- •List of Authors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •1.1 Burns for Doctors in Antiquity
- •1.1.1 Chemical Burns Since Antiquity
- •1.1.4 Conclusion
- •1.2 Modern History of the Chemical Burns
- •1.2.2 Start of Medical Treatment
- •1.2.4 Rinsing Therapy
- •1.2.5 Classification of Eye Burns
- •1.2.6 Specific Treatment Options
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.2.1 Individual Publications/Case Series
- •2.2.3 US Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
- •2.3 Etiology
- •2.3.1 Work-Related Injury
- •2.3.2 Deliberate Chemical Assault
- •2.3.3 Complications of Face Peeling
- •2.3.4 Burn Center/Hospital Studies
- •2.4 Involved Chemicals
- •2.5 Conclusions
- •References
- •3.1 From Chemistry to Symptoms
- •3.1.1 What Is a Chemical Burn?
- •3.1.3 Extent of the Matter
- •3.2 The Chemical Agent
- •3.2.2.1 Acidic Function
- •3.2.2.2 Basic Function
- •3.2.2.3 Oxidizing Function
- •3.2.2.4 Reduction Function
- •3.2.2.5 Solvent Function
- •3.2.2.6 Chelating Function or Complexation
- •Energy Scale of Chelation Reactions
- •3.2.2.7 Alkylation Reaction
- •Reactivity Scale for Alkylating Agents
- •3.2.3 Modulation of the Expression of the Reactivity of a Molecule
- •3.2.3.1 Acetic Acid and Its Derivatives
- •3.2.3.2 Hydrofluoric Acid
- •3.2.3.3 Phenol
- •3.2.3.4 Methylamines Series
- •3.2.3.5 Last Illustration: Acrolein
- •3.2.4.1 Acid–Base Scale
- •3.2.4.3 Scales of Energy Level
- •3.3 Constituents of the Tissues: Which Are the Biological and Biochemical Targets?
- •3.4 The Mechanisms of the Chemical Burn During the Contact Between the Aggressor and the Eye
- •3.4.3 Key Parameters of Chemical Burns
- •Solid Form
- •Viscosity
- •Exothermic Reaction
- •Titanium Tetrachloride
- •Trichloromethylsilane
- •Boron Trifluoride
- •Sulfuric Acid
- •Concentration of the Chemical
- •Phenomenon of the Diffusion of Corrosives in Relation with Their Concentration
- •Time of Contact
- •Temperature
- •Pressure
- •3.5 Practical Conclusions in Order to Manage the Optimal Chemical Decontamination of an Eye
- •3.5.2 Consequences of a Passive Washing: A Longer Time of Action
- •3.5.3 The Concept of Active Wash
- •3.6 What is Now the Extent of Our Knowledge About Ocular Chemical Burns?
- •References
- •4: Histology and Physiology of the Cornea
- •4.1 Corneal Functions
- •4.2 Anatomy Reminder
- •4.3 Histology
- •4.3.1 The Epithelium and Its Basement Membrane
- •4.3.1.1 The Lacrymal Secretion
- •4.3.1.2 The Corneal Epithelium
- •4.3.1.3 The Superficial Cells
- •4.3.1.4 The Intermediate Cells
- •4.3.1.5 Basal Cells
- •4.3.1.6 The Basement Membrane
- •4.3.2 Bowman’s Membrane
- •4.3.3 The Stroma
- •4.3.3.1 Keratocytes
- •4.3.3.2 The Collagen Lamellae
- •4.3.3.3 Ground Substance
- •4.3.3.4 Other Cells
- •4.3.4 Descemet’s Membrane
- •4.3.5 The Endothelium
- •4.3.6 The Limbus
- •4.4 Vascularization
- •4.5 Innervation
- •4.6 Factors of the Corneal Transparency
- •4.6.1 The Collagen Structure
- •4.6.2 The Proteoglycans Function
- •4.6.3 The Absence of Vascularization
- •4.6.4 The Scarcity of Cells in the Stroma
- •4.6.5 The Regulation of the Hydration
- •4.6.6.1 The Limbus
- •4.6.6.2 The Stroma
- •4.6.7 Action of the Intraocular Pressure
- •References
- •5.1 Physiology of the Cornea
- •5.1.1 Eye Burns Physiological Barriers
- •5.1.3 Physiology of Local Decontamination
- •5.1.5 Limits between Irritation and Burn
- •5.1.6 Eye Burns
- •5.2 Pathophysiology of Eye Burns1
- •5.2.1 Types of Burns and Eye Irritation
- •5.2.2 Mechanisms of Corneal Burns
- •5.2.2.1 Contact Mechanisms
- •5.2.2.2 Thermal Contact
- •Particles
- •Hot Fluids
- •Steam
- •Liquid Metals
- •Cold Gazes
- •5.2.2.3 Eye Burns with Chemically Active Foreign Bodies
- •5.2.2.4 Eye Burns with Chemically Reactive Fluids
- •Alkali
- •Acids
- •Peroxides
- •Hydrofluoric Acid
- •Detergents/Solvents
- •5.2.3 Influence of Osmolarity
- •5.2.4 Penetration Characteristics
