Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Atlas of Glaucoma, Second Edition_Choplin, Lundy_2007
.pdf
282 Atlas of glaucoma
or damaged or when there are structural abnormali- |
Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) to be most effec- |
||||
ties and anomalies in the limbal and paralimbal |
tive in achieving the desired results. |
|
|||
regions. Of note, argon laser trabeculoplasty and |
|
|
|
|
|
selective laser trabeculoplasty are not contraindica- |
Procedure |
|
|
||
tions to NPGS. |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
NPGS can be performed under topical (authors’ |
||||
|
preference), peribulbar or retrobulbar anesthesia. |
||||
TECHNIQUE |
The common elements of both procedures are |
||||
|
illustrated in Figures 18.5–18.13. The steps specific |
||||
Instruments and devices |
for DS are presented in Figures 18.3, 18.14, 18.15, |
||||
Aside from the regular instrumentation required to |
and those for VC in Figures 18.4, 18.16, 18.17. Of |
||||
note, many surgeons combine techniques used in |
|||||
perform trabeculectomies, there are a few addi- |
|||||
VC (i.e. injection of viscoelastic into Schlemm’s |
|||||
tional instruments that are beneficial when per- |
|||||
canal) with DS. |
|
|
|||
forming NPGS. Diamond blades are particularly |
|
|
|||
If |
performing |
phacoemulsification |
concur- |
||
suited to performing NPGS, given the high degree |
|||||
rently, |
the phacoemulsification should |
be per- |
|||
of accuracy that is required when creating the scle- |
|||||
formed first. In order to perform NPGS immediately |
|||||
ral flaps. Two diamond blades have been specifi- |
|||||
following phacoemulsification, it is imperative that |
|||||
cally designed for NPGS (Figure 18.2). |
|||||
the anterior chamber be adequately pressurized to |
|||||
Peeling of the inner wall of SC is facilitated by for- |
|||||
facilitate proper scleral dissection. Viscoelastic |
|||||
ceps specifically designed for that purpose, the most |
|||||
should |
be left in |
the anterior chamber |
after the |
||
common being the Mermoud forceps (Figure 18.3). |
|||||
insertion of the IOL, and removed following the |
|||||
Maintenance of the scleral lake, which has been |
|||||
excision of the deep flap with an irrigation syringe |
|||||
shown to greatly improve the efficacy of DS, is |
|||||
(i.e. 27-gauge cannula) instead of the mechanical |
|||||
accomplished with a space-maintaining device. |
|||||
irrigation and aspiration which could raise the IOP |
|||||
The AquaFlow Collagen Drainage Device (Staar |
|||||
and result in rupture of the TDW. |
|
||||
Surgical, Monrovia, CA) is the most commonly |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
used implant (Table 18.2). Other devices include |
Intraoperative complications |
|
|||
the SKGEL® implant (Corneal, Paris, France), which |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
is an absorbable reticulated collagen implant, and |
Complications related to the superficial flap can be |
||||
the T-Flux implant (Ioltech, France), which is |
managed similarly to flap complications encoun- |
||||
biocompatible but non-absorbable. |
tered during trabeculectomy. The most significant |
||||
In VC, cannulation of the cut ends of SC |
intraoperative complication that may occur during |
||||
requires the use of a 150 m diameter polished |
NPGS is inadvertent perforation of the TDW, |
||||
cannula (Greishaber, Switzerland) (Figure 18.4). |
which can be classified as either a microperfora- |
||||
Subsequent to cannulation, a viscoelastic agent is |
tion or a macroperforation. Microperforations are |
||||
injected. Studies have shown Healon 5 (Advanced |
often occult and result in a small and localized leak |
||||
(a) |
(b) |
Figure 18.3 DS – Peeling of the inner wall of Schlemm’s canal. (a) After the removal of the deeper scleral flap, the inner wall of SC is peeled with specially designed forceps. (b) It will often come in one strip spanning the width of the dissection, appearing as a transparent tubular structure once peeled. Upon successful completion of this step, the surgeon will notice an immediate increase in the percolation of fluid through the TDM.
Non-penetrating surgery 287
(a) |
(b) |
Figure 18.13 Removing the deeper flap. The deep flap must be excised to create space for the scleral lake. Removal of the flap is facilitated by the scoring of the undersurface of the flap (a) prior to using fine Vanna scissors (b).
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
|
Figure 18.14 DS – Placement of collagen implant. (a,b) To |
|
fixate the collagen implant which will maintain the scle- |
|
ral lake, a 10-0 nylon suture is preplaced in the scleral |
|
bed. This suture is passed full thickness through the |
|
remaining sclera but remains in the suprachoroidal |
|
space. Collagen implants have also been shown to |
|
reduce inflammation adjacent to the scleral flap and bleb |
|
by activating collagenase. The collagen implant is placed |
|
in a centripetal orientation (c) and then tied into place |
|
(d). Some surgeons will also leave the implant longer |
|
than the flap such that the posterior extent of the implant |
|
protrudes beyond the posterior edge of the flap, thereby |
|
further promoting the drainage of aqueous into the sub- |
(e) |
conjunctival space (e). |

