Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Clinical Ocular Pharmacology 5th edition_Bartlett, Jaanus_2008

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
13.42 Mб
Скачать

Table 11-14

Antifungal Drugs: Clinical Application, Side Effects, and Comments

Drug

Clinical Regimensa

Side Effects, Contraindications, and Comments

Natamycin

Topical: Commercially available 5% suspension

Well tolerated, less irritating than amphotericin B

 

One drop 6–8 times per day

Not effective for deep stromal infection

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown

Amphotericin B

Topical: 0.15–0.3% solution 1 drop q1h

Not commercially available as a topical formulation

 

Intracameral use: 5–10 mcg/0.1 ml

Good corneal penetration with topical use

 

Intravitreal use: 5–10 mcg/0.1 ml

Corneal toxicity increases with topical concentrations over 0.15%

 

Intravenous: 0.3–1 mg/kg qd

Marked tissue necrosis at injection site

 

 

Oral use not affective: poor ocular bioavailability

 

 

Side effects include nephrotoxicity, agranulocytosis, liver dysfunction, thrombocytopenia,

 

 

leukopenia, electrolyte imbalance, anemia, headache, nausea, vomiting, malaise, weight

 

 

loss, phlebitis, fever, chills; lipid formulations associated with less nephrotoxicity;

 

 

antagonism with miconazole

 

 

Pregnancy category B; lactation safety unknown

Ketoconazole

Topical: 1–5% suspension, depending on vehicle

Topical formulation not commercially available, must compound

 

Oral: 200–400 mg PO qd

Fungistatic activity, therapy response generally slow; inappropriate for severe or progressive

 

 

fungal disease

 

 

Side effects include adrenal insufficiency, hepatotoxicity, anaphylaxis, leukopenia,

 

 

thrombocytopenia, hepatic failure, nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, headache, lethargy,

 

 

somnolence, gynecomastia, papilledema

 

 

Many drug interactions exist including CYP3A4 substrates.

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown

Miconazole

Topical: 1% ophthalmic suspension 1 drop q1h

Topical side effects of burning, itching, tearing

 

Subconjunctival: 10 mg/0.5 ml

Not commercially available; both topical and subconjunctival formulations must be

 

 

compounded; IV brand discontinued in United States

 

 

Good ocular penetration with topical and subconjunctival use

 

 

Toxic conjunctival necrosis may occur with subconjunctival use

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown

Itraconazole

Topical: 1% suspension 1 drop q1h

Topical not effective for severe infections, penetrates cornea poorly; not commercially

 

Oral: 200 mg PO qd–bid

available: must be compounded

 

 

Penetrates all eye tissues poorly with oral administration

 

 

Side effects include hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal problems, hypokalemia, elevated

 

 

liver enzymes, rash, vasculitis, headache, fever, HTN, hypertriglyceridemia

 

 

Many drug interactions exist including CYP3A4 substrates.

 

 

Coadministration of itraconazole is contraindicated with multiple antiretrovirals

 

 

(refer to Table 11-12)

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown

Fluconazole

Topical: 2 mg/ml solution 1 drop q2h

Very good bioavailability, low toxicity

 

Oral: 100–400 mg PO qd–bid (adjust dose

Topical not commercially available; must be compounded

 

for renal impairment)

 

Drugs Infective-Anti 11 CHAPTER

Continued

211

Table 11-14

Antifungal Drugs: Clinical Application, Side Effects, and Comments—cont’d

Drug

Clinical Regimensa

Side Effects, Contraindications, and Comments

 

 

One of the best tolerated drugs. Side effects include gastrointestinal problems,

 

 

hepatotoxicity (rare), allergic rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, thrombocytopenia,

 

 

angioedema, agranulocytosis, headache, elevated liver enzymes

 

 

Increases concentrations of cyclosporine, warfarin, sulfonylureas, phenytoin, metformin

 

 

(risk of hypoglycemia), and others

 

 

Many drug interactions exist including CYP3A4 substrates.

 

 

Coadministration of terfenadine, and cisapride with multiple antiretrovirals

 

 

(refer to Table 11-2)

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation probably safe

Voriconazole

Oral: 200 mg bid

Excellent bioavailability

 

IV: 4 mg/kg q12h; may use 6 mg/kg q12 loading

Can increase concentrations of digoxin, warfarin, cyclosporine, and others

 

dose

Side effects include visual disturbances (blurred vision, photophobia, altered visual

 

 

perception), hepatitis, renal failure, liver failure, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, angioedema,

 

 

blood dyscrasias, fever, chills, headache, gastrointestinal symptoms, liver function test

 

 

elevations

 

 

Many drugs interactions exist including CYP3A4 substrates

 

 

Coadministration of voriconazole with sirolimus, rifampin, rifabutin, ergot alkaloids,

 

 

carbamazepine, and long-acting barbiturates is contraindicated

 

 

Coadministration of voriconazole is contraindicated with multiple antiretrovirals

 

 

(refer to Table 11-12)

 

IV 50 mg q24h; loading dose 70 mg × 1 on day 1

Pregnancy category D; lactation safety unknown

Caspofungin

Scant ocular treatment information

 

 

Side effects include pulmonary edema, blood dyscrasias, hypercalcemia, hepatotoxicity

 

 

(rare), gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, fever, chills, anemia, eosinophilia, hypokalemia,

 

 

liver function test elevations, infusion site reactions. Drug interaction with cyclosporine

 

 

and additional voriconazole.

