Structural mechanics
.pdfConsequently, |
|
|
|
r . |
(9.8) |
ik |
ki |
|
Expression (9.8) is a formal notation of the theorem on reciprocity of reactions and displacements (second theorem of J. Rayleigh): the displacement of the point of application of force Fi 1 in its direction,
caused by the unit displacement of link “ k ”, is numericly equal (with the opposite sign) to the reaction in link “ k ” due to unit force Fi 1.
The dimensions of reactions and displacements in this expression are the same. They are installed like this:
|
|
= |
Dimension of the reaction in link "k " |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dimension rki |
|
Dimension of |
force "F" |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Dimension of the displacement |
||
Dimension |
|
= |
|
in the direction of |
force "F" |
|
|
Dimension of the displacement |
|||||
|
ik |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
in the direction of |
link "k" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To determine the free terms, we consider the primary system of the displacement method in state “ k ” and in state “ F ” (load state, Figure 9.16, d).
On the basis of the reciprocity theorem, there is equality:
WkF WFk .
Revealing this equality, we obtain:
RkF 1 F ik 0 .
From the last equality it follows
RkF F ik .
281
To determine the displacement ik (Figure 9.16, a) in a statically
indeterminate system using the Mohr formula, as you know, one of two “multiplied” diagrams of bending moments can be constructed in a statically determinate system obtained from the given system. In this case, it is the primary system of the displacement method.
Then, denoting the diagram of bending moments due to F 1 in a
ˆ 0 |
|
(Figure 9.16, e), we obtain |
||||||
statically determinate system by M F |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
ˆ 0 |
dx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ik |
|
Mk M F |
. |
|
(9.9) |
|||
|
|
|
EJ |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the external load is a group of forces, then |
ˆ 0 |
is a bending mo- |
||||||
M F |
||||||||
ments diagram constructed in the primary system of the force method due to a generalized unit force corresponding to the nature of a given exposure.
Substituting the value of ik into the expression for RkF , we obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
ˆ 0 |
dx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
RkF F |
Mk M F |
. |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
EJ |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By introducing F to the integrand and denoting |
|
||||||||
0 |
|
|
|
|
ˆ 0 |
|
|
|
|
M F |
F M F , |
|
|
|
|
||||
we find: |
|
|
|
|
k M F0 dx |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
RkF |
M |
. |
(9.10) |
||||||
|
|
|
|
EJ |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, the calculation of the load reaction RkF is reduced to the calculation of the expression (9.10), in which:
Mk is a unit diagram of bending moments constructed in the primary system of the displacement method;
M F0 is a diagram of bending moments from the given load, built in a
statically determinate system, obtained either from the primary system of the displacement method with the mandatory rejection of link “k”, or
282
obtained from the given statically indeterminate system, i.e. constructed in the primary system of the force method .
E x a m p l e. Let us determine by kinematic method the reactions
r12 , R1F and R2F |
|
for the frame shown in Figure 9.14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h |
|
|
4EJ 6EJ |
2EJ 6EJ |
|
6EJ |
|||||||
r12 |
M |
1M2 dx |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
EJ |
|
|
|
|
h |
h |
2 |
h |
h |
2 |
|
|
h |
2 . |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
6EJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
To determine |
|
R1F , |
we construct in a statically determinate system |
|||||||||||||||||
obtained from the primary system of the method of displacements (Fi-
gure 9.14, c) a diagram of the bending moments M F0(a) |
(Figure 9.17, a). |
||||||||||||||||||||||
The index (a) in the designation |
M F0(a) corresponds to a variant of the |
||||||||||||||||||||||
primary system (Figure 9.17, a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M 0 a |
dx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
R1F |
M |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 2 q l |
2 |
|
3 2EJ |
|
|
1 2 q l2 |
|
3 2EJ |
|
|
q l2 |
|
q l2 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
1 |
|
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
l |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
. |
2EJ 3 8 |
|
2l |
2EJ 3 8 |
|
2l |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
8 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 9.17
283
To determine R2F , we select a statically determinate system obtained from the given system (Figure 9.14, a), and construct a diagram of the M F0(b) (Figure 9.17, b):
|
|
|
2M F0(b)dx |
|
1 1 Fh h 5EJ |
|
5 |
|
||||
R2F |
M |
|
F. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
EJ |
EJ 2 4 2 |
2h |
16 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
9.6. Building and Checking Internal Forces Diagrams Due to External Loads
Having solved the system of canonical equations (9.4), we find the values of the primary unknowns of the displacements method. To build the final diagram of bending moments, it is necessary to first build the
adjusted unit diagrams MiZi (they are called “corrected" unit diagrams
of moments). The final diagram M of bending moments from an external load in the given statically indeterminate system is constructed by summing the load diagram M F with the “corrected" unit diagrams, i. e.,
the ordinate of the diagram M in each concrete section “k” of the frame bar is calculated by the formula:
Mk MkF Mk1 Z1 Mk 2 Z2 Mkn Zn .
The main verification of the correctness of the final diagram of bending moments M in the displacement method is a static check, which, as is known, reduces to checking the equilibrium of moments in the frame nodes.
In addition, as in the force method, a kinematic check can be applied to check the correctness of the final diagram M: the result of “multiplying”
each unit moments diagram (or total unit diagram) of the force method by the final moments diagram should be zero
The diagram of transverse forces Q is constructed, as in the method of forces, according to diagram M , and the diagram of the longitudinal
forces |
N is constructed according to diagram Q . Static check of dia- |
grams |
Q and N is performed in the same way as in the force method |
(in the displacement method, static check refers to the main one).
284
E x a m p l e 1. Let us construct a diagram of bending moments in the frame shown in Figure 9.18, a.
To reduce the number of unknowns, when calculating the degree of linear mobility of the frame nodes, the console, as a statically determinate fragment, is discarded. Then the degree of freedom W of the
hinge-rod system (Figure 9.18, b) will be equal to unity, that is nl 1 .
The total number of the displacement method unknowns is equal n na nl 2 1 3 . At Figure 9.18, c the primary system and the pos-
itive directions of the primary unknowns are shown, and Figure 9.18, d– g shows the bending moments diagram in the primary system, due to load, and unit diagrams of bending moments.
The system of canonical equations has the form:
r11Z1 |
r12Z2 |
r13Z3 |
R1F |
0, |
|||||||||||
r |
Z |
r |
Z |
2 |
|
r |
Z |
3 |
|
R |
|
0, |
|
||
21 |
|
1 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
2F |
|
|
|
||||
r |
Z |
1 |
|
r |
Z |
2 |
|
r |
Z |
3 |
|
R |
|
0. |
|
31 |
|
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
3F |
|
|
|
|||||
We note some features of calculating the coefficients at the unknowns and free terms of the canonical equations. To determine coefficient r32 ,
we write the condition for the equilibrium of the fragment (Figure 9.18, h) of the design scheme taken from Figure 9.18, f:
X 0; |
r32 0.24EJ 0.375EJ 0; |
r32 0.135EJ . |
Using the data (Figure 9.18, g), we can verify that the reciprocity of the reactions is observed: r23 r32. Indeed, from the condition of the
equilibrium of moments in the node (Figure 9.18, i) it follows that
M 0; |
r23 0.24EJ 0.375EJ 0; |
r23 0.135EJ. |
Free term R3F can be determined from the equilibrium equation for the fragment (Figure 9.18, j) obtained from (Figure 9.18, d):
X 0; |
R3F 15.0 0; |
R3F 15.0. |
285
Figure 9.18
286
Figure 9.20
290
