Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Carbonic Anhydrase Its Inhibitors and Activators_Supuran, Scozzafava, Conway_2004
.pdf
Development of Sulfonamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MeOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MeOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
HCONH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) 12NHCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTs |
LiS |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
S |
|
(iI) (CF3CO)2O |
|
S |
S |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
4.145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
toluene |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.147 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.148 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OH |
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
LiAIH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
epimerization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H2O2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
toluene |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
S |
|
1NH2SO4 |
S |
S |
Na2WO4 |
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.149a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.149b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHAc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHCOCH3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHCOCH3 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
CH3CN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CISO3H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2CI |
|
|
NH3 |
|
|
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
H |
SO |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2CI2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THF |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
4.151 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHEt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BH |
.Me |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HCI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
MK-507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
THF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEME 4.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NHEt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
R2 |
|
N |
R1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
MeO(CH2)3 |
S |
|
|
S |
|
S |
NH2 |
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R |
S |
|
S |
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
O |
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.154 |
|
|
|
|
4.155: R = Me, Et, Pr, allyl, MeO-(CH2)3, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NR1R2= 4-morpholinyl; N(CH2CH2OMe)2, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
novel CAIs contained either moieties protonable at endocyclic nitrogen atoms (such as pyridineor quinoline rings 4.156 to 4.161) or at amino groups belonging to amino acids and some of their derivatives (such as in tails derived from glycine, β- alanine, GABA, sarcosine, creatine and glycyl-glycine moieties of types 4.162 to 4.167), polyaminopolycarboxylic acid tails (of types 4.168 to 4.174), protonated by acids and ionized by bases as well as perfluoroalkyl/aryl moieties (which are not protonable at pH values in the neutral range, of types 4.175 to 4.180). The water solubility of the first type of such derivatives is assured by formation of salts with hydrochloric, trifluoroacetic or triflic acid, or by formation of sodium salts for derivatives possessing carboxylic acid moieties (tails of types 4.160 and 4.168 to 4.174). The perfluoroderivatives (incorporating tails 4.175 to 4.180) constitute a special case that is discussed later. The tail was generally attached to the sulfonamide scaffold as an amide (CONH), ester (COOR), sulfonamide (SO2NH) or imide moiety
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbonic Anhydrase |
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
||
|
NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NH2 |
|
|
NHNH2 |
|
A |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
D |
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
CI |
CH2NH2 |
|
|
CH2CH2NH2 |
|
|
NH2 |
|
|
NH2 |
||
|
E |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
G |
|
|
H |
SO2NH2 |
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
SO2NH2 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
H2N |
|
|
CI |
|
|
|
|
Br |
|
I |
CI |
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
||
NH2 |
|
NH2 |
|
|
|
CI |
|
|
NH2 |
||
|
I |
|
J |
|
|
|
K |
|
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
H3C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
|
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
H2N |
S |
SO2NH2 |
HN |
S |
SO2NH2 |
H2NCH2CH2CONH |
S |
SO2NH2 |
|||
|
|
M |
|
|
N |
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
H2N |
S |
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
HO |
S |
SO2NH2 |
||
|
|
P |
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOCH2CH2O |
S |
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH2OH |
|
|
CH2CH2OH |
|
|
R |
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
T |
|
|
O |
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
H3C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
N |
N |
|||
|
|
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
||||
H2N |
|
S N |
S |
|
|
H2N |
S N |
S |
SO2NH2 |
||
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
V |
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
SO2NH2 |
H2N |
|
S N |
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
H2N |
S N |
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
W |
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
N
NH2
Y
FIGURE 4.2 The tail approach.
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
Development of Sulfonamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors |
115 |
(in one case, the tail 4.161 was obtained by reaction of pyridine-2,3-dicarboxylic acid anhydride with amino-sulfonamides), leading to phthalimide-like compounds (Scozzafava et al. 1999b). Thus, a sulfonamide CAI obtained by the tail approach is generally conveniently described by a figure (corresponding to the tail moiety) and a letter (corresponding to the sulfonamide scaffold to which the tail has been attached, through a carboxamide, ester or secondary sulfonamide bond). For instance, 4.158C should be the isonicotinoylamido derivative of sulfanilamide or 4.162M the glycinamido derivative of 5-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole-2-sulfonamide (Scozzafava et al. 1999a, 1999b, 2000c, 2001, 2002; Supuran et al. 1999b, 1999c, 2000a; Menabuoni et al. 1999; Mincione et al. 1999; Barboiu et al. 1999; Casini et al. 2001).