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown. Coadministration of caspofungin is

 

 

contraindicated with multiple antiretrovirals (refer to Table 11-3)

Micafungin

Topical: 0.1% solution 1 drop q1 h while awake;

Topical not commercially available

 

reduce to 5 times a day after

Report of 3 cases of yeast keratitis treated successfully with topical micafungin

 

epithelialization

Side effects include anaphylaxis, thrombophlebitis, hepatic failure, renal failure, hemolytic

 

IV: 50–150 mg qd

anemia, phlebitis, injection site reaction, headache, leukopenia, nausea, hyperbilirubinemia,

 

 

hypokalemia, vasodilation, liver function test elevations, pruritus, facial swelling. Concurrent

 

 

use with nifedipine and sirolimus may increase the levels of these drugs.

 

 

Pregnancy category C; lactation safety unknown

Drugs Infective-Anti 11 CHAPTER 212

aVaries with site of infection, severity of infection, and fungal organism; adult doses.

CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

213

Table 11-15

Clinical and In Vitro Spectra of Activity for Antifungal Drugsa

 

Candida sp.

Aspergillus sp.

Fusarium sp.

Scedosporium sp.

Curvularia sp.

Amphotericin B1

+,+ 2

± 2

-2

-

+ 2, 3

Natamycin

±

±

+ 4, 5

±

+,+ 5

Flucytosine6

+

Resistant in vitro

-

Resistant in vitro

Resistant in vitro

 

(use with

 

 

 

 

 

amphotericin B)

 

 

±

+3

Miconazole

Insufficient data

Insufficient data

-

Ketoconazole

+ 7

± 8

± 8

-

+ 8

Itraconazole

+ 3, 7

+

±

- 3

+ 8

Fluconazole

+,+ 8

-3

-3

± 3

Resistant in vitro

Voriconazole

+

Susceptible in

Susceptible in

+

Susceptible in vitro

 

 

vitro

vitro

 

 

Caspofungin

Strong response

Susceptible in

Resistant in

Susceptible in vitro

Susceptible in vitro

 

in rabbit model

vitro

vitro

 

 

Micafungin

+ 3

Susceptible in

Resistant in

Insufficient data

Insufficient data

 

 

vitro

vitro

 

 

+, + strong response; + good response; ± variable response; - poor response.

aUsual clinical response, based on small numbers of published cases. Interpret with caution because there are exceptions. Clinical responses do not always agree with in vitro sensitivity results.

1Includes lipid formulations.

2Topical use.

3Limited data.

4Use in combination with oral ketoconazole, for deep lesions. 5Preferred therapy.

6Combination therapy indicated. Resistance develops with monotherapy.

7In combination with topical amphotericin B.

8Topical and/or oral administration.

subgroup of azole antifungals that were developed to provide an effective group of drugs with lower toxicity issues than amphotericin B. Ketoconazole, fungistatic in activity, has been largely replaced by itraconazole and other triazoles that have good broad-spectrum activity for many ocular fungi and less liver toxicity. Ketoconazole has very good activity against Candida albicans but spotty species dependent Aspergillus coverage. The response to therapy is generally slow, making this drug inappropriate for severe or progressing fungal disease. It has been used as a topical suspension in concentrations from 1% to 5% depending on the formulation. However, it is not commercially available.

Miconazole

Miconazole comes in topical (1% ophthalmic suspension), subconjunctival depot (10 mg/0.5 ml), and oral

(200–400 mg/day) formulations but is not commercially available now in any of these formulations. Miconazole is relatively broad spectrum and active against most yeast but has variable coverage of Aspergillus and Fusarium. Miconazole is generally well tolerated with topical and subconjunctival administration, but cases of corneal toxicity have been reported.

Itraconazole

Pharmacology

Please refer to the general pharmacology section for antifungal drugs.

Clinical Uses

Itraconazole is a broad-spectrum synthetic triazole that has good oral bioavailability and is less toxic than amphotericin B and ketoconazole.The solution has better bioavailability than the capsule and provides higher plasma concentration levels. Compared with fluconazole and ketoconazole, itraconazole penetrates all ocular tissues poorly when orally administered. Itraconazole can be used as a 1% ophthalmic suspension but is not very effective in treating severe fungal keratitis.

Side Effects

Itraconazole is generally well tolerated with oral administration with gastrointestinal symptoms as the most common reaction.

Contraindications

Itraconazole is contraindicated in patients who have shown hypersensitivity to the drug or its components.

214 CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

There is no information regarding cross-hypersensitivity between itraconazole and other azole antifungal agents. Caution should be used in prescribing itraconazole to patients with hypersensitivity to other azoles. Refer to Table 11-14 for drug interactions.

Fluconazole

Pharmacology

Please refer to the general pharmacology section for antifungal drugs.

Clinical Uses

Fluconazole has been used topically and in subconjunctival injection. Fluconazole, fungistatic in action, is mainly effective against yeast, including Candida and Cryptococcus, but has no clinically significant activity against molds, such as Aspergillus. Resistance has been developing, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Fluconazole has a bioavailability of about 90% with oral or intravenous administration and appears to penetrate well into the ocular fluids. Fluconazole has a relatively long half-life of approximately 30 hours. Fluconazole lacks the broad-spectrum coverage necessary to be effective against many of the most commonly encountered fungal organisms that cause endophthalmitis.

