Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation_Erian, Shiffman_2011.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
49.82 Mб
Скачать

212

D.W. Buck II et al.

Fillers of this type will require repeated injections for long-term results. Semipermanent fillers typically last longer than most non-permanent fillers, but can be expected to experience some resorption as well. Only permanent fillers can be expected to produce long-term results with a single injection. As the name implies, these products will persist within the tissue indefinitely; a characteristic that might raise concerns regarding safety and the potential for long-term side effects.

Although injectable facial fillers can offer an efficacious alternative to the surgery for the aging face, they also have their limitations. It is important for the plastic surgeon to recognize specific circumstances which may be best managed with an alternative to fillers, including superficial contour defects too shallow for fillers, areas with significant skin laxity in which filler injection may result in lumpiness, and deep defects or folds in areas of dynamic movement which may result in filler dislodgement or visible implants.

20.3 Available Facial Fillers

There are currently many soft-tissue fillers on the market today (Table 20.1). As stated above, these fillers fall within one of four major categories: autologous implants, collagens, hyaluronic acids, and biosynthetic polymers.

20.3.1 Autologous Fat

Despite Neuber’s successful use of autologous fat for soft-tissue augmentation in 1893, its use declined until the late 1970s. This decline was most likely due to the limited reproducibility of results; however, with the advent of suction lipectomy and improved harvesting techniques, autologous fat grafts have regained significant popularity. Overall correction and duration are similar to that of bovine collagen, although a high rate of resorption can occur.

20.3.2 Collagen

Collagen is a major component of human connective tissues such as bone, cartilage, skin, and vasculature.

The injectable forms consist of varying concentrations of purified bovine or human collagens. Bovine collagen, harvested from cattle skin, was the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved product for softtissue augmentation in the USA. Prior to the development of hyaluronic acid fillers, collagen was the “gold standard” injectable filler. As the name implies, newer human collagens are derived from cadavers or laboratory cultures of human fibroblast cells. These collagens have gained popularity due to the reduced risk of hypersensitivity and immunologic reactions when compared to their bovine counterparts.

20.3.3 Hyaluronic Acids (HAs)

Like collagen, hyaluronic acid (HA) is also a major component of connective tissues. HAs are especially prevalent within the human dermis, where it provides a scaffold for collagen development. The main functions of HA include hydration, lubrication, and stabilization of connective tissues. During the aging process, the amount of HA within the connective tissues decreases, leading to a reduction in cell hydration, elasticity, and movement. In its natural form, injectable HA lasts only 1–2 days as a result of local degradation. Fortunately, Biotechnical companies have been successful in creating stabile HA molecules with longer-lasting effects. Most plastic surgeons would agree that the HA filler, Restylane, is currently the most commonly used facial filler worldwide.

20.3.4 Synthetic Polymers

Synthetic compounds are gaining favor as soft-tissue augmentation agents for several reasons: overall costeffectiveness, consistency of formulation with the possibility for reproducible mass production, limited immunogenicity, and the potential for long-term effects. As discussed previously, one of the first synthetics on the market was silicone. Despite a track record of excellent cosmetic results, reported problems with migration and foreign body reactions have precluded its approval for injectable cosmetic purposes within the USA and Europe. Synthetic facial fillers are typically composed of a biosynthetic polymer

Table 20.1 Available facial fillers (With permission from Buck et al. [8])

Filler type

Name (Manufacturer)

Indication

Durability

Advantages

Disadvantages

Market status

Autologous

Viable fat

Deep defects

Variable –

Abundant supply,

Donor site morbidity,

No FDA/EEA

products

 

 

months to

safe, inexpensive

variable reproducibility,

approval required

 

 

 

years

 

requires processing

 

 

Autologous collagen/autolagen

Moderate to deep

Months to

Processed from excised

Donor morbidity, painful,

FDA approved/

 

(Collagenesis, Beverly, MA;

defects

years

skin, can be stored

costly

CE mark

 

Isolagen, Exton, PA)

 

 

up to 6 months, safe

 

 

