- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Contributors
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Etiology
- •A Genetic Cause
- •Family Studies
- •Associations with Race
- •Specific Genes Conferring AMD Risk
- •Complement Factor H
- •C2-CFB Locus
- •Complement Component 3
- •Other Inflammatory Factor Variants
- •Toll-Like Receptor
- •VEGF-A
- •Genetic Variants on Chromosome 10q26
- •LOC387715/ARMS2
- •HTRA1
- •Other Genetic Variants
- •Apolipoprotein E
- •Fibulin 5
- •Hemicentin-1
- •LOC387715/HTRA1 and CFH
- •Genetic Predisposition to a Specific Late Phenotype
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Smoking
- •Alcohol
- •Increased Light Exposure
- •Obesity
- •Exercise
- •Dietary Fat Intake
- •Phytochemicals
- •Ginkgo Biloba
- •Anthocyanins
- •Resveratrol
- •Epigallocatechin Gallate
- •Mineral Supplements
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Classification
- •Nonexudative (Non-neovascular or Dry) AMD
- •Exudative (Neovascular or Wet) AMD
- •Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation
- •Polypoidal Vasculopathy
- •Diagnosis
- •Differential Diagnosis
- •Nonexudative AMD
- •Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR)
- •High Myopia
- •Stargardt’s Disease/Fundus Flavimaculatus
- •Cuticular Drusen
- •Pattern Dystrophy
- •Old Exudative AMD
- •Old Laser Scars
- •Other Conditions
- •Exudative AMD
- •Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
- •Idiopathic Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- •Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP)
- •Presumed Ocular Histoplasmosis Syndrome (POHS)
- •Angioid Streaks
- •High Myopia
- •Cystoid Macular Edema
- •Traumatic Choroidal Rupture
- •Macular Hemorrhage
- •CNV Secondary to Laser
- •Idiopathic
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Color Photography
- •Monochromatic Photography
- •Autofluorescence Imaging
- •Optical Coherence Tomography
- •Enhanced Depth Imaging
- •Fundus Angiography
- •Fluorescein Dye Characteristics
- •Indocyanine Green Dye Characteristics
- •Cameras and Angiography
- •Patient Consent and Instruction
- •Fluorescein Injection
- •Fluorescein Technique
- •Indocyanine Green Technique
- •The Macula
- •Deviations from Normal Angiographic Appearance
- •Indocyanine Green Angiographic Interpretation
- •Drusen
- •Choroidal Neovascularization
- •CNV and Fluorescein Angiography
- •Retinal Vascular Contribution to the Exudative Process
- •Fundus Imaging Characteristics of Therapies for Neovascular AMD
- •Thermal Laser
- •Photodynamic Therapy
- •Anti-VEGF Therapy
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •AREDS
- •Carotenoids
- •Beta-Carotene
- •Macular Xanthophylls
- •Fatty Acids
- •Vitamin E
- •Vitamin C
- •Zinc
- •Folate/B-Vitamins
- •AREDS2
- •Summary
- •References
- •6: Management of Neovascular AMD
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Angiogenesis
- •An Overview of VEGF
- •VEGF-A Isoforms
- •VEGF-A Physiological Response
- •VEGF-A Response in Retinal Diseases
- •Antiangiogenic Drugs
- •Pegaptanib
- •Drug Overview
- •Published Trials
- •Bevacizumab
- •Drug Overview
- •Published Studies
- •Ranibizumab
- •Drug Overview
- •Published Trials
- •Safety Data
- •Upcoming Clinical Trials
- •Promising VEGF Inhibitors
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Antinflammatory Therapy
- •Verteporfin Angioocclusive Therapy
- •Antiangiogenic Therapy
- •Rationale for Combination Therapy in the Treatment of Exudative AMD
- •Clinical Data Examining Combination Therapy for Exudative AMD
- •Verteporfin Therapy in Combination with Triamcinolone
- •Verteporfin PDT Therapy in Combination with Anti-VEGF Agents
- •Triple Therapy for Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Drusen
- •Geographic Atrophy
- •Imaging Modalities in Dry AMD
- •Clinical Trials for Dry AMD
- •Study Design
- •Risk Reduction in Dry AMD
- •AREDS
- •Laser/CAPT
- •Anecortave Acetate
- •Control of Disease Progression
- •Visual Cycle Inhibition: Antioxidants
- •Antioxidants
- •Complement
- •Neuroprotective Agents
- •Modulators of Choroidal Circulation
- •Recovery
- •Gene Therapy
- •Stem Cell Therapy
- •Retinal Prostheses
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Emerging and Future Therapies
- •Ranibizumab
- •Bevacizumab
- •VEGF Trap-Eye
- •Bevasiranib
- •Vatalanib
- •Pazopanib
- •Sirna-027
- •Anti-VEGFR Vaccine Therapy
- •Radiation
- •Epi-Rad90™ Ophthalmic System
- •IRay
- •Infliximab
- •Sirolimus
- •Gene Therapy
- •AdPEDF.11
- •AAV2-sFLT01
- •Other Pathways
- •Squalamine Lactate
- •Combretastatin A4 Phosphate/CA4P
- •Volociximab
- •NT-501, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor
- •Sonepcizumab
- •Summary
- •References
- •Key Points
- •Introduction
- •Evidence-Based Medicine
- •Interventional Evidence
- •Masking
- •Dropout Rate
- •Validity
- •Risk Reduction
- •Pharmacoeconomic Analysis
- •Cost-Minimization Analysis
- •Cost-Benefit Analysis
- •Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- •Quality-of-Life Instruments, Function-Based
- •Quality-of-Life Instruments, Preference-Based
- •Utility Acquisition
- •Utility Gain
- •Decision Analysis
- •Comparative Effectiveness (Human Value Gain)
- •Value Trumps Cost
- •Costs
- •Cost Basis
- •Cost Perspective
- •Cost-Utility Ratio
- •Cost-Effectiveness Standards
- •Discounting
- •Standardization
- •Patient Respondents
- •Cost Perspective
- •The Future
- •Macroeconomic Costs and AMD
- •Employment and Wage Loss
- •Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
- •Other Costs
- •Financial Return on Investment (ROI)
- •References
- •Index
82 |
F.M. Penha and P.J. Rosenfeld |
|
|
in pathologic conditions while preserving a wide range of VEGF-mediated physiological processes associated with the smaller isoforms [47–51].