Side Effects

Fluconazole is one of the best tolerated antifungal drugs, with the most common complaint being gastrointestinal. Hepatotoxicity occurs only in a small number of patients.

Contraindications

Fluconazole is contraindicated in patients who have shown hypersensitivity to fluconazole or to any of its components. There is no information regarding crosshypersensitivity between fluconazole and other azole antifungal agents. Caution should be used in prescribing fluconazole to patients with hypersensitivity to other azoles. Refer to Table 11-14 for drug interactions.

Voriconazole

Pharmacology

Voriconazole exhibits dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. Voriconazole has 96% oral bioavailability and reaches peak plasma concentrations in 2 to 3 hours after oral administration. Please refer to the general pharmacology section for antifungal drugs.

Clinical Uses

Voriconazole is the first of the second-generation broad-spectrum triazoles approved by the FDA and the first antifungal agent since amphotericin B to be approved for first-line treatment of invasive aspergillosis.Voriconazole has now replaced amphotericin B as the treatment of choice for systemic Aspergillus infections. Voriconazole also has activity against Fusarium. It is a derivative of

fluconazole that shows activity to some fungi resistant to fluconazole.

Side Effects

Voriconazole is well tolerated after oral or intravenous administration.

Contraindications

Voriconazole is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to voriconazole or its components. There is no information regarding cross-sensitivity between voriconazole and other azole antifungal agents. Caution should be used when prescribing voriconazole to patients with hypersensitivity to other azoles. Refer to Table 11-14 for drug interactions.

Echinocandin Antifungal Drugs

Caspofungin

Pharmacology

Caspofungin has linear pharmacokinetics and a half-life of 9 to 11 hours, permitting once a day usage. Please refer to the general pharmacology section for antifungal drugs.

Clinical Uses

Caspofungin, the first FDA-approved echinocandin antifungal, is fungicidal in activity. Caspofungin has activity against a wide range of fungi, including all Candida species. Caspofungin shows activity against some azole-resistant organisms. An investigation showed that caspofungin and amphotericin B were synergistic or synergistic to additive for a least half of the Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates evaluated in vitro. Topical formulations are not available.

Side Effects

Very few drug interactions occur with the echinocandins, compared with the azoles. This is because echinocandins are not acted on by the major liver enzymes.

Contraindications

Caspofungin is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to any component of this product.

Micafungin

Pharmacology

Please refer to the general pharmacology section for antifungal drugs.

Clinical Uses

Micafungin has activity against Candida, including azoleresistant C. albicans. It has some activity against molds such as Aspergillus but no activity against Fusarium.

Side Effects

Refer to Table 11-14 for side effects.

Contraindications

Micafungin is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to any component of this product.

Anidulafungin

Anidulafungin is available as an intravenous infusion. It is fungicidal and effective against azoleand amphotericin B–resistant strains of Candida. Anidulafungin has a halflife of 24 hours and is the least protein bound of the echinocandins, at 84%. Anidulafungin does not need to be dose adjusted for hepatic or renal insufficiency and appears to not have any significant drug interactions.

ANTIPROTOZOAL DRUGS

Drugs Used to Treat Acanthamoeba Keratitis

Acanthamoeba keratitis is known to be difficult to diagnosis and to treat. Most patients are initially treated for viral, fungal, of bacterial keratitis before the diagnosis of

Acanthamoeba. Most Acanthamoeba infections are associated with contact lens wear (85% to 92%), but a smaller number are secondary to trauma. The incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis may be greater than 1 per 30,000 contact lens wearers per year as indicated by cohort studies and questionnaires. The frequency of Acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens wearer may be 1 per 10,000/year or higher.

Acanthamoeba are amoeba that can exist in two forms, as trophozoites or as cysts. Acanthamoeba are found in fresh water and soil, and the cystic form can be airborne. Not all strains of Acanthamoeba are pathogenic. Fifty percent of the apparently healthy adults tested had Acanthamoeba cultured from their nasal passages. Both trophozoites and cysts can adhere to the surface of unworn soft contact lenses. A break in the corneal epithelium can then allow an organism present on a contact lens to invade the eye tissues.

A retrospective review indicated that an early diagnosis (less than 18 days) results in a better final visual acuity and lessens the likelihood of needing penetrating keratoplasty. In the early stages of an infection, the trophozoite form predominates and is confined to the epithelium. As the infection progresses, the organism enters the stroma and encysts. The cystic form protects the organism from adverse conditions and is more resistant to treatment. Thus treatment failures are more frequent in advanced infections because the organism is deeper in the cornea and encysted. A biocidal agent must destroy both the trophozoite and cystic stages to be clinically effective. Although most agents are effective against trophozoites, not all agents are consistently effective against cysts.

A clinical suspicion of an Acanthamoeba infection is the critical first therapeutic step. Acanthamoeba can be diagnosed by eye smears, culture, tissue biopsy, polymerase chain reaction, and confocal microscopy.

CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

215

Unfortunately, no reliable readily available methods test the sensitivity of Acanthamoeba organisms to various antimicrobials.A significant study determined a poor correlation between the clinical outcomes of individual cases and the in vitro sensitivity results. This study concluded that there was no value in a technique that gives only minimum cidal values for 90% of the organisms, when it is essential to achieve a 100% pharmaceutical kill for successful treatment. There is also no method for definitively testing whether the organism has been eradicated from the cornea, except for stopping treatment and waiting for a recurrence.