The main advantages of this approach over the ring approach are that it is much simpler and allows a parallel type synthesis easily, so that a large number of different derivatives can be prepared and their physicochemical properties modulated in such a way as to assure possession of the desired pharmacological properties. By choosing different tails, it is possible to attain the much desired water solubility of these CAIs (as salts of acids or bases) at pH values around neutrality, thus avoiding the irritation problems observed with the strongly acidic dorzolamide solutions. Many of the protonatable moieties of tails 4.156 to 4.174 possess pKa values of 6 to 7, which is quite advantageous for the solubility of these derivatives at pH values in the almost neutral range. Furthermore, some of these derivatives also contain carboxylic acid moieties in addition to the protonatable amino moieties, which provide aqueous solutions as their sodium salts with pH values of 7.0 to 7.5. Such solutions never irritate the eyes of experimental animals (Scozzafava et al. 1999a, 1999b, 2000c, 2001, 2002; Supuran et al. 1999b, 1999c, 2000a; Menabuoni et al. 1999; Mincione et al. 1999; Barboiu et al. 1999; Casini et al. 2001).
Sulfonamides obtained by incorporating pyridine-carboxamido- or quinolinesulfonamido tails (of types 4.156 to 4.161) into the scaffolds A–Y were in many cases nanomolar inhibitors of isozymes hCA II and bCA IV (Scozzafava et al. 1999a, 1999b; Borras et al. 1999; Supuran et al. 1999b, 1999c), possessed a good water solubility of 1.5 to 2%, and the pH of their solutions used for in vivo experiments was 6.5 to 7.5. Many of these compounds were very effective IOP-lowering agents in normotensive and glaucomatous albino rabbits, with potencies two or three times greater than dorzolamide.
New derivatives prepared by the tail approach, incorporating amino acyl-, oligopeptidylor polyaminopolycarboxylmoieties (of types 4.162 to 4.174) were again potent inhibitors of isozymes CA I, CA II and CA IV, and could be formulated in water solutions in at concentrations of 2 to 2.5% at almost neutral pH values (pH 6 to 7). They produced powerful and prolonged IOP lowering after topical administration in normotensive and glaucomatous rabbits (Scozzafava et al. 1999a; Supuran et al. 2000a; Mincione et al. 1999; Barboiu et al. 1999).
A special case of this approach was constituted by the perfluoroalkyl-/aryl- containing derivatives, which incorporated tails 4.175 to 4.180 (Scozzafava et al. 2000d). Such derivatives cannot form water-soluble salts with acids or bases at neutral pH. Unexpectedly, this class of derivatives possessed a high water solubility (1.5 to 2%), balanced by a significant lipid solubility (because of the presence of
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbonic Anhydrase |
|||
|
|
|
CO |
|
CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
N |
CO |
N |
|
|
|
|
N |
HOOC |
N |
CO |
|
4.156 |
|
4.157 |
|
|
N |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.158 |
|
4.160 |
|
|||
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
4.159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
O |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
H2N |
|
|
||
|
|
H2N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
N |
|
|
|
H3C N |
|
|
N |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
H |
|
HN |
CH3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
4.161 |
4.162: Gly- |
4.163: Sar- |
4.164: Crt- |
|
|||||||
|
|
O |
O |
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
H2N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
H2N |
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
H |
|
|
H2N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.165: GlyGly- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
4.166: beta-Ala- |
4.167: GABA |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
HOOC |
N |
CO |
|
HOOC N |
CO |
HOOC |
N |
N |
CO |
|||
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
HOOC |
|
|
|
H |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
4.168: IDA |
|
|
|
4.169: NTA |
|
4.170: EDDA |
|
||||
HOOC |
N |
N |
CO |
|
|
HOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
N |
CO |
|
|
|||
|
|
H |
COOH |
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
HOOC |
|
COOH |
|
|
|||
HOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.171: EDTA |
|
|
|
|
|
4.172: DTPA |
|
|
|
||
HOOC |
N |
O |
O |
|
N |
CO |
|
HOOC |
|
|
CO |
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
COOH |
HO |
N |
OH |
|
||
HOOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
4.173: EGTA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.174: EDDHA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SO2 |
