Анализ статья 2

1.The text under analysis belongs to the publicistic style, specifically a newspaper article presenting a problematic issue. It includes elements of hard news due to its focus on current events and political tensions.

2.The text belongs to political and social spheres of communication. The text provides relevant information and aims, such as:

•Information regarding the allegations made by Russian officials, specifically the assertion by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov that the reported chemical attack in Syria was staged by foreign agents.

•Accusations leveled against the UK by Russia's defense ministry, implicating British involvement in orchestrating the alleged attack.

•Statements from the US and France claiming to possess evidence of the chemical attack and considering military retaliation, indicating the potential for further escalation of tensions.

•Russia's warning about the risk of Western airstrikes leading to war, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.

•Quotes from various officials and representatives, including Lavrov, General Igor Konashenkov, the UK's envoy to the UN, and the White House, providing different perspectives on the issue.

to impact readers by shaping public opinion on the matter.

3.The main functions of the text are informative and effecting.

Informative Function: The text primarily aims to inform readers about the current geopolitical situation, specifically regarding the alleged chemical attack in Syria and the subsequent responses from various countries. It provides details about the accusations, statements, and warnings issued by different officials and governments involved in the matter. The information presented includes quotes, evidence, and positions taken by key figures, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the events unfolding.

Effecting Function: In addition to providing information, the text also seeks to influence or affect the readers' perspectives and attitudes towards the issue. By presenting the viewpoints and arguments of different parties involved, the text indirectly attempts to persuade readers to consider certain interpretations or positions. For example, by including statements from Russian officials alleging the staged nature of the attack and warning about the risks of military escalation, the text may seek to shape readers' perceptions of the situation and garner support for Russia's stance. Similarly, by including responses from the US, UK, and France, the text may aim to provoke critical thinking or evoke emotional responses from readers regarding the seriousness of the allegations and potential consequences.

The dominating function of this text is the informative function, because

•The text predominantly focuses on presenting factual information about the alleged chemical attack in Syria and the subsequent responses from various countries.

•It provides details about statements, accusations, warnings, and actions taken by different officials and governments involved in the situation.

•The text includes quotes, evidence, and descriptions of events to support the information presented.

•The primary goal is to inform readers about the complex geopolitical dynamics and developments surrounding the issue, allowing them to gain a deeper understanding of the situation.

4.The article is intended for a wide audience due to the significant social, political, and economic implications of the issues raised, such as:

•Allegations of a staged chemical attack in Syria by foreign agents, as asserted by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.

•Accusations against the UK by Russia's defense ministry regarding involvement in staging the attack.

•Claims by the US and France of possessing proof of the chemical attack and consideration of military retaliation.

•Warning from Russia about the risk of Western airstrikes potentially leading to war.

•Contradictory statements and accusations exchanged between different countries and officials regarding responsibility for the attack.

•The role of international organizations, such as the UN and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), in investigating the alleged attack.

•The broader implications of the situation on international peace and security, as highlighted by various leaders and officials.

5.The text reflects analytical generalization, as it presents a comprehensive analysis of the political situation surrounding the alleged chemical attack in Syria. So, it consists of:

•Comprehensive Analysis: The text delves into various aspects of the situation, including accusations, responses, warnings, and potential consequences. It provides a detailed examination of the positions taken by different countries and officials involved in the matter.

•Critical Thinking: By presenting multiple viewpoints and arguments, the text encourages readers to engage in critical thinking and analysis. Readers are prompted to consider the validity of different perspectives and evaluate the evidence presented by various parties.

•Logical Reasoning: The text employs logical reasoning to assess the credibility of the claims made by different sources. It examines the evidence, inconsistencies, and motivations behind the statements made by officials and governments, allowing readers to form their own conclusions.

•Balanced Presentation: Despite potential biases or conflicting interests among the parties involved, the text strives to present a balanced analysis by including quotes and

perspectives from different sources. This approach enables readers to consider multiple viewpoints and form informed opinions.