Bovine

Zyderm 1 (3.5% dermal

Superficial defects,

2–4 months

Safe, reliable, contains

Allergic reaction in 1–3%,

FDA approved/

collagens

collagen) (INAMED, Santa

fine lines, acne scars

 

lidocaine, ease of

short-term results, requires

CE mark

 

Barbara, CA)

 

 

administration

skin testing prior to use,

 

 

 

 

 

 

reactivation of herpes is

 

 

 

 

 

 

possible with lip injections

 

 

Zyderm 2 (6.5% collagen)

Moderate defects,

2–6 months

Same as Zyderm 1

Same as Zyderm 1

FDA approved/

 

(INAMED, Santa Barbara,

deeper acne scars, lip

 

 

 

CE mark

 

CA)

augmentation

 

 

 

 

 

Zyplast (3.5% crosslinked

Deep defects, lip

2–6 months

Same as Zyderm 1, more

Can cause skin necrosis

FDA approved/

 

collagen) (INAMED, Santa

augmentation

 

viscous and resistant to

if used in glabella, allergies in

CE mark

 

Barbara, CA)

 

 

degradation

3%, requires skin testing

 

Cadaveric

AlloDerm (acellular human

Deep wrinkles or scars,

6–12 months

Safe, no allergy

Expensive, surgically

FDA approved/

collagens

dermis, comes in sheets of

lip augmentation

 

testing required

implanted, often causes

CE mark

 

varying sizes) (LifeCell,

 

 

 

temporary swelling,

 

 

Branchburg, NJ)

 

 

 

occasionally palpable,

 

 

 

 

 

 

shrinkage with time

 

 

Cymetra (micronized, injectable

Deep wrinkles or scars,

3–6 months

Safe, no allergy

Can cause skin necrosis

FDA approved/

 

form of AlloDerm) (LifeCell,

lip augmentation

 

testing required, contains

if used in glabella, costly,

CE mark

 

Branchburg, NJ)

 

 

lidocaine

often clumps within needle

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(continued)

Fillers Facial Injectable 20

213

Table 20.1 (continued)

 

 

 

 

214

 

 

 

 

 

Filler type

Name (Manufacturer)

Indication

Durability

Advantages

Disadvantages

Market status

Cell-cultured

Cosmoderm (35 mg/ml

Superficial defects,

3–4 months

Safe, no allergy testing

Short-term results, the more

FDA approved/

collagen

collagen) (INAMED, Santa

shallow wrinkles

 

required, contains

common side effects include

CE mark

 

Barbara, CA)

and acne scars

 

lidocaine

cold symptoms (4%), flu

 

 

 

 

 

 

symptoms (2%)

 

 

Cosmoplast (35 mg/ml

Deeper defects and

3–4 months

Same as Cosmoderm

Same as Cosmoderm

FDA approved/

 

crosslinked collagen)

wrinkles, lip

 

 

 

CE mark

 

(INAMED, Santa Barbara, CA)

augmentation

 

 

 

 

Avian-derived

Hylaform gel (INAMED,

Moderate defects,

3–4 months

Safe, reliable,

Short-term results,

FDA approved/

hyaluronic

Santa Barbara, CA)

lip augmentation

 

no allergy testing

immunologic reactions in

CE mark

acids

 

 

 

is required

patient allergic to avian

 

 

 

 

 

 

products (eggs)

 

 

Hylaform plus (INAMED,

Moderate to deeper

3–4 months

Same as Hylaform gel

Same as Hylaform gel,

FDA approved/

 

Santa Barbara, CA)

defects, facial

 

 

superficial injection may lead

CE mark

 

 

wrinkles, and folds

 

 

to skin discoloration

 

Bacterial

Restylane/Restylane Fine

Superficial (Restylane

6–12 months

Safe, reliable,

Rare immunologic reactions,

FDA approved/

cultured

(Medicis, Scottsdale, AZ)

Fine) to moderate

 

predictable results, no

higher incidence of bruising,

CE mark

hyaluronic

 

defects, deeper wrinkle

 

allergy testing required,

pain, and post-procedure

 

acids

 

reduction, nasolabial folds,

 

longer lasting than

swelling vs. bovine collagens,

 

 

 

glabellar creases, lip

 

bovine collagens

higher cost

 

 

 

augmentation

 

 

 

 

 

Perlane (Medicis, Montreal,

Deeper defects,

6–12 months

Same as Restylane

Same as Restylane

FDA approved/

 

Canada)

shaping facial contours, lip

 

 

 

CE mark

 

 

augmentation

 

 

 

 

 

Captique (INAMED, Santa

Superficial defects,

3–6 months

Safe, no allergy testing

Relatively new product,

FDA approved/

 

Barbara, CA)

fine lines and wrinkles

 

required, similar

short-term results

CE mark

 

 

 

 

to Restylane

 

 

 

Juvederm 18, 24, 30 (L.E.A.