Published Trials
The landmark phase III VEGF Inhibition Study In Ocular Neovascularization (VISION) trials were multicenter, dose-ranging studies that enrolled subjects with a wide range of neovascular lesions, including all angiographic subtypes and lesions up to 12 disc areas in size (including blood, scar, or atrophy, and neovascularization). Patients in the study had a best corrected visual acuity (VA) of 20/40–20/320 in their study eye [52, 53]. Subjects received sham injections or injections of intravitreal pegaptanib sodium (0.3, 1, or 3 mg) every 6 weeks for 54 weeks for the first year of the study.
In the combined trials, 1,186 subjects were enrolled and the results showed that intravitreal pegaptanib sodium decreased the loss vision, with 70% of treated patients losing fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity compared with 55% of controls [53, 54]. Moreover, 6% of pegaptanib sodium-treated patients gained at least 15 letters compared with 2% of the patients in the control group [53]. Fluorescein angiography at 30 and 54 weeks showed that the pegaptanib-treated group had a significant reduction (P < 0.01) in the rate of growth in the total area of their CNV and in the severity of leakage compared with the control group [53]. The 0.3 mg dose appeared more effective than the 1 mg or 3 mg doses, so the 0.3 mg became the FDA-approved dose.
Bevacizumab
Drug Overview
Research from the 1980s and 1990s has shown that VEGF inhibition using a murine and humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF markedly suppressed tumor growth in vivo, thereby setting the stage for the development of bevacizumab. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG1) against human VEGF-A that selectively inhibits all isoforms and bioactive proteolytic breakdown products of VEGF-A. Bevacizumab is
an immunoglobulin G molecule that is comprised of amino acid sequences, which are about 93% human and 7% murine. FDA-approved in 2004 as treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer, bevacizumab was given intravenously at a dose of 5 mg/ kg and infused every two weeks in combination with 5-fluorouracil. Additional phase III clinical trials with bevacizumab have since resulted in FDA approval for the treatment of breast, lung, kidney, and brain cancers [55]. No evidence of an antibody immunogenic response to bevacizumab has been found in any clinical trials, confirming the success of the humanization technique.
Bevacizumab is commercially available as 100 and 400 mg preservative-free, single-use vials in a volume of 4 or 16 mL (25 mg/mL). The 100 mg product is formulated in 240 mg a(alpha),a(alpha)-trehalose dihydrate, 23.2 mg sodium phosphate (monobasic, monohydrate), 4.8 mg sodium phosphate (dibasic, anhydrous), and 1.6 mg polysorbate 20, and should be diluted in water prior to intravenous infusion. For off-la- bel ophthalmic use, bevacizumab is not diluted, but rather dispensed into individual syringes for intravitreal injection and the volume (dose) of injection ranges from 0.05 mL (1.25 mg) to 0.1 mL (2.5 mg).
The intravitreal pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies was initially studied in monkeys and rabbits and found to be about 5.6 days [56, 57]. Bevacizumab has since been studied experimentally in rabbits and is shown to have a half-life of 4.32 days [58]. When 1.25 mg was injected in rabbits, concentrations of over 10 m(mu)g/mL bevacizumab were maintained in the vitreous for at least 30 days. Additional animal studies in rabbits and monkeys suggest a half-life of bevacizumab in the range of four– six days [59, 60]. A human study reported that the half-life of intravitreal bevacizumab was approximately three days, and also showed that a single dose of intravitreal bevacizumab was likely to provide complete intravitreal VEGF blockade for a minimum of four weeks [61]. Another human study has suggested a half-life of 6.7 days while yet another study has reported a half-life of as long as 9.8 days [62, 63]. The exact half-life of bevacizumab in the eye is uncertain at this time
6 Management of Neovascular AMD |
83 |
|
|
and may vary depending on the extent of vitreous liquefication and the phakic status of the eye.