- •5.2.5 Cellular Survival
- •5.2.6 Release of Inflammatory Mediators
- •References
- •6: Rinsing Therapy of Eye Burns
- •6.1 Important
- •6.3 Osmolar Effects in Rinsing Therapy
- •6.3.1 Types of Irrigation Fluids
- •6.4 Effect of Irrigation Fluids
- •6.5 High End Decontamination
- •6.5.2 Hydrofluoric Acid Decontamination
- •6.6 Side Effects of Rinsing Solutions in the Treatment of Eye Burns
- •6.7 Our Expectations
- •References
- •7: The Clinical of Ocular Burns
- •7.1 Few Reminders
- •7.1.1 Anatomy Reminder
- •7.1.2 Physiology Reminder
- •7.2.1.2 Ulcer of the Cornea
- •7.2.1.3 Edema of the Cornea
- •7.2.3 The Initial Sketch
- •7.2.4.1 Signs of Alteration of the Conjunctiva
- •7.2.4.2 Signs of Intraocular Lesions
- •7.2.4.3 Extraocular Signs
- •7.3 Clinical Examination of the Evolution of Chemical Eye Burns
- •7.3.1 Benign Ocular Burns
- •7.3.2 Serious Ocular Burns
- •7.3.2.1 Complications on the Ocular Surface
- •Corneal Nonhealing
- •Other Complications on the Ocular Surface
- •7.3.2.2 Endocular Complication
- •Bibliography
- •8: Surgical Therapeutic of Ocular Burns
- •8.1 Surgical Treatment of Ocular Burns
- •8.1.3 Tenon’s Plastics
- •8.1.4 The Conjunctival Transplantation
- •8.1.6 The Transplantation of Limbus
- •8.1.6.1 Exeresis of the Conjunctival Pannus
- •8.1.6.2 The Limbus Autograft
- •8.1.6.3 The Limbus Allograft
- •8.1.8 Keratoplasties
- •8.1.8.1 Big Diameter Transfixion Keratoplasty
- •8.1.8.3 The Deep Lamellar Keratoplasty
- •8.1.8.4 The Big Diameter Lamellar Keratoplasty
- •8.1.8.5 The Keratoplasty with Architectonic Goal
- •8.1.10 Keratoprosthesis
- •8.2 Surgical Treatment of Eyelid Burns
- •8.3 Conclusion
- •References
- •9: Emergency Treatment
- •9.3.1 In Occupational Environments
- •9.3.3 Industrial Accidents
- •9.3.4 Attacks
- •9.3.5 Lack of Initial Care
- •9.4 Organizing the Emergency Chain
- •9.5.1 Emergency Chain Definition
- •9.5.2 Safety Obligations
- •9.6 Which Care Chain for Optimum Management of Chemical Eye Burns?
- •9.6.1 Immediate Care by “Nonspecialists”
- •9.6.3.1 Develop a Protocol Which Must Be Simple in Every Aspect
- •9.6.3.2 Training
- •9.6.3.3 Necessary Specialized Supervision
- •Index
68 |
5 Physiopathology of the Cornea and Physiopathology of Eye Burns |
|
|
foreign bodies that are subject of the typical ironcontaining foreign body touching the eye in all types of metal processing professions. The process is an initial mechanical attachment of a hot and high surface metallic foreign body to the corneal or conjunctival surface. Next, an ionic dissolving of iron from the surface of the particle and under oxygen exposure on the eye surface leads to the formation of rust [19] that moves into the tissue and forms the typical aspect around the particles. This process might, if removal is delayed, result in complete dissolving of the particle and severe inflammation triggered by iron oxide [20].
Another foreign body that typically interferes in eye burns is calcium oxide in any form like fluid concrete to fresh mixtures of CaO (Calcium oxide) with water. The reactive CaO dissolves with the water being attracted from the eye into Ca++ with additional hydroxyl ions. The saponification of the tissues by the alkali results in the diffusion of the foreign body into the tissue with deep corneal foreign body, difficult to remove [21]. All other known bioactive foreign bodies usually, more or less, follow these two different reaction types.
5.2.2.4 Eye Burns with Chemically Reactive Fluids
Alkali
Alkali is a frequent cause of eye burns as again confirmed in a recent study of Midelfarth [22]. Alkali reacts with the tissue surface by concentration and time-dependent dissolution of the lipid membranes of epithelial cells; the chemical mechanism is saponification of lipids with loss of all membranous barriers. Lipid saponification of membranous lipids starts at a pH over 11 [23].