There are no drugs specifically approved by the FDA to treat Acanthamoeba, necessitating the compounding of all medications.Antimicrobial agents are generally used in combination to increase the likelihood of a successful response. Treatment is often prolonged as the mean time to healing is about 100 days. A small number of patients develop Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis. It is not known whether this severe scleral inflammation is infective or immune mediated.

Randomized controlled studies have not been performed for Acanthamoeba treatments because of the difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of cases within a given time frame. Evidence-based information is scant, because many of the reports have been in the form of single case reports, studies of small numbers of patients, or retrospective reviews of patient records.

Two classes of antimicrobial agents are currently used to treat most Acanthamoeba infections, biguanides and diamidines. The biguanides include polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) and chlorhexidine (bis-biguanide), and the diamidines include propamidine (Brolene),hexamidine (Desomedine), and pentamidine. Published reports of the amoebicidal activities of the different agents vary, which may be due to different degrees of pathogenicity and virulence among different Acanthamoeba species or strains.

PHMBis generally the preferred agent, either in combination or as a monotherapy. Chlorhexidine has also been used as a monotherapy, but it does not appear to be as effective as when used in combination. Propamidine is used combination with a biguanide, PHMB, or chlorhexidine, because biguanides have the lowest minimum cysticidal concentrations in vitro and are generally more effective against Acanthamoeba cysts. PHMB is also used in combination with hexamidine, because some clinicians believe hexamidine is more efficacious and less toxic than propamidine. The use of neomycin should be avoided because cysts are almost always resistant (Table 11-16).

The greatest frequency of ocular toxicity has been reported with propamidine. Superficial punctate

PHMB has been used as a disinfectant in swimming pools and contact lens solutions.

Table 11-16

Agents used to treat Acanthamoeba

Agent(s)

Study Conclusions

PHMB

Five of 6 patients who failed to respond to other antiamoebic agents had complete resolution with 0.02% PHMB. Only PHMB was

 

cysticidal at low concentrations (Larkin et al.).

PHMB, chlorhexidine

Chlorhexidine showed greater anti-acanthamoeba activity with a mean minimum cysticidal concentration (MCC).a of 32.81 ug/ml

 

compared with 55.26 μg/ml for PHMB (Narasimhan et al.).

 

Both agents are generally time-dependent in action. Trophozoites were killed more rapidly than cysts and both agents had similar levels

 

of activity (Tirado-Angel et al.).

 

Chlorhexidine was more effective than PHMB in eradicating both trophozoites and cysts (Borazjani et al.,Wysenbeek et al.).

 

Seal et al. demonstrated a lower MCC for chlorhexidine than PHMB.

 

PHMB and chlorhexidine cause structural and membrane damage to trophozoites and cysts, and both agents appear to target the

 

Acanthamoeba plasma membrane (Khunkitti et al.).

PHMB, chlorhexidine,

PHMB and chlorhexidine were found to be the most successful cysticidal agents. Neomycin was reported to be ineffective against

neomycin, propamidine

Acanthamoeba cysts in vivo. The cysticidal effectiveness of propamidine was more variable than its trophozoite amoebicidal activity

 

(Elder et al.).

PHMB, propamidine,

PHMB and propamidine were found to be the most active agents against corneal Acanthamoeba isolates with MIC values < 10 mcg/mL.

chlorhexidine

Chlorhexidine had intermediate activity (Lim et al.).

 

Chlorhexidine as a monotherapy does not appear to be as effective as when used in combination with propamidine or PHMB

 

(Kosrirukvongs et al.).

Hexamidine, propamidine

Hexamidine demonstrated greater amoebicidal activity than propamidine. Perrine et al. recommended replacing propamidine with

 

hexamidine in Acanthamoeba treatment.

Chlorhexidine,

Twelve patients were successfully treated with the combination of topical chlorhexidine and propamidine (Seal et al.).

propamidine

 

Chlorhexidine,

Kitagawa and Oikawa successfully treated two patients with 0.02% chlorhexidine, natamycin, and debridement. No toxic effects were

natamycin

reported.

Oral itraconazole,

Ishibashi et al. reported successful treatment of 3 Acanthamoeba keratitis patients with oral itraconazole, topical miconazole, and

topical miconazole

debridement.

aMCC is the lowest concentration of a test solution that results in no cyst formation or growth of Acanthamoeba trophozoites after 7 days of incubation.

Drugs Infective-Anti 11 CHAPTER 216

keratopathy is common. Propamidine keratopathy was reported in two patients who presented with corneal microcysts in a pattern that followed the lacrimal lake contour.

Rarely, non-Acanthamoeba amebic keratitis may present. There is limited clinical evidence that nonacanthamoeba infections may respond to Acanthamoeba treatment. Two cases were reported of presumed non-Acanthamoeba keratitis in contact lens wearers in which the clinical presentation resembled Acanthamoeba keratitis. Nonacanthamoeba cysts (Vahlkampfia jugosa and Naegleria) were cultured from the contact lenses. One patient responded to treatment with PHMB 0.2% and propamidine 0.1% and the other patient was lost to follow-up.

Drugs Used to Treat Ocular

Toxoplasmosis

Toxoplasmosis is a recurrent, potentially blinding, disease caused by the obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Toxoplasmosis affects millions of people worldwide. Cats are the definitive host for the parasite but not the primary source of human infection. Environmental contamination of the soil, water, fruits and vegetables, and infection in other animals cause most human infections. Human infection may be either congenital or acquired, and acquired disease appears to be the most prevalent.