Bevacizumab has a molecular weight of approximately 149 kDa and there was a question of whether such a large molecule could penetrate the retina. Han et al. were the first to show that a full-length immunoglobulin was capable of penetrating the rabbit retina after an intravitreal injection [64]. Subsequently, Sharar et al. used qualitative immunofluorescence to show that intravitreal bevacizumab was able to completely penetrate the retina by 24 h and was essentially absent at four weeks after an injection [65] Moreover, Dib et al. demonstrated subretinal detection of bevacizumab after an intravitreal injection in rabbit eyes. They detected bevacizumab molecules in the subretinal space of all six eyes studied 2 h after an intravitreal bevacizumab injection of 0.05 mL (1.25 mg), suggesting that the molecule could rapidly diffuse through the retina [66].
Published Studies
Although systemic bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) was shown to reduce leakage from CNV, decrease central retinal thickness (CRT) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and significantly improve vision in neovascular AMD [67–70], the intravenous use of bevacizumab for neovascular AMD was never widely adopted because the intravitreal approach uses up to 500-fold less drug, is much less expensive, and is perceived to be safer due to the smaller dose of drug. In the first-reported case [71] of intravitreal bevacizumab, a patient with recurrent CNV secondary to AMD, who had previously been treated with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in combination with triamcinolone acetonide and then treated with pegaptanib injections, was shown to experience a reduction in retinal thickness with resolution of subretinal fluid using OCT imaging and the visual distortion resolved within one week following a single injection of 1.0 mg bevacizumab. Subsequently, several retrospective [72–86] and prospective [73, 87–97] studies of intravitreal bevacizumab (dose range 1.0–2.5 mg) in neovascular AMD patients have been published, all demonstrating clinically significant
improvement in mean visual acuity, reduction in fluorescein angiographic leakage, resolution of OCT-visualized edema in up to 90% of bevaci- zumab-treated patients, and apparent overall clinical safety (see example of treatment effect in Fig. 6.1). Most studies have been small (up to 100 patients), uncontrolled studies with different retreatment criteria and outcome measures.
A randomized, prospective clinical trial compared verteporfin PDT with bevacizumab (2.5 mg) for the treatment of predominantly classic CNV secondary to AMD and found that at month 6, all 32 eyes (100%) receiving bevacizumab lost fewer than15 letters of visual acuity compared with 73.3% of the PDT-receiving eyes (P = 0.002) [98]. The OCT outcomes were significantly better at 3 and 6 months in patients treated with bevacizumab versus the PDT group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.002, respectively). The study showed overall benefit of treatment with bevacizumab compared with PDT. Another study showed the effect of previous PDT treatment on the response to bevacizumab injections. The authors compared treatment-naïve eyes (80) with eyes previously treated with PDT (29) and showed that both groups had equal anatomic and functional improvements. However, the eyes previously treated with PDT required fewer injections (4.22) when compared with treatment-naïve eyes (6.13) [99]. The rationale of using combined therapy is to either reduce the number of antiVEGF injections in wet AMD [98–100], or to improve the efficacy of anti-VEGF treatment in cases of exudative maculopathy such as polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy [100]. Combined therapy is now being evaluated by several prospective randomized trials and Chapter 7 discusses this topic in greater detail.
Systemic and ocular adverse events (AEs) attributable to intravitreal bevacizumab have been rare with the most common ocular side effects being endophthalmitis, uveitis, submacular hemorrhage, and RPE tears. In a recent retrospective safety assessment of intravitreal bevacizumab involving 1,173 patients, there were 18 (1.5%) reported systemic AEs, including five deaths (0.4%) and the ocular AEs included subconjunctival hemorrhage [838 cases (19% of 4,303
84 |
F.M. Penha and P.J. Rosenfeld |
|
|
Fig. 6.1 A 72-year-old woman with age-related macular degeneration diagnosed with an occult lesion and a vascularized retinal pigment epithelium detachment (PED) in the right eye. She received four-monthly bevacizumab injections and then was treated every three months. Color fundus images with late-phase images of the fluorescein
and indocyanine angiograms at baseline are shown. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) responses from baseline to one year after the last bevacizumab injection are shown. Horizontal (left) and vertical (right) OCT B-scans through the central macula and visual acuity are shown. Resolution of the PED was observed at the last follow-up visit
injections)], increased intraocular pressure (IOP), endophthalmitis, and tractional retinal detachment [seven cases (0.16%)] each [85]. The low rates of systemic complications in these studies
were consistent with the rates of these lifethreatening adverse events in the general, untreated population and those reported in an earlier survey of 5,228 patients [101].
