2 курс / Writing - Opinion Essay (1)

Plan:

I. Introduction. Problem: Animal experimentation is an important and controversial issue. The author believes that testing should be prohibited.

II. Alternative Methods

Alternatives that eliminate the need for animal use.

III. Argument 2: Animal Rights

1. Animals have the right to life and freedom from pain.

2. Ethical position: It is morally unacceptable to inflict suffering to satisfy human desires (cosmetics).

IV. Argument 3: Unreliable Results. Animal studies produce unreliable results for human health.

V. Conclusion. Confirmation: Animal testing of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals is unethical and should be prohibited.

Essay

Animal experimentation is a significant and contentious issue in today's world. The ethical implications of this practice generate considerable debate. Personally, I find the use of animals for drug and cosmetic testing unethical and advocate for its prohibition, particularly given the availability of alternative techniques and the inherent value of animal life, which should not be compromised for commercial profits.

Firstly, our modern world offers a range of alternative testing approaches that eliminate the need for animals. These include in vitro methods, which utilize cells cultivated in a laboratory setting; computer simulations that predict the effects of substances on the body; and the utilization of human tissues. Such methods can be more precise and efficient than animal testing, as they consider the specific attributes of the human organism.

Secondly, animals, much like humans, possess the right to live and be free from pain. Animal testing in the drug and cosmetic industries often entails cruel and detrimental processes, such as administering toxic substances, inflicting wounds, and causing burns. Subjecting living creatures to suffering simply to satisfy human desires, especially when focused on producing cosmetic products, is morally indefensible.

Thirdly, animal studies don't always deliver trustworthy findings for human health. Because animal and human physiology differ, test outcomes may be unreliable. History contains cases of medications deemed safe in animals that proved hazardous to humans. This calls into doubt the practicality and efficiency of using animals for testing.

In summary, I am deeply persuaded that testing cosmetics and pharmaceuticals on animals is unethical and must be outlawed. The presence of more compassionate and alternative methodologies, acknowledgment of animals' right to life, and the dubious validity of these tests all offer compelling reasons to stop this procedure. I hope for a future in which animal testing is superseded by more ethical and efficient solutions that consider both human welfare and the rights of our fellow creatures.