
- •FOREWORD
- •CONTENTS
- •1. INTRODUCTION
- •1.1. BACKGROUND
- •1.2. IMPLICATIONS OF THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT
- •1.3. OBJECTIVE
- •1.4. SCOPE
- •1.5. USERS
- •1.6. STRUCTURE
- •2. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT — PREPARATORY PHASE
- •2.1. PLANNING
- •2.2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
- •2.3. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
- •2.4. MAIN CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
- •2.5. LICENSING MANAGEMENT
- •2.6. PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
- •2.7. CONSTRUCTION INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
- •2.8. SECURITY
- •3.1. OVERVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONS (SITE AND HQ) AND MAIN ACTIVITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION
- •3.2. MANUFACTURING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
- •3.3. COORDINATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
- •3.4. CATEGORIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION WORK PACKAGES
- •3.5. PROJECT SCHEDULING AND CONTROL DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE
- •3.6. QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
- •3.7. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
- •3.8. SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
- •3.9. DEVELOPING A HUMAN RESOURCES PLAN
- •4.1. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROCESS
- •4.2. TURNOVER PROCESSES
- •4.3. PRESERVING REFERENCE DATA, MATERIAL CONDITIONS, KEEP TEST MATERIAL
- •5.1. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ISSUES
- •5.2. COUNTRY SPECIFIC LESSONS LEARNED
- •5.3. COUNTRY REPORT SUMMARY
- •6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
- •REFERENCES
- •ABBREVIATIONS
- •Glossary
- •I–1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION
- •I–2. LESSONS LEARNED
- •II–1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF BELENE NPP
- •II–2. LESSONS LEARNED
- •IV–1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NPP
- •IV–2. LESSONS LEARNED
- •IV–3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT – CONSTRUCTION PHASE
- •V–1. CONSTRUCTION APPROACH
- •V–2. COMMISSIONING SCHEME
- •V–3. GRADING OF HEPCO’ INVOLVEMENT
- •V–4. PROCESS OF TURNOVERS
- •V–5. COMMISSIONING FOR SYSTEMS AND PLANT TURNOVER
- •VI–1. STATUS OF NPP IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA
- •VI–2. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ISSUE
- •VI–3. LESSONS LEARNED
- •VII–1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NPP
- •VII–2. LESSONS LEARNED
- •VIII–1. HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION OF DESIGN SOLUTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF RUSSIA
- •IX–1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION
- •IX–2. LESSONS LEARNED
- •BIBLIOGRAPHY
- •CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
3.9.3.Defining the required skill level of supervisors and workers and carrying out education and training
Given the strict quality requirements and the high upfront costs of a nuclear power plant project, the intervention of the utility together with its main contractors and subcontractors in sponsoring, establishing and implementing training is of the utmost importance.
Planning and implementing effective education and training programs depends on several factors: country and location of the project, infrastructure and human resources available, specific requirements linked to construction methods and procedures, etc. In all cases, sufficient funding should be provided to allow on the job training and activities such as developing special skill requirements.
Skill level, education and training of supervisors
Usually, supervisors have several years of previous experience as trade workers and then as foremen. The basic skills needed can be either previously possessed or developed, such as:
—Planning, scheduling, organizing work;
—Directing and coordinating work;
—Leadership skills, human relations, problem solving methods;
—Understanding the elements of a safety culture;
—Quality principles, quality implementation and quality control skills;
—Motivation, effective communications.
The skills indicated above should be complemented by formal education and training where and when necessary or gradually improved through informal on the job coaching (apprenticeship with more experienced co-workers or supervisors).
Skill level, education and training of workers
On-going issues for employers have been present in the construction work force due to a lack of sufficiently detailed skill requirements and ineffective personnel training. Education and training efforts should be on-going to meet the needs due to the typically high attrition levels and worker turnover numbers on a construction site.
Training and certification as well as special skills for all relevant areas should be developed (such as welders, electricians for cable connections, etc.).
4. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT —
COMMISSIONING PHASE
4.1. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROCESS
Project progress has to be controlled from bulk material installation basis to system turn over basis. Around six to eight months before supply of electric power, construction office sets up the construction completion group (CCG). The main functions of CCG are:
—Overall responsibilities of construction completion and system turn over;
—Preparation turnover package to commissioning group based on the turnover schedule.
At the early stage of construction, the commissioning group has to prepare procedures for the commissioning and operation including a training programme. After completion of each test, final turnover has to be done by the
58

