Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation_Erian, Shiffman_2011.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
49.82 Mб
Скачать

606

M. Salgarello

Fig. 54.20 (a1, a2) Preoperative 15-year-old boy with mildly asymmetrical prominent ears. (b1, b2) One year postoperative.

a1

b1

a2

b2

54.5 Conclusions

Otoplasty techniques include a large number of different methods, over 200 techniques, today restricted to the different combination of the elements of few basic techniques. The sunset of full-thickness methods is evident, as well as the current trend of the use of a graduated approach of combining the elements of various techniques.

The author utilizes a combination of techniques that are adapted to the anatomical needs of each deformity which gives natural and pleasant results and few complications. Their basic principles are presented as a graduated approach which is suitable to standardization, thus making this a simple, reliable, versatile, and reproducible method.

54 Combined Technique in Otoplasty

607

References

1.Kompatscher P, Schuler CH, Clemens S, Seifert B, Beer GM. The cartilage-sparing versus the cartilage-cutting technique: a retrospective quality control comparison of the Francesconi and Converse otoplasties. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(6): 446–53.

2.Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowsky KA. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(4):60e–72e.

3.Matsuo K, Hayashi R, Kiyono M, Hirose T, Netsu Y. Non surgical correction of congenital auricular deformities. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17(2):383–95.

4.Porter CJW, Tan ST. Congenital auricular anomalies: topographic anatomy, embryology, classification and treatment strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(6):1701–12.

5.Bennett SPH, Dagash H, McArthur PA. The role of the antitragicus muscle in plical folding of the pinna. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(5):1266–8.

6.Guyuron B, De Luca L. Ear projection and the posterior auricular muscle insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2): 457–60.

7.Tan ST, Shibu M, Gault DT. A split for correction of congenital ear. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(8):575–8.

8.Tan ST, Abramson DL, MacDonald DM, Mulliken JB. Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(3):263–8.

9.Matsuo K, Hirose T, Tomoro T, Iwisawa M, Katohda S, Takahashi N, et al. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;73(1):38–51.

10.Adamson PA, Galli SK. Otoplasty. In: Cummings CW, editor. Otolaryngology – head and neck surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 853–61.

11.Adamson JE, Horton CE, Crawford HH. The growth pattern of the external ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36(4):466–70.

12.Gasques JA, Pereira de Godoy JM, Cruz EM. Psychosocial effects of otoplasty in children with prominent ears. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(6):910–4.

13.Gosain AK, Kumar A, Huang G. Prominent ears in children younger than 4 years of age: what is the appropriate timing for otoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1042–54.

14.Balogh B, Millesi H. Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992; 89(4):623–30.

15.McDowell AJ. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(1):17–27.

16.Richards SD, Jebreel A, Capper R. Otoplasty: a review of the surgical techniques. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(1):2–8.

17.Salgarello M, Gasperoni C, Montagnese A, Farallo E. Otoplasty for prominent ears: a versatile combined technique to master the shape of the ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):224–7.

18.Lavy J, Stearns M. Otoplasty: techniques, results and complications – a review. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997; 22(5):390–3.

19.Calder JC, Nassan A. Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(3):170–4.

20.Nuara MJ, Mobley SR. Nuances of otoplasty: a comprehensive review of the past 20 years. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14(2):89–102.

21.Adamson PA, Litner JA. Otoplasty technique. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40(2):305–18.

22.Stucker FJ, Vora NM, Lian TS. Otoplasty: an analysis of technique over a 33-year period. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(6): 952–6.

23.Kelley P, Hollier L, Stal S. Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(5):643–53.

24.Petersson RS, Friedman O. Current trends in otoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2008;16(4):352–8.

25.Dieffenbach JE. Die Operative Chirurgie. Leipzig: FA Brockhause; 1845.

26.Luckett WH. A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1910; 10:635.

27.Converse JM, Nigro A, Wilson FA, Johnson N. A technique for surgical correction of lop ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;15(5):411–8.

28.Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:268–72.

29.Pitanguy I, Rebello C. Ansiform ears. Correction by “island” technique. Acta Chir Plast. 1962;4:267–77.

30.Pitanguy I, Fiazza G, Calixto CA, et al. Prominent ears – Pitanguy’s island technique: long-term results. Head Neck Surg. 1985;7:418–26.

31.Gibson T, Davies W. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg. 1958; 10:257.

32.Stenstroem SJ. A natural technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;32:509–18.

33.Bulstrode NW, Huang S, Martin DL. Otoplasty by percutaneous anterior scoring. Another twist to the story: a long term study of 114 patients. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(2): 145–9.

34.Pilz S, Hintringer T, Bauer M. Otoplasty using a spherical metal head dermabrader to form a retroauricular furrow: five-year results. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1995;19(1):83–91.

35.Weinzweig N, Chen L, Sullivan WG. Histomorphology of neochondrogenesis after antihelical fold creation: a comparison of three otoplasty techniques in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33(4):371–6.

36.Mustarde JC. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:170–8.

37.Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by concha-mas- toid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.

38.Scuderi N, Tenna S, Bitonti A, et al. Repositioning of posterior auricular muscle combined with conventional otoplasty: a personal technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007; 60:201–4.

39.Wood-Smith D. Otoplasty. In: Rees T, editor. Aesthetic plastic surgery. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980. p. 833.

40.Spira M. Otoplasty: what I do now-a 30-year perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(3):834–40.

41.Farrior RT. A method of otoplasty; normal contour of the antihelix and scaphoid fossa. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1959; 69(4):400–8.

42.Kaye BL. A simplified method for correcting the prominent ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;40(1):44–8.

43.Francesconi G, Grassi C, Ciocchetti FC. La nostra esperienza nel trattamento chirurgico dell’orecchio ad ansa. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1982;2:163–82.