6.The text is written in a deductive contemplation style, supported by arguments and conclusions drawn from the presented evidence, such as:

Arguments:

•The text presents arguments supporting the assertion that the reported chemical attack in Syria was staged by foreign agents, as claimed by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and General Igor Konashenkov, a spokesman for Russia's defense ministry.

•It includes statements from Lavrov and Konashenkov mentioning "irrefutable evidence" and "evidence that proves Britain was directly involved in organizing this provocation," respectively.

•Additionally, the text highlights warnings from Russia about the risk of Western airstrikes potentially leading to war, indicating the seriousness of the situation.

Conclusion:

•Based on the arguments presented in the text, the conclusion drawn is that the situation surrounding the alleged chemical attack in Syria is highly contentious and complex, with conflicting claims and potential consequences.

•While Russia asserts that the attack was staged and warns against military retaliation, other countries, such as the US and UK, claim to have proof of the attack's occurrence and are considering military action.

•The text does not explicitly offer a definitive conclusion but rather leaves the situation open-ended, emphasizing the need for further investigation and diplomatic efforts to address the escalating tensions.

7.The text combines expressive and standard means.

Data: The text incorporates factual data, such as statements from officials and descriptions of events, to support its arguments and conclusions. This data provides a foundation for the analysis presented in the article, enhancing its credibility and reliability.

Simplicity: The language used in the text is straightforward and accessible, making it easy for readers to understand complex geopolitical issues. The clarity of expression ensures that readers can grasp the nuances of the situation without undue difficulty. Intelligibility: The text is intelligible, with logical progression and clear explanations of key concepts. This ensures that readers can follow the flow of information and reasoning presented in the article, facilitating comprehension and engagement. Consistency on the Facts: The text maintains consistency in its presentation of facts, ensuring that information is accurate and coherent throughout. By providing a coherent narrative and avoiding contradictions, the text enhances its credibility and trustworthiness.

8.The language of the text features full of:

Terms: The text utilizes a variety of specialized terms related to politics and international relations. For instance, terms such as "chemical attack," "military retaliation," and "provocation" are employed to describe key events and concepts in the article.

Abbreviations: The text includes several abbreviations to streamline communication and save space. Examples include "UN" (United Nations), "VDC" (Violations Documentation Center), "UK" (United Kingdom), and "OPCW" (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons).

Question-and-Answer Format: The text occasionally adopts a question-and-answer format to facilitate dialogue and engagement with the reader. For instance, when discussing the proof of the chemical attack, the text includes a question posed by unnamed US officials to NBC News: "What proof is there of a chemical attack?" This format serves to break up the text and prompt reflection on key issues raised in the article.

9.The author remains generalized, serving as an objective presenter of information without expressing personal opinions.

10.The main topic of the text is the Russian perspective on the alleged chemical attack in Syria. There are the following subtopics, underlying in this article:

• Russia's Views on the Accident:

This subtopic focuses on Russia's perspective on the alleged chemical attack in Syria. It includes statements from Russian officials, such as Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and General Igor Konashenkov, who assert that the attack was staged by foreign agents.

Russia's warnings about the risk of Western airstrikes leading to war are also discussed within this context.

• Discussions about the Blame for the Attack Among Different Politicians:

This subtopic explores the debates and accusations surrounding the responsibility for the chemical attack. It includes discussions among politicians from various countries, such as the US, UK, France, and Russia, regarding who should be held accountable for the incident. Contradictory statements and accusations exchanged between different parties are highlighted within this subtopic.

• Descriptions of Proofs and Risks After the Chemical Attack in Syria

This subtopic provides details about the evidence and proofs presented by different parties to support their claims regarding the chemical attack. It includes descriptions of blood and urine samples obtained by US officials, as well as warnings from Russia about the potential risks of military retaliation and escalation. The subtopic emphasizes the complexities and potential consequences of the situation.

11.I enjoyed this text. It was informative, as there were many new terms that expanded my vocabulary. I'm not particularly interested in politics, but it was an interesting experience reading the article on politics and learning about important events and developments in the world