The penetration into the tissue follows the initial breakdown of the epithelial barrier. This results in an immediate and strong edema of the conjunctiva, known as chemosis, due to a water influx from the surrounding tissue, vascular leakage, tears, and applied fluids. The cornea itself loads up with ions to a measured osmolarity of 1,830 mOsmol/kg after a 1 mol NaOH burn for 30 s [24]. The penetration of strong alkali has been systematically tested on sodium hydroxide by means of evaluation of the anterior chamber pH. This pH change typically occurs within 2 min after exposure of the corneal surface. The change of the cornea
shows immediate swelling of the corneal tissue in an order of magnitude of 20%, as published by Kompa et al in 2000. Increasing opacity of the cornea is a result of the tissue edema and of the change of the fibrillary structure of the collagen.
Acids
Acids act on the organic tissues when in a range of pH under 5. The free hydrogen ion is highly reactive and causes severe coagulation of proteins with superficial and deep ulceration if the excess of acid is high enough. The propagation of acids into the tissue is less fast than that of alkali. In case of hydro sulfuric acid, we found very fast propagation of the acid into the anterior chamber. We believe that in highly concentrated acids, the shrinkage of the tissue allows faster diffusion [25].
Peroxides
Peroxides react by free electron transfer from one molecule to the next. This gives typically slower damage characteristics. The body is quite used to decontaminate free radicals by means of the superoxide dismutase [26]; the system consists of glutathione, tocopherol, and ascorbic acid with its regeneration by means of the glutathione peroxidase. Further, the enzyme catalase is highly reactive toward hydrogen peroxide and its decontamination [27]. If this system is exhausted, the damage of any chemical structure results in membrane lysis, DNA strain breaks, and protein damage; this causes a delayed onset of necrosis which is commonly known on the eye of contact lens wearers forgetting to neutralize their 3% hydrogen peroxide containing cleaning solutions. The onset of symptoms is late, from 6 h to 3 days after exposure, being proven by Maurer et al. [28] in their experimental exposure on rabbits (Fig. 5.13).
Sometimes severe damage of the cornea can occur [29, 30]. The conjunctival damage is mostly low due to the good vascularization and fast repair by means of blood refilling of the protective mechanisms.
We found severe endothelial and stromal damage after exposure to hydrogen peroxide with a defined 10 mL exposure of a 7 mm diameter on the cornea in the EVEIT model. These exposures lead in all cases to a dose-dependent endothelial dysmorphy in lower
5.2 Pathophysiology of Eye Burns |
69 |
|
|
concentrations and to endothelial necrosis in higher concentrations. The severity of the damage can be
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
judged by the epithelial necrosis with a nonhealing |
|
|
|
Sodium perborate |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
corneal erosion in the EVEIT model (Fig. 5.14). |
||
|
|
|
Sodium hydroxide |
|
|
||
score |
60 |
|
|
|
Endothelial defects of ex vivo corneas at different |
||
|
10% Hydrogen peroxide |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
15% Hydrogen peroxide |
|
|
time points after exposure to various concentrations of |
||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
H2O2 are shown in Fig. 5.15. The ordinate shows the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
score of epithelial defects. The bars over the abscissa |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
give the mean values and standard deviations, from left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to right with exposure to 1.5, 3, 6, and 12% H2O2, |
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
respectively, for each concentration of H2O2. The time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
points zero mark the state immediately after applica- |
|
3h 1D 3D 7D |
|
14D |
21D |
28D |
35D |
tion of H2O2, then the healing progress or failure on |
|
|
|
|
Time |
|
|
day 2 and 7 is presented. Each bar represents the mean |
value of n = 3 individual ex vivo corneas; no dose
Fig. 5.13 Corneal exposure to peroxides |
responses, but increasing damage with time. |
|
|
5 |
H2O2 epithelial healing in dose response exposure |
|
Fig. 5.14 Epithelial healing after exposure to H2O2
Fig. 5.15 Endothelial defects of ex vivo corneas at different time points after exposure to various concentrations of H2O2
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0-4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
graded |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
defect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Epithelial |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
H2O2−12 H2O2−12 H2O2−12 |
|
H2O2 |
H2O2 |
H2O2 |
H2O2 3 H2O2 3 H2O2 3 |
H2O2 6 H2O2 6 H2O2 6 |
|
|
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
|
day 0 |
day 2 |
day 7 |
Type of exposure and day of measurement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
4 |
|
|
H2O2 endothelium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
damage |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Endothlial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2O2 |
H2O2 |
H2O2 |
H2O2 3 H2O2 3 H2O2 3 |
H2O2 6 H2O2 6 H2O2 6 |
H2O2 12 H2O2 12 H2O2 12 |
|
1.5% |
1.5% |
1.5% |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
% day 0 % day 2 % day 7 |
|
day 0 |
day 2 |
day 7 |
Type of exposure and day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
