Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
01 POWER ISLAND / Overview of Light Water.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.04.2025
Размер:
8.88 Mб
Скачать

negative throughout the core lifetime. Analyses and operational achievements for these dynamic characteristics have confirmed that the power response to any change in reactivity does not oscillate. In forced circulation cooling of the PWR, the stability requirements of the whole reactor system, including the primary coolant system and the reactor core, do not allow coolant bulk boiling at the core outlet and hence, no problem occurs in connection with it

  1. Reactor stability against control-induced power oscillations

No unstable response to load perturbations is expected due to set point optimization of the reactor control system (RCC assemblies system).

  1. Core stability against xenon oscillations

The horizontal component of the xenon-induced spatial oscillations of the power distribution is stable throughout the core lifetime. The axial component of power distribution is also stable until almost the end of the cycle, where xenon- induced axial oscillation may occur due to power distribution flattening. However, this power oscillation in the axial direction is suppressed and easily stabilized by adjusting the control group rod control cluster position in the core.

  1. Reactivity control

  1. Control methods and control systems

Reactivity control is achieved by the combination of two independent methods, i.e., by moving RCC assemblies and by adjusting the concentration of boron in the primary coolant. In addition, to suppress the excess reactivity and to keep the moderator temperature coefficient negative, burnable poison rods are used when necessary. Burnable poison rods are inserted into the control rod guide thimbles of the fuel assembly which is shown in Figure 3.3.10.

Control rods provide reactivity control for relatively rapid reactivity changes during startup, shutdown and design load changes. On the other hand, the boron concentration in the coolant is adjusted to compensate for slow reactivity changes, such as changes in reactivity due to: fuel burnup; the amounts of xenon and samarium; and changes in coolant temperature from the cold shutdown to hot operating temperature. Control

rods are driven by the magnetic jack-type CRDM attached to the top of the reactor vessel. The structure of the RCC assembly and the CRDM are shown in Figures 3.3.11and 3.3.12, respectively. The concentration of the boron is adjusted by the chemical and volume control system according to either a heat regeneration method or a feed and breed method. The followings are the detailed explanations of the chemical shim, control rods and burnable poison rods.

i) Chemical shim

Boric acid is used as soluble neutron absorber in the primary coolant system. At all operating conditions including the refueling operation, boron concentration is sufficiently lower than its solubility. The chemical shim is designed to provide reactivity control for the reactivity changes associated with the changes in the core conditions during the core temperature rise from cold shutdown to hot zero power condition. That covers a pressure change from about 0.1 to 15.4MPa (gage), and a change in moderator temperature from about 20to 3001". At normal power operating condition, boron chemical shim provides reactivity control for reactivity changes

Figure 3.3.10 Structure of burnable poison assembly

NSRA, Japan

3-26

Chapter 3 Systems of PWR Nuclear Power Plants

Figure 3.3.11 Structure of control rod clusters

associated with changes in the concentrations of xenon, samarium and other FPs, as well as to compensate for reactivity losses associated with the fuel burnup. In Figure 3.3.13, the critical concentration of boron in the coolant as a function of fuel burnup is given at hot full power and all rods withdrawn operating condition.

ii) Control rods

The absorbing material of the control rods is silver-indium-cadmium alloy (percent ratio, 80 tol5 to 5), and housed in stainless steel cladding. A group of 16 to 24 of these individual control rods, fastened at the top end to a common spider, forms a rod cluster.

Control rods are used to provide reactivity control when relatively rapid reactivity change is necessary. Although all the control rods have the same structure, they are divided into the shutdown group and the control group, depending on their function. In addition, about 4 to 8 RCC assemblies

are grouped to be driven together as a bank A typical group arrangement of the RCC assemblies in a 4-loop PWR core is shown in Figure 3.3.14. Control rods of the control group are used during the normal power operation to provide control for changes in reactivity associated with the changes in the reactor operation conditions such as the core output or the coolant temperature. Control rods of the shutdown group together with the rods of the control group are used to provide the necessary shutdown reactivity. As an example, the differential and integral reactivity worth of one of the control banks (bank D) of a

Figure 3.3.12 Control rod drive mechanism

J -27

NSRA, Japan