Добавил:
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
01 POWER ISLAND / Overview of Light Water.docx
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
01.04.2025
Размер:
8.88 Mб
Скачать

Chapter 9 Siting

I I

Figure 9.5.7 Seismic assessment flow for class S buildings and structures

response spectra) is used as the input earthquake motion for the equipment and piping located on that floor.

The important civil structures outside of the buildings are not subject to the Classification of Importance in Seismic Design, but it must be assured that they are capable of supporting the facilities within them when the earthquake ground motion applicable to the seismic design of related facilities is applied to these structures.

  1. Seismic assessment of equipment and piping system

Seismic design is carried out for the plant equipment and piping system in order to preserve their safety functions against seismic forces according to their importance. In carrying out the design, proper consideration should be paid to the plant operating conditions when an earthquake occurs and, if necessary, a combination of seismic loads and other loads (internal pressure, thermal load, etc.) should be considered. The seismic assessment compares the stress generated by

9- 15

NSRA, Japan

these loads to the prescribed allowable limits. The allowable limits are determined through the following philosophy.

  1. Class S equipment and piping system

For the seismic load from the DBEGM Ss, the equipment and piping system must maintain their safety functions. Also, they must withstand the seismic load from the EDEGM Sd or the static design earthquake force in Table 9.5.2.

The expression “maintain safety functions” means that in the event of a large earthquake, the reactor is safely shut down, the reactor core is cooled down successfully, and all necessary safety functions for avoiding the risk of significant radiation exposure to the public are preserved. So those plastic deformations of the equipment or piping that do not affect such safety functions are allowed. And the expression “withstand the seismic load” means that for a certain earthquake force, the nuclear facility is designed so that overall behavior is mostly within the elastic range, in other words, its dynamic behavior seems maintain linearity.

  1. Class B and C equipment and piping system

The equipment and piping system must withstand the static seismic force as shown in Table 9.5.2.

In addition to strength, those active components

that have dynamic functions such as rotating or switching during an earthquake must demonstrate that they can work under the design earthquake loads, based on past vibration tests and experiments. For the electrical instrumentation and equipment as well, they must demonstrate their functionality based on their qualification tests, etc.

The magnitude of dynamic seismic force applied to the equipment and piping is given, in most cases, by the spectrum modal analysis using the response spectra of the floor where such equipment is located. The floor response spectra are shown as a parameter of the natural period and the damping ratio of the equipment as to how such equipment located on a floor shakes in the event the seismic ground motion is applied to the building. The equipment and piping system are modeled by multi­degrees of freedom system.

Furthermore, large equipment, such as the reactor pressure vessel or reactor containment vessel, is coupled with the reactor building for the dynamic seismic response analysis.

For very important large equipment and facilities in a NPP, the high performance, large scale shaking table at Nuclear Power Engineering Corporation was used for proving their aseismic reliability. Figure 9.5.8 and Table 9.5.3 show the typical tested equipment and the scale.

Sectional View of PWR Reactor Building

Sectional View of BWR Reactor Building

Figure 9.5.8 Layout of large equipment and facilities Important for safety inside the reactor building

NSRA, Japan

9- 16

Chapter 9 Siting

Table 9.5.3 Tested facilities and size

Item

Facility

Actual Weight

Scale Factor

Test Weight

Schematic View

^\Item Facility\^

Actual Weight

Scale Factor

Test Weight

Schematic View

(1) Primary Containment Vessel (PWR)

~ 3,800t

1/3.7

350t (Incl.

Support Structures)

(8) Reactor Pressure Vessel

— 800t

1/2

600t (Incl.

Support Structures)

(2) Primary Loop Recirculation Piping (BWR)

~800t

1/1

665t (Incl. Support Structures)

® Emergency

Diesel

Generator

System

~600t

1/1

450t (Incl.

Support Structures)

(3) Reactor Core Internals (PWR)

~500t

1/1

555t (Incl.

Support Structures)

©Main

Computer

System

~ 300t

1/1

81t (Incl. Support Structures)

©RPV Internals (BWR)

~500t

1/1

750t (Incl.

Support Structures)

5

I

(1'1) Reactor Shutdown Cooling System

~ 300t

1/1

(Control Panel and h^rument^)

294t (Incl.

Support Structures)

.

© Primary Containment

Vessel

(BWR)

~ 3,500t

1/3.2

350t (Incl.

Support Structures)

©Main

Steam

System

~ 200t

~ 1/2.5 (Piping)

~450t (Incl.

Support Structures)

(6) Primary Coolant Facilities (PWR)

- 1,0001

1/2.5

525t (Ind.

Support Structures)

1

o O

1

0)

o

b Cl d ©

PCCV

~27,000t

~ 1/8

~ 500t

(7) Reactor Vessel (PWR)

— 800t

1/1.5

700t (Incl.

Support Structures)

RCCV

~ 19,000t

~ 1/8

~470t

9- 17

NSRA, Japan