Table 6.3.3. Aqueous flare values (photon counts/ms) in normal controls, pseudoexfoliation (PEX) with or without secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (statistics: Mann-Whitney test) (from Küchle et al. 1995)
Group |
Eyes |
Flare val- |
Range |
Signifi- |
|
(n) |
ues (mean |
|
|
cance (P) |
|
|
± SD) |
|
|
|
|
Normal controls |
164 |
4.6 |
± 1.1 |
2.0 |
– 7.2 |
|
0.1 |
POAG eyes |
100 |
4.7 |
± 1.6 |
2.0 |
– 7.4 |
|
|
All PEX eyes |
90 |
14.3 |
± 9.2 |
6.0 – 43.2 |
< 0.0001 |
PEX with SOAG |
40 |
14.5 |
± 9.8 |
7.4 |
– 43.2 |
|
0.5 |
PEX without SOAG |
50 |
14.1 |
± 7.9 |
6.0 |
– 42.0 |
|
|
jority of intraocular PEX deposits cannot be observed by direct biomicroscopy, and the accumulations on zonules, ciliary processes (Fig. 6.3.4f), and trabecular meshwork may be only detected on gonioscopy or cycloscopy or may be visualized by high resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy (Naumann et al. 1998; Inazumi et al. 2002).
In addition to deposits of PEX material, several other clinical signs aid in the diagnosis. Pigment loss from the peripupillary iris pigment epithelium and its deposition on anterior chamber structures is a hallmark of PEX syndrome. Further PEX-associated clinical signs that can alert the clinician to the presence of PEX include phacodonesis, iris stroma atrophy, iris hemorrhages after pupillary dilation, increased aqueous flare values, posterior synechiae, elevated intraocular pressure, and insufficient pupillary dilation, particularly if asymmetrically present. An atypical cornea guttata may precede the full clinical picture for decades. The differential diagnosis of PEX syndrome is presented in Table 6.3.3.
6.3.3.2
Masked PEX Syndrome
In cases of circular posterior synechiae, which frequently form in PEX eyes, particularly under miotic therapy, the evaluation of the anterior lens surface may be hindered and PEX deposits may be masked by the synechiae (Fig. 6.3.4g) (Mardin et al. 2001). In these cases, high resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy may be useful to reveal PEX deposits on the lens or zonules (Inazumi et al. 2002; Naumann et al. 1998). The presence of “spontaneous” posterior synechiae without any other obvious cause should alert the clinician to suspect PEX.
6.3.3.3
Early Stages of PEX Syndrome
The classical picture of lens deposits represents, however, a very late stage of the disease, which is preceded by a long, chronic, preclinical course. Early recognition
is critical for reducing operative complications due to PEX. By thorough biomicroscopic examination, a dif- fuse-matte homogeneous film on the surface of the anterior lens capsule can be observed prior to the formation of obvious PEX deposits (Fig. 6.3.4h) (Naumann et al. 1998; Tetsumoto et al. 1992). To visualize these early changes at the slit lamp, it has been suggested to place the slit beam at 45 degrees to the axis of observation, reducing the light source, and focus temporally from the center of the lens to highlight the subtle deposits on the lens surface (Ritch and Schlötzer-Schrehardt 2001). Electron microscopy shows this surface film to consist of a layer of microfibrils, a precursor of PEX fibrils, diffusely deposited on the entire surface of the anterior lens capsule from the aqueous humor (Dark et al. 1990; Tetsumoto et al. 1992) (Fig. 6.3.5). As the precapsular layer becomes thicker, focal defects begin to form in the mid-peripheral zone by abrasive movements of the iris, often in the upper nasal quadrant (“mini-PEX”) (Fig. 6.3.4h), which further enlarge and become confluent to form the classical picture of manifest PEX syndrome (Figs. 6.3.3, 6.3.5).
Additional clinical signs, which help alert the ophthalmologist to the presence of these early stages, comprise peripupillary atrophy of the iris pigment epithelium, melanin dispersion associated with pupillary dilation, increased trabecular pigmentation, and poor mydriasis (Table 6.3.1) (Prince et al. 1987; Tetsumoto et al. 1992). As PEX often is an asymmetric condition (see below), comparison with the fellow eye is diagnostically helpful in highlighting these early changes.
6.3.3.4
Asymmetry of Involvement
For unknown reasons, PEX patients can present clinically with either unilateral or bilateral involvement, which may be markedly asymmetric. Unilateral involvement is often regarded as a precursor to bilateral involvement. PEX syndrome manifests unilaterally in about 50 – 70 % of patients and the conversion rates from clinically unilateral to bilateral disease were found to vary from 15 % to 40 % within 5 years (Ritch and Schlötzer-Schrehardt 2001). Clinically, the involved eye often has a poorer visual acuity, more advanced lens opacity, higher intraocular pressure, a smaller pupil, and a more pronounced trabecular pigmentation than the noninvolved fellow eye.
However, in the majority of clinically unilateral cases, there are subtle histopathological and ultrastructural changes in the fellow eye suggesting that all cases are in fact asymmetric (Hammer et al. 2001; Kivelä et al. 1997). PEX material has been shown to be almost invariably present on electron microscopy in the conjunctiva (Prince et al. 1987) and in the iris, particularly in the dilator muscle and blood vessel walls, of the clini-