|
|
CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
F |
F |
|
F |
CF3SO2 |
n -C4F9SO2 |
n -C8F17SO2 C8F17CO |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|||||
4.175 |
4.176 |
4.177 |
|
|
4.178 |
F |
|
F |
|
F |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.179 |
|
4.180 |
|
|
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
Development of Sulfonamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors |
117 |
the perfluoroalkyl-/aryl moieties; Scozzafava et al. 2000d). Correlated with their very good CA inhibitory properties against isozymes CA I, CA II and CA IV (in the low nanomolar range), such derivatives possessed optimal properties to act as efficient IOP-lowering agents: they were formulated as aqueous solutions at neutral pH; they showed very good penetrability through the cornea (because of their good lipophilic character), arriving thus at the ciliary processes enzyme; and their duration of action was much more prolonged than that of dorzolamide. Compounds such as 4.179M or 4.178N, among others, showed a very strong IOP-lowering effect in both normotensive and glaucomatous rabbits, and this IOP-lowering effect lasted for 5 to 6 h. (In the case of dorzolamide, pressure returns to basal levels after a much shorter period; Scozzafava et al. 2000d.)
It was obvious from these studies that the tail incorporated into the molecules of such CAIs is important for at least three critical properties of the topical antiglaucoma agent: (1) to assure the water solubility of the drug in order to formulate it as a solution for ophthalmologic use. By the tail approach it is possible to formulate topically acting antiglaucoma sulfonamides as 1.5 to 2% solutions at pH values in the neutral range (pH 6.5 to 7.5, salts of either a strong acid or a strong base); (2) to assure the optimal penetration of the drug through the cornea to inhibit the ciliary body enzymes (CA II and CA IV), this being mainly possible if the inhibitors possess a modest, but not insignificant, lipophilicity. Highly lipophilic sulfonamides are readily washed away from the eye by blood circulation (where high amounts of CA I and CA II are present), whereas compounds that are too hydrophilic do not have the chance to penetrate through the membranes to reach the ciliary process enzyme; and (3) to assure high affinity for the enzyme (mainly the isozyme II), with nanomolar inhibitors as the best candidates for clinical development as antiglaucoma drugs (Scozzafava et al. 1999a, 1999b, 2000c, 2001, 2002; Supuran et al. 1999b, 1999c, 2000a; Menabuoni et al. 1999; Mincione et al. 1999; Barboiu et al. 1999; Casini et al. 2001).
The tail approach is a general one, as shown by the multitude of highly active topically effective antiglaucoma sulfonamides reported in the last few years. Several variants of the main approach summarized here have also been designed and examples are provided. Thus, sulfonamides of type A–Y possessing free amino, imino or hydrazino moieties were reacted with 7-chloro-4-chloromethylcoumarin 4.181, affording a series of secondary amines possessing N-[(7-chloro-4-coumarinyl)- methyl]-moieties in their molecules. These showed effective inhibition of three CA isozymes (CAs I, II and IV) and were water soluble as hydrochloride salts (Renzi et al. 2000). Some of these derivatives also showed IOP-lowering properties in the normotensive rabbits after topical application as 2% aqueous solutions, but their
|
H2C |
CI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
X |
CO |
|
|
|
|
|
||
CI |
O |
O |
|
A: X = O |
|
4.182 B: X = NH |
|||||
|
|
|
|||
|
4.181 |
|
|
C: X = S |
|
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
118 |
Carbonic Anhydrase |
efficiency was not as good as that of the previously mentioned derivatives. In another paper, some of the sulfonamides (A–Y) were derivatized by furan-, pyrroleand thiophene-carboxamido moieties of type 4.182 (Ilies et al. 2000). The new derivatives obtained this way were not water soluble and were formulated as suspensions for in vivo experiments, similarly to that for brinzolamide. The compounds incorporating furanand pyrrole-carboxamido moieties (but not the corresponding thiophene-substituted derivatives), showed effective and long-lasting IOP lowering both in normotensive and glaucomatous animals, with potencies superior to those of dorzolamide and brinzolamide, and this was explained by the insufficient lipophilicity of the later derivatives as compared with those of the structurally related furanand pyrrole-carboxamido-containing compounds, because all of them showed nanomolar affinity for hCA II and bCA IV (Ilies et al. 2000).
