Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Офтальмология / Английские материалы / Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation_Erian, Shiffman_2011.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.03.2026
Размер:
49.82 Mб
Скачать

28

P.M. Prendergast

3.2.7 Zone 7

The greater auricular nerve arises from the anterior primary rami of the second and third cervical nerves. It provides sensory innervation to the lower two-thirds of the auricle, the skin underneath the ear, and the posterior two-thirds of the jawline. The nerve pierces the deep cervical fascia at the posterior border of sternocleidomastoid and runs on the muscle, superficial and posterior to platysma toward the angle of the jaw. At a point 6.5 cm inferior to the external auditory canal, the nerve can be found halfway between the posterior and anterior borders of the sternocleidomastoid [16]. Below the ear it divides into anterior and posterior branches. This danger zone can be considered as an oblong, 2 cm wide and 6 cm long, with its center on a point 6.5 cm below the external auditory meatus oriented parallel to the external jugular vein (Fig. 3.7). The greater auricular nerve is prone to injury during neck dissections and suture plication of platysma to the mastoid fascia.

Great care should be taken as dissections proceed forward from the postauricular incision toward the nerve. It is identifiable about 1 cm posterior to the external jugular vein and runs parallel to it. The dissection in this zone should be in the subcutaneous plane, superficial to the nerve. When platysma is mobilized, it should be redraped over the nerve, and care should be taken not to compress or include the nerve or its branches in the suture. Injury to the greater auricular nerve may result in numbness, dysesthesia, or chronic hypesthesia in the skin of the inferior part of the ear, and skin anterior and inferior to this area.

3.3 Conclusions

No surgical procedure is without risks and potential complications. In the face, although there are several risks associated with surgery, such as infection, bleeding, and hematoma, the most serious complication is injury to one of the cranial nerves. Injury to one of the facial nerve branches, such as transection, traction, thermal injury, or blunt trauma, may present as weakness, asymmetry, or total paralysis of the brow, eye, lips, and mouth. There are several, welldefined areas or zones in the face where the important motor and sensory nerves have a predictable path. Mapping these danger zones out before surgical intervention, using bony landmarks where possible, helps orient the surgeon during dissections of the face and neck and may reduce the incidence of significant complications.

Fig. 3.7 Danger zone 7. This lies 6.5 cm below the external auditory meatus, in the middle of sternocleidomastoid, parallel to the external jugular vein. The greater auricular nerve is prone to injury as it passes through this danger zone behind the border of platysma

References

1.Adamson PA, Litner JA. Evolution of rhytidectomy techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(3): 383–91.

2.Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(1):80–8.

3.Zide BM. The facial nerve–cranial nerve VII. In: Zide BM, editor. Surgical anatomy around the orbit. The system of zones. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 19.

4.Pitanguy I, Ramos AS. The frontal branch of the facial nerve: the importance of its variation in face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1966;38(4):352–6.

5.Tellioglu AT, Hosaka Y. Temporoparietal fascia plication in rhytidectomy. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2006;30(2):175–80.

3 Danger Zones in Surgical Facial Rejuvenation

29

6.Toth BA, Daane SP. Subperiosteal midface lifting: a simplified approach. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(3):293–6.

7.Wilhelmi BJ, Mowlavi A, Neumeister MW. The safe face lift with bony anatomic landmarks to elevate the SMAS. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(5):1723–6.

8.Mowlavi A, Wilhelmi BJ. The extended SMAS facelift: identifying the lateral zygomaticus major muscle border using bony anatomic landmarks. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(4): 353–7.

9.Mendelson BC. Correction of the nasolabial fold: extended SMAS dissection with periosteal fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(5):822–33.

10.Barton FE. Rhytidectomy and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(4):601–7.

11.Dingman RO, Grabb WC. Surgical anatomy of the mandibular ramus of the facial nerve based on the dissection of 100 facial halves. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1962;29:266–72.

12.Daane SP, Owsley JQ. Incidence of cervical branch injury with “marginal mandibular nerve pseudo-paralysis” in patients undergoing face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111(7):2414–8.

13.Zide BM. Supraorbital nerve: nuances/dissections from above. In: Zide BM, editor. Surgical anatomy around the orbit. The system of zones. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005. p. 77.

14.Tabatabai N, Spinelli HM. Limited incision nonendoscopic brow lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(5):1563–70.

15.Williams JV. Transblepharoplasty endoscopic subperiosteal midface lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(7):1769–75.

16.McKinney P, Katrana DJ. Prevention of injury to the great auricular nerve during rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66(5):675–9.