- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •Contents
- •1 Introduction
- •1.1 Auditory Temporal and Spatial Factors
- •1.2 Auditory System Model for Temporal and Spatial Information Processing
- •2.1 Analysis of Source Signals
- •2.1.1 Power Spectrum
- •2.1.2 Autocorrelation Function (ACF)
- •2.1.3 Running Autocorrelation
- •2.2 Physical Factors of Sound Fields
- •2.2.1 Sound Transmission from a Point Source through a Room to the Listener
- •2.2.2 Temporal-Monaural Factors
- •2.2.3 Spatial-Binaural Factors
- •2.3 Simulation of a Sound Field in an Anechoic Enclosure
- •3 Subjective Preferences for Sound Fields
- •3.2.1 Optimal Listening Level (LL)
- •3.2.4 Optimal Magnitude of Interaural Crosscorrelation (IACC)
- •3.3 Theory of Subjective Preferences for Sound Fields
- •3.4 Evaluation of Boston Symphony Hall Based on Temporal and Spatial Factors
- •4.1.1 Brainstem Response Correlates of Sound Direction in the Horizontal Plane
- •4.1.2 Brainstem Response Correlates of Listening Level (LL) and Interaural Crosscorrelation Magnitude (IACC)
- •4.1.3 Remarks
- •4.2.2 Hemispheric Lateralization Related to Spatial Aspects of Sound
- •4.2.3 Response Latency Correlates of Subjective Preference
- •4.3 Electroencephalographic (EEG) Correlates of Subjective Preference
- •4.3.3 EEG Correlates of Interaural Correlation Magnitude (IACC) Changes
- •4.4.1 Preferences and the Persistence of Alpha Rhythms
- •4.4.2 Preferences and the Spatial Extent of Alpha Rhythms
- •4.4.3 Alpha Rhythm Correlates of Annoyance
- •5.1 Signal Processing Model of the Human Auditory System
- •5.1.1 Summary of Neural Evidence
- •5.1.1.1 Physical Characteristics of the Ear
- •5.1.1.2 Left and Right Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABRs)
- •5.1.1.3 Left and Right Hemisphere Slow Vertex Responses (SVRs)
- •5.1.1.4 Left and Right Hemisphere EEG Responses
- •5.1.1.5 Left and Right Hemisphere MEG Responses
- •5.1.2 Auditory Signal Processing Model
- •5.2 Temporal Factors Extracted from Autocorrelations of Sound Signals
- •5.3 Auditory Temporal Window for Autocorrelation Processing
- •5.5 Auditory Temporal Window for Binaural Processing
- •5.6 Hemispheric Specialization for Spatial Attributes of Sound Fields
- •6 Temporal Sensations of the Sound Signal
- •6.1 Combinations of Temporal and Spatial Sensations
- •6.2 Pitch of Complex Tones and Multiband Noise
- •6.2.1 Perception of the Low Pitch of Complex Tones
- •6.2.3 Frequency Limits of Missing Fundamentals
- •6.3 Beats Induced by Dual Missing Fundamentals
- •6.4 Loudness
- •6.4.1 Loudness of Sharply Filtered Noise
- •6.4.2 Loudness of Complex Noise
- •6.6 Timbre of an Electric Guitar Sound with Distortion
- •6.6.3 Concluding Remarks
- •7 Spatial Sensations of Binaural Signals
- •7.1 Sound Localization
- •7.1.1 Cues of Localization in the Horizontal Plane
- •7.1.2 Cues of Localization in the Median Plane
- •7.2 Apparent Source Width (ASW)
- •7.2.1 Apparent Width of Bandpass Noise
- •7.2.2 Apparent Width of Multiband Noise
- •7.3 Subjective Diffuseness
- •8.1 Pitches of Piano Notes
- •8.2 Design Studies of Concert Halls as Public Spaces
- •8.2.1 Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for Shape Optimization
- •8.2.2 Two Actual Designs: Kirishima and Tsuyama
- •8.3 Individualized Seat Selection Systems for Enhancing Aural Experience
- •8.3.1 A Seat Selection System
- •8.3.2 Individual Subjective Preference
- •8.3.3 Distributions of Listener Preferences
- •8.5 Concert Hall as Musical Instrument
- •8.5.1 Composing with the Hall in Mind: Matching Music and Reverberation
- •8.5.2 Expanding the Musical Image: Spatial Expression and Apparent Source Width
- •8.5.3 Enveloping Music: Spatial Expression and Musical Dynamics
- •8.6 Performing in a Hall: Blending Musical Performances with Sound Fields
- •8.6.1 Choosing a Performing Position on the Stage
- •8.6.2 Performance Adjustments that Optimize Temporal Factors
- •8.6.3 Towards Future Integration of Composition, Performance and Hall Acoustics
- •9.1 Effects of Temporal Factors on Speech Reception
- •9.2 Effects of Spatial Factors on Speech Reception
- •9.3 Effects of Sound Fields on Perceptual Dissimilarity
- •9.3.1 Perceptual Distance due to Temporal Factors
- •9.3.2 Perceptual Distance due to Spatial Factors
- •10.1 Method of Noise Measurement
- •10.2 Aircraft Noise
- •10.3 Flushing Toilet Noise
- •11.1 Noise Annoyance in Relation to Temporal Factors
- •11.1.1 Annoyance of Band-Pass Noise
- •11.2.1 Experiment 1: Effects of SPL and IACC Fluctuations
- •11.2.2 Experiment 2: Effects of Sound Movement