4.4 ISOZYME-SPECIFIC INHIBITORS
Although many sulfonamide CAIs possess high affinity for the major isozymes (such as CA II, CA IV and CA V) considered to play important physiological functions (Supuran et al. 2003), the critical challenge for designing novel pharmacological agents from this class is their lack of specificity toward different isozymes. Among the 14 isozymes described, several, such as CA II, CA VII and CA IX, have very similar affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors, although small differences exist between them (Supuran et al. 2003). This fact, as well as the physiological importance of these different isozymes, prompted much research in many laboratories to find compounds that might discriminate between them. Some progress has been made recently in designing compounds with some selectivity toward CA I, CA IV and CA III, and these data are presented later.
4.4.1 ISOZYME I
The main difference in the active-site architecture of isozymes CA I and CA II is the presence of more histidine residues in CA I. Thus, in addition to the zinc ligands (His 94, His 96 and His 119), His 64 plays an important role in catalysis. This is the only other histidine residue present in the active site of CA II, whereas in CA I there are three such additional residues, His 67, His 200 and His 243 (Ferraroni et al. 2002a, 2002b). Another important difference between the two isozymes is that CA II contains a histidine cluster, consisting of residues His 64, His 4, His 3, His 10, His 15 and His 17 (streching from the middle of the active site to the rim of the cavity and protruding on the surface of the protein), which is absent in CA I (Supuran et al. 2003). These two isozymes also possess a different affinity for the two main classes of inhibitors: CA I has higher affinity than CA II for anions (such as cyanide, thiocyanate, cyanate and halides), whereas CA II has generally a higher affinity than CA I for sulfonamides (Supuran et al. 2003). As a consequence, it is relatively difficult to obtain sulfonamide inhibitors with higher affinity for CA I than for CA II, although the two isozymes possess significant differences in the active-site architecture. The first of such compounds was only recently reported by this group (Supuran et al. 1998c; Scozzafava and Supuran 1998a, 1999; Scozzafava et al.
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
Development of Sulfonamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors |
|
119 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
O |
N |
N |
|
|
HN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
|
|
||||
CI |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
|
S |
SO2NH2 |
|
H |
|
SO2NH2 |
|||||
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CI |
|
4.183 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.184 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
O S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CI |
|
|
N |
|
N |
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
CI |
|
|
|
H |
H |
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.185 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
||
O |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
H2N |
O |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
H2N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
S |
N |
|
|
SO2NH2 |
N |
S N |
|
|
||
N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
H |
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
H |
H |
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
4.186 |
|
|
|
|
4.187 |
|
O |
||
|
SO2NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
H3C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
RNH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
S N |
||
|
|
|
|
N |
|
N |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
||
CI |
|
SO2NH2 |
RN |
S |
SO2NH2 |
In 4.188,4.189 R = |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
CI |
|
|
|
|
4.189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me |
|
||
|
4.188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
NH2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
O |
N |
( )2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
O
NH
S
XC6H4 O
4.190: X = H, p-Me; o-Me; p-F; p-CI
2000a) and were discovered serendipitously by screening a large number of sulfonamides possessing different structural motifs in their molecules. Remarkably, all the compounds possessing higher affinity for CA I than for CA II (and CA IV), of types 4.183 to 4.190, contain ureido or thioureido moieties in their molecules. Table 4.20 gives their inhibition data against the three isozymes.