Once ingested, Toxoplasma invades the retina where it transforms into the cyst form. Primary and recurrent toxoplasmic retinitis is believed to occur when cysts rupture, releasing trophozoites that multiply in surrounding cells to cause retinal and choroidal inflammation. Ocular toxoplasmosis is self-limiting and usually resolves in 6 to 8 weeks without treatment. However, vision may be threatened if the macula or optic nerve is involved. Antimicrobial drugs are thought to limit proliferation of trophozoites during the active phase, thereby limiting the inflammatory response and resultant retinal damage. None of the currently available drugs destroys cysts in the eye tissues, so recurrent disease is not prevented. Please refer to Chapter 31 for the treatment of toxoplasmosis.

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abbasoglu OE, Hosal BM, Sener B, et al. Penetration of topical fluconazole in human aqueous humor. Exp Eye Res 2001;72:147–151.

Agarwal PK, Roy P, Das A, et al. Efficacy of topical and systemic itraconazole as a broad-spectrum antifungal agent in mycotic corneal ulcer. A preliminary study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001; 49(3):173–176.

Al-Nammari S, Robertson B, Ferguson C. Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Should a child with preseptal periorbital cellulitis be treated with intravenous or oral antibiotics? Emerg Med J 2007;24:128–129.

CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

217

Alexander BD,Wingard JR. Study of renal safety in amphotericin B lip complex-treated patients. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40(suppl 6): S414–S421.

American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred practice pattern. Bacterial keratitis. Retrieved 2006 from http:// www.AAO.org

Arikan S, Loranzo-Chin M, Paetznick V, et al. In vitro synergy of caspofungin and amphotericin B against Aspergillus and Fusarium spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46(1): 245–247.

Barron BA, Gee I, Hanuck WW, et al. Herpetic eye disease study. A controlled trial of oral acyclovir for herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1871–1882.

Beutner KR, Friedman DJ, Forszpaniak C, et al. Valaciclovir compared with acyclovir for improved therapy for herpes zoster in immunocompetent adults. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39(7):1546–1553.

Borazjani RN, May LL, Noble JA, et al. Flow cytometry for determination of the efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Acanthamoeba spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66(3):1057–1061.

Borderie VM, Meritet J, Chaumeil C, et al. Culture-proven herpetic keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty in patient with no previous history of herpes disease. Cornea 2004; 23(2):118–124.

Borruat FX, Buechi ER, Piguet B, et al. Prevention of ocular complications of herpes zoster ophthalmicus by adequate treatment with acyclovir. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1991; 198(5):358–360.

Brandt CR. Virulence genes in herpes simplex virus type 1 corneal infection. Curr Eye Res 2004;29(2–3):103–117.

Breit SM, Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, et al. Management of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis with voriconazole and caspofungin.Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139(1):135–140.

Buznach N, Dagan R, Greenberg D. Clinical and bacterial characteristics of acute bacterial conjunctivitis in children in the antibiotic resistance era. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24: 823–828.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines 2002. MMWR 2002; 51(No. RR-6):1–80.

Chosidow O, Drouault Y, Leconte-Vavriac F, et al. Famciclovir vs. aciclovir in immunocompetent patients with recurrent genital herpes infections: a parallel-groups, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 2001;144(4):818–824.

Claerhout I, Goegebuer A,Van Den Broecke, et al. Delay in diagnosis and outcome of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Graefe Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:648–653.

Colin J, Prisant O, Cochener B, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of valaciclovir and acyclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 1507–1511.

Colin J, Hoh HB, Easty DL, et al. Ganciclovir ophthalmic gel (Virgan; 0.15%) in the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis. Cornea 1997;16(4):393–399.

Collum LM, McGettrick P, Akhtar J, et al. Oral acyclovir (Zovirax) in herpes simplex dendritic corneal ulceration. Br J Ophthalmol 1986;70(6)435–438.

Danve-Szatanek C, Avmard M, Thouvenot D, et al. Surveillance network for herpes simplex virus resistance to antiviral drugs: 3-year follow up. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42(1): 242–249.

218 CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

Dau HS,AzuarapBlanco A, Hossain M, et al. Non-Acanthamoeba amebic keratitis. Cornea 1998;17(6):675–677.

Degreef H, Andrejevic L, Aoki F, et al. Famciclovir, a new oral antiherpes drug: results of the first controlled clinical study demonstrating its efficacy and safety in the treatment of uncomplicated herpes zoster in immunocompetent patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1994;p4(4):241–246.

DeJesus E,Wald A,Warren T, et al.Valacyclovir for the suppression of recurrent genital herpes in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. J Infect Dis 2003;188(7):1009–1016.

Donley TG, Smith RF, Roy B. Reduced oral contraceptive effectiveness with concurrent antibiotic use: a protocol for prescribing antibiotics to women of childbearing age. Compendium 1990;11:392–396.

Duggirala A, Sharma JJ, Nutheti R, et al. Activity of newer flouroquinolones against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria isolated from oculsr infections: an in vitro comparison. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:15–19.

Duguid IGM, Dart JKG, Morlet N, et al. Outcome of Acanthamoeba keratitis treated with polyhexamethyl biguanide and propamidine. Ophthalmology 1997;104(10): 1587–1592.