- •11.3 Effects of Noise and Music on Children
- •12 Introduction to Visual Sensations
- •13 Temporal and Spatial Sensations in Vision
- •13.1 Temporal Sensations of Flickering Light
- •13.1.1 Conclusions
- •13.2 Spatial Sensations
- •14 Subjective Preferences in Vision
- •14.1 Subjective Preferences for Flickering Lights
- •14.2 Subjective Preferences for Oscillatory Movements
- •14.3 Subjective Preferences for Texture
- •14.3.1 Preferred Regularity of Texture
- •15.1 EEG Correlates of Preferences for Flickering Lights
- •15.1.1 Persistence of Alpha Rhythms
- •15.1.2 Spatial Extent of Alpha Rhythms
- •15.2 MEG Correlates of Preferences for Flickering Lights
- •15.2.1 MEG Correlates of Sinusoidal Flicker
- •15.2.2 MEG Correlates of Fluctuating Flicker Rates
- •15.3 EEG Correlates of Preferences for Oscillatory Movements
- •15.4 Hemispheric Specializations in Vision
- •16 Summary of Auditory and Visual Sensations
- •16.1 Auditory Sensations
- •16.1.1 Auditory Temporal Sensations
- •16.1.2 Auditory Spatial Sensations
- •16.1.3 Auditory Subjective Preferences
- •16.1.4 Effects of Noise on Tasks and Annoyance
- •16.2.1 Temporal and Spatial Sensations in Vision
- •16.2.2 Visual Subjective Preferences
- •References
- •Glossary of Symbols
- •Abbreviations
- •Author Index
- •Subject Index
8.2 Design Studies of Concert Halls as Public Spaces |
153 |
Fig. 8.7 Initial scheme of the concert hall as a base of model 2. The rear wall of the stage and the rear wall of the audience area were divided into two. Sidewalls were divided into four
S4 values are shown in Fig. 8.11. To maximize S4, on the other hand, the rear wall of the stage and the rear wall of the audience area took on convex shapes. Thus it was proved that a “leaf-shape” plan of concert hall is one of the most optimal schemes, and this basic plan was applied in the design of the Kirishima International Concert Hall, which opened in 1994.
As for the conflicting requirements for S1 and S4, the maximization of S4 (IACC) may take a higher priority than S1 (listening level LL) because the preference increases with a decreasing IACC for all subjects tested (Singh et al., 1994), while there are a large individual differences in the preferred listening level LL (Sakai et al., 1997). Thus, listeners can choose the seat with respect to their preferred level LL when they buy tickets for concert (Section 8.3).
8.2.2 Two Actual Designs: Kirishima and Tsuyama
This preference-based optimization of architectural acoustics was applied to the design of the Kirishima International Concert Hall in cooperation with the architect Fumihiko Maki in 1992, as shown in Fig. 8.12 (Maki, 1997; Ando et al., 1997; Nakajima and Ando, 1997). Acoustic design elements were as follows (Ando, 1998,
154 |
8 Applications (I) – Music and Concert Hall Acoustics |
Fig. 8.8 Resulting shape for model 2 optimized with respect to scale preferences for listening
level, S1
Fig. 8.9 Contour lines of equal S1 listening level preference values calculated for the geometry shown in Fig. 8.8
8.2 Design Studies of Concert Halls as Public Spaces |
155 |
Fig. 8.10 Resulting of shape for model 2 optimized with respect to scale preferences for sound diffuseness and envelopment that are associated with minimal IACCs, i.e. S4
Fig. 8.11 Contour lines of equal S4 sound diffuseness preference values calculated for the geometry shown in Fig. 8.10
156 |
8 Applications (I) – Music and Concert Hall Acoustics |
Fig. 8.12 Scheme of the Kirishima International Concert Hall (Miyama Conceru) designed by architect Maki (1997). (a) Longitudinal section. (b) Plane of balcony level. (c) Plane of audience level
2007b): (1) A leaf-shape plan was applied, (2) the sidewalls were tilted, and (3) the ceiling consisted of triangular plates. These realized a small value of the IACC at nearly every seat (Photo 8.1).
Another example is the Tsuyama Music Cultural Hall (Suzumura et al., 2000) with a shape similar to that of the Kirishima Hall. An additional design, introduced 52 columns (each 30 cm diameter) as a design element in the hall
8.2 Design Studies of Concert Halls as Public Spaces |
157 |
Photo 8.1 Kirishima International Concert Hall (Miyama Conceru)
Photo 8.2 Tsuyama Music Cultural Hall with 52 columns each of 30 cm diameter around the walls
(Photo 8.2). The columns provide surfaces for scattering reflected sound waves for the higher-frequency range above 1 kHz. This avoids image shifts of sound sources on the stage, and brings about a smaller value of IACC for areas near the columns and at the seating-center area close to the stage. Because columns