First Concrete |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set RV |
Energization |
|
CHT |
HFT |
F/L |
COD |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t |
|
Y |
[ |
] |
_ |
XW |
XY |
X[ |
X] |
X_ |
YW |
YY |
Y[ |
Y] |
Y_ |
ZW |
ZY |
Z[ |
Z] |
Z_ |
[W |
[Y |
[[ |
[] |
[_ |
\W |
\Y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organize CCG (FC + 22M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installation Work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System T/O (Const S/U) |
Area T/O |
Organize Startup |
|
|
|
(Const Operation) |
||
(FC + 10M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue Sub-scoping DWG |
|
Startup Testing |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sys.T/O |
(Startup Operation)
Plant |
Organize Plant Operation |
|
|
Operation |
(COD – 24M) |
|
PAT |
|
|
FIG. 23. Typical construction completion process.
CHT : Cold hydrostatic test
HFT : Hot Function Test
F/L : Fuel Loading
COD : Commercial Operation Date
PAT : Power Ascension Test
commissioning group. From the fuel loading (F/L), operation organization starts the power ascension test, plant performance test for commercial operation.
4.2.TURNOVER PROCESSES
Typically, there are three turnover processes from the end of erection to commercial operation.
—The first is the system turnover. It is a transfer of system and components jurisdiction from construction to commissioning after checking and testing the system and components being turned over for installation correctness, cleanliness and completeness;
—The second turnover is the one in which systems and components are transferred to the plant operations after the construction activities and start-up tests have been completed;
—Finally, the room turnover is done to transfer jurisdiction of the construction areas from construction to plant operations.
The construction group submits the turnover (T/O) package to the commissioning group in which are included; i.e. the following documents:
—Completion certificates;
—Marked up piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) and electrical drawings;
—Copy of outstanding non-conformance reports (NCR), field change records (FCR);
—Equipment alignment data sheet;
—List of special tools and spare parts;
—Turnover exception list;
—Test results (hydro test and pneumatic test etc.), vendor testing and calibration records;
—Equipment specification;
—Maintenance records, vendor drawing, etc.
59

|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
Commissioning |
|
|
Operation |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
[Functional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue sub-scoped drawing |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T/O] |
|
|
|
|
Pre-walkdown |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punch list issue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Final walkdown |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
T/O Package issue |
|
|
|
T/O Package review |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T/O Package acceptance |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Tagging |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/U Testing Phase I, II |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
[Final |
|
|
|
System T/O request |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
T/O] |
|
|
|
Walk down Inspection |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Area
T/O]
|
|
|
T/O Package Issue |
|
T/O Package Review |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T/O Package Acceptance |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Tagging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S/U Testing Phase III |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Scoping of Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-walk down / Final walk down |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T/O Package Issue |
|
|
|
|
T/O Package Review |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
T/O Package Acceptance |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance of Area |
FIG. 24. General turnover process from construction to operation.
The commissioning group submits their T/O package to operations which contains the following documents:
—Turnover exception list;
—Markup P&ID and electrical drawings;
—Copy of the outstanding non-conformance report (NCR), and the field change record (FCR);
—Startup test results;
—Specific construction assurance testing like flushing, pre-operational summary sheets and event records;
—Preventive maintenance records, special maintenance records, etc.
The construction group submits the room T/O packages to operations organization comprising the following documents:
—Work completion certificate;
—Area/room check and exception list;
—Building layout drawing;
—Area/room key list.
4.3.PRESERVING REFERENCE DATA, MATERIAL CONDITIONS, KEEP TEST MATERIAL
Construction records in nuclear power plants are required by applicable codes, standards, specifications, regulations and by the Owner/Operator. These records are assembled and retained as history dockets for nuclear systems and as history files for non-nuclear systems by the construction contractors during the construction phase
60

FIG. 25. Typical turnover process to commissioning and operation.
of the project, by the commissioning team during the commissioning phase of the project and by the site project management.
History dockets and history files are also prepared for equipment and materials in the nuclear steam plant by material suppliers. They are then reviewed and accepted by the general contractor/architect engineer and by the owner. Preservation of all history dockets/files, prepared by all parties involved is the ultimate responsibility of the Owner/Operator.
Construction contractors and sub-contractors prepare their history dockets and history files as per the site project management organization requirements. Project management should have a construction quality assurance program and procedures governing it. They should contain clear requirements and performance expectations regarding record keeping of all contractors in order to ensure that the contractors inspect the installation/fabrication in accordance with the inspection and test plan (ITP) and all applicable procedures, technical and quality requirements, that the drawings, specifications, codes, standards, regulations have been followed.
In terms of manufacturing records, it is the responsibility of the general contractor/architect engineer to ensure that inspections, tests and examinations have been carried out in accordance with the accepted inspection and test plans and checklists.
Requirements on manufacturing records and their contents should include:
—Certificates showing that the inspection status was maintained and items were properly identified;
—Qualification of the suppliers was demonstrated through audits and quality system verifications, that the correct revision of applicable specifications, drawings, standards and procedures was used;
—Qualified personnel executed the work, that environmental and seismic qualifications are complete and acceptable;
—Measuring and testing equipment was calibrated;
—Data and test results were accurately recorded and evaluated;
61