Dupont B. Overview of the lipid formulations of amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002;49(suppl S1):31–36.

Durand ML, Kim IK, D’Amico DJ, et al. Successful treatment of Fusarium endophthalmitis with voriconazole and Aspergillus endophthalmitis with voriconazole plus caspofungin. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(3):552–554.

Elder MJ, Kilvington S, Dart JKG. A clinicopathologic study of in vitro sensitivity testing and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol 1994;35(3):1059–1064.

Fife KH, et al. Valaciclovir versus acyclovir in the treatment of first-episode genital herpes infection. Results of an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. The Valaciclovir International Herpes Simplex Virus Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1997;24(8):481–486.

Frobert E, Ooka T, Cortay JC, et al. Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase mutations associated with resistance to acyclovir: a site-directed mutagenesis study. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2005;49(3):1055–1059.

Garcia-Valenzuela E, Song CD. Intracorneal injection of amphotericin B for recurrent fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1721–1723.

Gaynor BD, Chidambaram JD, Cevallos V, et al. Topical ocular antibiotics induce bacterial resistance at extraocular sites. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1097–1099.

Gebo KA, Kalvani R, Moore RD, et al. The incidence of, risk factors for, and sequelae of herpes zoster among HIV patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005;40(2):169–174.

Givner LB. Periorbital versus orbital cellulitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002;21:1157–1158.

Goldblum D, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, et al. Ocular distribution of intravenously administered lipid formulation of amphotericin B in a rabbit model. Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 46(12):3719–3723.

Grant DM. Acyclovir (Zovirax) ophthalmic ointment: a review of clinical tolerance. Curr Eye Res 1987;6(1):231–235.

Harding SP, Porter SM. Oral acyclovir in herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Curr Eye Res 1991;10(suppl):177–182.

Hariprasad SM, Mieler WF, Holz ER, et al. Determination of vitreous, aqueous, and plasma concentration of orally administered voriconazole in humans. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:42–47.

Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group 1. A controlled trial of oral acyclovir for the prevention of stromal keratitis or iritis in patients with herpes simplex virus epithelial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:703–712.

Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group 3. A controlled trial of oral acyclovir for iridocyclitis caused by herpes simplex virus. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114(9):1065–1072.

Herpetic Eye Disease Study. Acyclovir for the prevention of recurrent herpes simplex virus eye disease. N Engl J Med 1998;339:300–306.

Hillenkamp J, Reinhard T, Ross RS, et al. The effects of cidofovir 1% with and without cyclosporine A 1% as a topical treatment of acute adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis: a controlled clinical pilot study. Ophthalmology 2002;109(5): 845–850.

Hoang-Xuan T, Buchi ER, Herbort CP, et al. Oral acyclovir for herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Ophthalmology 1992;99(7): 1062–1070.

Hoh HB, Hurley C, Claoue C, et al. Randomized trial of ganciclovir and acyclovir in the treatment of herpes simplex dendritic keratitis: a multicenter study. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80(2):140–143.

Hou Y, Chen C, Wang I, et al. Recurrent herpetic keratouveitis following YAG laser peripheral iridotomy cornea 2004; 23:641–642.

Hovding G.A comparison between acyclovir and trifluorothymidine ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of epithelial dendritic keratitis. Acta Ophthalmol 1989;67(1):51–54.

Huff JC, Bean B, Balfour HH, et al. Therapy of herpes zoster with oral acyclovir. Am J Med 1988;29:84–89.

Hwang DG. Fluoroquinolone resistance in ophthalmology and the potential role for newer ophthalmic fluoroquinolones. Surv Ophthalmol 2004;49(suppl 2):S79–S83.

Ishibashi Y, Matsumoto Y, Kabata T, et al. Oral itraconazole and topical miconazole with debridement for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109(2):121–126.

Ito JI, Hooshmand-Rad R. Treatment of Candida infections with amphotericin B lipid complex. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40(suppl 6): S384–S391.

Jackson Breslin CW, Lorenzetti DW, et al. Treatment of herpes simplex keratitis: comparison of acyclovir and vidarabine. Can J Ophthalmol 1984;19(3):107–111.

Jain A, Rubin PAD. Orbital cellulitis in children. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2001;41:71–86.

Johns KJ, Head WS, O’Day DM. Corneal toxicity of propamidine. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106(1):68–69.

Kalavathy CM, Parmar P, Kaliamurthy J, et al. Comparison of topical itraconazole 1% with topical natamycin 5% for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis. Cornea 2005;24(4): 449–452.

Kana JS. Delayed trifluridine treatment of subepithelial corneal infiltrates.Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113(2):212–214.

Katusic D, Petricek I, Mandic Z, et al. Azithromycin vs doxycycline in the treatment of inclusion conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:447–451.

Kaushik S, Ram J, Brar GS, et al. Intracameral amphotericin B. Initial experience in severe keratomycosis. Cornea 2001; 20(7):715–719.

Khunkitti W Hann AC, Lloyd D, et al. Biguanide-induced changes in Acanthamoeba castellanii: an electron microscopic study. J Appl Microbiol 1998;84(1):53–62.

King BA, Geelhoed GC. Adverse skin and joint reactions associated with oral antibiotics in children: the role of cefaclor in

serum sickness-like reactions. J Paediatr Child Health 2003; 39:677–681.