Superficial (18),

3–6 months

Safe, predictable results,

Short-term results, rare

FDA approved

 

Derm, Paris, France)

moderate (24),

 

no allergy testing

immunologic reactions,

 

 

 

and deep (30) defects

 

needed

relatively new product

 

.al et II Buck .W.D

Synthetics

Sculptra (poly-L-lactic acid

Deep defects

1–2 years

Long-term results, safe

Rare foreign body reaction,

Approved for

 

microparticles) (Dermik

 

 

 

limited US results studies

lipoatrophy; off

 

Laboratories, Berwyn, PA)

 

 

 

 

label for cosmetic

 

 

 

 

 

 

purposes/CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

mark

 

Radiesse (calcium

Deep defects,

1–2 years

Long-term results,

Can rarely develop nodules

FDA approved/

 

hyodroxyapatite microspheres)

nasolabial folds,

 

no allergy testing

if injected superficially

CE mark

 

(Bioform Medical, Franksville,

vertical lip lines, acne

 

required, no concern

 

 

 

WI)

scars, marionette lines,

 

for antigenic or

 

 

 

 

volume restoration

 

inflammatory

 

 

 

 

around cheeks

 

reactions

 

 

 

Artecoll/ArteFill (polymethyl-

Deep defects, glabella,

Permanent

Unrivaled longevity,

Palpable if placed superfi-

Preliminary FDA

 

methacrylate microspheres in

nasolabial folds

after nearly

probably safe, but reports

cially or excessively – thus

approval for

 

3.5% bovine collagen and 0.3%

 

50%

of persistent erythema at

avoid injecting into the lips

cosmetic

 

lidocaine) (Artes Medical, San

 

resorption

injection site

and areas with thin overlying

purposes/CE

 

Diego, CA)

 

 

 

skin, requires allergy testing

mark

 

Reviderm intra (Dextran beads

Deep defects, lip

Months to

Long-term results,

Post-procedural swelling,

Not FDA

 

in a hylan gel) (Rofil Medical

augmentation

years

safe

relatively new product

approved/CE

 

International, Breda, The

 

 

 

to USA

mark

 

Netherlands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silicone/Silikon-1000 (liquid

Deep defects, lip

Permanent

Permanent, safe, long

Migration, foreign body

Off label for

 

silicone) (Alcon Laboratories,

augmentation

 

clinical experience

reactions, poor reputation

cosmetic

 

Fort Worth, TX)

 

 

 

 

purposes

 

Endoplast 50 (Elastin and

Deep defects, lip

12 months

Long-term results

Allergy tests required, limited

Not FDA

 

Collagen) (Laboratories

augmentation

 

 

experience

approved/CE

 

Filorgra, Paris, France)

 

 

 

 

mark

 

Bio-Alcamid (96% water, 4%

Deep defects

Permanent

Long-term results,

Limited experience,

FDA Approved/

 

poly-alkyl imide) (Pur Medical

 

 

removable, no allergy

inflammatory reactions,

CE mark for HIV

 

Corp, Toronto, Canada)

 

 

testing required,

infectious complications,

lipoatrophy

 

 

 

 

bio-compatible

migration

 

 

Aquamid (polyacrylamide

Deep defects, lip

Permanent

Long-term results,

High rate of granuloma

Not FDA

 

hydrogel) (Contura

augmentation

 

compound plasticity

formation, infectious

approved/CE

 

International)

 

 

 

complications

mark

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: Adapted from Johl [2], Murray [3], Broder [4], Eppley [5], Sengelmann [6]

Fillers Facial Injectable 20

215