Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation_Erian, Shiffman_2011.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
49.82 Mб
Скачать

492

 

J. Ramirez et al.

Fig. 43.41 (a) Preoperative.

a

b

(b) Eight months postopera-

 

 

tively after endoscopic

 

 

forehead lifting and

 

 

blepharoplasty (Photo

 

 

courtesy Dr. James Ramirez)

 

 

43.9 Complications

The possible complications depend on the technique and the choice of approach, also on the patient’s condition.

1.Based on the area of the incision, visible scarring or alopecia may occur.

2.The extension of the dissection may produce a neurological alteration with hypoesthesia or vascular damage caused by the occurrence of hematomas.

3.Other possible complications include:

Asymmetry or deformation of the brow with a surprised expression.

Excess or undercorrection of the frontal skin Injury to the facial nerve

Necrotic tissue Infection

43.10 Discussion

As a surgeon, it is important to acquire the experience in recognizing the most suitable approach or surgical technique that offers advantages and complies with the needs and expectations of each patient and to know that there is not a single approach that is useful for all cases.

Currently endoscopic surgery is an excellent option for the forehead-lift procedure, given its versatility,

advantages, and safety profile that allow optimum results in most patients. In cases when only the elevation of the brow tails and diminishing of the lateral furrows is required, it is possible to limit the dissection to a trough to single bilateral incisions that allows the suspension of this specific area.

Neither the effectiveness of the diverse suspension methods has been studied comparatively nor has its cost effectiveness has been analyzed. Currently there are different methods for anchorage such as nails, bone perforations to allow sutures, endothelial sutures [37], and multiple suture materials. The authors have only used Ethibond 3–0 for suspension, with favorable results.

43.11 Conclusions

Facial aging is a multifactor process, especially in the superior third of the face. Manipulation of this area must be integral in the process of rejuvenation. The chosen technique must be individualized for each patient, and gender, age, physical features, and expectations should be taken into consideration. The plastic facial surgeon who has diverse techniques in his operational resources can provide the best results depending on each patient. The technique to minimize incisions and reduce scarring has led to the development of advanced procedures.

43 Forehead Lifting Approach and Techniques

493

References

1.Paul MD. The evolution of the brow lifting aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(5):1409–24.

2.Pedroza F, dos Anjos GC, Bedoya M, Rivera M. Update on brow and forehead lifting. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14(4):283–8.

3.Daniel R, Tirkanits B. Endoscopic forehead lift: an operative technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1148–57.

4.Ramirez O. Why I prefer endoscopic forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(4 Suppl):1033–9.

5.Passot R. La chirurgie esthetique des rides du visage. Presse Med. 1919;27:258.

6.Hunt HL. Plastic surgery of the head, face, and neck. Philadelphia: Lea & Febige; 1926.

7.Passot R. Chirurgie estheetique pure: techniques et results. Paris: Gaston Doin & Cie; 1930.

8.Fomon S. The Surgery of injuries and plastic repair. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1939. p. 1409.

9. Patrocinio Lucas G, Patrocinio Jose A. Forehead-lift. A 10 year review. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008; 10(6):391–4.

10.Gonzales-Ulloa M. Facial wrinkles: integral elimination. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;29:658–73.

11.Marino H, Gandolfo E. Treatment of wrinkles of the forehead. Prensa Méd Argent. 1964;51:1368–71.

12.Isse NG. Endoscopic facial rejuvenation: endoforehead, the functional lift, case reports. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994;18(1): 21–9.

13.Vinas JC, Caviglia C, Cortinas JL. Forehead rhytidoplasty and brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57(4):445–54.

14.Kaye BL. The forehead lift: a useful adjunct to face left and blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;69(2):161–71.

15.Vasconez LO, Core GB, Oslin B. Endoscopy in plastic surgery: an overview. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22(4):585–9.

16.Isse NG. Endoscopic facial rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24(2):213–31.

17.Chajchir A. Endoscopic subperiosteal forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1994;18(3):269–74.

18.Chajchir A. Endoscopic facelift: two years experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997;21(1):1–6.

19.Sullivan PK, Salomon JA, Woo AS, Freeman MB. The importance of the retaining ligamentous attachments of the forehead for selective eyebrow reshaping and forehead rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117 (1):95–104.

20.Knize DM. Reassessment of the coronal incision and subgaleal dissection for foreheadplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(2):478–89; discussion 490–2.

21.Patel BC. Endoscopic brow lifts uber alles. Orbit. 2006;25(4): 267–301.

22.Patel BCK. Surgical eyelid and periorbital anatomy. Semin Ophthalmol. 1996;11(2):118–37.

23.Steinsapir KD, Shorr N, Hoenig J, Goldberg RA, Baylis HI, Morrow D. The endoscopic forehead lift. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(2):107–18.

24.Walden JL, Orseck MJ, Aston SJ. Current methods for brow fixation: are they safe? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(5): 541–8.

25.Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA, Hakim-Faal Z. The course of the temporal branch of the facial nerve in the periorbital region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(2):178–84.

26.Stuzin JM, Wagstrom L, Kawamoto HK, Wolfe SA. Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(2): 265–71.

27.Webster RC, Gaunt JM, Hamdan US, Fuleihan NS, Giandello PR, Smith RC. Supraorbital and supratrochlear notches and foramina: anatomical variations and surgical relevance. Laryngoscope. 1986;96(3):311–5.

28.Isse NG. Orbiculari oculii muscle myotomy, its role in the functional and passive brow lift/forehead lift. Plast Surg Forum. 1994;18:7–9.

29.Fodor PB, Isse NG. Endoscopically assisted aesthetic plastic surgery. Mosby: St. Louis; 1996. p. 39–61.

30.Trinei FA, Januszkiewicz J, Nahai F. The sentinel vein: an important reference point for surgery in the temporal region. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(1):27–32.

31.Isse NG. Endoforehead plasty. Lipoplasty Newsl. 1995;12: 8–15.

32.Lam S, Williams III E. Enfoque integral del rejuvenecimiento facial. Venezuela: Editorial Amolca; 2006. p. 55.

33.Lazor JB, Cheney ML. The forehead lift. In: Cheney ML, editor. Facial surgery: plastic and reconstructive. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 905–11.

34.Chand MS, Perkins SW. Comparison of surgical approaches for upper Facial rejuvenation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;8:326–31.

35.Dailey R, Saulny S. Current treatments of brow ptosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14(5):260–6.

36.Henderson JL, Larrabee W. Analysis of the upper face and selection of rejuvenation techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14(3):153–8.

37.Jacovella P, Tuccillo F, Zimman O, Repetti G. An alternative approach to brow lift fixation: temporoparietalis fascia, galeal, and periosteal imbrication. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119(2):692–702.