Kitagawa K, Oikawa Y, Nakamura T, et al. A novel combination treatment of chlorhexidine gluconate, natamycin (primarin) and debridement for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2003;47:616–617.

Kosrirukvongs P, Wanachiwanawin D, Visvesvara GS, et al. Treating Acanthamoeba keratitis with chlorhexidine. Ophthalmology 1999;106(4):798–802.

Kuriakose T, Kuriakose T, Kothari M, et al. Intracameral amphotericin B injection in the management of deep keratomycosis. Cornea 2002;21(7):653–656.

Larkin DF, Kilvington S, Dart JK. Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis with polyhexamethylene biguanide. Ophthalmology 1992;99(2):185–191.

Lee GA, Gray TB, Dart JKG, et al. Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis. Treatment with systemic immunosuppression. Ophthalmology 2002;109(6):1178–1182.

Leibovitch I, Lai TF, Senarath L, et al. Infectious keratitis in South Australia: emerging resistance to cephazolin. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:23–26.

Leibowitz HM. Clinical evaluation of ciprofloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution for treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112(suppl):S34–S47.

Levy J, Lapid-Gortzak R, Klemperer I, et al. Herpes simplex virus keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2005;21(4):400–402.

Lim L, Coster DJ, Badenoch PR, et al.Antimicrobial susceptibility of 19 Australian corneal isolates of Acanthamoeba. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;28:119–124.

Mah FS. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: new topical agents in the war on ocular bacterial infections.Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:316–320.

Malvy D, Treilhaud M, Boues S, et al. A retrospective, casecontrol study of acyclovir resistance in herpes simplex virus. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41(3):320–326.

Marangon FB, Miller D, Giaconi JA, et al. In vitro investigation of voriconazole susceptibility for keratitis and fungal pathogens. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137(5):820–825.

Marsh RJ, Cooper M. Double-masked trial of topical acyclovir and steroids in the treatment of herpes zoster ocular inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75(9):542–546.

Mathers WD. Acanthamoeba. A difficult pathogen to evaluate and treat. Cornea 2004;23(4):325.

Mathers WD, Nelson SE, Lane JL, et al. Confirmation of confocal microscopy diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis using polymerase chain reaction analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118: 178–183.

Matsumoto Y. Dogru M, Goto E, et al. Successful topical application of a new antifungal agent, micafungin, in the treatment of refractory fungal corneal ulcers. Cornea 2005;24(6): 748–753.

McCulley JP, Binder PS, Kaufman HE, et al. A double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of acyclovir vs. idoxuridine for treatment of epithelial herpes simplex keratitis. Ophthalmology 1982;89(10):1195–1200.

McCulley JP, Shine WE. Changing concepts in the diagnosis and management of blepharitis. Cornea 2000;19:650–658.

Mills R. Controversies in ophthalmology.View 1: corneal scraping and combination antibiotic therapy is indicated. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1167–1169.

Morlet N, Daniell M.View 2: empirical fluoroquinolone therapy is sufficient initial treatment. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:1169–1172.

CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

219

Narasimhan S, Madhaven HN, Therese KL. Development and application of an in vitro susceptibility test for Acanthamoeba species isolated from keratitis to polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine. Cornea 2002;21(2): 203–205.

Neoh C, Harding SP, Saunders D, et al. Comparison of topical and oral acyclovir in early herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Eye 1994;8(6):688–691.

Nesburn AB, Lowe GH, Lapoff NJ, et al. Effect of topical trifluridine on Thygeson’s superficial punctate keratitis. Ophthalmology 1984;91(10):1188–1192.

O’Day DM, Robinson R, Head WS. Efficacy of antifungal agents in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983; 24:1098–1102.

Panda A, Sharma N,Angra SK, et al. Topical fluconazole therapy of Candida keratitis. Cornea 1996;5(4):373–375.

Parmar P, Salman A, Kalavathy CM, et al. Comparison of topical gatifloxacin 0.3% and ciprofloxacin 0.3% for the treatment of bacterial keratitis.Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:282–286.

Perrine D, Chenu JP, Georges P, et al. Amoebicidal efficiencies of various diamidines against two stains of Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39(2): 339–342.

Pharmakakis NM, Andrikopoulos GK, Papdadopoulos GE, et al. Does identification of the causal organism of corneal ulcers influence the outcome. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003; 13:11–17.

Pichichero ME. A review of evidence supporting the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation for prescribing cephalosporin antibiotics for penicillin-allergic patients. Pediatrics 2005;115:1048–1057.

Polcicova K. Herpes keratitis in the absence of anterograde transport of virus for sensory ganglia to the cornea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102(32):11462–11467.

Rao SK, Madhaven HN, Rao G, et al. Fluconazole in filamentous fungal keratitis. Cornea 1997;16(6):700.

Remeijer L, Maertzdorf J, Buitenwerf J, et al. Corneal herpes simplex virus type 1 superinfection in patients with recrudescent herpetic keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43(2):358–363.

Roth DB, Flynn HW. Antibiotic selection in the treatment of endophthalmitis: the significance of drug combinations and synergy. Surv Ophthalmol 1997;41:395–401.

Ruter T, Cockerham KP. A single case report of successful treatment of periorbital zygomycosis (mucormycoses) with posoconazole.Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(I):187–188.

Seal D, Hay J, Kirkness C, et al. Successful medical therapy of Acanthamoeba keratitis with topical chlorhexidine and propamidine. Eye 1996;10(4):413–421.