Such isozyme I avid inhibitors belong to both the aromatic sulfonamide class and the heterocyclic sulfonamide class, whereas the ureido/thioureido moieties present in their molecules might be unsubstituted or substituted with bulkier groups (3,4-dichlorophenyl, phenyl, substituted-phenylsulfonyl, etc.). Compounds 4.190 containing arylsulfonylcarbamate instead of arylsulfonylureido moieties were investigated in more detail (Supuran et al. 1998c; Scozzafava and Supuran 1998a, 1999; Scozzafava et al. 2000a). These compounds also significantly inhibit isozymes II
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
120 |
Carbonic Anhydrase |
TABLE 4.20
Inhibition of Isozymes I, II and IV with
Compounds 4.183 to 4.195 Showing
Selectivity Toward One of Them
|
|
KI (nM) |
|
Inhibitor |
hCA I |
hCA II |
bCA IV |
4.183 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
4.184 |
50 |
53 |
70 |
4.185 |
7 |
10 |
24 |
4.186 |
3 |
8 |
20 |
4.187 |
4 |
10 |
25 |
4.188 |
8 |
12 |
14 |
4.189 |
4 |
5 |
11 |
4.190a (X = 4-Me) |
40 |
110 |
120 |
4.190b (X = 4-Cl) |
60 |
100 |
160 |
4.191 |
1100 |
150 |
140 |
4.192 |
200 |
20 |
10 |
4.193 |
200 |
10 |
8 |
4.194 |
620 |
12 |
10 |
4.195 |
180 |
15 |
12 |
Source: From Supuran, C.T. et al. (2003) Medicinal
Research Reviews 23, 146–189. With permission.
and IV and are thus not really isozyme-I specific, but represent an important step toward generating isozyme-specific CAIs. Dorzolamide has a very low affinity for hCA I, but its deethylated metabolite is a very potent inhibitor of this isozyme (Supuran et al. 2003).
4.4.2 ISOZYME IV
Isozyme CA IV contains only one histidine residue, besides the zinc ligands, within its active site His 64, which, as in hCA II, plays a critical role in catalysis as proton shuttle residue between the active site and the environment (Supuran et al. 2003). The most characteristic feature of the active site of this isozyme is related to the presence of four cysteine residues, which form two disulfide bonds situated at the entrance within the cavity (Cys 6 – Cys 11G, and Cys 23 – Cys 203; Supuran et al. 2003). These residues occupy practically the same region of the active site as the histidine cluster in hCA II does, and it was hypothesized that this might be the most relevant aspect explaining the difference in affinity for sulfonamide inhibitors of these two isozymes (Supuran et al. 2003). Even so, similar to those for CA I, the first compounds with some specificity for CA IV, of type 4.191 to 4.195, were again discovered serendipitously, and they all belong to the same class of Schiff bases of aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides (Supuran et al. 1996b, 1996c, 1997b; Popescu et al. 1999).
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
Development of Sulfonamide Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors |
121 |
|||||
|
|
|
O |
NH2 |
O |
|
|
|
|
|
NH2 |
||
|
|
|
|
S |
S |
|
|
H |
|
|
O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
O |
||
|
|
|
|
H |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
( )2 |
|
N |
N ( )n |
|
O2N |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.191 |
|
|
4.192: n = 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.193: n = 2 |
|
|
|
|
O |
NH2 |
O |
|
|
|
|
|
NH2 |
||
|
|
|
|
S |
|
|
|
H |
|
|
O |
|
S |
|
|
|
|
O |
||
|
|
|
|
H |
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N |
N |
( )2 |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
N ( )2 |
|
|||
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.194 |
|
|
4.195 |
|
|
Only Schiff bases of aromatic sulfonamides were investigated in some detail, and it was shown that the best CA IV inhibition patterns are connected to the presence of heterocyclic moieties (in the original aldehyde used for the preparation of the Schiff base) or aromatic moieties substituted with electron-attracting groups, such as the nitro group. Such compounds also appreciably inhibited CA II, and, to a smaller extent, CA I (Table 4.20; Supuran et al. 1996b, 1996c, 1997b; Popescu et al. 1999).
4.4.3 ISOZYME III
Although the structure of this isozyme is relatively similar to that of hCA II, CA III’s CO2 hydration activity is ca. 0.3% that of hCA II, because it does not possess a His but a Lys residue in position 64, which is much less effective as a proton shuttle (Erikson and Liljas 1993). Furthermore, position 198 in CA III is occupied by a Phe, which possesses a very bulky side chain, whereas the water bound to Zn(II) has a pKa ca. 5.5. All these characteristics might explain the low catalytic activity of CA III as well as its insensitivity to sulfonamide inhibitors that do not have sufficient space to bind in the neighborhood of the Zn(II) ion, principally because of steric impairment of Phe 198 (Erikson and Liljas 1993). Only the very small sulfonamide CF3SO2NH2 acts as an efficient CA III inhibitor, having an inhibition constant of 0.9 μM (but this compound is a nanomolar inhibitor of CAs I, II and IV; Maren and Conroy 1993). Other sulfonamides (such as acetazolamide or methazolamide) inhibit CA III, with inhibition constants in the millimolar range (Maren and Conroy 1993).
