Физика космических лучей / HEA11
.pdf5Characteristic acceleration timescale & rate for 2nd order Fermi
Acceleration as result of repeated collisions with "clouds":
Mean time between two collision = "scattering time": s
Average distance between two interactions (mean free path):
For energetic particle (v ' c) mean scattering time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s ' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Characteristic acceleration timescale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
E |
|
|
' |
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
c |
|
2 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
< dE=dt > |
' E |
|
|
4 c2 c |
|
|
4c |
Vc |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
t |
:= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
s |
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
acc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acceleration rate: |
dt ' |
3 c2 |
, |
|
dt |
= tacc |
|
|
3 c2E |
|||||||||||||||||||||
tacc |
= E |
|
= |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
dE |
4 c |
|
|
|
|
|
dE |
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
4c |
|
|
|
||||||
11
6Evolution of Particle Spectra - recap
Remember kinetic equation derived in lecture 6:
|
@n(E; t) |
= |
|
@ |
[ (E)n(E; t)] + Q(E; t) |
|
@t |
@E |
|||
|
|
|
|||
n(E; t) dE number density of particle in interval dE at time t,
Q(E; t) injection term,
(E) := dEdt describing energy loss or gain (acceleration)
) for synchrotron losses (ignoring gains): dE=dt = c1E2
) for 2nd order Fermi (ignoring losses):
(E) = dEdt
12
7Particle Spectra with Escape
Evolution of particle distribution assuming particles to be accelerated by 2nd order Fermi and to escape on energy-independent timescale esc:
Kinetic equation with escape term:
@t |
' @E |
tacc n(E; t) |
n( esc |
||
@n(E; t) |
@ |
|
E |
|
E; t) |
In steady-state @n(E; t)=@t = 0:
1 |
|
|
|
|
E dn(E) |
|
n(E) |
||||
0 ' |
|
|
n(E) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
tacc |
tacc |
|
dE |
esc |
|||||||
) dE |
' E 1 + esc |
|
|||||||||
|
|
dn |
|
n |
|
|
tacc |
|
|||
Solution for particle spectrum is a power-law:
n(E) / E |
with = 1 + |
tacc |
|
esc |
|
13
Caution: The above treatment is only approximately valid (i.e., in the limit of small tacc= esc) and hides broadening/momentum dispersion < ( p)2= t > that accompanies the energy increase in this stochastic process. The latter can be correctly obtained within a Fokker-Planck approach:
14
Fokker-Planck Equation
Widely used for description of stochastic processes.
P (p;~ p~) := probability that particle with momentum p~ at time t changes momentum by p~ in time t.
f(~x; p;~ t):=phase space distribution function = probability to nd particle in phase space volume element d3xd3p.
Can write:
Z
f(p;~ t + t) = f(p~ p;~ t) P (p~ p;~ p~) d3( p)
Taylor expansion gives (to 2nd order in small p):
f(p;~ t) + |
@f |
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
@t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
' Z f |
@f |
pi |
+ |
1 @2f |
|
pi pj P |
@P |
pi + |
1 @2P |
pi pj d3( p) |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
@pi |
2 |
@pi@pj |
@pi |
2 @pi@pj |
|||||||||||||||||
' Z f P |
|
f P ) |
|
1 |
@2(f P ) |
pi pj::: d3( p) |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
@( |
|
pi + |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
@pi |
|
2 |
@pi@pj |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
15
Have from above: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
f(p;~ t) + |
@f |
t |
|
|
|
|
|
|
@t |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
' Z f P |
f P ) |
|
1 @2(f P ) |
|
||||
@( |
pi + |
|
|
|
pi |
|||
@pi |
2 @pi@pj |
|||||||
pj::: d3( p)
Imposing normalization:
Z
P (p;~ p~) d3( p) = 1
and de ning "Fokker-Planck" coe cients:
Z
< pi > := P (p;~ p~) pi d3( p)
Z
< pi pj > := P (p;~ p~) pi pj d3( p)
) Fokker-Planck equation:
|
@f |
|
@ < p |
> |
|
1 |
@2 |
|
< p p |
j |
> |
|
|||||
|
|
= |
|
|
i |
|
|
f + |
|
|
|
|
i |
|
f |
|
|
|
@t |
@pi |
t |
|
|
2 @pi@pj |
t |
|
|
||||||||
with 1st term (rhs) describing systematic energy gain/losses, and 2nd di u- sion part/dispersion/broadening.