Seal DV. Acanthamoeba keratitis update—incidence, molecular epidemiology and new drugs for treatment. Eye 2003; 17:893–905.

Shama S, Garg P, Rao GN. Patient characteristic, diagnosis, and treatment of non-contact lens related Acanthamoeba keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:1103–1108.

Shen M, Lin H, Lee SS, et al. Double-blind, randomized, acyclovircontrolled, parallel-group trial comparing the safety and efficacy of famciclovir and acyclovir in patients with uncomplicated herpes zoster. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2004; 37:75–81.

Shin YK, Cai G,Weinberg A, et al. Frequency of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens and laboratory isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39(3):913–917.

220 CHAPTER 11 Anti-Infective Drugs

Solomon AW, Holland MJ, Alexander ND, et al. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1962–1971.

Sonego-Krone S, Sanchez-DiMartino D, Ayala-Lugo R, et al. Clinical results of topical fluconazole for the treatment of filamentous fungal keratitis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005.

Sotozono C, Inagaki K, Fujita A, et al. Methicillin-resistant

Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis infections in the cornea. Cornea 2002; 21:S94–S101.

Sozen E, Avunduck AM, Akyol N. Comparison of efficacy of oral valaciclovir and topical acyclovir in the treatment of herpes simplex keratitis: a randomized clinical trial. Chemotherapy 2006;52(1):29–31.

Steingrimsdottir H. Bioavailability of aciclovir after oral administration of aciclovir and its prodrug valaciclovir to patient with leukopenia after chemotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44(1):207–209.

Tabery HM. Healing of recurrent herpes simplex corneal epithelial lesions treated with topical acyclovir. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79(3):256–261.

The Ofloxacin Study Group. Ofloxacin monotherapy for the primary treatment of microbial keratitis. A double-masked, randomized, controlled trial with conventional dual therapy. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1902–1909.

Tirado-Angel J, Gabriel MM,Wilson LA, et al. Effects of polyhexamethylene biguanide and chlorhexidine on four species of Acanthamoeba in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1996;15(2):225–228.

Tu EY, McCartney DL, Beaty RF, et al. Successful treatment of resistant ocular fusariosis with posaconazole (SCH-56592). Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:222–227.

Tyring S, Belanger R, Bezwoda W, et al. A randomized, doubleblind trial of famciclovir versus acyclovir for the treatment of localized dermatomal herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients. Cancer Invest 2001;19(1):13–22.

Tyring S, Engst R, Corriveau C, et al. Famciclovir for ophthalmic zoster: a randomized aciclovir controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(5):576–581.

Tyring S, Barbarash Ra, Nahlik JE, et al. Famciclovir for the treatment of acute herpes zoster. Effects on acute disease and postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial.Ann Intern Med 1995;123(2):89–96.

Tyring SK, Douglas JM, Corey L, et al. A randomized, placebocontrolled comparison of oral valacyclovir and acyclovir in

immunocompetent patients with recurrent genital herpes infections. The Valaciclovir International Study Group. Arch Dermatol 1998;134(2):185–191.

Tyring SK, Beutner KR, Tucker BA, et al. Antiviral therapy for herpes zoster. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of valacyclovir and famciclovir therapy in immunocompetent patients 50 years and older. Arch Fam Med 2000;9: 863–869.

Tyring SK, Diaz-Mitoma F, Shafran SD, et al. Oral famciclovir for the suppression of recurrent genital herpes: the combined data from two randomized controlled trials. J Cutan Med Surg 2003;7(6):449–454.

Uchoa UBC, Rezende RA, Carrasco MA, et al. Long-term acyclovir use to prevent recurrent ocular herpes simplex infection. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121(12):1702–1704.

Udell IJ. Trifluridine-associated conjunctival cicatrisation. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99(3):363–364.

Van Rooij J, Rijneveld WJ, Remeijer L, et al. Effect of oral acyclovir after penetrating keratoplasty for herpetic keratitis: a placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(10):1916–1919.

Velicer CM, Heckbert SR, Lampe JW, et al. Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2004;291(7):827–835.

Wood MJ, Johnson RW, McKendrick MW, et al. A randomized trial of acyclovir for 7 days or 21 days with and without prednisolone for treatment of acute herpes zoster. N Engl J Med 1994;330(13):896–900.

Wood MJ, Shukla S, Fiddian AP, et al. Treatment of acute herpes zoster: affect of early (<48 h) versus late (48–72 h) therapy with acyclovir and valaciclovir on prolonged pain. J Infect Dis 1998;178(suppl 1):S81–S84.

Wroblewski KJ, Pasternak JF, Bower KS, et al. Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy in the United States army and navy. Ophthalmology 2006;113:520–525.

Wu Z, Yiug H,Yiu S,et al.Fungal keratitis caused by Scedosporium apiospermun. Report of two cases and review of treatment. Cornea 2002;21(5):519–523.

Wysenbeek YS, et al. The reculture technique. Individualizing the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea 2000; 19(4):464–467.

Yee RW, Cheng CJ, Meenakshi S, et al. Ocular penetration and pharmacokinetics of topical fluconazole. Cornea 1997; 16(1):64–71.

Yilmaz S, Maden A. Severe fungal keratitis treated with subconjunctival fluconazole. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(3):454–458.

Соседние файлы в папке Английские материалы