4.5SELECTIVE INHIBITORS FOR MEMBRANEASSOCIATED CAs
At least four CA isozymes (CA IV, CA IX, CA XII and CA XIV) are associated with cell membranes, with the enzyme active site generally oriented extracellularly
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
122 |
Carbonic Anhydrase |
(Supuran et al. 2003). Some of these isozymes were shown to play pivotal physiological roles (e.g., CA IV in the eye, lungs and kidneys, CA IX in the gastric mucosa and many tumor cells; Supuran et al. 2003), whereas the function of the other membrane isozymes (CA XII, CA XIV) is at present less well understood. Because of the extracellular location of these isozymes, it is possible to design membraneimpermeant CAIs, which in this way would become specific inhibitors for the membrane-associated CAs. This possibility has been fully explored in our laboratory by designing positively charged sulfonamides (Supuran et al. 2003), whereas an alternative approach consisted of designing polymeric (high-molecular-weight) inhibitors, but such compounds were not very useful in vivo because of the usual problems connected with polymers (i.e., allergic reactions or problems of bioavailability).
Thus, the first historical approach for inducing membrane impermeability to CAIs was that of attaching aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides to polymers such as polyethyleneglycol (Maren et al. 1997), aminoethyldextran (Lucci et al. 1983; Tinker et al. 1981) or dextran (Heming et al. 1986). Compounds such as 4.196 to 4.198, possessing molecular weights of 3.5 to 99 kDa, prepared this way showed membrane impermeability because of their high molecular weights and selectively inhibited in vivo CA IV only and not the cytosolic isozymes (primarily CA II), being used in several renal and pulmonary physiological studies. Because of their macromolecular nature, such inhibitors could not be developed as drugs or diagnostic tools, because in vivo they induced potent allergic reactions. A second approach for achieving membrane impermeability was that of using highly polar salt-like compounds. Only one such sulfonamide, quaternary ammonium sulfanilamide (QAS) 4.199, has been used in physiological studies, which has been reported by Henry (1996) to inhibit only extracellular CAs in a variety of arthropods (such as the crab Callinectes sapidus) and fish. The main drawback of QAS is its high toxicity in higher vertebrates (Maren 1967).
Thus, a program of developing cationic sulfonamides was initiated in our laboratory (Supuran et al. 1992; Supuran and Clare 1995) by using QAS (4.199) as lead molecule, which is also a relatively weak CAI, with micromolar affinity for hCA II (Supuran and Clare 1995). The first such compounds of types 4.200 to 4.203 were prepared by reacting aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides containing free NH2 groups with pyrylium salts, affording pyridinium derivatives (Supuran et al. 1992, 1998b; Supuran and Clare 1995). These compounds were moderately active CA II and CA IV inhibitors, with affinities of 10–6 to 10–7 M. By using QSAR data from our laboratory (Supuran and Clare 1995), it was shown that increased CA II and CA IV inhibitory properties of aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides were connected with the presence of an elongated inhibitor molecule [on the axis passing through the Zn(II) of the enzyme, the sulfonamide nitrogen atom and the long axis of the inhibitor molecule itself]. Thereby, such elongated molecules have been designed (Supuran et al. 2000b; Scozzafava et al. 2000c) by reacting pyrylium salts with amino acids (such as glycine or β-alanine) and coupling the pyridinium derivatives thus obtained of types 4.204 to 4.207 with the aromatic/heterocyclic sulfonamides possessing free amino, hydroxy, imino or hydroxyl moieties of types A-Y (a variant of the tail approach, not intended in this case for obtaining antiglaucoma sulfonamides). The inhibitors obtained this way, such as 4.208 to 4.211, showed nanomolar affinities
Copyright © 2004 CRC Press, LLC