16
"Principle of detailed balance": if scattering process is reversible in the sense that:
P (p;~ p~) = P (p~ p;~ p~)
Taylor expand rhs: |
|
|
|
|
@2P |
|
P (p;~ p~) ' P (p;~ p~) pi |
@P |
+ |
1 |
pi pj |
||
|
|
|
|
|||
@pi |
2 |
@pi@pj |
||||
Integrating over d3( p) gives (treating p and p as independent variables):
@pi |
< pi > 2 @pj |
< pi pj > |
= 0 |
||||||||||
@ |
|
|
|
1 @ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
) |
< pi > 1 |
@ < pi pj > |
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
t |
2 |
@pj |
|
t |
|
|
|||||
Fokker-Planck eq. then reduces to a di usion equation in momentum space:
|
@f |
= |
@ |
Dij |
@f |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
@t |
@pi |
@pj |
where
Dij := < pi pj >
2 t are the components of the di usion tensor.
17
Example: Stochastic 2nd order Fermi for isotropic di usion in momentum space with f(p~) ! f(p) (i.e., f(p~)d~p = 4 p2f(p)dp; use spherical coordinates], and with constant escape:
@f |
1 @ |
@f |
|
f |
||||
|
= |
|
|
|
p2Dp |
|
|
|
@t |
p2 |
@p |
@p |
esc |
||||
with Dp(p) = < p p> =: D0p2 momentum space di usion coe cient.
2 t
Thus, to properly incorporate di usion in kinetic eq. before (Sec. 7), an additional term / @E@ E2 @E@n needs to be added.
Steady-state solution assuming power law ansatz f(p) = f0 p s:
1 @ |
|
|
|
@f |
|
@f |
|
@2f |
|
|
f |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
p2Dp |
|
|
= 4D0p |
|
|
+ D0p2 |
|
|
= |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
p2 @p |
@p |
@p |
@p2 |
esc |
||||||||||||||||||
) |
|
4D0f0( s) + D0f0( s)( s 1) = |
|
|
f0 |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
esc |
||||||||||||||||||||||
s2 3s D0 esc |
= 0 |
) |
|
s = 2 |
+ 2r |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
1 + |
9 D0 esc |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
1 |
|
||||||
(choose positive solution to ensure nite particle number).
18
We have < E= t >= (4=3)(c= ) c2E for relativistic particles (E ' pc). Using "detailed balance"-relation for Fokker-Planck coe cients:
|
|
|
p |
1 |
@ |
|
|
|
( p)2 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
in spherical coordinates, D t E = |
|
|
|
p2 |
D |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|||||
2p2 |
|
|
@p |
|
t |
|
|
|
||||||||
) |
Dp(p) := |
2 t |
= p2 Z |
p2 |
|
|
|
t |
|
|
dp = p2 Z |
p2 |
3 c2p dp = |
3 c2p2 |
||
|
|
< p p > 1 |
|
|
< p > |
|
1 |
|
|
4 c |
1 c |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
)D0 = 13 c c2
Power law index for f(p) = f0p s becomes:
s = 2 |
+ 2r |
1 + |
9 D0 esc |
= 2 |
+ 2r |
1 + |
9 esc |
|
|||
3 |
3 |
|
4 1 |
|
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
16tacc |
|
noting that (e.g. sec. 5) tacc = E= < dE=dt >= 34c |
1 |
|
= 1=(4 D0). |
||||||||
2 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c |
|
|
|
Di erential particle distribution: n(p) / p2f(p) / p2 s / p with
= s 2 ' ( |
3 |
2) + |
3 |
1 + |
8 tacc |
= 1 + |
4 tacc |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
2 |
2 |
9 esc |
3 esc |
||||||||||
with expansion for large D0 esc. This is close to our estimate from the kinetic equation.
19
82nd order Fermi acceleration and its limits
E cient Acceleration of CR by 2nd order Fermi in the Galaxy?
Slow process: Acceleration time too long
) ISM clouds < Vc > 10 km/s, i.e. c 10 4, so < E=E >' c2 10 8 ) Distance or mean free path L 1 pc, so s L=c a few years.
) Acceleration timescale:
tacc = |
s |
108 yr > tCR 107 yr |
< E=E > |
tCR=typical CR con nement time (leaky box) in the Galaxy.
Injection Problem:
) Coulomb losses independent of E, dominate at low energy
) Protons have to be injected with kinetic energy of a few 100 MeV ) need pre-acceleration/injection mechanism.
Non-universal index: power law index s sensitive to tacc and esc ) tacc depends on c
) esc depends on density of scattering clouds
20
