case report. Ophthalmologica 212:73–76.
This page intentionally left blank
